215: Demographic and Health Factors Associated with Physical Activity in Adults with Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes

2005 ◽  
Vol 161 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S54-S54
Author(s):  
R Plotnikoff ◽  
L Taylor ◽  
P Wilson ◽  
K Courneya ◽  
R Sigal ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Satoshi Ida ◽  
Ryutaro Kaneko ◽  
Kanako Imataka ◽  
Kaoru Okubo ◽  
Yoshitaka Shirakura ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of flash glucose monitoring on dietary variety, physical activity, and self-care behavior in patients with diabetes. This study included outpatients with diabetes using insulin who presented at the Department of Diabetes and Metabolism of the Ise Red Cross Hospital. Before initiating flash glucose monitoring and 12 weeks after its initiation, blood glucose-related parameters were assessed and self-administered questionnaires were completed (Dietary Variety Score (DVS), the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities Measure (SDSCA), and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)) and compared between the two time points. We analyzed 42 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and 48 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, but not type 1 diabetes mellitus, there was an increase in moderate/high category scores for IPAQ (P<0.001) and for treatment satisfaction reported via DTSQ. Furthermore, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, the glycemic excursion index improved significantly and HbA1c decreased significantly (from 7.7 (1.2) to 7.4 (0.8), P=0.025). Results showed that standard deviation and mean amplitude of glycemic excursions significantly decreased in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (from 71.2 (20.4) to 66.2 (17.5), P=0.033 and from 124.6 (31.9) to 108.1 (28.4), P<0.001, respectively). Flash glucose monitoring is a useful tool to improve physical activity in patients with type 2 diabetes.


2007 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald C. Plotnikoff ◽  
Sonia Lippke ◽  
Nandini Karunamuni ◽  
Neil Eves ◽  
Kerry S. Courneya ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adedapo W Awotidebe ◽  
Auwalu Shehu

BACKGROUND፡ There are few data concerning the prevalence and predictors of musculoskeletal pain among adults with type 2 diabetes in population with low-risk of obesity. Our objective was to describe the point prevalence and factors associated with increased risk of musculoskeletal pain in this population.METHODS: A cross-sectional data of 200 adults with type 2 diabetes, aged ≥ 18 years who were attending two tertiary hospitals were examined. Musculoskeletal pain and physical activity were collected with Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ) and International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQSF) respectively. We used logistic regression to examine the risks associated with musculoskeletal pain.RESULTS: The point prevalence of musculoskeletal pain was 72.7% and similar between men (72.3%) and women (73.1%). In the last 7days, advancing age (odds ratio=1.09;95%CI:1.02-1.16) and comorbidity (odds ratio=3.0;95%CI:1.07-8.39) were risk factors associated with musculoskeletal pain. In the last 12 months, only comorbidity (odds ratio=5.57;95%CI:1.62-19.17) was a risk factor for increasing musculoskeletal pain. However, a unit increase in physical activity level (odds ratio=0.06;95%CI:0.008-0.51) was associated with decreased odds of musculoskeletal pain.CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of musculoskeletal pain was high and physical activity was associated with a decreased risk thereof. A further research should be evaluated on the influence of physical activity on musculoskeletal pain.


Health ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 1474-1486
Author(s):  
Nedaa A. Al-Khamees

Diabetes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1027-P
Author(s):  
ROZALINA G. MCCOY ◽  
KAVYA SINDHU SWARNA ◽  
RODOLFO J. GALINDO ◽  
HOLLY VAN HOUTEN ◽  
PATRICK J. O’CONNOR ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Julia Riske ◽  
Martin Janert ◽  
Melanie Kahle-Stephan ◽  
Michael A. Nauck

Abstract Background/aims Physical activity is recommended for patients with type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). We wanted to assess whether owning a dog influences duration or intensity of physical activity and metabolic control of diabetes mellitus. Patients and methods 143 patients with T1D (age 50±16 y.; BMI 25.7±4.5 kg/m2, HbA1c 8.6±1.6%) and 303 with T2D (age 63±11 y., BMI 33.7±7.3 kg/m2, HbA1c 9.0±1.6%, 232 [76.6%] insulin-treated, 89±61 IU/d), respectively, participated. A standardized questionnaire assessed diabetes history and treatment, details regarding time spent (per week) and intensity (MET, metabolic equivalent of task) of physical activity (“walking the dog” and other activities), anthropometric (BMI) and laboratory measures. Results 31.5% of T1D 23.1% of T2D patients were dog owners. Dog owners with T1D and T2D diabetes spent 19.0±3.3 and 19.8±2.6 MET.h per week walking the dog, which represented 61.3±5.7 and 62.9±4.9% of their total physical activity. Participants not owning a dog compensated by performing significantly more other activities. Taken together, total physical activity was similar in dog owners with T1D (p=0.80), but higher in dog owners with T2D (30.1±2.8 vs. 18.6±1.4 MET.h per week in those not owning a dog; p=0.0001). Body-mass-index or HbA1c were not significantly different in either patients with T1D or T2D either owning a dog or not. Conclusions Owning a dog motivates to a significant amount of physical activity, but this was fully compensated for by other forms of physical activity in (younger) patients with T1D. Even the higher physical activity in dog owners with T2D did not result in improved glycaemic or body weight control.


2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 205031211562285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mashhood Ahmed Sheikh ◽  
Eiliv Lund ◽  
Tonje Braaten

Objective: Self-reported information from questionnaires is frequently used in epidemiological studies, but few of these studies provide information on the reproducibility of individual items contained in the questionnaire. We studied the test–retest reliability of self-reported diabetes among 33,919 participants in Norwegian Women and Cancer Study. Methods: The test–retest reliability of self-reported type 1 and type 2 diabetes diagnoses was evaluated between three self-administered questionnaires (completed in 1991, 1998, and 2005 by Norwegian Women and Cancer participants) by kappa agreement. The time interval between the test–retest studies was ~7 and ~14 years. Sensitivity of the kappa agreement for type 1 and type 2 diabetes diagnoses was assessed. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess whether test–retest reliability varies with age, body mass index, physical activity, education, and smoking status. Results: The kappa agreement for both types of self-reported diabetes diagnoses combined was good (⩾0.65) for all three test–retest studies (1991–1998, 1991–2005, and 1998–2005). The kappa agreement for type 1 diabetes was good (⩾0.73) in the 1991–2005 and the 1998–2005 test–retest studies, and very good (0.83) in the 1991–1998 test–retest study. The kappa agreement for type 2 diabetes was moderate (0.57) in the 1991–2005 test–retest study and good (⩾0.66) in the 1991–1998 and 1998–2005 test–retest studies. The overall kappa agreement in the 1991–1998 test–retest study was stronger than in the 1991–2005 test–retest study and the 1998–2005 test–retest study. There was no clear pattern of inconsistency in the kappa agreements within different strata of age, BMI, physical activity, and smoking. The kappa agreement was strongest among the respondents with 17 or more years of education, while generally it was weaker among the least educated group. Conclusion: The test–retest reliability of the diabetes was acceptable and there was no clear pattern of inconsistency in the kappa agreement stratified by age, body mass index, physical activity, and smoking. The study suggests that self-reported diabetes diagnosis from middle-aged women enrolled in the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study is reliable.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document