scholarly journals Southampton Arm Fracture Frailty and Sarcopenia Study (SAFFSS): a study protocol for the feasibility of assessing frailty and sarcopenia among older patients with an upper limb fracture

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e031275
Author(s):  
Kinda Ibrahim ◽  
Mark Mullee ◽  
Guiqing Lily Yao ◽  
Shihua Zhu ◽  
Mark Baxter ◽  
...  

IntroductionFalls are a major health problem for older people; 35% of people aged 65+ years fall every year, leading to fractures in 10%–15%. Upper limb fractures are often the first sign of osteoporosis and routine screening for osteoporosis is recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence to prevent subsequent hip fractures. However, both frailty and sarcopenia (muscle weakness) are associated with increased risk of falling and fracture but are not routinely identified in this group. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of assessing and managing frailty and sarcopenia among people aged 65+ years with an upper limb fracture.Methods and analysisThis study will be conducted in three fracture clinics in one acute trust in England. 100 people aged 65+ years with an upper arm fracture will be recruited and assessed using six validated frailty measures and two sarcopenia tools. The prevalence of the two conditions and the best tools to use will be determined. Those with either condition will be referred to geriatric clinical teams for comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). We will document the proportion who are referred for CGA and those who receive CGA. Other outcome measures including falls, fractures and healthcare resource use over 6 months will be collected. In-depth interviews with a purposive sample of patients who undergo the frailty and sarcopenia assessments and healthcare professionals in fracture clinics and geriatric services will be carried out to their acceptability of assessing frailty and sarcopenia in a busy environment.Ethics and disseminationThe study was given the relevant ethical approvals from NHS Research Ethics Committee (REC No: 18/NE/0377), the University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, and the University of Southampton, Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee and Research Governance Office. Findings will be published in scientific journals and presented to local, national and international conferences.Trial registration numberISRCTN13848445

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 258-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah T. Lancaster ◽  
Thomas N. Grove ◽  
David A. Woods

Background A proportion of patients who sustain upper limb fractures develop post-traumatic stiffness (PTS), which may progress in a similar way to primary frozen shoulder (PFS). We have had success in treating PFS with manipulation under anaesthetic (MUA) and therefore treated PTS using MUA. Oxford Shoulder Scores (OSS), range of motion (ROM) data pre- and post-MUA, and the need for repeat procedure were compared. Methods Sixty-four patients with PTS following an upper limb fracture, unresponsive to conservative measures, were seen between 1 January 1999 and 1 November 2015. Thirty-two patients had sustained a proximal humeral fracture, six of whom had a concurrent shoulder dislocation. MUA was performed using a standard technique. The results were compared with 487 PFS patients undergoing the same procedure. Results There was no significant difference in ROM change between the groups. Improvement in OSS was slightly greater in the PFS group (17 versus 14, p = 0.005) but, upon subgroup analysis of the PTS group, no significant difference was found for patients presenting with humeral fractures alone. Conclusions MUA results for PTS following upper limb fracture are comparable to MUA for PFS. We therefore recommend MUA in PTS cases where conservative methods have failed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (08) ◽  
pp. 1151-1154
Author(s):  
Sajjad Rasool ◽  
Basharat Manzoor ◽  
Ali Amjad

Introduction: Upper limb fractures are one of the common fractures presentingin Accident and Emergency departments. Some of the upper limb fractures need openreduction and internal fixation. Use of suction drains after upper limb surgery is still debatableissue. Some surgeons routinely use, others never use and few occasionally use. Objectives:Aim of this study was to compare the results of upper limb fracture surgery by using or not usingthe suction drains. Design: Quasi Experimental Design. Settings: Orthopedic department AzizBhatti Shaheed Teaching Hospital Gujrart. Period: From December 2015 to November 2016.Method & Material: Total 120 patients were selected as per selection criteria. In 60 patients weused suction drain post-operatively & remaining 60 patients without Suction drain. Results:In our study we selected 120 patients .Patients divided in two groups. In group A 60 patientsincluded in the study. We did not use suction drain in these patients. In group B we also selected60 patients of upper limb fractures. We used suction drain in these patients. We compared theresults of both groups on the basis of superficial wound infection and pain. In group A, sixpatients developed superficial wound infection while four patients developed superficial woundinfection in group. There was no difference in severity of pain in both groups. Conclusion:We concluded from our study that there is no added advantage of suction drain in upper limbfracture surgery.


Viruses ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1064
Author(s):  
Gitana Scozzari ◽  
Cristina Costa ◽  
Enrica Migliore ◽  
Maurizio Coggiola ◽  
Giovannino Ciccone ◽  
...  

This observational study evaluated SARS-CoV-2 IgG seroprevalence and related clinical, demographic, and occupational factors among workers at the largest tertiary care University-Hospital of Northwestern Italy and the University of Turin after the first pandemic wave of March–April 2020. Overall, about 10,000 individuals were tested; seropositive subjects were retested after 5 months to evaluate antibodies waning. Among 8769 hospital workers, seroprevalence was 7.6%, without significant differences related to job profile; among 1185 University workers, 3.3%. Self-reporting of COVID-19 suspected symptoms was significantly associated with positivity (Odds Ratio (OR) 2.07, 95%CI: 1.76–2.44), although 27% of seropositive subjects reported no previous symptom. At multivariable analysis, contacts at work resulted in an increased risk of 69%, or 24% for working in a COVID ward; contacts in the household evidenced the highest risk, up to more than five-fold (OR 5.31, 95%CI: 4.12–6.85). Compared to never smokers, being active smokers was inversely associated with seroprevalence (OR 0.60, 95%CI: 0.48–0.76). After 5 months, 85% of previously positive subjects still tested positive. The frequency of SARS-COV-2 infection among Health Care Workers was comparable with that observed in surveys performed in Northern Italy and Europe after the first pandemic wave. This study confirms that infection frequently occurred as asymptomatic and underlines the importance of household exposure, seroprevalence (OR 0.60, 95%CI: 0.48–0.76).


Author(s):  
Vanessa Rentrop ◽  
Johanna Sophie Schneider ◽  
Alexander Bäuerle ◽  
Florian Junne ◽  
Nora Dörrie ◽  
...  

Abstract Due to the SARS CoV-2-virus (COVID-19), anxiety, distress, and insecurity occur more frequently. In particular, infected individuals, their relatives, and medical staff face an increased risk of high psychological distress as a result of the ongoing pandemic. Thus, structured psychosocial emergency concepts are needed. The University hospital of Essen has taken up this challenge by creating the PEC concept to reduce psychosocial long-term consequences for infected patients, relatives, and medical staff at the university hospital. The concept includes professional medical as well as psychological support to convey constructive coping strategies and the provision of adequate tools such as the low-threshold online training program (CoPE It), which is accessible via the webpage www.cope-corona.de.


1988 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 308-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. S. Leung ◽  
M. Kwan ◽  
J. Wong ◽  
W. Y. Shen ◽  
A. Tsang

Injury Extra ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (9) ◽  
pp. 122
Author(s):  
E.S. Uppin ◽  
A. Khurana ◽  
U.K. Choudhuri ◽  
R. Trickett

Public Health ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Madhok ◽  
R.S. Bhopal

Bone ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 480-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sulin Cheng ◽  
Leiting Xu ◽  
Patrick H.F. Nicholson ◽  
Frances Tylavsky ◽  
Arja Lyytikäinen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Suhartoyo Winarno ◽  
Anne Mondal ◽  
Franca Christina Martignoni ◽  
Tanja Natascha Fehm ◽  
Monika Hampl

Abstract Background: Sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) technique in unifocal vulvar cancer (diameter of < 4cm) and unsuspicious groin lymph nodes, the morbidity rate of patients has significantly decreased all over the world. In contrast to SLNB, bilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (IFL) has been associated with increased risk of common morbidities. Current guidelines (NCCN, ESGO, RCOG, and German) suggest that in cases of metastasis of unilateral SLNB, groin node dissection with IFL, should be performed bilaterally. However, a publication by Woelber et al. 0% (p=0/28) and Nica et al. 5.3% (p=1/19) contradicted the current guideline. Methods: A single-center analysis conducted in the University Hospital of Dusseldorf, evaluating vulvar cancer patients treated with SLNB retrospectively from 2002 to 2018. Result, discussion and conclusion: Current guideline for bilateral IFL should remain as the standard management because 22.2% women (n=4/18) had contralateral IFL groin metastasis after unilateral SLNB metastasis initially. The depth of tumor infiltrating cells was correlated significantly and positively with the incidence rate of groin metastasis (p=0.0038). Therefore, it is an indication for bilateral IFL.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document