scholarly journals Retroperitoneal sarcomas: patterns of care in advanced stages, prognostic factors and focus on main histological subtypes: a multicenter analysis of the French Sarcoma Group

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 730-734 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Toulmonde ◽  
S. Bonvalot ◽  
I. Ray-Coquard ◽  
E. Stoeckle ◽  
O. Riou ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. e59-e60
Author(s):  
João Carvas ◽  
Pedro Martins ◽  
Mariana Peyroteo ◽  
Rita Canotilho ◽  
Ana Margarida Correia ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrė Lideikaitė ◽  
Julija Mozūraitienė ◽  
Simona Letautienė

Introduction. Melanoma is the most dangerous form of skin cancer. Morbidity from melanoma is increasing every year. Previous studies have revealed that there are some demographic and clinical factors having effect on melanoma survival prognosis. Aim of the study. Purpose of our study was to assess melanoma survival depending on prognostic factors, such as age, sex, stage, depth, histology and anatomical site. Materials and methods. We investigated melanoma-specific survival up to 10 years in 85 primary cases of melanoma from diagnosis at the National Cancer Institute in 2006. Analysis was performed for one-, five-, and ten-year survival. The data were processed with Microsoft Excel, data analysis was conducted using SPSS® software. Results. Melanomas diagnosed at stage IV or thicker than 4.00 mm had lower survival (five-year survival: 12.5% and 26.66%, respectively). A significant survival difference was observed among the different stages (p = 0.003) and different depths (p = 0.049) of melanoma. Ten-year survival was 32% for men and 61% for women, but melanoma-specific survival dependent on sex did not have a statistically significant difference (p = 0.121). In persons diagnosed at the age of 65 or older, ten-year survival was lower than in those of 40–64 years of age and in the  age group of 15–39 years (44.44% and 26.66%, respectively), but melanoma-specific survival in different age groups did not have a statistically significant difference (p = 0.455). Back/breast skin melanoma had lower ten-year survival (37.03%) than other anatomic sites. Nodular melanoma had the poorest five-year and ten-year melanoma-specific survival among histological subtypes (51.67% and 38.75%). The differences between melanoma localizations (p = 0.457) and histological types (p = 0.364) were not statistically significant. Conclusions. Lower melanoma-specific survival rates were observed among patients diagnosed at a late stage, older age, and when melanomas were thicker than 4.00 mm. Female and younger patients had better melanoma-specific survival than men and older people, and these differences were statistically significant. Melanoma diagnosed at an early stage and of a  small depth had higher survival rates. Back/breast skin melanoma had poorer prognosis than other anatomic sites. Nodular melanoma had the  lowest melanoma-specific survival, while superficial spreading or lentigo maligna had the best prognosis among histological subtypes. However, differences in melanoma survival in different sex and age groups, localizations and histological types were not statistically significant.


2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (9) ◽  
pp. 1596-1604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven F. Mandish ◽  
Jeremy T. Gaskins ◽  
Mehran B. Yusuf ◽  
Brendan P. Little ◽  
Neal E. Dunlap

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 794-794 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.M. De Witte ◽  
A. Hagemeijer ◽  
S. Suciu ◽  
A. Belhabri ◽  
M. Delforge ◽  
...  

Abstract Allo-SCT is currently considered the only curative treatment option of patients (pts) with advanced stages of MDS. The CRIANT study tested in pts without an HLA-id. sibling the value of auto-SCT versus one additional course of high dose cytarabine (HDAC). Pts with identified HLA-id. sibling(s) were candidates for allo-SCT. All pts received remission-induction therapy consisting of idarubicin, cytarabine and etoposide (ICE). Pts who reached CR received one consolidation course (cons) with intermediate dose of cytarabine and idarubicin. All pts without a HLA-id. sibling received filgrastim during the recovery phase of 1st cons to mobilize stem cells and were randomized between ASCT and 2nd cons. Between November 1996 and September 2003, 345 pts were registered (69% of them ≤ 55 years of age and 77% with MDS). Reviewed cytogenetic data were available of 295 (86%) and FISH data of 167 pts (48%). Out of 341 evaluable pts 256 have died and the median follow-up was 5.3 years. The median survival was 1.3 years and the 4-year survival rate was 29% (SE=3%). Age (> vs ≤ 55 yrs: HR=1.5, p=0.003) and the IPSS cytogenetic/FISH score (intermediate vs low: HR=1.5, p=0.02; high vs low: HR=3.1, p<0.0001) were independent prognostic factors for survival. ICE induced CR in 194 (57%) pts. The median DFS was 1.0 yr and the 4-year DFS rate was 29% (SE=3%). 176 (91%) CR pts received the 1st cons. 34 pts were randomized for auto-SCT and 38 for HDAC. Mobilization of stem cells after the 1st cons was adequate in 48 and failed in 54 pts. In total 19 randomized pts (56%) received auto-SCT and 26 (68%) received HDAC. The 4-year DFS rates of the 2 groups were 30% (SE=8%) and 17% (SE=7%), resp. (p=0.32). The 4-year DFS rate of pts with a failed mobilization was 26% vs 17% for those with a successful harvest (p=0.21; p=0.76 adjusted for cytogenetics). The outcome of pts in CR (≤ 55 yrs) was compared according to the availability of a HLA-id. sibling donor. The 4-year DFS of the 50 pts with a donor was 45% (SE=8%) and of the 85 pts without a donor 27% (SE=7%) (HR=0.62, 95% CI 0.39–0.97, p=0.04, after adjustment for age and IPSS cytogenetic score). In intermediate/high risk pts. the difference was higher (HR=0.43, p=0.009). Cytogenetic analysis in CR was performed in 43 of 73 pts in CR with cytogenetic/FISH aberrations at diagnosis. The 4-year relapse rate was higher in the 13 pts with persisting abnormalities compared to the 30 pts with no cytogenetic abnormalities in CR: 93% versus 74%, resp. (p=0.22). In conclusion: cytogenetic characteristics and age are the major prognostic factors in MDS/sAML pts treated by intensive remission-induction/consolidation chemotherapy, followed by another consolidation course or SCT. Pts with a donor and candidates for allo-SCT in CR-1 have a better outcome than those without a donor. Pts randomized for auto-SCT had a 13% higher 4-yr DFS rate than those randomized for intensive chemotherapy only.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 97-97
Author(s):  
Lucia Nogova ◽  
Thorsten Reineke ◽  
Corinne Brillant ◽  
Thomas Ruediger ◽  
Hans K. Mueller-Hermelink ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (LPHL) differs in histological and clinical presentation from classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Treatment of LPHL patients using standard approaches leads to complete remission (CR) in more than 95% of patients. However, differences in terms of relapse rates, overall survival (OS) and freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) between LPHL and cHL patients were suggested by a recent intergroup analysis. To obtain a more comprehensive picture, we reviewed all LPHL-cases registered in the GHSG database comparing patient characteristics and treatment outcome with cHL patients. Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 8298 HL patients treated within the GHSG trials (HD4 to HD12). 394 patients had LPHL and 7904 cHL. From 394 LPHL patients, 63% were in early favorable stage, 16% in early unfavorable and 21% in advanced stage of disease. Of the 7904 cHL patients analyzed, 22% were in early favorable, 39% in early unfavorable and 39% in advanced stages. 9% of LPHL patients had B symptoms compared to 40% in cHL patients. Results: 91% LPHL vs. 86% cHL patients in early favorable stages, 86% vs. 83% in early unfavorable and 79% vs. 75% in advanced stages reached CR/CRu. 0.3% LPHL patients developed progressive disease (PD) compared to 3.7% cHL patients. The relapse rate of LPHL patients was very similar to cHL (8.1% vs. 7.9%). There were 2.5% secondary malignancies in LPHL and 3.7% in cHL patients. 4.3% LPHL patients and 8.8% cHL patients died. The FFTF rates for LPHL and cHL patients at a median observation of 41 or 48 months were 88% and 82% (p=0.0093), respectively. The OS for LPHL and cHL patients was 96% and 92%, respectively (p=0.0166). The analysis between LPHL stages showed significant differences in FFTF (p=0.0239). According to a multiple Cox-regression analysis, advanced stage (p=0.0089) and lymphocytes < 8% of white cell count was shown as negative prognostic factors for FFTF and age ≥ 45 years (p=0.008) as negative factor for OS in LPHL patients. Hb value < 10.5 g/dl was shown as negative factor for both, FFTF and OS (p=0.0125, p=0.0002). Conclusion: This is the largest analysis comparing LPHL and cHL patients. We found differences in FFTF and OS rates between both groups and differences in FFTF between LPHL stages. New treatment protocols for LPHL patients with reduced intensity schedules are to be discussed.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 2597-2597
Author(s):  
R. Ben Lakhal ◽  
S. Hdiji ◽  
M. A Laatiri ◽  
S. Ladeb ◽  
R. Jeddi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: HL, independently of socio economic conditions, is often intrinsically more aggressive in developing countries, including in Tunisia (Tunis Med.1999 77:614). We evaluated clinical characteristics and outcome of HL pts included in a prospective multicenter Tunisian adult HL trial. Methods: Between 2002 and 2006, 251 consecutive eligible pts from 6 Tunisian departments with newly diagnosed HL were enrolled in a prospective trial (MDH 2002). Pts were staged using EORTC prognostic factors in early stages and the international prognostic scoring (IPS) in advanced stages. ABVD was used at 3 cycles for favorable (fav) early stages (G1), 6 cycles for unfavorable (unfav) early stages (G2) and stage IIIA (G3) and 8 cycles for fav advanced stages (IPS <3) (G5). Involved field RT was combined to chemotherapy (CT) for early stage and stage IIIA. Intensive CT (4 escalated BEACOPP + 4 standard BEACOPP) was used for unfav advanced stages (IPS 3 3): (G4). G-CSF was given after each escalated BEACOPP course Refractory and relapsed pts were proposed for intensive CT and autologous SCT. Closing date of the study was Dec 2007 Results: Median age at presentation was 31 years (range 15–70), with 140 M and 111 F. 50% patients had advanced disease (28% with stage IV) and 44% had unfav early stage (G2). 25% pts had Bulky mediastinal disease and 69% had B symptoms. 40% pts were treated in G2, 29% in G4, 17% in G5 and only 9% in G1. Eleven (4.3%) toxic deaths were observed during treatment, including 10 deaths in the 72 pts treated with escalated BEACOPP. Of the remaining pts, 83% had CR and 17% had primary failure at the end of the planned treatment (including 14 % with response <50% and 3 % with response between 50 and 75 %. Only 17 (42%) of the primary failure pts could receive auto SCT (13 pts alive in CR, 2 progressive disease and 2 relapses). The 23 remaining refractory pts had progressive disease and died before SCT (16 pts) or failed to respond to salvage CT before SCT (7pts). Twenty five relapses (12%) were observed with a median time to relapse of 9 months: 9(10%) in G2, 6(8%) in G4 and 10(23%) in G5. Five year OS, EFS, and RFS were respectively 88%, 73% and 88%. In multivariate analysis, the only unfavorable prognostic factors emerging were bulky mediastinal disease for primary failure rate (35% vs 10% p=0.0004, OR=5.3) and for EFS (55% vs 80% p = 0.03, OR = 1.9)and remission status at the end of therapy which influenced EFS (87% vs50% vs5% p=0.0000, OR=21.8) and OS (96% vs62%vs 55% p=0.001, OR=14.6) in pts who achieved CR, had primary failure with >50 % to 75% response and with <50% response, respectively Conclusions: This study confirms the high incidence of aggressive forms of HD in Tunisia, therefore frequently requiring intensive treatment, sometimes difficult to apply in pts with relatively low socio economic condition Apart from escalated BEACOPP (which resulted in high toxicity that will have in the future to be better prevented), treatments could however generally be administered completely, which possibly contributed to the relatively few relapses. Bulky mediastinal disease and absence of CR at the end of treatment were, as in other countries, major issues requiring treatment intensification


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2625-2625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Evens ◽  
Irene Helenowski ◽  
Chadi Nabhan ◽  
Erika Ramsdale ◽  
June M McKoy ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2625 Purpose. Survival rates for eHL (most commonly defined as age over 60 years) are significantly and disproportionately inferior to those achieved in younger patients (pts). Reported 5-year event-free survival (EFS) rates for advanced-stage eHL have historically ranged from 30%–45% with 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of 40%–55%. Potential explanations for these discrepant inferior outcomes include co-morbidities precluding delivery of chemotherapy, treatment-related toxicities, and biology of disease. Data examining toxicity, survival, and prognostication for eHL in the modern era are lacking. Methods. We report a multicenter collaboration that retrospectively investigated a large cohort of eHL pts treated over a recent 12-year period (June 1999 December 2010). We examined clinical characteristics, treatment-related toxicities, and outcomes. Furthermore, comorbidities were assessed using the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics (CIRS-G) scale. Patients were also classified as “fit” vs “not fit” (i.e., loss of activities of daily living (ADLs), >3 grade 3 CIRS-G, any grade 4, and/or presence of geriatric syndrome). Univariate associations with survival were determined, while a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was completed. Additionally, a prognostic model was constructed by classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. Results. 113 eligible pts were identified, while 95 had full data and were analyzed. Among these 95 pts (58M:37F), median age was 67 years (range, 60–89), with 33% of pts ages 70–79 years, while 7% were 80–89 years. 27% of pts had a prior malignancy at a median of 8.4 years (range, 1–25 years) prior to HL diagnosis, for which most had received radiation. At HL diagnosis, there were presence of B symptoms in 54%, performance status 2–4 in 27%, 21% with history of coronary artery disease, and 16% had diabetes. In terms of functional status, 61% of pts had a CIRS-G grade 3 or 4 in at least 1 category, while 46% had a cumulative score >6. Further, 17% had presence of a geriatric syndrome, 26% were classified as 'not fit', and 13% had loss of ADLs at time of HL diagnosis. 25% of pts had bone marrow involvement, while 20% had other extranodal disease (most common: bone and lung). Altogether, 64% of pts had stage III/IV disease, of which 58% had an international prognostic score (IPS) of 4–7. HL histology was nodular sclerosis in 47%, mixed cellularity 31%, NOS 16%, lymphocyte predominant 5%, and lymphocyte depleted 1%. Primary treatment consisted of: ABVD-based (n=67), MOPP-based (n=6), BCVPP (n=6), ChlVPP (n=5), radiation alone (n=4), CHOP (n=3), hospice (n=2), BEACOPP (n=1), and watchful waiting (n=1). 78% of pts received granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) with therapy. The overall response rate (ORR) among treated pts was 85% (73% complete remission (CR) rate). In terms of toxicity, the incidence of bleomycin lung toxicity (BLT) was 32%, which had an associated mortality rate of 25%. Notably, the incidence of BLT was 37% vs 0% among pts who received G-CSF vs not, respectively (p=0.041). With a median follow-up of 66 months (6–154) months, the 5-year EFS and OS for all eHL pts were 44% and 58%, respectively (stage I/II: 61% and 79%; and stage III/IV: 36% and 46%; p=0.009 and p=0.001, respectively). Prognostic factors that predicted survival on univariate analysis are detailed in Table 1. On multivariate regression analysis, 2 factors were associated with inferior survival: 1) age ≥ 70 years (EFS: 1.76 (95%CI 0.98–3.16), p=0.06; and OS: 2.24 (95%CI 1.16–4.33), p=0.02) and 2) Loss of ADLs (EFS: 2.47 (95%CI 0.98–6.21), p=0.055; and OS: 2.71 (95%CI 1.07–6.84), p=0.04). Furthermore, a survival model by multivariate CART analysis, based on number of these 2 adverse factors (0, 1, 2), was formed: 5-year EFS 73%, 51%, 0%, respectively (p<0.0001), and 5-year OS 93%, 68%, 11%, respectively (p<0.0001) (Figure 1). Conclusions. This large, retrospective multicenter analysis of eHL found a high ORR and CR rate, but poor long-term outcomes. As shown previously, a significant percentage of eHL pts suffered BLT, which was fatal in 25% and appeared strongly related to use of growth factors. Further, several geriatric specific variables, including loss of ADL's, was highly predictive of outcome and should be prospectively incorporated into clinical trials. Finally, we developed a new prognostic model for eHL that identifies pt populations with markedly divergent outcomes. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document