scholarly journals Exploratory analysis based on tumor location of REACHIN, a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of regorafenib after failure of gemcitabine and platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic biliary tract tumors

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. iv127 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Demols ◽  
I. Borbath ◽  
M. Van den Eynde ◽  
G. Houbiers ◽  
M. Peeters ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15622-e15622
Author(s):  
Anne Demols ◽  
Ivan Borbath ◽  
Marc Van Den Eynde ◽  
Ghislain Houbiers ◽  
Marc Peeters ◽  
...  

e15622 Background: The REACHIN trial met its primary endpoint of improving PFS for patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) treated with regorafenib (R) as compared to placebo (P): Median (m) PFS for R was 3.0 months (mo) (95% CI: 2.3-4.9) and 1.5 mo (95% CI : 1.2-2.0) for P with an HR= 0.49 (95% CI: 0.29-0.81), p=0.005 (Demols A et al, ASCO-GI 2019, Abstr 345). We exploratory analyzed the benefit of R according to tumor location: intra-hepatic (ICC), extra-hepatic (ECC), gallbladder (GB) or peri-hilar (PH). Methods: Tumor locations were recorded at randomization of patients in REACHIN (NCT02162914), a multicenter double-blinded P-controlled randomized phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of R in patients with locally advanced (non resectable) and metastatic histologically proven BTC, progressing after gemcitabine-platinum. We analyzed mPFS according to tumor location and their respective 95% CI. Results: 66 patients were randomized and the mPFS data are summarized in the table. Conclusions: Most of the patients had ICC location (64%). The mPFS in the P arm is similar according to the tumor location. Despite its exploratory value and the small number of patients per tumor location, R seems superior to P in ICC, GB and PH. Data in ECC are not conclusive. Additional biomarkers (FGFR, NGS analysis) are ongoing and will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT02162914. [Table: see text]


2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 819-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Malka ◽  
Pascale Cervera ◽  
Stéphanie Foulon ◽  
Tanja Trarbach ◽  
Christelle de la Fouchardière ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 492-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna C. Bendell ◽  
Benjamin R. Tan ◽  
James Andrew Reeves ◽  
Henry Xiong ◽  
Bradley G. Somer ◽  
...  

492 Background: 3-drug chemotherapy (CT) + BEV (cFOLFOXIRI-BEV) significantly improved efficacy vs FOLFIRI-BEV for 1L mCRC tx, but safety and the impact of subsequent fluoropyrimidine-BEV maintenance tx require further definition. The phase 2 STEAM (NCT01765582) trial assessed efficacy of 1L cFOLFOXIRI-BEV vs FOLFOX-BEV and safety of alternating 2-drug CT (FOLFOX and FOLFIRI) + BEV tx monthly in a sequential sFOLFOXIRI-BEV regimen. Methods: Pts with unresectable, previously untreated mCRC were randomized 1:1:1 to BEV-containing (5 mg/kg) arms (cFOLFOXIRI, sFOLFOXIRI [alternating FOLFOX and FOLFIRI every 4 weeks {q4w}], or FOLFOX q3w) in a 4–6 month induction phase, followed by BEV-containing maintenance tx. Stratification factors included extent of metastatic disease and tumor location. Primary objectives: 1L ORR, 1L progression-free survival (PFS), safety. Secondary objectives: resection and conversion to resectable disease rates, time to 2L PFS, overall survival. ORR was tested with a 1-sided alpha of 5%; tx arms were compared with a stratified 1-sided Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. PFS was analyzed descriptively. Results:Among 280 enrolled pts (median age, 57.5 yrs), 186 remainined in the study on July 1, 2015. Efficacy and safety are shown (see Table). Conclusion: While not statistically significant, there was a trend of increased ORR with cFOLFOXIRI-BEV vs FOLFOX-BEV in 1L mCRC tx. Analysis of PFS is ongoing. All 3 regimens were well tolerated. Clinical trial information: NCT01765582. [Table: see text]


2013 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 557-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Néstor Sosa ◽  
Zeuz Capitán ◽  
Javier Nieto ◽  
Melissa Nieto ◽  
José Calzada ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Quan ◽  
Abdullah Alismail ◽  
Noha Daher ◽  
Derrick Cleland ◽  
Sonia Chavan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Curcumin, a derivative of the spice turmeric, has been adopted by Eastern medicine for centuries as an adjunct to treat several medical conditions (e.g., anorexia and arthritis) because of its well-established anti-inflammatory properties. Studies have shown that the use of curcumin in mice models has led to reduction in several inflammatory markers as well as key inflammatory pathway enzymes. As a result, studies in Western medicine have developed to determine if this recognized benefit can be utilized for patients with inflammatory lung diseases, such as asthma. This study will seek to better understand if curcumin can be used as an adjunctive therapy for improving asthma control of patients with moderate to severe asthma; a finding we hope will allow for a more affordable treatment. Methods This study will utilize a randomized, placebo controlled, double blinded pilot superiority phase 2 trial at an outpatient pulmonary clinic in Southern California, USA. Subjects will be receiving Curcumin 1500 mg or matching placebo by mouth twice daily for the study period of 12 weeks. Subjects will be randomized to either a placebo or intervention Curcumin. Subjects will have 6 clinic visits: screening visit, a baseline visit, monthly clinic visits (weeks 4, 8, and 12), at weeks 4, 8, and a follow-up clinic visit or phone-call (week 16). Changes in asthma control test scores, number of days missed from school/work, FEV1 (% predicted), FEV1/FVC ratio, FVC (% predicted), blood eosinophil count, blood total IgE, and FeNO levels will be compared by group over time. Discussion The therapeutic effects of curcumin have been studied on a limited basis in asthmatics and has shown mixed results thus far. Our study hopes to further establish the benefits of curcumin, however, there are potential issues that may arise from our study design that we will address within this paper. Moreover, the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in safety concerns that have delayed initiation of our study. This study will contribute to existing literature on curcumin’s role in reducing lung inflammation as it presents in asthmatics as well as patients suffering from COVID-19. Trial registration This study protocol has been approved by the Institutional Review Board at Loma Linda University Health, (NCT04353310). IND# 145101 Registered April 20th, 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04353310.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document