Implementation of a pharmacist-provided pharmacogenomics service in an executive health program

Author(s):  
Ina Liko ◽  
Lisa Corbin ◽  
Eric Tobin ◽  
Christina L Aquilante ◽  
Yee Ming Lee

Abstract Disclaimer In an effort to expedite the publication of articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic, AJHP is posting these manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. Purpose We describe the implementation of a pharmacist-provided pharmacogenomics (PGx) service in an executive health program (EHP) at an academic medical center. Summary As interest in genomic testing grows, pharmacists have the opportunity to advance the use of PGx in EHPs, in collaboration with other healthcare professionals. In November 2018, a pharmacist-provided PGx service was established in the EHP at the University of Colorado Hospital. The team members included 3 physicians, a pharmacist trained in PGx, a registered dietitian/exercise physiologist, a nurse, and 2 medical assistants. We conducted 4 preimplementation steps: (1) assessment of the patient population, (2) selection of a PGx test, (3) establishment of a visit structure, and (4) selection of a billing model. The PGx consultations involved two 1-hour visits. The first visit encompassed pretest PGx education, review of the patient’s current medications and previous medication intolerances, and DNA sample collection for genotyping. After this visit, the pharmacist developed a therapeutic plan based on the PGx test results, discussed the results and plan with the physician, and created a personalized PGx report. At the second visit, the pharmacist reviewed the PGx test results, personalized the PGx report, and discussed the PGx-guided therapeutic plan with the patient. Overall, the strategy worked well; minor challenges included evaluation of gene-drug pairs with limited PGx evidence, communication of information to non-EHP providers, scheduling issues, and reimbursement. Conclusion The addition of a PGx service within an EHP was feasible and provided pharmacists the opportunity to lead PGx efforts and collaborate with physicians to expand the precision medicine footprint at an academic medical center.

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S90-S91
Author(s):  
Matthew S Lee ◽  
Christopher McCoy

Abstract Background Multi-disciplinary engagement and education remain key measures for Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs). Over 3 years, our ASP has undergone key changes to pre-authorization review, post-prescriptive activities, and core team members, coinciding with a 30% increase in stewardship interventions. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the familiarity of Nursing, Pharmacy and Prescribers at our academic medical center regarding ASP activities and services, as well as perceived impact on patient care and value. Secondary objectives were to determine what resources are currently utilized and areas for improvement. Methods Distinct surveys were distributed to three participant groups: Nurses, Pharmacists, and Prescribers (Housestaff, Advanced Practice Providers, and staff physicians). Questions were developed to assess familiarity, perceived value, and overall satisfaction with the ASP. Additional items included questions on the current use of ASP resources and educational engagement. Survey results were compared to a similar survey conducted 3 years amongst the same participant groups. Results The survey was delivered electronically to 3367 Prescribers, Nurses and Pharmacists. 403 responders completed the survey (208 Nurses, 181 Prescribers, and 18 Pharmacists). Familiarity was lowest amongst Nurses, but almost doubled compared to 2016 (Figure). Prescribers cited “restricted antibiotic approval”, “de-escalation”, and “alternative therapies relative to allergies” as the three most common interaction types, similar to 2016. ASP interactions continued to be rated “moderate” or “high” value (88.4% vs 89.15% in 2016), however, face-to-face interactions were preferred by only 4% of responders (unchanged compared to 2016). Prescribers also responded uncommon use of ASP online resources (20%) and clinical decision support tools (34%). 78% of responders expressed desire for increased ASP-related education. Conclusion As ASPs evolve, it is important to constantly evaluate impact and value, and identify areas for growth. Despite ASP familiarity being high and interactions valued, we need to further optimize ASP provided resources, clinical support tools, and educational offerings. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Blake M Snyder ◽  
Jessica S Mounessa ◽  
Melissa Fazzari ◽  
Joseph V Caravaglio ◽  
Alexandra Kretowicz ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-7
Author(s):  
Rebecca Namenek Brouwer ◽  
Emily Miller ◽  
Sunita Patil ◽  
Geeta K. Swamy ◽  
Rebbecca Moen ◽  
...  

AbstractNavigating the research domain at an academic medical center can be challenging, even for seasoned investigators. To address this, Duke University launched two initiatives: (1) a research navigation “hotline” to provide brief assistance with a variety of research questions; and (2) researcher onboarding and consultation, a one-to-one tailored offering to ensure that researchers are equipped to navigate research resources and processes effectively. The services are provided by the myRESEARCHnavigators (MRN) team, funded by Duke’s CTSA. The diverse scientific backgrounds of the six team members align well with those of the research community, allowing for a good match between the researcher and MRN team member. The MRN team answers approximately 30 questions per month, and has provided consultations to almost 400 researchers. Both services receive high satisfaction ratings (4 or 5 stars [out of 5 stars] given to 90% of hotline answers, and 99% of researcher onboarding/consultation sessions). As of July 2019, the School of Medicine has determined that the consultations are critical to their mission and have made them a requirement for new research faculty. The team will continue marketing both services to encourage adoption.


2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles P. Mullan ◽  
Jo Shapiro ◽  
Graham T. McMahon

Abstract Background The first year of graduate medical education is an important period in the professional development of physicians. Disruptive behavior interferes with safe and effective clinical practice. Objective To determine the frequency and nature of disruptive behavior perceived by interns and attending physicians in a teaching hospital environment. Method All 516 interns at Partners HealthCare (Boston, MA) during the 2010 and 2011 academic years were eligible to complete an anonymous questionnaire. A convenience nonrandom sample of 40 attending physicians also participated. Results A total of 394 of 516 eligible interns (76.4%) participated. Attendings and interns each reported that their team members generally behaved professionally (87.5% versus 80.4%, respectively). A significantly greater proportion of attendings than interns felt respected at work (90.0% versus 71.5% respectively; P  =  .01). Disruptive behavior was experienced by 93% of interns; 54% reported that they experienced it once a month or more. Interns reported disruptive behavior significantly more frequently than attending physicians, including increased reports of condescending behavior (odds ratio [OR], 5.46 for interns compared with attendings; P < .001), exclusion from decision making (OR, 6.97; P < .001), and berating (OR, 4.84; P  =  .02). Inappropriate jokes, abusive language, and gender bias were also reported, and they were not significantly more frequent among interns than attending physicians. Interns most frequently identified nurses as the source of disruption, and were significantly more likely than faculty to identify nurses as the source of disruptive behavior (OR, 10.40; P < .001). Attendings reported other physicians as the most frequent source of disruption. Conclusions Although interns generally feel respected at work, they frequently experience disruptive behavior. Interns described more disruptive behaviors than a convenience sample of attending physicians at our institution.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew S. Lee ◽  
Michael A. Fenstermaker ◽  
Emily E. Naoum ◽  
Suzanne Chong ◽  
Cosmas J. Van de Ven ◽  
...  

Introduction: The management of nephrolithiasis during pregnancy can be stressful for urologists due to concerns for investigations and treatments that may pose risk of fetal harm, and unfamiliarity with optimal management of these complex patients. In response, we created multi-disciplinary evidence-based guidelines to standardize the care for obstetric patients presenting with flank pain and suspicion for nephrolithiasis.Methods: A multi-disciplinary team involving Urology, Obstetric Anesthesiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Diagnostic Radiology, and Interventional Radiology from a single academic medical center was assembled. A PubMed search was performed using keywords of pregnancy/antepartum, nephrolithiasis/calculi/kidney stones, ureteroscopy, non-obstetric surgery, complications, preterm delivery, MRI, computerized tomography, renal bladder ultrasound (RBUS), and anesthesia to identify relevant articles. Team members reviewed their respective areas to create a comprehensive set of guidelines. One invited external expert reviewed the guidelines for validation purposes.Results: A total of 54 articles were reviewed for evidence synthesis. Four guideline statements were constructed to guide diagnosis and imaging, and seven statements to guide intervention. Guidelines were then used to create a diagnostic and intervention flowchart for ease of use. In summary, RBUS should be the initial diagnostic study. If diagnostic uncertainty still exists, a non-contrast CT scan should be obtained. For obstetric patients presenting with a septic obstructing stone, urgent decompression should be achieved. We recommend ureteral stent placement as the preferred intervention if local factors allow.Conclusions: We present a standardized care pathway for the management of nephrolithiasis during pregnancy. Our aim is to standardize and simplify the clinical management of these complex scenarios for urologists.


2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 510-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine A. Motzkus ◽  
Stavroula A. Chrysanthopoulou ◽  
Roger Luckmann ◽  
Teresa A. Rincon ◽  
Kate L. Lapane ◽  
...  

Purpose: Sepsis is the leading noncardiac cause of intensive care unit (ICU) death. Pre-ICU admission site may be associated with mortality of ICU patients with sepsis. This study quantifies mortality differences among patients with sepsis admitted to an ICU from a hospital ward, emergency department (ED), or an operating room (OR). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1762 adults with sepsis using ICU record data obtained from a clinical database of an academic medical center. Survival analysis provided crude and adjusted hazard rate ratio (HRR) estimates comparing hospital mortality among patients from hospital wards, EDs, and ORs, adjusted for age, sex, and severity of illness. Results: Mortality of patients with sepsis differed based on the pre-ICU admission site. Compared to patients admitted from an ED, patients admitted from hospital wards had higher mortality (HRR: 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-1.68) and those admitted from an OR had lower mortality (HRR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.23-0.58). Conclusion: Patients with sepsis admitted to an ICU from a hospital ward experienced greater mortality than patients with sepsis admitted to an ICU from an ED. These findings indicate that there may be systematic differences in the selection of patient care locations, recognition, and management of patients with sepsis that warrant further investigation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 156 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S11-S12
Author(s):  
Thomas Herb ◽  
Carmen Gherasim ◽  
David Manthei

Abstract Objectives Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) has emerged as a specific biomarker for alcohol use with superior diagnostic values compared to traditional alcohol biomarkers including urinary ethyl glucuronide (uEtG), urinary ethyl sulfate (uEtS), and carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT). PEth can extend the detection window of alcohol use up to 28 days and has been dubbed a “hemoglobin A1c”-like biomarker for alcohol use. Measurement of PEth concentration in the blood has become of increasing interest in a wide variety of clinical settings including transplant evaluation, detection of chronic alcohol consumption and monitoring alcohol abstinence. Availability of PEth testing is currently limited to few reference laboratories; at our institution, PEth quickly became one of the most expensive chemistry/toxicology sendout tests. Few testing guidelines exist for PEth regarding test utilization and time intervals for appropriate repeat testing. This retrospective analysis was conducted evaluating the patterns of PEth ordering to inform best test utilization strategies. Methods A retrospective limited data set of PEth (PEth 16:0/18:1 by LC-MS/MS) test results was obtained from a large academic medical center. Concordance of the positive test results using a cutoff of 20 ng/mL for repeat testing within 7, 14 and 28 days was analyzed. Results 3,739 distinct results from 1,957 patients was obtained. The median age of patients was 57 years (range 19-94). Males accounted for 58.4% (1,142 patients) of the testing. The overall positivity rate was 23.3% (median concentration 188.5 ng/mL), with 52% of positive results suggesting moderate alcohol consumption (20 – 200 ng/mL) while the remaining 48% reflected heavy alcohol consumption or chronic alcohol use (>200 ng/mL). 588 patients (30%) had multiple PEth results, including 150 patients with ≥ 5 results and 36 patients with ≥ 10 results. Long term monitoring of alcohol use in pre- and post- transplant patients (n=36) with ≥ 10 results revealed that 52.7% had all negative results, 5.6% all positive results, and 41.7% with mixed results included a subset (25%) initially positive and subsequently negative results monitored for up to 2 years. Analysis of two consecutive tests ordered within 7 (n=96), 14 (n=205) and 28 days (n=411) revealed that 90%, 82.9% and 83.7% of the results had the same interpretation with an average change in concentration of 15.2 ng/mL 35.9 ng/mL, and 35.4 ng/mL, respectively. Of the 10% observed changes within 7 days, the majority accounted for expected PEth 16:0/18:1 elimination. Conclusions Our data suggests that long-term monitoring of alcohol use with PEth may be helpful in the surveillance of alcohol abstention or alcohol relapse that can assist in prioritizing patients for liver transplant. To improve PEth test utilization (and decrease expensive sendout testing), PEth should not be ordered less than 7 days apart. Instead, recent alcohol use may be monitored with traditional biomarkers (uEtG/uEtS).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document