Commentary on: Spare Roof Technique Versus Component Dorsal Hump Reduction: A Randomized Prospective Study in 250 Primary Rhinoplasties, Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald P Gruber ◽  
Danielle Rochlin ◽  
Kelsey McClure
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Hump Reduction

Five-Year Prospective Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric and Clinical Outcomes of the BioPro MTP-1 Hemiarthroplasty

2021 ◽  
pp. 107110072110613
Author(s):  
Vinay V. Balesar ◽  
Lennard A. Koster ◽  
Bart L. Kaptein ◽  
Stefan B. Keizer
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Condition Number ◽  
Clinical Assessment ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Metatarsal Bone ◽  
Migration Patterns ◽  
Patient Questionnaires

Background: Mixed results for functional outcomes and long-term fixation have been reported for first metatarsophalangeal arthroplasty. This prospective study was designed to evaluate the migration of the BioPro metatarsophalangeal-1 (MTP-1) joint hemiprosthesis with Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). Migration patterns of the prosthesis, prosthesis-induced erosion of the metatarsal bone, and clinical outcomes were evaluated sequentially to 5 years postoperation (PO). Methods: Eleven female patients received the BioPro-1 hemiprosthesis. Prosthesis translation and metatarsal erosion were measured with RSA at immediately PO, 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 12, 36, and 60 months postoperatively. Clinical assessment was done by patient questionnaires. Results: RSA data of 9 patients were available for analysis. Median (range) number of markers used in RSA analysis, condition number, and mean error of markers around the prosthesis were 4 (3-7), 320 (208-862), and 0.13 (0.02-0.28), respectively. Progressive subsidence was seen up to 3 years PO (mean 2.1 mm, SE 0.32). Progressive metatarsal erosion was found from 1 year PO (mean 0.49 mm, SE 0.15). Pain, function, and quality scores improved after surgery and did not deteriorate at later follow-up moments. Conclusion: Model-based RSA of the BioPro-1 prosthesis shows nonstabilizing medial and distal translation and metatarsal erosion. Despite the measured migration and erosion, clinical outcomes improved and remained similar up to 5 years postoperation.

scholarly journals Evaluation of aesthetic and functional outcomes in rhinoplasty surgery: a prospective study

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. 552-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Sena Esteves ◽  
Miguel Gonçalves Ferreira ◽  
João Carvalho Almeida ◽  
José Abrunhosa ◽  
Cecília Almeida e Sousa
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
A Prospective Study

scholarly journals Open Reduction Internal Fixation versus External Fixation with Limited Internal Fixation for Displaced Comminuted Closed Pilon Fractures: A Randomised Prospective Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-89
Author(s):  
Rayan Ahmed ◽  
Kotb Ahmed ◽  
M. Elmoatasem Elhussein ◽  
Samir Shady ◽  
Tamer A. El-Sobky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
External Fixation ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Articular Surface ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Pilon Fractures

Background Pilon fractures involve the dome of the distal tibial articular surface. The optimal treatment for high-energy pilon fractures remains controversial. Some authors advocate the use of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) to avoid articular incongruence. Others advocate the use of bridging external fixation with limited internal fixation (EFLIF) to reduce soft tissue complications. Literature reports of prospective studies comparing the radioclinical outcomes of ORIF and EFLIF in high-energy fractures are scarce. Retrospective studies have their limitations because of insufficient randomisation. The objective of this randomised prospective study is to compare the clinical, radiologic and functional outcomes of displaced and comminuted closed pilon fractures, Rüedi and Allgöwer type II and III, treated by either ORIF or EFLIF. Materials and Methods Forty-two patients were selected for the study. Twenty-two patients were subjected to ORIF and 20 patients were subjected to EFLIF. We used the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score as a standard method of reporting clinical status of the ankle. Patients were followed-up clinically and radiologically for over 2 years after the surgical treatment. Results The results of ORIF and EFLIF in treatment of high-energy pilon fractures are equally effective in terms of functional outcomes and complication rates on the short term. Conclusion Soft tissue integrity and fracture comminution seem to have a significant influence on outcomes of intervention. A prospective multicentre study with a larger sample size that controls for other associated variables and comorbidities is warranted. Level of evidence Level II.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document