A Single Center's Clinical Experience With Ergonomix Breast Implants

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Botti ◽  
Chiara Botti ◽  
Francesco Ciancio
Keyword(s):  
Capsular Contracture ◽  
Breast Implants ◽  
Early Experience ◽  
High Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Important Improvement ◽  
Aesthetic Results ◽  
Capsular Contractures ◽  
The Aesthetic ◽  
Augmentation Mastopexy

Abstract Background This retrospective study reports on the early experience of a private surgical center with Motiva Ergonomix SilkSurface SikSurface breast implants. Objectives to examine the incidence of complications and satisfaction levels in women who received primary and revision breast augmentation or augmentation-mastopexy with this device. Methods 356 consecutive patients received Motiva Ergonomix breast implants from April 2014 to October 2018 by 3 different surgeons and were followed-up for a minimum of 12 months. Complications were assessed by measuring the rate of rupture, capsular contracture, malposition, late seroma, double capsule, reoperation, symmastia, ptosis, extrusion, and infection. Satisfaction with aesthetic results was assessed by both surgeon and patient, using the Likert scale. Results Only six major complications were observed in these 356 patients (712 implants). One unilateral implant ptosis (“bottoming out”) at 12 months (0.14 %) and 2 capsular contractures (0.28 %), one at 14 months and the other at 2 years. At all time-points, 98% of the patients were “extremely satisfied or very satisfied” with the aesthetic results and surgeons categorized the outcomes as “very important or important improvement” in 96% of the cases. Conclusions Motiva Ergonomix SilkSurface devices provided high patient satisfaction up to more than 5 years postoperatively with very few complications. These data are consistent with other reports in the literature. The observed favorable outcomes might be attributed, at least in part, to Motiva Ergonomix’s bio-engineered “cell-friendly” surface.

Composite Breast Remodeling After Implant Removal by Tissue Recruitment and Loops Fixation With Power-Assisted Liposuction and Lipofilling (PALLL)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marwan H Abboud ◽  
Ayush K Kapila ◽  
Svetlana Bogaert ◽  
Nicolas M Abboud
Keyword(s):  
Breast Implant ◽  
Capsular Contracture ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Fat Grafting ◽  
Implant Removal ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Aesthetic Results ◽  
And Migration ◽  
The Aesthetic

Abstract Background An increasing number of women wish breast implant removal whilst maintaining an acceptable projection and form were possible. Objectives The authors propose a technique to remodel the breast after implant removal utilizing internal suture loops to project the breast, recruit abdominal and axillary tissue cranially and medially, and provide a matrix for lipofilling. Methods A prospective analysis was performed of consecutive patients undergoing implant extraction followed by power-assisted liposuction loops and lipofilling. Patient characteristics were measured. The aesthetic results were evaluated by 2 independent raters. Patient-reported satisfaction was measured by standardized questionnaires. Results Implants in 52 patients with an average age of 55 and body mass index of 23.7 were extracted followed by breast remodeling. A total of 73% of patients had implants for aesthetic reasons, 41% were smokers, and 43% of the reconstruction cases received radiotherapy. A total of 28% had implant extraction for rupture, 58% for capsular contracture, and 14% due to pain and migration. The average volume of the implants removed was 292 cc, followed by an average lipofilling of 223 cc, yielding a ratio of 0.76 to 1. The average tissue recruited by loops was 82.5 cc. Independent raters measured 79% of results as good, 13% as acceptable, and 8% as requiring improvement; 80% of patients were satisfied to very satisfied. Conclusions The authors propose implant extraction followed by power-assisted liposuction loops and lipofilling can provide footprint definition, sustained projection, and high patient satisfaction. Moreover, the recruitment of a vascularized adipo-cutaneous flap by loops allows a reduced ratio of fat grafting to implant volume. Level of Evidence: 4

scholarly journals Does Implant Surface Texture Affect the Risk of Capsular Contracture in Subglandular Breast Augmentation and Breast Augmentation-Mastopexy?

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 499-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Lista ◽  
Ryan E Austin ◽  
Maryam Saheb-Al-Zamani ◽  
Jamil Ahmad
Keyword(s):  
Breast Augmentation ◽  
Bacterial Contamination ◽  
Capsular Contracture ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Breast Implants ◽  
Textured Surface ◽  
Implant Surface ◽  
Silicone Gel ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Augmentation Mastopexy

Abstract Background Previous studies have reported decreased rates of capsular contracture associated with the use of textured surface breast implants placed in the subglandular plane during breast augmentation. However, since the publication of these studies, our understanding of the pathophysiology of capsular contracture, as well as the surgical techniques utilized to minimize bacterial contamination of the implant, have advanced considerably. Objectives The purpose of this study was to re-evaluate the relation between implant surface texturization and capsular contracture rates for breast implants placed in the subglandular plane during primary breast augmentation. Methods Retrospective chart review was performed of all primary subglandular breast augmentation procedures involving the use of either smooth or textured round silicone gel implants, with or without simultaneous mastopexy. The primary outcome measures included clinically significant capsular contracture (Baker grade III/IV) and revision surgery for capsular contracture. Results Between 2010 and 2017, 526 patients underwent primary subglandular breast augmentation with either smooth (n = 212) or textured (n = 314) round silicone gel implants; 248 patients underwent breast augmentation, whereas 278 underwent breast augmentation-mastopexy. Average follow-up was 756 days in the textured group and 461 days in the smooth group. Five cases of capsular contracture were observed in the textured group, and 7 cases of capsular contracture were observed in the smooth group (P = 0.20). Conclusions Smooth surface implants placed in the subglandular plane were not at a significantly increased risk of capsular contracture compared with textured surface implants. We suggest that adherence to a surgical technique focused on minimizing bacterial contamination of the implant is of greater clinical significance than implant surface characteristics when discussing capsular contracture. Level of Evidence: 4

scholarly journals Frontobiparietal remodeling with or without a widening bridge for sagittal synostosis: comparison of 2 cohorts for aesthetic and functional outcome

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Lise C. van Veelen ◽  
Dalibor Mihajlović ◽  
Ruben Dammers ◽  
Hester Lingsma ◽  
Leon N. A. van Adrichem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Head Circumference ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Sagittal Synostosis ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Aesthetic Results ◽  
The Aesthetic ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Over Time

OBJECT Various techniques to correct sagittal synostosis have been described. The authors of this study assess the results of 2 techniques for late complete cranial remodeling and test the hypothesis that adding a widening bridge would improve outcome. METHODS In this retrospective study, the authors evaluated patients with nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis—those who underwent frontobiparietal remodeling (FBR) and those who underwent modified FBR (MFBR) involving the introduction of a bony bridge to increase the width of the skull. Outcomes for both groups are described in terms of the aesthetic results assessed on photographs and any changes in the cranial index (CI) and head circumference over time, the presence of papilledema, and complaints of headache. The effect of the surgical technique on CI and head circumference over time was assessed using linear regression analysis, with adjustment for preoperative CI and head circumference. RESULTS Sixty-nine patients with isolated sagittal synostosis were included in this study: 35 underwent MFBR and 34 underwent the original technique of FBR. The mean follow-up period was 7 years. In the 1st year after surgery, mean CI improved by 9% in the FBR group and by 12% in the MFBR group. One year after surgery, CI in the MFBR group was on average 4.7% higher than that in the FBR group (p < 0.001). During follow-up, CI decreased in both groups; however, at all time points CI was significantly higher in the MFBR group than in the FBR group. The impact of surgical technique on CI was less important than the impact of preoperative CI (R2= 0.26 vs 0.54), and this applied at all time points during follow-up. Head circumference declined during follow-up in both groups. It was influenced by preoperative head circumference, but not by surgical technique. Aesthetic outcome, prevalence of headache (42%), and papilledema (7%) were comparable in both groups. CONCLUSIONS Adding a widening bridge to late complete remodeling significantly improved CI and helped to prevent CI from decreasing in the long term. This addition did not affect the head circumference growth curve. Despite a mean head circumference remaining at +1 SD, patients continued to develop papilledema postoperatively (7%).

Transitioning From Conventional Textured to Nanotextured Breast Implants: Our Early Experience and Modifications for Optimal Breast Augmentation Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Montemurro ◽  
Vincent K S Tay
Keyword(s):  
Breast Augmentation ◽  
Breast Implant ◽  
Capsular Contracture ◽  
Breast Implants ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Capsular Contractures

Abstract Background Nanotextured breast implants were hailed as an innovation that may address capsular contracture and breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma and may provide the sweet spot between smooth and conventional textured implants. Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the introduction of nanotextured implants alongside conventional textured implants and to compare early complications. Methods Patients who underwent breast augmentation from the introduction of nanotextured implants in the author’s practice with at least 1 year of follow-up were included. They were divided into nanotextured and conventional textured implant groups and then into 3 chronological subgroups. Patient characteristics, implant specifications, operative factors, and complication rates were compared. Results A total 415 cases with a mean follow-up of 26.9 months were identified, of which 38.8% utilized nanotextured implants and 61.2% conventional textured implants. Utilization of nanotextured implants increased from 26.9% in period 1 to 54.5% in period 3. Complication rates for the conventional textured group were 0.8% at 1 year and 3.5% on overall follow-up, with mostly capsular contractures; for the nanotextured group, complication rates were 6.8% and 8.7%, respectively, and “bottoming out” was most common. When analyzed across chronological subgroups, complication rates decreased for nanotextured implants by period 3. Conclusions A learning curve and associated complications are expected for early adopters of new implants. In our series, nanotextured implants were associated with higher complication rates at 1 year and on overall follow-up. Modifications in patient selection, intraoperative techniques, and postoperative care reduced complications in the later period. Level of Evidence: 4

The effect of late infection and antibiotic treatment on capsular contracture in silicone breast implants: A rat model

2016 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine E. Miller ◽  
Bernardo Hontanilla ◽  
Alvaro Cabello ◽  
Diego Marre ◽  
Leticia Armendariz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Treatment ◽  
Rat Model ◽  
Capsular Contracture ◽  
Breast Implants ◽  
Late Infection ◽  
Silicone Breast Implants

Dermatography: 10 Years of Applications as an Adjuvant Treatment after Nipple and Areola Reconstruction

2000 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eddy M. Van Der Velden ◽  
Brigitte H. I. M. Drost ◽  
Otto E. Ijsselmuiden ◽  
Abraham M. Baruchin
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Breast Surgery ◽  
Total Resection ◽  
Refined Method ◽  
Aesthetic Results ◽  
The Aesthetic ◽  
Small Parts ◽  
Bilateral Reconstruction ◽  
Over Time

Introduction: Nipple and areola reconstruction have recently become in demand because more women are having breast surgery because of breast cancer diagnoses. Many methods for reconstructing the nipple and areola of the breast have been described and several treatment methods have been developed to improve the aesthetic results. The purpose of this paper is to describe one method, dermatography, a refined method of medical tattooing and the results obtained from this method. Materials and Methods: Over 10 years, 112 patients were treated with dermatography for nipple and areola reconstructions. Of these, 89 patients had received a unilateral reconstruction and 23 received a bilateral reconstruction. The first dermatographic treatment was given 8–12 months after the last intervention by the plastic surgeon. The average session lasted 45 minutes. Results were assessed by means of a short questionnaire. Results over time were evaluated by comparing pictures from previous sessions. Dermatography uses a modified tattooing called a dermainjector machine. Keloidectomy is the technique used to reduce keloid in postoperative scars. The needles of the dermainjector are positioned at an angle of 70–90 degrees to the scar surface. Small parts of the keloid are removed. At the same time pigmentation is performed. Results: Patients evaluated their results as satisfactory. Pigmentation over 5 years was judged to be stable with minor loss of pigment in only 6% of the patients, all of whom received radiation therapy for their cancer. Dermatography was well tolerated by the patients. None of the patients required local anesthesia. Discussion: Patients receiving total resection of their breasts are getting younger and perceiving the results as a severe deformation of their bodies. Results of reconstruction are judged very critically. We found that our patients considered the general visual aspect of the nipple and areola shape more important, and most of the patients did not consider reconstruction of the actual nipple mound to be necessary.

Otoplasty for Prominent Ears: A Versatile Combined Technique to Master the Shape of the Ear

2007 ◽  
Vol 137 (2) ◽  
pp. 224-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marzia Salgarello ◽  
Carlo Gasperoni ◽  
Antonella Montagnese ◽  
Eugenio Farallo
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Prominent Ears ◽  
Major Complications ◽  
Aesthetic Results ◽  
Skin Excision ◽  
The Aesthetic ◽  
Combined Technique

OBJECTIVE: We present our experience with an otoplasty technique that combines “closed” anterior scoring using the Stenström otoabrader with mattress sutures to the posterior cartilage. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: In a retrospective study, we report our experience with 135 patients operated on in the last 12 years. Some surgical principles make our procedure different from previous combination techniques: the posterior access incision is linear without skin excision; anterior scoring is performed along the entire antihelix and scapha, with care to score toward the concha at the tail of the antihelix to bring the ear lobe nearer to the mastoid; Mustarde's mattress sutures are used to stabilize the result. RESULTS: There were no major complications and few minor complications. The aesthetic results were graded as very good or good in 95% of the cases; the rest were graded as satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: Our technique is versatile, gives pleasant, natural-looking results, and has a low complication rate. It is a simple, reliable, reproducible, and easily mastered method.

scholarly journals The A, B and C’s of Silicone Breast Implants: Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, Biofilm and Capsular Contracture

Materials ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 2393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Mempin ◽  
Honghua Hu ◽  
Durdana Chowdhury ◽  
Anand Deva ◽  
Karen Vickery
Keyword(s):  
Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Biofilm Formation ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Breast Implant ◽  
Capsular Contracture ◽  
Breast Implants ◽  
Surface Characteristics ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Breast Implantation ◽  
Large Cell Lymphoma

Breast implantation either for cosmetic or reconstructive e purposes is one of the most common procedures performed in plastic surgery. Biofilm infection is hypothesised to be involved in the development of both capsular contracture and anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). Capsular contracture is one of the principal reasons for breast revision surgery and is characterised by the tightening and hardening of the capsule surrounding the implant, and ALCL is an indolent lymphoma found only in women with textured implants. We describe the types of breast implants available with regard to their surface characteristics of surface area and roughness and how this might contribute to capsular contracture and/or biofilm formation. The pathogenesis of capsular contracture is thought to be due to biofilm formation on the implant, which results in on-going inflammation. We describe the current research into breast implant associated ALCL and how implant properties may affect its pathogenesis, with ALCL only occurring in women with textured implants.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document