Abstract
Objective
The use of IVIG plus high- or low-dose aspirin for the initial treatment of Kawasaki disease remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of IVIG plus high-dose aspirin compared with IVIG plus low-dose aspirin in the treatment of Kawasaki disease.
Methods
Studies related to aspirin therapy for Kawasaki disease were selected by searching the databases of Medline (PubMed), Embase and the Cochrane Library before March 2019. Statistical analyses were performed by using a Review Manager Software package and STATA v.15.1.
Results
Eight retrospective cohort studies, characterizing 12 176 patients, were analysed. Overall, no significant difference was found in the incidence of coronary artery abnormalities between the high- and low-dose aspirin groups [relative risk (RR) 1.15; 95% CI: 0.93, 1.43; P = 0.19; random-effects model]. The patients treated with high-dose aspirin had slightly faster resolution of fever [mean difference (MD) −0.30; 95% CI: −0.58, −0.02; P = 0.04; random-effects model]. but the rates of IVIG resistance (RR, 1.26; 95% CI: 0.55, 2.92; P = 0.59; random-effects model) and days in hospital (MD, 0.22; 95% CI: −0.93, 1.37; P = 0.71; random-effects model) were similar between the two groups.
Conclusion
Low-dose aspirin plus IVIG might be as effective as high-dose aspirin plus IVIG for the initial treatment of Kawasaki disease. Considering that high-dose aspirin may cause more adverse reactions than low-dose aspirin, low-dose aspirin plus IVIG should be recommended as the first-line therapy in the initial treatment of Kawasaki disease.
A discrete-time survival model with random effects for designing and analyzing repeated low-dose challenge experiments
