Apply Molecular Method To Diagnosis A Very Rare Bone Primary Myoepithelial Tumor: A Case Report

2020 ◽  
Vol 154 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S50-S50
Author(s):  
F Chen ◽  
H Syed

Abstract Introduction/Objective A 38-year-old female without a history of trauma and malignancy presented with left knee pain and swelling for two weeks. MRI and PET scan find a left knee mass arising from the bone along the medial metaphysis of the distal femur. She underwent femur resection, and the specimen was sent for pathology evaluation. Methods Grossly, the cut surface of the sample revealed a 4.5 x 2 cm area of hemorrhagic softening of the bone with adjacent soft tissue nodules. Microscopically, the tumor showed biphasic or multiphase morphologic features, prominently presented with areas showing well-differentiated epithelial features and other areas with spindling and sheets of tumor cells. Areas suspicious for a vascular invasion were seen at the periphery of the soft tissue extension of the tumor. Immunohistochemistry stains showed the tumor cells are positive for vimentin, AE1/3, EMA, CK7, CK19, GATA3, and BRST2; and are negative for S100, HMB45, GFAP, Calponin, CDX2, PAX8, WT1, P63, CD34, and ER. The molecular test showed positive for the ESWR1 gene but negative for SYT gene translocation. Results A diagnosis of primary myoepithelial carcinoma of bone extension into surrounding soft tissue was made. Conclusion The most challenging differential diagnosis for this case is metastatic breast cancer. Many of the positive epithelial stains distinctly highlight the epithelial featured geographic areas sparing the background spindled stroma. The positive staining of GATA3 and BRST2, two commonly used breast linage markers, is unusual and not known in myoepithelial carcinoma. In light of the EWSR1 positive and SYT FISH negative results, combined with the morphologic features, locations as well as negative PET scan against its breast origins. Although many myoepithelial markers, such as S100, Calponin, P63, and GFAP were negative, make this case very unique. The molecular diagnosis is the mainstay for this final diagnosis.

2014 ◽  
Vol 74 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Wallwiener ◽  
AD Hartkopf ◽  
S Riethdorf ◽  
J Nees ◽  
FA Taran ◽  
...  

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 695
Author(s):  
Sebastian Weiss ◽  
Alexander Korthaus ◽  
Nora Baumann ◽  
Jin Yamamura ◽  
Alexander S. Spiro ◽  
...  

Soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) are a rare subtype of soft-tissue mass and are frequently misinterpreted as benign lesions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the primary recommended type of diagnostics. To assess the quality of primary radiology reports, we investigated whether recommended MRI report elements were included in compliance with European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) guidelines. A total of 1107 patients were evaluated retrospectively, and 126 radiological reports on patients with malignant STS were assessed for ESSR quality criteria. One or more required sequences or planes were missing in 67% of the reports. In all 126 cases, the report recognized the mass as anomalous (100%). Sixty-eight percent of the reports mentioned signs of malignancy. The majority of reports (n = 109, 87%) articulated a suspected diagnosis, 32 of which showed a mismatch with the final diagnosis (25%). Thirty-two percent of the reports had a misinterpretation of the masses as benign. Benign misinterpretations were more common in masses smaller than 5 cm (65% vs. 27%). Thirty percent of the reports suggested tissue biopsy and 6% recommended referral to a sarcoma center. MRI reports showed frequent deviations from ESSR guidelines, and protocol guidelines were not routinely met. Deviations from standard protocol and reporting guidelines could put patients at risk for inadequate therapy.


2012 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Auxiliadora Aparicio ◽  
Fernando López-Barea ◽  
Juan Jesús Cruz ◽  
María del Carmen García Macías ◽  
Teresa Hernández ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raquel A. Nunes ◽  
Xiaochun Li ◽  
Soonmo Peter Kang ◽  
Harold Burstein ◽  
Lisa Roberts ◽  
...  

The detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in peripheral blood may have important prognostic and predictive implications in breast cancer treatment. A limitation in this field has been the lack of a validated method of accurately measuring CTCs. While sensitivity has improved using RT-PCR, specificity remains a major challenge. The goal of this paper is to present a sensitive and specific methodology of detecting CTCs in women with HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer, and to examine its role as a marker that tracks disease response during treatment with trastuzumab-containing regimens. The study included patients with HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer enrolled on two different clinical protocols using a trastuzumab-containing regimen. Serial CTCs were measured at planned time points and clinical correlations were made. Immunomagnetic selection of circulating epithelial cells was used to address the specificity of tumor cell detection using cytokeratin 19 (CK19). In addition, the extracellular domain of the HER-2 protein (HER-2/ECD) was measured to determine if CTCs detected by CK19 accurately reflect tumor burden. The presence of CTCs at first restaging was associated with disease progression. We observed an association between CK19 and HER-2/ECD. The association of HER-2/ECD with clinical response followed a similar pattern to that seen with CK19. Finally, the absence of HER-2/ECD at best overall response and a change of HER-2/ECD from positive at baseline to negative at best overall response was associated with favorable treatment response. Our study supports the prognostic and predictive role of the detection of CTCs in treatment of HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients. The association between CK19 and markers of disease burden is in line with the concept that CTCs may be a reliable measure of tumor cells in the peripheral blood of patients with metastatic breast cancer. The association of CTCs at first restaging with treatment failure indicates that CTCs may have a role as surrogate markers to monitor treatment response.


F1000Research ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 1445 ◽  
Author(s):  
LanLan Zhou ◽  
David T. Dicker ◽  
Elizabeth Matthew ◽  
Wafik S. El-Deiry ◽  
R. Katherine Alpaugh

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were added to the arsenal of clinical testing in 2004 for three cancer types: metastatic breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer. CTCs were found to be an independent prognostic indicator of survival for these three diseases. Multiple enrichment/isolation strategies have been developed and numerous assay applications have been performed using both single and pooled captured/enriched CTCs. We have reviewed the isolation techniques and touched on many analyses. The true utility of a CTC is that it acts as a “silent” predictor of metastatic disease. The mere presence of a single CTC is an indication that disease has spread from the primary site. Comments and suggestions have been set forth for CTCs and cell-free DNA to be used as a screening panel for the early detection of disease recurrence and metastatic spread, providing the opportunity for early intervention with curative intent to treat metastatic disease.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document