Incidence of Androgen Receptor and DNA Repair Gene Mutations in Advanced Solid Malignancies: Clinical Impact of Liquid Biopsy at Veteran Affairs Medical Center

2020 ◽  
Vol 154 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S145-S146
Author(s):  
S Dalal ◽  
D Jhala

Abstract Introduction/Objective The advent of Liquid biopsy targeting genetic mutations in solid tumors is a major milestone in field of precision oncology. This minimally invasive, novel revolutionary technique analyses circulating tumor cells (CTC) in peripheral blood and detects signature genomic alterations. DNA repair gene (DDR) mutations have been reported in 25-40% of prostatic cancers and >50% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), being more common in late-stage and hormone refractory prostate cancers. One of the DDR, especially Tp53 has been found to be associated with poor prognosis and increased germline mutations. We herein present a quality assurance study to determine feasibility of liquid biopsy for personalized management in veterans for advanced solid malignancies and its clinical impact. Methods Quality assurance documentation from Foundation One (Cambridge MA, NGS) on liquid biopsies performed for the Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veteran Affairs Medical Center (CMCVAMC) from May 2019 to April 15, 2020 were reviewed. Statistical data for adequacy, cases with notable mutations, frequency and type of mutations of AR, DNA damage repair (DDR) gene and Tp53 were noted. Results A total of 31 liquid biopsies were performed over this time period, of which 29/31 (93.50%) were adequate for evaluation. 23/29 (79.30%) showed notable mutations, in 4/23 (17.39%) guided treatment decisions based on androgen receptor (AR) amplification, and 7/29 (24.1%) of all cases showed DDR gene mutations indicating poor outcome and resistance to the current therapy. Greater than 50% (16/29 (55.7%)) of the veterans with advanced cancers harbored Tp53 mutation, which instills hope and future insight for patient tailored oncologic therapy. Conclusion The minimally invasive liquid biopsy shows a great promise as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the personalized clinical management of advanced prostate and NSCLC in veteran patient population with unique demographic characteristics. Difference in frequency of the genetic mutations (DDR, TP53, AR) in this cohort provides valuable information for disease progression, lack of response, mechanism of resistance to the implemented therapy and clinical decision making. Precision oncology can be further tailored for this cohort by focusing on DNA repair genes and Tp53 in future for personalized targeted therapy.

JAMA Oncology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael T. Schweizer ◽  
Smruthy Sivakumar ◽  
Hanna Tukachinsky ◽  
Ilsa Coleman ◽  
Navonil De Sarkar ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. e79-e80
Author(s):  
Andrew Spencer ◽  
Malarmathy Ramachandran ◽  
Kawa choi ◽  
jay hocking ◽  
Daniela Klarica ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. S23
Author(s):  
Rosalind Eeles ◽  
Daniel Leongamornlert ◽  
Edward Saunders ◽  
Sarah Wakerell ◽  
Ian Whitmore ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5035-5035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karim Boudadi ◽  
Daniel L. Suzman ◽  
Brandon Luber ◽  
Hao Wang ◽  
John Silberstein ◽  
...  

5035 Background: ARV7+ mCRPC is an aggressive phenotype with a median PFS of 3-4 mo and OS of 7-9 mo. We hypothesized that ARV7+ tumors would be enriched for DNA repair mutations, rendering them more responsive to combined immune checkpoint blockade. Methods: We enrolled 15 mCRPC pts with ARV7+ CTCs (using a CLIA-certified assay) into a single arm phase 2 study. Pts received Nivo 3 mg/kg plus Ipi 1 mg/kg every 3 wk x 4 doses, then maintenance Nivo 3 mg/kg every 2 wk. Targeted sequencing for DNA repair defects was performed on pretreatment tumor biopsies (n=11) or cell-free DNA (n=4). Primary endpoint: PSA50response rate. Secondary endpoints: objective response rate (ORR) in pts with measurable disease, durable PFS (lack of progression ≥24 wk), PSA‐PFS, radiographic (r)PFS, overall survival (OS), and frequency/intensity of AEs. Results: 15 ARV7+ men were enrolled, with median f/u 8.4 (range 1.9–10.5) mo. Median age was 65, 47% had ECOG ≥1, median PSA was 115 ng/mL, 67% had visceral/nodal mets, all had bone mets, and 60% had ≥4 prior regimens for mCRPC. Mean ARV7/AR ratio was 23% (range 3–75%). 6/15 men (40%) had pathogenic DNA repair gene mutations ( BRCA2, ATM, MSH6, FANCM, FANCA, POLH). Overall, the PSA50rate was 1/15 (7%), ORR was 2/8 (25%), durable PFS rate was 3/15 (20%), PSA-PFS was 3.0 (95%CI 2.1–4.9) mo, rPFS was 3.9 (95%CI 2.8–5.5) mo, and OS was 9.5 (95%CI 7.2–NA) mo. Outcomes appeared better in DNA repair deficient (DRD+) tumors vs. DNA repair proficient (DRD–) tumors (TABLE). 15 grade 3-4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 7/15 (46%) men (including 2 hepatitis, 2 colitis, 1 pneumonitis); there were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: In this first study targeting ARV7+ mCRPC, treatment with Ipi/Nivo had acceptable safety and encouraging efficacy, particularly in men with DRD+ tumors. DNA repair mutations may be enriched in ARV7+ prostate cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT02601014. [Table: see text]


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4014-4014 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Gabriela Chiorean ◽  
Katherine A Guthrie ◽  
Philip Agop Philip ◽  
Elizabeth M. Swisher ◽  
Florencia Jalikis ◽  
...  

4014 Background: PC is characterized by DNA Damage Repair (DDR) deficiencies, including in BRCA1/2, ATM, and FANC genes. Given preclinical synergism between veliparib with irinotecan, safety and preliminary efficacy, we designed a randomized phase II study of mFOLFIRI (no 5-FU bolus) + veliparib vs FOLFIRI alone for 2nd line mPC patients (pts). Methods: Eligible pts had mPC, adequate organ function, ECOG PS 0-1, and 1 prior non-irinotecan systemic therapy.143 pts were to be randomized (1:1) to veliparib vs control. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). All pts had blood and tumor biopsies at baseline to assess germline and somatic BRCA1/2 mutations (integrated), and homologous recombination (HR) or DDR biomarkers (exploratory). Results: 123 pts were accrued between 09/2016 to 12/2017, and 108 were included in this analysis. 117 pts were biomarker evaluable: 109 blood/106 tumors. 11 cancers (9%) had HR deficiency (HRD), including 4 germline ( BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM) and 7 somatic mutations ( BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, CDK12). Additional 24 cancers (20%) had germline (n = 11, e.g., FANC, BLM, SLX4, CHEK2) or somatic mutations (n = 13, e.g., FANC, BLM, POLD1, RIF1, MSH2, MSH6) in other DNA repair genes, not classified as HRD. A planned interim futility analysis at 35% of expected PFS events determined the veliparib arm was unlikely to be superior to control. Most common grade 3/4 treatment related toxicities were neutropenia (33% vs 20%), fatigue (19% vs 4%), and nausea (11% vs 4%), for veliparib vs control. Treatment exposure was similar for veliparib vs control: median 4 cycles (range 1-31 vs 1-32). Median OS was 5.1 vs 5.9 mos (HR 1.3, 95%CI 0.9-2.0, p = 0.21), and median PFS was 2.1 vs 2.9 mos (HR 1.5, 95%CI 1.0-2.2, p = 0.05) for veliparib vs control arms, respectively. Correlations of gene mutations and signatures with efficacy outcomes will be presented. Conclusions: Nearly 30% of mPC pts had DNA repair gene abnormalities, including 9% with HRD. Veliparib increased toxicity and did not improve OS when added to mFOLFIRI in biomarker unselected pts. BRCA1/2 and DDR biomarkers will be correlated with efficacy to inform patient selection for future PARP inhibitor clinical trials. Clinical trial information: NCT02890355.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document