scholarly journals Evaluation of Aphid Control in Lettuce with Admire Applied Through Drip Irrigation

1997 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. Palumbo ◽  
C. H. Mullis ◽  
F. J. Reyes
Keyword(s):  
Drip Irrigation ◽  
Sprinkler Irrigation ◽  
F Test ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Stand Establishment ◽  
Aphid Control ◽  
Direct Seeded ◽  
Plant Data ◽  
Mean Differences ◽  
Overhead Sprinkler

Abstract Lettuce was direct seeded on 29 Nov at the Yuma Valley Agricultural Center, Yuma, AZ. into double row beds on 42 inch centers and stand establishment achieved using overhead sprinkler irrigation. Subsequent irrigations and chemigations were made with sub-surface (6-8”) drip irrigation. Plots consisted of 4 beds, 50 feet long with a two bed buffer between the plots. Plots were arranged in a RCB design with four replications. The four Admire 2F chemigation treatments were applied once 54 d after planting (23 Jan) through the drip system during the last hour of the irrigation run. The two Metasystox-R chemigation treatments were applied through the drip three times on 23 Jan, 1 and 8 Feb. The foliar Metasystox-R + Capture treatment was applied at 60 PSI in 20 gpa total volume on 23 Jan, 1 and 8 Feb. Insect data were collected only from the inner two beds of each plot. Aphid densities were estimated bi-weekly by sampling 10 plants per replicate and counting the total number of aphids per plant. Data were analyzed as a 1-way ANOVA using a protected LSD F test to distinguish treatment mean differences.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Pyrethroids and Selected Insecticides for Control of Cabbage Looper in Broccoli

1997 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-86
Author(s):  
J. C. Palumbo
Keyword(s):  
Cabbage Looper ◽  
F Test ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Insecticide Efficacy ◽  
Direct Seeded ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
Mean Differences

Abstract Broccoli was direct seeded into double-row beds on 21 Sep at the Yuma Valley Agricultural Center, Yuma, AZ. Each plot consisted of four, 30 ft long beds spaced 42 inches apart and bordered on each side by an untreated bed. Plots were arranged in a CRB design with 4 replicates. Foliar applications were made on 30 Oct and 4 Nov with a hand-held CO2 sprayer operated at 50 psi, delivering 20 gpa. Spreader-sticker (Kinetic) was included in all spray treatments at a rate of 0.125% of the total volume. Insecticide efficacy was determined by counting the total number of small (1 st and 2nd instars) and large (>2nd instar) CL larvae on 5 randomly selected broccoli plants per replicate. A pre-treatment sample was taken on 29 Oct and evaluations were made 5 DAT on 4 and 9 Nov. Data were analyzed as a 1-way ANOVA using a protected LSD F test to distinguish treatment mean differences.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Experimental Compounds for Leafminer Control on Lettuce, 1996

1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-108
Author(s):  
J. C. Palumbo ◽  
F. J. Reyes
Keyword(s):  
F Test ◽  
Insecticide Efficacy ◽  
University Of Arizona ◽  
Recorded Data ◽  
Direct Seeded ◽  
Mean Differences ◽  
The University ◽  
One Way Anova

Abstract Lettuce was direct seeded on 13 Sep. at the University of Arizona Yuma Agricultural Center. Each plot consisted of four, 60-ft-long beds spaced 42 inches apart and bordered on each side by 2 untreated beds. Plots were arranged in a CRB design with 4 replicates. Prior to application of treatments, a Lannate (0.75 lb (AI)/acre) and Karate (0.3 lb (AI)/acre) spray was applied to all plots on 27 Sep to control lepidopterous larvae. Foliar treatments were applied on 10 and 17 Oct with a tractor drawn sprayer operated at 150 psi, delivering 45 gpa. No spreader-sticker was added to any of the spray treatments. Insecticide efficacy was determined by randomly selecting 10 lettuce plants in each replicate and placing them in emergence containers for 3-4 weeks to allow for pupation and emergence of liriomyza and parasitoid adults. Adults were counted and their species recorded. Data were analyzed as a one-way ANOVA using a protected LSD F test to distinguish treatment mean differences.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Selected Insecticides for Control of Cabbage Looper in Cauliflower

1997 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-116
Author(s):  
J. C. Palumbo
Keyword(s):  
Cabbage Looper ◽  
F Test ◽  
Insecticide Efficacy ◽  
Direct Seeded ◽  
Mean Differences

Abstract Cauliflower was direct seeded into on 21 Sep at the Yuma Valley Agricultural Center, Yuma, Az. Each plot consisted of four, 30-ft-long beds spaced 42 inches apart and bordered on each side by two untreated beds. Plots were arranged in a CRB design with 4 replicates. Foliar applications were made on 10 and 14 Oct with a hand-held CO2 sprayer operated at 50 psi, delivering 20 gpa. Spreader-sticker (Kinetic) was included in all spray treatments at a rate of 0.125% of the total volume. Insecticide efficacy was determined by counting the total number of small (1 st and 2nd instars) and large (>2nd instar) CL on 5 randomly selected plants replicate. Data were analyzed as a 1-way ANOVA using a protected LSD F test (P = 0.05) to distinguish treatment mean differences.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Pyrethroids and Lannate on Lepidopterous Larvae in Lettuce, 1995

1996 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-124
Author(s):  
J. C. Palumbo
Keyword(s):  
F Test ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Insecticide Efficacy ◽  
Direct Seeded

Abstract Lettuce was direct seeded into double-row beds on 9 Sep at the Yuma Valley Agricultural Center, Yuma, Az. Each plot consisted of four, 30 ft long beds spaced 42 inches apart and bordered on each side by an untreated bed. Plots were arranged in a RCB design with 4 replicates. Foliar applications were made on 22 and 30 Sep and with a hand-held CO2 sprayer operated at 60 psi, delivering 20 gal/acre. Spreader-sticker (Kinetic) was included in all spray treatments at a rate of 0.25% of the total volume. Insecticide efficacy was determined by counting the total number of small (1st and 2nd instars) and large (>2nd instar) BAW and CL larvae on 20 randomly selected lettuce plants per replicate. Insect counts were conducted the day of application, 22 and 30 Sep, and at 3 days after treatment, 30 Sep and 3 Oct. Treatment differences among means were estimated with the Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Welsch multiple F test.

Dry matter partitioning as influenced by drip irrigation and fertigation levels in direct seeded scented rice

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 2667-2669
Author(s):  
Samarth Tewari ◽  
Gurvinder Singh ◽  
Avikal Kumar ◽  
Narendra Bhandari ◽  
Saurabh Gangola
Keyword(s):  
Drip Irrigation ◽  
Dry Matter ◽  
Dry Matter Partitioning ◽  
Direct Seeded

Special features of drip-sprinkler irrigation technology

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 841-849 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ye. V. Angold ◽  
V. A. Zharkov
Keyword(s):  
Drip Irrigation ◽  
Water Regime ◽  
Plant Root ◽  
Sprinkler Irrigation ◽  
Vegetation Period ◽  
Yielding Capacity ◽  
Irrigation Technology ◽  
Air Temperatures ◽  
Agricultural Plants ◽  
Plant Root System

Irrigation techniques and technology based on principle of regular accumulation of moisture in active layer (surface irrigation, regular sprinkler irrigation) are most common in science and in practice. More progressive is principle of non-stop water supply of plants and soil in conformity to their water consumption. Drip irrigation and impulse sprinkling are based on this principle. The main advantage of drip irrigation is establishment of optimal water and nutritive regime directly in the plant root system. However, such irrigation is not effective enough under conditions of high air temperatures (over 25–35 °С), as growing process of several agricultural plants is known to slow down at 30–35 °С and photosynthesis, consequently, stops, which, in turn, affects plants yielding capacity. Sprinkling irrigation provides improvement of both microclimate in plant's environment and their water regime. Combination of drip and sprinkling irrigation permits the positive characteristics of each individual technology to be united, and to remove a series of disadvantages of their separate use as well as to use drip-sprinkler irrigation technology to create optimal conditions for plant development. Drip-sprinkler irrigation technology facilitates saving of irrigation water through drip irrigation in the main vegetation period and through improvement of microclimate and water regime of agricultural plants with additional sprinkling irrigation within the period of high temperatures and low air humidity that affects the growing process and increases yielding capacity of grown cultures.

Disease Management in Overhead Sprinkler and Subsurface Drip Irrigation Systems for Peanut

2004 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 1058-1065 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Lanier ◽  
David L. Jordan ◽  
J. Stephen Barnes ◽  
J. Matthews ◽  
Gary L. Grabow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Management ◽  
Drip Irrigation ◽  
Subsurface Drip Irrigation ◽  
Irrigation Systems ◽  
Subsurface Drip ◽  
Overhead Sprinkler

Problems Associated with Particulate Matter in Water Reuse for Agricultural Irrigation and Their Prevention

1986 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 185-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Adin
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Drip Irrigation ◽  
Distribution System ◽  
Water Reuse ◽  
Sprinkler Irrigation ◽  
Water Quality Monitoring ◽  
Chemical Precipitation ◽  
Surface Irrigation ◽  
Irrigation Systems

Methods of irrigation are reviewed, including surface irrigation, sprinkler irrigation and drip irrigation, and the problems of these systems with regard to the quality of the water used are described. Surface irrigation does not suffer much from water quality problems, but both sprinkler irrigation and drip irrigation systems are more affected, the main problem being clogging of pumps, pipes and orifices. Clogging is usually due to a combination of suspended matter, chemical precipitation and biological growth. Current solutions through water treatment, and associated problems with this, are described, with examples given of typical strainers and filters. The key to the solution of clogging problems is a proper match between water quality of the source and within the distribution system, and the type ot treatment to be used, therefore, proper water quality monitoring is recommended. Direct granular filtration is the most preferaDle treatment process for drip irrigation systems.

Performance of pea under different irrigation systems

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.V. Ramana Rao ◽  
Suchi Gangwar ◽  
Arpna Bajpai ◽  
Ravish Keshri ◽  
Lavesh Chourasia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drip Irrigation ◽  
Irrigation System ◽  
Sprinkler Irrigation ◽  
Sprinkler System ◽  
Crop Water ◽  
Flood Irrigation ◽  
Irrigation Systems ◽  
Weekly Basis ◽  
Agricultural Engineering ◽  
Micro Irrigation

The field experiment was conducted at Precision Farming Development Centre, Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal on influence of different irrigation methods in three continuous years (2010-2013) on the performance pea crop. Conventional flood irrigation, micro sprinkler and drip irrigation systems were adopted as three treatments and with seven replications in each treatment in the study. Pea (Arkel variety) crop was sown at a spacing of 45 X 10 cm. During the period of experiment flood irrigation were applied on weekly basis and micro irrigation and drip irrigation systems were operated every third day to meet the crop water requirement. The total quantity of water applied in flood, drip irrigation and micro sprinkler systems were 387.5, 244.7 and 273.5 mm respectively. Maximum crop yield was observed under micro sprinkler system (98.60 q/ha) followed by drip and conventional irrigation system. Saving of water was found better under drip irrigation over micro sprinkler irrigation system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document