scholarly journals Lenalidomide in combination with intravenous rituximab (REVRI) in relapsed/refractory primary CNS lymphoma or primary intraocular lymphoma: a multicenter prospective ‘proof of concept’ phase II study of the French Oculo-Cerebral lymphoma (LOC) Network and the Lymphoma Study Association (LYSA)

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 621-628 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Ghesquieres ◽  
M. Chevrier ◽  
M. Laadhari ◽  
O. Chinot ◽  
S. Choquet ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Martinu ◽  
Claudia P. Correia ◽  
Andersson M. Figueiredo ◽  
Miguel N. Burnier Jr

Primary intraocular lymphoma is generally considered as a subset of primary CNS lymphoma. This study attempts to show that they may in fact represent distinct entities by comparing their respective proliferation rates using DNA flow cytometry. Four samples of primary intraocular lymphoma and seven samples of primary CNS lymphoma were analyzed, all from paraffin-embedded tissue. All tumors were of the large B-cell type. A normal human tonsil sample was used as a control. Tissue samples were analyzed by DNA flow cytometry, which is a precise and objective method to measure DNA content and cell proliferation of a tumor. S-phase fraction (SPF) and DNA content were measured for each sample. The average SPF for primary intraocular lymphoma was significantly higher than that of primary CNS lymphoma, 23.8 (range: 18.9 to 29.6) versus 15.1 (range: 1.1 to 25.1) respectively. Of the 11 tumors analyzed, 2 brain tumors were aneuploid and 1 eye tumor was peridiploid. All other tumors were diploid. Thus, no significant pattern was detected in the DNA content of the tumors. This lack of clinical significance of tumor aneuploidy is consistent with data reported in the literature. The results of this study indicate that primary intraocular lymphoma is more aggressive and of higher grade than primary CNS lymphoma. The different proliferation rates of intraocular and CNS lymphomas may be explained by either their different spatial location or a distinct genetic composition, the latter reinforcing the hypothesis that the two are fundamentally different entities


2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (24) ◽  
pp. 4489-4495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hendrik Pels ◽  
Ingo G.H. Schmidt-Wolf ◽  
Axel Glasmacher ◽  
Holger Schulz ◽  
Andreas Engert ◽  
...  

Purpose: To evaluate response rate, response duration, overall survival (OS), and toxicity in primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) after systemic and intraventricular chemotherapy with deferred radiotherapy. Patients and Methods: From September 1995 to July 2001, 65 consecutive patients with PCNSL (median age, 62 years) were enrolled onto a pilot and phase II study evaluating chemotherapy without radiotherapy. A high-dose methotrexate (MTX; cycles 1, 2, 4, and 5) and cytarabine (ARA-C; cycles 3 and 6)–based systemic therapy (including dexamethasone, vinca-alkaloids, ifosfamide, and cyclophosphamide) was combined with intraventricular MTX, prednisolone, and ARA-C. Results: Sixty-one of 65 patients were assessable for response. Of these, 37 patients (61%) achieved complete response, six (10%) achieved partial response, and 12 (19%) progressed under therapy. Six (9%) of 65 patients died because of treatment-related complications. Follow-up is 0 to 87 months (median, 26 months). The Kaplan-Meier estimates for median time to treatment failure (TTF) and median OS were 21 months and 50 months, respectively. For patients older than 60 years, median survival was 34 months, and the median TTF was 15 months. In patients younger than 61 years, median survival and median TTF have not been reached yet; the 5-year survival fraction is 75%. Systemic toxicity was mainly hematologic. Ommaya reservoir infection occurred in 12 patients (19%), and permanent cognitive dysfunction possibly as a result of treatment occurred in only two patients (3%). Conclusion: Primary chemotherapy based on high-dose MTX and ARA-C is highly efficient in PCNSL. Response rate and response duration in this series are comparable to the response rates and durations reported after combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Neurotoxicity was infrequent.


2008 ◽  
Vol 91 (3) ◽  
pp. 299-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hendrik Pels ◽  
Annika Juergens ◽  
Axel Glasmacher ◽  
Holger Schulz ◽  
Andreas Engert ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (14) ◽  
pp. 2726-2731 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Hoang-Xuan ◽  
L. Taillandier ◽  
O. Chinot ◽  
P. Soubeyran ◽  
U. Bogdhan ◽  
...  

Purpose: To assess the efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy alone in patients older than 60 years with primary CNS lymphoma. Patients and Methods: Fifty patients with a median age of 72 years and a median Karnofsky performance score (KPS) of 50 were eligible for this multicenter phase II study. The protocol consisted of high-dose methotrexate (MTX), lomustine, procarbazine, methylprednisolone, and intrathecal chemotherapy with MTX and cytarabine. The patients received one induction cycle; if objective response was achieved, five additional maintenance cycles were administered every 6 weeks. The median follow-up of patients was 3 years. Results: Twenty four patients (48%) achieved an objective response (compete response [CR], 42%; partial response, 6%), with a median duration of CR of 27 months (range, 3 to 47+ months). Overall median survival time was 14.3 months, and 1-year progression-free survival was 40% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26% to 53%). Myelosuppression was the most frequent side effect, with grade 3 to 4 neutropenia in 19% of patients. One patient died during chemotherapy, as a result of pulmonary embolism. Most patients improved or preserved their cognitive functions (47% and 45% of the patients, respectively) and KPS (36% and 52% of the patients, respectively) until relapse, whereas cognitive and KPS decline attributed to delayed treatment neurotoxicity occurred in 8% and 12% patients, respectively. Conclusion: In the elderly, this chemotherapy regimen compares favorably with radiotherapy (RT) alone and reduces considerably the risk of delayed neurotoxicity associated with combined chemoradiotherapy. Chemotherapy alone is an appropriate strategy in older patients to delay or avoid RT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document