Exposure to Solar UV During Outdoor Construction Work in Britain

Author(s):  
John W Cherrie ◽  
Amanda Nioi ◽  
Charlotte Wendelboe-Nelson ◽  
Sue Cowan ◽  
Mark Cherrie ◽  
...  

Abstract Excessive exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun in summer can cause skin cancer and in Britain there are around 1500 new cases of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) each year, caused by exposure to solar UV at work. Little is known about the magnitude of UV exposure amongst outdoor construction workers in Britain, although this is one of the main groups at risk. The aim of this paper is to summarise measurements of erythema-weighted UVB radiation amongst construction workers in Scotland and the Southeast of England and interpret the data in terms of the risk of NMSC. The measurements were made as part of an intervention study using short mobile phone text messages to alter worker behaviour to either reduce UV exposure in summer or increase serum vitamin D in winter; the intervention is only briefly reported here. Data were collected from 67 workers from 9 worksites, of whom 41 provided measures of UV exposure for 758 working days. Daily exposure ranged from 0 to 13.47 standard erythema dose (SED), with the mean exposure for outdoor workers being 2.0 SED and the corresponding value for indoor workers being 0.7 SED. These data were obtained from a sensor located on the back of the workers hard hat; others have measured exposure on the wrist or upper arm and these locations probably, on average, have higher levels of UV exposure. It is likely that an outdoor construction worker in Britain could accumulate sufficient solar UV exposure over 30–40 years of work to more than double their risk of NMSC. We argue that employers in Britain should take a more proactive approach to manage sun safety and they should take responsibility for skin health surveillance for their workers.

2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-43
Author(s):  
Alexandra-Irina Butacu ◽  
◽  
Marc Wittlich ◽  
Swen Malte John ◽  
Sabina Zurac ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 1251-1257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Visalini Nair-Shalliker ◽  
David P. Smith ◽  
Mark Clements ◽  
Vasikaran Naganathan ◽  
Melisa Litchfield ◽  
...  

PeerJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. e12234
Author(s):  
Carolina Morgado-Águila ◽  
Guadalupe Gil-Fernández ◽  
Orlando Rafael Dávila-Villalobos ◽  
Jesús Pérez-Rey ◽  
Purificación Rey-Sánchez ◽  
...  

Background Skin cancer is one of the common malignancies. There is sufficient evidence that sunlight (ultraviolet radiation) contributes to the development of skin cancer, but there is also evidence that relates adequate serum levels of vitamin D produced on the skin by the action of ultraviolet radiation with the decreased risk of various types of cancers, including skin cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of vitamin D serum levels among patients with non-melanoma skin cancers (basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma) and controls. Methods A prospective observational case-control study was conducted in a sample of 84 subjects in Extremadura (Spain). Forty-one patients with histologically diagnosed basal cell carcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas and 43 healthy controls were randomly chosen to assess whether vitamin D (25(OH)D3) serum level, age and sex were related to non-melanoma skin cancer and to determine the possible risk of this type of skin cancer for these variables. Results When analysing serum vitamin D levels, we ensured that all our subjects, both cases and controls, had normal or low serum vitamin D levels, even though the samples were taken during months with the highest solar irradiance in our region. It is striking in our results that there was a higher percentage of subjects with deficits of vitamin D who did not have skin cancer (66%) than patients with deficits with these types of skin cancers (34%). When adjusting the model for age and sex, vitamin D values above 18 ng/ml increased the risk of suffering from non-melanoma skin cancer by nearly 7-fold (aOR: 6.94, 95% CI [1.55–31.11], p = 0.01). Conclusions Despite the controversial data obtained in the literature, our results suggest that lower levels of vitamin D may be related to a reduced incidence of non-melanoma skin cancer.


2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 525-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
María-Antonia Serrano ◽  
◽  
Javier Cañada ◽  
Juan Carlos Moreno

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S433-S434
Author(s):  
Y. Wu ◽  
S. Ghaly ◽  
S. Kerr ◽  
K. Krishnaprasad ◽  
R. Prosser ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 461-463
Author(s):  
Silas Paras Soemantri ◽  
Martin Dörler ◽  
Markus Stücker ◽  
Eggert Stockfleth ◽  
Heinrich Dickel

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 4292
Author(s):  
Alejandro Martin-Gorgojo ◽  
Yolanda Gilaberte ◽  
Eduardo Nagore

Background: The current vitamin D deficiency epidemic is accompanied by an increase in endemic skin cancer. There are still multiple controversies. This review aims to give practical recommendations regarding vitamin D among people at risk or with a personal history of skin cancer. Methods: Narrative review including human research articles published between 2011 and 2021, elaborated bearing in mind an epidemiological, patient-centered approach. Results: Ultraviolet (UV) exposure (neither artificial nor natural) is not the ideal source to synthesize vitamin D. There is conflicting epidemiological evidence regarding vitamin D, non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC), and cutaneous melanoma (CMM), confounded by the effect of sun exposure and other factors. Conclusions: Current evidence is controversial, and there are no widely applicable strategies. We propose three practical recommendations. Firstly, sun protection recommendations should be kept among people at risk or with a personal history of skin cancer. Secondly, vitamin D should preferably be sourced through diet. In patients with melanoma or at risk of cutaneous cancer, serum vitamin D checks are warranted to detect and avoid its insufficiency.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document