scholarly journals 88HARROW PLANNING AND CARING TOGETHER (PACT) PROJECT FOR CARE HOME RESIDENTS: DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTER-PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION PROGRAMME TO IMPROVE ADVANCE CARE PLANNING FOR CARE HOME RESIDENTS

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (suppl_3) ◽  
pp. iii31-iii42
Author(s):  
A P Katwa ◽  
C Jenner ◽  
S Ali
Author(s):  
Maggie Stobbart-Rowlands ◽  
Mandy Thorn

This chapter describes the care home setting, aspects that have an impact on use of Advance care planning (ACP) in care homes, examples of challenges and best practice, use of ACP in the GSF Care Homes Training Programme, ACP with people with dementia, and culture change. Many people in care homes are in the last year/s of life, and ACP discussions are especially important for them to ensure that the care they receive is in line with what they want. Care homes lead the way in their extensive use of ACP discussions. ACP is more routinely used by care home staff than is often recognized, and can be easier to introduce in care homes than in other settings. Key challenges include poor means of communication due to dementia/cognitive impairment or physical deterioration, and how staff address the expectations of families, and ensure any interventions are in the best interests of the person.


Dementia ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 822-829
Author(s):  
Asha Pari Katwa ◽  
Chris Jenner ◽  
Karen MacDonald ◽  
Nina Barnett

The importance of effective advance care planning is often underestimated by professionals caring for care home residents. Using a simulated scenario, this model aimed to highlight the importance of timely advance care planning for care home residents. An adapted simulation effectiveness tool was used to evaluate a simulated scenario of a resident with advanced dementia. Feedback from this tool, N = 28 (response rate 82%), suggests this model was well received and that simulation training delivered by a multi-professional faculty, effectively demonstrates the benefits of early advance care planning for residents with dementia.


2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 14-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Les Storey ◽  
Eleanor Sherwen

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 727-733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fumio Shaku ◽  
Madoka Tsutsumi ◽  
Asumi Nakamura ◽  
Hiroshi Takagi ◽  
Takahiro Otsuka ◽  
...  

Objectives:The aim of this study was to examine the preferences of home caregivers on patient advance care planning (ACP), including life-sustaining treatment (LST) and the factors relating to these preferences.Background:Personalized ACP aims to respect the autonomy and choices of terminally ill patients regarding end-of-life care. However, there have been cases wherein doctors must instead discuss ACP with surrogates (including caregivers) for various reasons such as dementia, intractable neurologic diseases, and cerebrovascular accident.Methods:In this cross-sectional study, self-written questionnaires (filled by individuals themselves) were distributed to 506 in-home caregivers in 6 Japanese prefectures; the questionnaires contained items on caregiver and patient demographics, number of people living together in a caregiver’s home (aside from patients), care duration, comprehension level of doctors’ explanations regarding their patient’s condition, patient diseases, whether caregivers have or have not told patients about their disease, level of nursing care, and caregiver LST preference (preferred or not preferred). The questionnaire package also contained the Burden Index of Caregiver-11, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and Short Form-8 Health Survey.Results:Valid responses were obtained from 309 caregivers. More than half of them were not sure of their patient’s LST preference. Sex, number of people living together in a care home, comprehension level of doctors’ explanations, and care duration were found to be the significant factors relating to caregivers’ LST preference ( P < .05).Conclusion:Health providers should be cognizant of the background factors relating to caregiver ACP preference when deciding on LST for terminal patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (12) ◽  
pp. 1898-1905
Author(s):  
Naomi T Katz ◽  
Bronwyn H Sacks ◽  
Jenny L Hynson ◽  
Melissa Heywood ◽  
Molly Williams ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-88
Author(s):  
Bobo Hi-Po Lau ◽  
James KH Luk ◽  
Candy HC Fong ◽  
Amy YM Chow ◽  
Cecilia LW Chan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document