Relationship Between Brachial–Ankle Pulse Wave Velocity and Risk of New-Onset Acute Myocardial Infarction

2022 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-112
Author(s):  
Shi-wei Li ◽  
Tao Yao ◽  
Li Zhang ◽  
Lei Zhao ◽  
Xiao-ling Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background To investigate the effect of brachial–ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) on new-onset acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed for the subjects who underwent baPWV examination during the follow-up of Kailuan Study Cohort from 2010 to 2017. The observation subjects were divided into 3 groups based on the levels of baPWV: <14, 14 to <18, and ≥18 m/s. The incidence density of AMI in 3 groups was calculated. Log-rank test was used to compare the differences of cumulative AMI incidence among 3 groups. The influence of baPWV on new-onset AMI was analyzed by Cox proportional risk model and restricted cubic spline. Results A total of 41,405 subjects were included in the study. During 2.66 (1.07–5.39) years’ follow-up, 150 new-onset AMI cases were observed. The incidence density of AMI in 3 groups was 3.69, 12.79, and 26.65 per 10,000 person-years, respectively. Log-rank test result showed the cumulative AMI incidence increased gradually from the subjects with the lowest baPWV to those with the highest baPWV (P < 0.05). Compared with subjects with baPWV <14 m/s, Cox model showed that hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) of AMI in those with baPWV 14 to <18 m/s and baPWV ≥18 m/s were 1.77 (1.04–3.01) and 1.93 (1.03–3.60) after adjusting for age, sex, and other potential confounding factors, respectively. Restricted cubic spline analysis showed that there was a dose–response relationship between the hazard ratio of AMI and baPWV levels. Conclusions The increased baPWV is a risk factor for new-onset AMI.

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S.L Xu ◽  
J Luo ◽  
H.Q Li ◽  
Z.Q Li ◽  
B.X Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been associated with poor survival, but the clinical implication of NOAF on subsequent heart failure (HF) is still not well studied. We aimed to investigate the relationship between NOAF following AMI and HF hospitalization. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted between February 2014 and March 2018, using data from the New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction in ShangHai registry, where all participants did not have a documented AF history. Patients with AMI who discharged alive and had complete echocardiography and follow-up data were analyzed. The primary outcome was HF hospitalization, which was defined as a minimum of an overnight hospital stay of a participant who presented with symptoms and signs of HF or received intravenous diuretics. Results A total of 2075 patients were included, of whom 228 developed NOAF during the index AMI hospitalization. During up to 5 years of follow-up (median: 2.7 years), 205 patients (9.9%) experienced HF hospitalization and 220 patients (10.6%) died. The incidence rate of HF hospitalization among patients with NOAF was 18.4% per year compared with 2.8% per year for those with sinus rhythm. After adjustment for confounders, NOAF was significantly associated with HF hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.30–4.28; p<0.001). Consistent result was observed after accounting for the competing risk of all-cause death (subdistribution HR: 3.06, 95% CI: 2.18–4.30; p<0.001) or performing a propensity score adjusted multivariable model (HR: 3.28, 95% CI: 2.39–4.50; p<0.001). Furthermore, the risk of HF hospitalization was significantly higher in patients with persistent NOAF (HR: 5.81; 95% CI: 3.59–9.41) compared with that in those with transient NOAF (HR: 2.61; 95% CI: 1.84–3.70; p interaction = 0.008). Conclusion NOAF complicating AMI is strongly associated with an increased long-term risk of heart. Cumulative incidence of outcome Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): 1. National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai


Author(s):  
Kyle P Hornsby ◽  
Kensey Gosch ◽  
Amy L Miller ◽  
Jonathan P Piccini ◽  
Renato D Lopes ◽  
...  

Background: Little data are available regarding differences in prognosis and health status between new-onset and prior atrial fibrillation (AF) among patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: The TRIUMPH study enrolled 4340 AMI patients who received longitudinal follow-up including SF-12 health status assessments through 1 year post-AMI. We compared 1-year mortality, rehospitalization, and functional status according to AF type (none, prior, new) after adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics. Results: A total of 212 AMI patients (4.9%) had prior AF and 254 (5.9%) had new-onset AF. Compared with no AF, new AF was associated with older age, male sex, first MI, worse baseline physical function, home atrioventricular nodal blocker use, and worse ventricular function (c-index 0.77). Rates of 1-year mortality were 6.2%, 14.5%, and 13.0%, and 1-year rehospitalization rates were 29.1%, 44.2%, and 36.8% for no, prior, and new AF, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, neither prior nor new AF was associated with increased 1-year mortality, and only prior AF was associated with increased risk of 1-year rehospitalization (Figure). After adjusting for baseline SF-12 physical function scores, patients with prior AF had lower 1-year scores than those with no AF (40.6 vs. 43.7, p <0.003), whereas patients with new AF had similar scores (42.9 vs. 43.7, p=0.36). Conclusion: New-onset AF during AMI is associated with a number of comorbidities but, unlike prior AF, is not associated with adverse outcomes. These results raise the question of whether AF is itself a cause of or simply a marker of comorbidities leading to downstream adverse outcomes after AMI.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aya Lafta ◽  
Aminu Bello ◽  
Sara Davison ◽  
Stephanie Thompson ◽  
Branko Braam

Abstract Background and Aims Fluid overload and vascular stiffness are two independent predictors of cardiovascular events in hemodialysis (HD) patients. To date, observational and interventional studies that investigated the effect of inter- and intradialytic fluid overload changes on vascular stiffness in HD patients are very limited. We performed a scoping review to explore existing reports about effects of fluid overload on vascular stiffness in adults receiving HD treatment and to identify knowledge gaps for future research. Method We followed the framework originally developed by Arksey and O’Malley. We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Database of systematic reviews from inception to October 29, 2019. References of review papers were screened for relevant studies not identified from the initial search until saturation is achieved. Results Of 666 eligible studies, nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. These included clinical observational studies (n=16) and randomized controlled trials (n=3). In general, most of the identified studies had small sample size and short term of follow up. Studies use different definitions of fluid overload and vascular stiffness. Measures of relative fluid overload like the ratio of extracellular fluid/intracellular fluid, fluid overload/extracellular fluid, and/or extracellular fluid/total body fluid were used as a representative of fluid status. Pulse wave velocity and augmentation index were used interchangeably as vascular stiffness measures. The accumulated findings were inconsistent and inconclusive. There was no consensus whether intradialytic fluid volume changes affected vascular stiffness. In the majority of the observational studies, a decrease in pulse wave velocity or augmentation index correlated with a decrease in blood pressure after fluid correction by HD treatment. The randomized clinical trials used different methods and technologies for the correction of fluid overload, thereby, results were conflicting. Conclusion Current literature is insufficient to justify whether fluid overload changes have a direct effect on vascular stiffness in HD patients. The findings were conflicting which limits the comparisons of studies and generalization of findings. These knowledge gaps urge the need for further clinical studies to enhance the understanding and to improve the quality of research in this topic. This includes standardized definitions and methodologies as well as longer term of follow up.


2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dae Young Kim ◽  
Sung Yeol Kong ◽  
Sung Ja Lee ◽  
Ha Do Song ◽  
Eun Jin Han ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Ito ◽  
M Takayama ◽  
J Yamashita ◽  
K Yahagi ◽  
T Shinke ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Although the patient's characteristics and outcome of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have been sufficiently investigated and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been recognized as established treatment strategy, those of recent myocardial infarction (RMI) have not been fully evaluated. Purpose The purpose of the present study was to clarify clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of RMI patients from the database of the Tokyo CCU network multicenter registry. Methods In Tokyo CCU network multicenter registry database from 2013 to 2016, 15788 consecutive patients were registered as AMI (within 24 hours from onset) and RMI (within 2–30 days from onset). However 1246 patients were excluded because of inadequate data. And we excluded 66 cases because of out of onset period and 129 cases that strongly suspected of involvement of vasospastic events. Therefore, remaining 14347 patients were categorized to RMI group (n=1853) and AMI group (n=12494), and analyzed. Results Compared with AMI group, average age was older (70.4±12.9 vs 68.0±13.4 years, p<0.001), male was less (72.4 vs 76.4%, p<0.001), chest pain as chief complaint was less (75.2 vs 83.6%, p<0.001), prevalence of diabetes mellitus was higher (35.9 vs 31.0%, p<0.001), multi-vessel coronary disease was more (54.7 vs 44.6%, p<0.001), patients undergoing PCI was less (79.0 vs 91.2%, p<0.001), and the incidence of mechanical complication was more in RMI group (3.0 vs 1.5%, p<0.001). Although 30-day mortality was equivalent between 2 groups (5.3 vs 5.8%, p=0.360), the major cause of death in AMI group was cardiogenic shock, while in the RMI group it was a mechanical complication. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, the 2 groups had significantly different cumulative incidence of death due to cardiogenic shock (p=0.006, Log-rank test) and mechanical complication (p=0.021, Log-rank test). Furthermore death due to mechanical complication in AMI group was plateau after about 1 week from hospitalization, whereas in RMI group it continued to increase. Kaplan-Meier analysis Conclusions RMI patients had distinctive clinical features in backgrounds and treatment strategies compared with AMI patients, and the major cause of death of RMI patients was different from that of AMI patients. Furthermore, even though treatment during hospitalization of RMI patients was well done, death due to mechanical complications continued to increase.


1977 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 839-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Walsh ◽  
Alexander Dale ◽  
David E. Anderson

In a study undertaken to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of two behavioral treatments for essential hypertension (biofeedback on arterial pulse-wave velocity and progressive relaxation) 24 hypertensive subjects were randomly assigned to either a relaxation or biofeedback treatment group for 5 weekly sessions. In a second stage of the study 16 of the original subjects received both biofeedback and relaxation treatments during 5 additional weekly sessions. Results indicated that biofeedback and relaxation were equally effective in initial lowering of blood pressure in hypertensives. Although biofeedback training led to superior reductions at the 3-mo. follow-up point, after 1 yr. the blood pressures of both groups were not only equal but well below those presented at the beginning of the study.


2013 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobutaka Doba ◽  
Yasuharu Tokuda ◽  
Hirofumi Tomiyama ◽  
Nathan E. Goldstein ◽  
Toshio Kushiro ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document