scholarly journals 10 Complete Mesocolic Excision Produces Favorable Survival Outcomes Compared to Conventional Colectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Z G W Ow ◽  
W Sim ◽  
K R Y Nistala ◽  
C H Ng ◽  
C S Chong
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Complete Mesocolic Excision ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Mesocolic Excision ◽  
Disease Free

Abstract Introduction Conventional colectomy, and the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) D2 Lymphadenectomy (LND2), are the standards of care for the surgical management of colon cancer. Colectomy with complete mesocolic excision (CME) and JSCCR D3 Lymphadenectomy (LND3) are alternative, and more radical procedures, that provide greater lymph nodal clearance. However, controversy exists over the long-term survival benefits of CME/LND3 over non-CME colectomies (NCME)/LND2. Method In this study, we performed a meta-analysis to compare the survival outcomes of CME/LND3 with NCME/LND2. Medline and Embase databases were searched for articles reporting survival outcomes of both CME/LND3 and NCME/LND2, with comparisons presented using odds ratios (OR). Results Ten studies were included in this analysis. Overall and disease-free survival favored CME/LND3 (3-year OS: OR = 1.56; CI 1.22-2.00; p = 0.0004, 5-year OS: OR = 1.29; CI 1.02-1.64, p = 0.03, 3-year DFS: OR = 1.45; CI 1.12-1.88; p = 0.005, 5-year DFS: OR = 1.61; CI 1.14-2.28; p = 0.007). Overall and disease-free survival rates at five years were 79.8% and 85.9%, and 74.6% and 78.0%, in the CME/LND3 and NCME/LND2 groups respectively. Conclusions This is the first meta-analysis to demonstrate that CME/LND3 has superior long-term survival outcomes compared to NCME/LND2, hence a strong case can be made for incorporating CME/LND3 into standard care practice.

scholarly journals Long-term outcomes after complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer at a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-211
Author(s):  
Reem A. Alharbi ◽  
Riyadh Hakami ◽  
Khayal A. Alkhayal ◽  
Omar A. Al-Obeed ◽  
Thamer A. Bin Traiki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Complete Mesocolic Excision ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Mesocolic Excision ◽  
Disease Free

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Data on long-term survival and recurrence of cancer after complete mesocolic excision (CME) for colon cancer has not been reported from our center and related to international data. OBJECTIVE: Describe overall and disease-free survival, survival by surgery site and stage, and recurrence rates after curative surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTINGS: Academic tertiary care center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included all patients who underwent either laparoscopic or open surgery for colon cancer with curative intent between 2001 and 2011. The colorectal database was reviewed for the following: demographic data, comorbidities, radiologic investigations, clinical stage, type of operation, complications, pathologic assessment, adjuvant treatment, recurrence and survival. Survival and recurrence rates were calculated, and survival curves were generated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 5-year overall survival, secondary endpoints were 5-year disease-free survival, survival by surgery site and stage, and recurrence rates. SAMPLE SIZE: 220. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 57 (13) years (CI 95%: 55-59 years). There were 112 males. Mean (SD) body mass index was 27.6 (5.7) kg/m 2 (CI 95%: 27-28). Pathological assessment revealed R0 (microscopically margin-negative) resection in 207 (94%). The overall 5-year survival and disease-free survival was 77.9% and 70%, respectively. The 5-year disease-free survival was 69% for the sigmoid/left colon and 69% for the right colon (difference statistically nonsignificant). Stages at the time of resection were stage 0 for 2 (0.01%) patients, stage I for 18 (8%), stage II for 92 (42%), stage III for 100 (46%), and stage IV for 6 (3%). The 5-year overall survival by stages I, II, III and IV was 94%, 80%, 75% and 50%, respectively (difference statistically non-significant). The overall 5-year recurrence rate was 23.4%. CONCLUSION: The outcomes of surgical treatment for colon cancer at our institution are equivalent to international sites. No difference was noted between left and right colon in terms of survival after CME. LIMITATIONS: Single center, retrospective, small sample size. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.

Long-term disease-free survival in small-cell carcinoma of the lung: a study of clinical determinants.

1986 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 1307-1313 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Osterlind ◽  
H H Hansen ◽  
M Hansen ◽  
P Dombernowsky ◽  
P K Andersen
Keyword(s):  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Disease Extent ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Stage Disease ◽  
Disease Free

The influence of treatment and of pretreatment patient characteristics on the probability of long-term disease-free survival in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) was investigated in a consecutive series of 874 patients. The patients were included in six controlled treatment trials from 1973 to 1981, using different combinations of chemotherapy with or without irradiation. All patients underwent pretreatment staging, including bronchoscopy, peritoneoscopy with liver biopsy, and bone marrow examination. The same procedures were repeated in patients without overt signs of disease 18 months from initiation of treatment, and patients without evidence of SCLC were regarded as long-term survivors. Seventy-two patients were disease-free at restaging, corresponding to 13% of 443 patients with limited-stage disease and 3% of 431 patients with extensive-stage disease. The possible relationship between different pretreatment variables and the probability of 18 months' disease-free survival was investigated by multiple regression analysis. Disease extent was the most important determinant of long-term survival. Being a woman was a positive factor and hypouricemia had negative influence on the long-term results, while features such as performance status and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) did not have significant influence in the regression model. Differences between the efficacy of the applied treatment regimens were less in limited disease than they were in extensive disease, in which six-agent regimens of alternating chemotherapy was significantly better than treatment with three- or four-agent regimens. Accordingly, disease extent seems to be the most pivotal determinant of long-term survival in SCLC, but influence of the patient's sex and serum urate concentration should also be considered.

P159 THE IMPACT OF POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS ON LONG-TERM SURVIVAL AND DISEASE RECURRENCE FOLLOWING OESOPHAGO-GASTRIC CANCER RESECTION

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
J H Saunders ◽  
F Yanni ◽  
M S Dorrington ◽  
C R Bowman ◽  
R S Vohra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Disease Free

Abstract Aim Postoperative complications following the resection of oesophago-gastric carcinoma can result in considerable early morbidity and mortality, however the long-term effects are less clear. Literature reports are mixed, so it remains unclear if complications reduce survival, as has been demonstrated in colorectal cancer. Background & Methods Some 1100 patients who underwent oesophago-gastric resection between 2006-16 were stratified by complication severity to determine the effect of leak and severe non-leak related complications on overall survival, recurrence and disease free survival. Results The median age was 69 years, 48% had stage III disease, with cancer recurrence in 39%. Clavien-Dindo (CD) complications ≥ III occurred in 22.2% of patients. The most common complications were pulmonary (30%), with a 13% incidence of pneumonia, 10% atrial dysrhythmia and 9.6% anastomotic leak. In comparison to CD 0-I complication free patients, those with CD III-IV leak did not suffer a significantly reduced survival. However patients with CD III-IV non-leak related complications were associated with a significant reduction in median overall survival (19.7 vs. 42.7 months) and disease free survival (18.4 vs. 36.4 months). Cox regression revealed age, stage, resection margin, and CD III-IV non-leak complications as independently associated with poor overall and disease free survival. Conclusion This cohort demonstrates that whilst leak does not affect long-term survival, other severe postoperative complications do significantly reduce overall survival and disease recurrence. A reduction in these complications, such as pneumonia, seen with adoption of hybrid / minimally invasive surgery may help change this pattern of disease recurrence and reduced survival.

scholarly journals Multimodal management of gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: Which type of neoadjuvant treatment?

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Zandirad ◽  
H Teixeira-Farinha ◽  
N Demartines ◽  
M Schäfer ◽  
S Mantziari
Keyword(s):  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Disease Free

Abstract Objective The current treatment for locally advanced gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma consists of neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) followed by surgery. Preoperative chemotherapy (CT) and radio-chemotherapy (RCT) are both valid options, but comparative data for their efficacy remain scarce. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of RCT and CT to achieve a complete pathologic response (CPR) for locally advanced GEJ adenocarcinoma. Secondary endpoints were R0 resection rates, postoperative complications, long-term survival and recurrence. Methods All consecutive patients with locally advanced GEJ adenocarcinoma treated with CT or RCT and oncologic resection from 2009 to 2018 were included. A CPR was defined with the Mandard tumor regression score. Standard statistical tests were used as appropriate. Overall and disease-free survival were compared with the Kaplan Meier method and log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed to define independent predictors of CPR, and long-term survival. Results Among the 94 patients (84%male, median age 62 years [IQR 9.7]), 67 (71.3%) received preoperative RCT and 27 (28.7%) CT. Patient’s characteristics and pretreatment tumor stages were comparable. Surgical approach was thoracoabdominal Lewis resection in 95.5% RCT and 81.5% CT patients (P = 0.085). CPR was more frequent in the RCT than the CT group (13.4% vs 7.4%, P = 0.009), but R0 resection rates were similar (72.1% vs 66.7%, P = 0.628). There was a trend to higher ypN0 stage in the RCT group (55.2% vs 33.3%; P = 0.057). Postoperatively, RCT patients presented more cardiovascular complications (35.8% vs 11.1%; P = 0.017), although overall morbidity was similar (68.6% vs 62.9%, P = 0.988). 5-year overall survival was comparable (61.1% RCT vs 75.7% CT, P = 0.259), as was 5-year disease-free survival (33.5% RCT vs 22.8% CT, P = 0.763). Isolated loco-regional recurrence occurred in 2.9% RCT vs 3.7% CT patients (P = 0.976). NAT type was not an independent predictor for complete pathologic response nor long-term survival in the multivariate analysis. Median follow-up was 30 months [95%CI 21.3-38.8] for all patients. Conclusion Patients with locally advanced GEJ adenocarcinoma demonstrated higher rates of CPR after RCT than CT, and a trend to a better lymph node sterilization, although this did not translate in a significant survival benefit or decreased recurrence rate.

scholarly journals Comparing the Effectiveness of Endoscopic Surgeries With Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Recurrent rT3 and rT4 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhouying Peng ◽  
Yumin Wang ◽  
Yaxuan Wang ◽  
Ruohao Fan ◽  
Kelei Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
T Stage ◽  
Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Disease Free

BackgroundThis meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and endoscopic surgery (ES) for high T-stage recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).MethodsRelevant studies were retrieved in six databases from 02/28,2011 to 02/28,2021. The 2-year, 3-year, 5-year overall survival (OS) rates and 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were calculated to compare the survival outcomes of the two treatments of IMRT and ES. Combined odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence interval (C Is) were measured as effect size on the association between high T-stage and 5-year OS rates.ResultsA total of 23 publications involving 2,578 patients with recurrent NPC were included in this study. Of these, 1611 patients with recurrent rT3-4 NPC were treated with ES and IMRT in 358 and 1,253 patients, respectively. The combined 2-year OS and 5-year OS rates for the two treatments were summarized separately, and the 2-year OS and 5-year OS rate for ES were 64% and 52%, respectively. The 2-year OS and 5-year OS rate for IMRT were 65% and 31%, respectively. The combined 2-year DFS rates of IMRT and ES were 60% and 50%, respectively. Combined ORs and 95% confidence intervals for 5-year survival suggest that ES may improve survival in recurrent NPC with rT3-4. In terms of complications, ES in the treatment of high T-stage recurrent NPC is potentially associated with fewer complications.ConclusionsThe results of our study suggest that ES for rT3-4 may be a better treatment than IMRT, but the conclusion still needs to be sought by designing more studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document