scholarly journals 208 Assessment of The Impact Of COVID-19 On the Management of Patients with Neck of Femur Fractures in A Major Trauma Center In Wales

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Solari ◽  
Z Ansar
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Neck Of Femur ◽  
Average Length Of Stay ◽  
Femur Fractures ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction Neck of femur (NOF) fractures form a significant proportion of trauma. Especially since they do not benefit from COVID-19 social isolation policies. Surgery and hospital admissions present risks to patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method Retrospective analysis of all NOF fractures from 24/3/20 to 26/6/20 in Morriston Hospital. Directly compared with 2019, allowing assessment of COVID-19’s impact. Results 179 NOF fractures were admitted, 158 had an operation. Increased from 127 patients in 2019. Average time to surgery increased from 39 to 67 hours. There were operation delays for 98 patients, and non-operative treatment increased from 2 to 21 patients. Prompt orthogeriatric reviews completed in 80.4% patients in 2020, up from 72.5%. Prompt physiotherapy review increased from 66.9% to 74.6%. Mortality remained similar at 8.6% (2019) and 8.5% (2020). Average length of stay reduced; 17.4 to 11 days in 2020. Conclusions 2020 saw increased waits for operations. There was reduction in length of stay and improved promptness of orthogeriatric and physiotherapy reviews. Increased non-operative treatment in 2020, reflecting decisions about risks and benefits of surgery in the pandemic. Mortality remained stable. This department improved some aspects of care, potentially due to pressures of COVID-19 heightening awareness of patient's needs.

scholarly journals 1671 The Effect Of COVID-19 On the Management and Outcome of Neck of Femur Fractures in A District General Hospital - A Comparative Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Linardatou Novak ◽  
B Davies ◽  
A Bacon ◽  
A MacDowell
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Femur Fracture ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Multidisciplinary Care ◽  
District General Hospital ◽  
Neck Of Femur ◽  
Time To Surgery ◽  
Average Length Of Stay ◽  
Femur Fractures ◽  
Neck Of Femur Fracture

Abstract Aim We wanted to see how the virus has impacted the management and outcome of our neck of femur fracture patients during Spring 2020. Method We performed a retrospective study of all neck of femur fracture patients presenting to our hospital from 23rd March 2020 (start of official lockdown in UK) until the end of May 2020 and compared them to patients presenting in the same time period in 2019. We recorded patient demographics, COVID-19 swab results, time to surgery, length of stay, transfers between wards, and 30-day mortality rates. Results We identified 75 patients in 2020 compared to 88 in 2019. Average length of stay was 11.4 days compared to 14.3 a year earlier. Mean time to surgery was 32.3 hours compared to 31.6 in 2019. The 30-day mortality increased significantly from 5.7% (5/88) in 2019 to 16% (12/75) in 2020 (p < 0.05) From 73 patients tested for COVID-19, 3 had a positive swab. Of these, 2 died. During their admission, 14 patients were transferred to 3 or more wards; in this group, 30-day mortality was 42.9% (6/14). Conclusions There has been a significant increase in 30-day mortality during COVID-19. Despite maintaining our time to surgery and reducing overall length of stay, we saw an increase in mortality, associated with multiple ward transfers rather than a high number of COVID-19 positive swab cases. Changes in pathways and wards configurations led to some patients requiring multiple transfers. This can cause difficulties in coordinated, multidisciplinary care for patients with NOF Fractures.

scholarly journals 1365 Analysis of Outcomes Pre- and Post-Physiotherapy Protocol for Centenarian Patients Presenting with Neck of Femur Fractures

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Shaladi ◽  
I Abdelkarim ◽  
J Kitson
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Inpatient Mortality ◽  
Neck Of Femur ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Patient Demographics ◽  
Average Length Of Stay ◽  
Femur Fractures ◽  
Improved Outcomes ◽  
Future Management

Abstract Aim The number of centenarians has quadrupled over the last 2 decades with an increase in the number presenting with proximal femur fractures. Very little is known about mortality and morbidity in this age group. There is a subjective assumption that they are too frail and may not do well with surgery. This audit aims to outline improved outcomes of surgery in centenarian patients with NOF fractures following dedicated modified physiotherapy intervention. Method Data reviewing centenarian NOF outcomes over a two-year period (2015-2016) was compared with outcomes following a dedicated post-operative physiotherapy trust protocol for centenarian NOF patients. 16 patients (15 female, 1 male) from Jan 2017- August 2019 were identified. Data was analysed for patient demographics, surgical details including anaesthesia, post-operative complications, physiotherapy outcomes and mortality. Results 10 patients had dynamic hip screws and 6 patients had hemiarthroplasties. Inpatient mortality was 0% compared to previous audit of 8.3%. The average length of stay had reduced from 23.3 days in previous audit to 18.5 days in current. 82% of patients could transfer with frame in the post-operative period. Conclusions Positive surgical outcomes are demonstrated even in centenarians particularly when given tailored post-operative physiotherapy with reduced length of stay, mortality, and high levels of physiotherapy compliance. Comparisons with younger elderly patients will help guide future management.

scholarly journals Times of change in complex environments - Evaluating hospital co-payments in Palestine refugee camps

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
S V Valente de Almeida ◽  
H Ghattas ◽  
G Paolucci ◽  
A Seita
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Policy Change ◽  
Negative Binomial ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Policy Impact ◽  
Average Length Of Stay ◽  
Ex Post ◽  
The Impact

Abstract We measure the impact introducing a of 10% co-payment component on hospitalisation costs for Palestine refugees from Lebanon in public and private hospitals. This ex-post analysis provides a detailed insight on the direction and magnitude of the policy impact in terms of demand and supply for healthcare. The data was collected by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East and include episode level information from all public, private and Red Crescent Hospitals in Lebanon, between April 2016 and October 2017. This is a complete population episode level dataset with information from before and after the policy change. We use multinomial logit, negative binomial and linear models to estimate the policy impact on demand by type of hospital, average length of stay and treatment costs for the patient and the provider. After the new policy was implemented patients were 18% more likely to choose a (free-of-charge) PRCS hospital for secondary care, instead of a Private or Public hospital, where the co-payment was introduced. This impact was stronger for episodes with longer stays, which are also the more severe and more expensive cases. Average length of stay decreased in general for all hospitals and we could not find a statistically significant impact on costs for the provider nor the patient. We find evidence that the introduction of co-payments is hospital costs led to a shift in demand, but it is not clear to what extent the hospitals receiving this demand shift were prepared for having more patients than before, also because these are typically of less quality then the others. Regarding costs, there is no evidence that the provider managed to contain costs with the new policy, as the demand adapted to the changes. Our findings provide important information on hospitalisation expenses and the consequences of a policy change from a lessons learned perspective that should be taken into account for future policy decision making. Key messages We show that in a context of poverty, the introduction of payment for specific hospital types can be efficient for shifting demand, but has doubtable impact on costs containment for the provider. The co-payment policy can have a negative impact on patients' health since after its implementation demand increased at free-of-charge hospitals, which typically have less resources to treat patients.

Impact of Length of Stay on Functional Outcomes of TBI Patients

2005 ◽  
Vol 71 (11) ◽  
pp. 920-930 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.L. Hawkins ◽  
F.D. Lewis ◽  
R.S. Medeiros
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Inpatient Care ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Average Length Of Stay ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Group 1

The purpose of this study was to compare the functional outcomes of two groups of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) with attention to the impact of reduced length of stay (LOS) in the trauma center (TC) and rehabilitation hospital (RH). From 1991 to 1994, 55 patients, Group 1, with serious TBI (Abbreviated Injury Scale score ≥3) were admitted to a level 1 TC and subsequently transferred to a comprehensive inpatient RH. These results have been previously published. From 1996 to 2002, 64 similarly injured patients, Group 2, received inpatient care at the same TC and RH. These patients had a marked decrease in length of stay. Functional Independence Measures (FIM) were obtained at admission (Adm), discharge (D/C), and at 1 year follow-up for both groups. The average length of stay at the TC dropped from 36 days in Group 1 to 26 days in Group 2. In addition, the average length of stay at the RH dropped from 46 days (Group 1) to 25 days (Group 2); overall, an average reduction of 31 days of inpatient care. Group 2 had significantly lower FIM scores at the time of RH discharge for self-care, locomotion, and mobility compared to Group 1. At the 1 year follow-up, however, there were no significant differences between Groups 1 and 2 in these FIM scores. FIM scores at 1 year were higher in Group 2 for communication (90% vs 71%) and social cognition (77% vs 49%) compared to Group 1. Over one-fourth of each group returned to work by the 1 year follow-up. Socially disruptive behavior occurred at least weekly in 28 per cent (Group 1) and 23 per cent (Group 2) of patients. The outcome for serious TBI is better than generally perceived. Reduction of inpatient LOS did not adversely affect the ultimate functional outcome. The decreased LOS placed a greater demand on outpatient rehabilitative services as well as a greater burden on the family of the brain-injured patient

Recent Critical Trends in Mental Hospital Admissions in the Oxford Region

1962 ◽  
Vol 108 (452) ◽  
pp. 59-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Barr ◽  
D. Golding ◽  
R. W. Parnell
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Mental Hospital ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Time Study ◽  
Ministry Of Health ◽  
Mental Hospitals ◽  
Average Length Of Stay ◽  
One Year

The statistics on mental hospitals published by the Ministry of Health (1957) show that the average length of stay for admissions to mental hospitals decreased in the period 1952–1956. According to the Registrar-General's Mental Health Supplement (1961) there was an average saving, between 1951 and 1958, of sixteen days for men and thirteen days for women, among patients staying less than one year. But these figures for stay only relate to the patients discharged each year, irrespective of the year of their admission, and furthermore we do not know what happens to particular groups such, for example, as schizophrenics. Although remarkable changes are occurring at the present time, study of them is hampered by lack of appropriate and up-to-date information.

Predicting the impact of new health technologies on average length of stay: Development of a prediction framework

2005 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 487-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sue Simpson ◽  
Claire Packer ◽  
Andrew Stevens ◽  
James Raftery
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Health Management ◽  
Average Length ◽  
New Technology ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Average Length Of Stay ◽  
Admission Policies ◽  
Mechanism Of Impact ◽  
The Impact

Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop a framework to predict the impact of new health technologies on average length of hospital stay.Methods: A literature search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Health Management Information Consortium databases was conducted to identify papers that discuss the impact of new technology on length of stay or report the impact with a proposed mechanism of impact of specific technologies on length of stay. The mechanisms of impact were categorized into those relating to patients, the technology, or the organization of health care and clinical practice.Results: New health technologies have a variable impact on length of stay. Technologies that lead to an increase in the proportion of sicker patients or increase the average age of patients remaining in the hospital lead to an increase in individual and average length of stay. Technologies that do not affect or improve the inpatient case mix, or reduce adverse effects and complications, or speed up the diagnostic or treatment process should lead to a reduction in individual length of stay and, if applied to all patients with the condition, will reduce average length of stay.Conclusions: The prediction framework we have developed will ensure that the characteristics of a new technology that may influence length of stay can be consistently taken into consideration by assessment agencies. It is recognized that the influence of technology on length of stay will change as a technology diffuses and that length of stay is highly sensitive to changes in admission policies and organization of care.

The Efficiency of Acute Care Bed Utilization in Newfoundland and Labrador

1998 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 15-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Doyle ◽  
Brendan J. Barrett ◽  
Jackie McDonald ◽  
Jerry McGrath ◽  
Patrick S. Parfrey
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Newfoundland And Labrador ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Average Length ◽  
National Data ◽  
Inappropriate Use ◽  
Average Length Of Stay ◽  
Evaluation Protocol ◽  
Canadian Institute

Hospital efficiency is closely related to utilization levels and length of stay. This study determined whether inappropriate bed utilization in Newfoundland was related to inefficiency or inadequate access to alternative services. It also compared Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) data to our survey to determine whether they provide comparable information for monitoring efficiency. Inappropriate acute care days were identified using a modified Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol. Average length of stay (ALOS) by service for each of the province's acute care institutions was also reviewed from 1993–94 to 1995–96 using the CIHI database. Hospital admissions were inappropriate in 14.2 percent of 2,007 cases. Of the 14,194 days of care, 22.8 percent were inappropriate, with most (16.4 percent) being avoidable with better use of existing resources. Of the inappropriate days, 49.2 percent related to physicians' functions. The provincial ALOS fell from 5.70 days in 1993–94 to 5.39 days in 1995–96, but remains 10.5 percent above the national average. CIHI national data for ALOS by service correlated with the percent of inappropriate days by service (r=0.57). Excess bed utilization remains because of the inappropriate use of existing services, and almost half of the total inappropriate days in hospital could be influenced by physicians. CIHI data on LOS can be used to target services or physicians for focused intervention.

scholarly journals The evaluation of a highly specialist inpatient psychologist working with patients with high risk presentations in an acute mental health inpatient setting

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-40
Author(s):  
Lisa Wood ◽  
Claudia Alonso ◽  
Tirma Morera ◽  
Claire Williams
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Clinical Data ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Inpatient Setting ◽  
Slight Reduction ◽  
Average Length Of Stay ◽  
Restrictive Practice ◽  
The Impact

Objective: To evaluate the function and impact of a highly specialist psychologist working with high risk patients in an acute mental health inpatient setting. The impact was examined on outcomes such as risk related incidents, re-admission, average length of stay, and use of restrictive practice.<br/> Method: A mixed methods service evaluation of a pilot project was undertaken to examine the impact of the specialist psychologist role on these outcomes over a 17-month period. Demographic and clinical data was collected for 18 patients who were seen by the psychologist. Routinely collected clinical data examining risk incidents, re-admission rates, average length of stay, and use of restrictive practice, were also used to evaluate outcome across the evaluation period (at baseline and six-month follow-up).<br/> Results: The specialist psychologist provided input to patients' care and undertook a variety of direct and indirect work and training. Examination of descriptive routine clinical data indicated a slight reduction in risk related incidents, readmissions, and average length of stay after the introduction of the psychologist role, however these were not statistically significant.<br/> Conclusion: These initial findings suggest the potential for outcome improvement, but further, more robust research is required to see if such a role can have a significant impact on outcomes.

scholarly journals The impact of inpatient bed capacity on length of stay

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan Walsh ◽  
Samantha Smith ◽  
Maev-Ann Wren ◽  
James Eighan ◽  
Seán Lyons
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Public Hospital ◽  
Negative Binomial ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Average Length Of Stay ◽  
Bed Capacity ◽  
Direction Of Causation ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Inpatient Length Of Stay

Abstract Objective Large reductions in inpatient length of stay and inpatient bed supply have occurred across health systems in recent years. However, the direction of causation between length of stay and bed supply is often overlooked. This study examines the impact of changes to inpatient bed supply, as a result of recession-induced healthcare expenditure changes, on emergency inpatient length of stay in Ireland between 2010 and 2015. Study design We analyse all public hospital emergency inpatient discharges in Ireland from 2010 to 2015 using the administrative Hospital In-Patient Enquiry dataset. We use changes to inpatient bed supply across hospitals over time to examine the impact of bed supply on length of stay. Linear, negative binomial, and hospital–month-level fixed effects models are estimated. Results U-shaped trends are observed for both average length of stay and inpatient bed supply between 2010 and 2015. A consistently large positive relationship is found between bed supply and length of stay across all regression analyses. Between 2010 and 2012 while length of stay fell by 6.4%, our analyses estimate that approximately 42% (2.7% points) of this reduction was associated with declines in bed supply. Conclusion Changes in emergency inpatient length of stay in Ireland between 2010 and 2015 were closely related to changes in bed supply during those years. The use of length of stay as an efficiency measure should be understood in the contextual basis of other health system changes. Lower length of stay may be indicative of the lack of resources or available bed supply as opposed to reduced demand for care or the shifting of care to other settings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document