scholarly journals P-BN17 Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy is a safe and effective treatment for gallstone disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Leivers ◽  
Zaher Toumi

Abstract Background Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard treatment of gallstones in fit patients with symptomatic gallbladder disease. If the critical view of safety cannot be achieved intra-operatively, there are few options, one of which is laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy. This study aims to ascertain the outcomes of subtotal cholecystectomy. Methods Retrospective review of all patients who underwent laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy by a single surgeon over a 5 year period. Results 37 consecutive patients who underwent subtotal cholecystectomy were included in this study; seventeen of which were males (49%); the median age was 69, and 18 were emergencies (49%).The most common reasons for conversion to laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy were adhesions (57%) and fibrotic Calot’s triangle (22%). One patient required ERCP and biliary stenting for ongoing bile leak and another returned to theatre for post operative bleeding during index admission. 6 patients (16%) required further hospital admissions for gallstone disease (1 for biliary colic, two for cholecystitis and three for CBD stones). 3 patients required ERCP. None required further gallbladder surgery. Conclusions Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy is a safe and effective alternative to total cholecystectomy when the critical view of safety cannot be achieved. In our experience, only a small proportion of patients have recurrent biliary problems. 

2010 ◽  
Vol 92 (4) ◽  
pp. 302-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Sanjay ◽  
C Kulli ◽  
FM Polignano ◽  
IS Tait

INTRODUCTION There is debate on optimal techniques that reduce bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). A national survey of Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS) members was carried out to determine current surgical practice for gallstones, including the use of intra-operative cholangiography (IOC) or critical view of safety to reduce the risk of bile duct injury. SUBJECTS AND METHODS An anonymous postal survey was sent to all 417 AUGIS members. Data on grade of surgeon, place of work (district general hospital, teaching), subspecialty, number LC per year, use of IOC, critical view of safety, and management of stones detected during surgery were collated. RESULTS There was a 36% (152/417) response – 134 (88%) from consultant surgeons (36, HPB; 106,OG; 64, DGH; 88, teaching hospital). Of these, 38% performed > 100 LC per year, 36% 50–100 LC per year, and 22% 25–50 LC per year. IOC was routine for 24%; and selective for 72%. Critical view of Calot's triangle was advocated by 82%. Overall, 55% first clip and divide the cystic artery, whereas 41% first clip and divide the cystic duct. Some 39% recommend IOC and 23% pre-oper-ative MRCP if dilated common bile duct (CBD) is noted on pre-operative ultrasound. When bile duct stones are identified on IOC, 61% perform laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE), 25% advise postoperative ERCP, and 13% perform either LCBDE or ERCP. Overall, 88% (n = 134) recommend index cholecystectomy for acute pathology, and this is more likely in a teaching hospital setting (P= 0.003). Laparoscopic CBD exploration was more likely to be performed in university hospitals (P< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS A wide dissection of Calot's triangle to provide a critical view of safety is the technique most commonly recommended by AUGIS surgeons (83%) to minimise risk of bile duct injury, in contrast to 24% that recommend routine IOC. The majority (88%) of AUGIS surgeons advise index admission cholecystectomy for acute gallbladder disease.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn Wakam ◽  
Dana Telem

Nearly 9% of men and 30% of women in the United States experience symptoms or complications of gallstone disease. As such, nearly every general surgeon in the country encounters patients with this pathology numerous times during his or her career. Cholelithiasis can cause complications such as acute cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis, gallstone pancreatitis, and the rare entities of Mirizzi syndrome and gallstone ileus. Patients with gallstones have a 1 to 3% risk per year of a complication, and that risk increases significantly to 30% in those with biliary colic. Surgical management of the complications of gallstones is especially intriguing because the cases are often perceived as low complexity; however, it is an operation that can challenge even the most seasoned attending and result in significant complications. Studies demonstrate complication rates up to 10% following cholecystectomy, with bile duct injury rates hovering at 4 in 1,000. This chapter aims to provide the reader with knowledge of the presentation, imaging, work-up, and framework for the management of complicate gallbladder disease. Furthermore, we hope to provide you with a foundation of how to perform a safe cholecystectomy in a variety of circumstances and impart a few tips and tricks for some challenging intraoperative situations. This review contains 2 figures, and 55 references. Key Words: cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis, cholescintigraphy, common bile duct exploration, critical view of safety, ERCP, gallstone pancreatitis, subtotal cholecystectomy


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marwa Al-Azzawi ◽  
Mohamed Abouelazayem ◽  
Chetan Parmar ◽  
Rishi Singhal ◽  
Bassem Amr ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cholecystectomy is one of the commonest abdominal operations performed worldwide. Sometimes, the operation can be technically difficult due to dense adhesions in Calot’s triangle. Conversion to open surgery or subtotal cholecystectomy have been described to deal with these situations. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis on STC suggested high perioperative morbidity associated with STC. These findings are at odds with a previous systematic review and meta-analysis on the topic which concluded that morbidity rates for STC were comparable to those reported for total cholecystectomy. However, both these reviews included patients undergoing Open Subtotal Cholecystectomy (OSTC). This makes it difficult for us to understand the outcomes of LSTC as surgeons are not faced with the choice of converting to open surgery to perform a subtotal cholecystectomy. The choice they face is whether they should perform a LSTC or convert to open surgery to perform a total cholecystectomy. It is, therefore, important to establish the outcomes of LSTC alone (without including patients who underwent OSTC). This is all the more important during COVID-19 pandemic when the complexity of gall stone disease appears to have worsened. There is thus an enhanced need to understand technical nuances and outcomes of LSTC alone. Methods Search strategy: We searched PUBMED (Medline), Google Scholar, and Embase for all relevant English language articles describing experience with LSTC in adult human population (≥18 years) anywhere in the world using key-words like “subtotal cholecystectomy”, “gallbladder resection”, “gallbladder excision”, “gallbladder removal”, “partial”, “incomplete”, “insufficient”, “deroofing”, and “near-total”. Case reports, articles only published as conference abstracts, case series with &lt;5 cases, and reviews were excluded. Only English-language studies were included. Participants: All studies with 5 or more cases, describing any experience with an adult cohort (≥18 years) of patients undergoing STC while attempting a Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy were included. Studies on patients who underwent preoperative cholecystostomy were excluded. Studies that had LSTC as part of another surgery were also excluded as we wanted to understand the morbidity and mortality of LSTC alone. Studies on patients who underwent OSTC (Open from start) were excluded as were those where the LSTC cohort was merged with the OSTC cohort and outcomes of LSTC were not separately reported. Study outcome: Primary outcome measure was early (≤30 days) morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcome measures were bile duct injury, bile leak rates, conversion to open surgery rates, duration of hospital stay, and late (&gt;30 days) morbidity. Results 45 studies were identified, with a total of 2166 patients. Mean age was 55 +/- 15 years with 51% females; 53% (n = 390) were elective procedures. The conversion rate was 6.2% (n = 135). Most common indication was acute cholecystitis (n = 763). Different techniques were used with the majority having a closed cystic duct/gallbladder stump (n = 1188, 71%). The most common closure technique was intracorporeal suturing (53%) followed by endoloop closure. There were a total of four, 30-day mortality [1] in this review. Early morbidity (≤30 days) included bile duct injury (0.23%), bile leak rates (18%), intra-abdominal collection (4%). Reoperation was reported in 23 patients (1%), most commonly for unresolving intra-abdominal collections and failed ERCP to control bile leak. Long term follow-up was reported in 30 studies with a median follow up period of 22 months. Late morbidity included incisional hernias (6%), CBD stones (2%), and symptomatic gallstones in 4% (n = 41) with 2% (n = 22) requiring completion of cholecystectomy. Conclusions Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy is an acceptable alternative in patients with a “difficult” Calot’s triangle. However, this has to be taken seriously as it is associated with a high early and late morbidity and mortality.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Gendia ◽  
S Korambayil ◽  
A Cota ◽  
I Finlay ◽  
M Clarke ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim This report aims to evaluate the use of an AI video analytics platform in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) based on the achievement of the critical view of safety (CVS) and to assess its ability to correctly comment on CVS. Method Touch surgery video platform, an AI-video based analytic tool, was screened for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our institute and analysed from April 2019 till October 2020. Data collected by the AI included identification of the critical view of safety and time needed to achieve CVS. A reviewer graded the LC according to Nasser grading and evaluated the ability of AI to identify the CVS. Results 66 LC were included from our video database. CVS was achieved in only 56% (37/66) in all LC videos included. Mean time spent to attend CVS from start of dissection of Calot’s triangle 16.8 (±13.6) mins. 26 (39.4%) LCs were Nasser grade 2 and 20 (30.3%) each were grade 1 and grade 3. There was no significant difference between number of CVS obtained between all grades. Time spent to achieve CVS from dissecting Calot’s triangle were the longest in grade 3 LCs (28.4±17.4 mins) with significant difference between all 3 grades. Finally, the platform correctly commented on CVS in 92.4% of the all LC videos. Conclusions AI video analytics can provide a useful tool to assess laparoscopic cholecystectomies and the critical view of safety. Additionally, more studies should explore the use of the platfrom and integrate the results with the clinical outcomes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 1160
Author(s):  
Mohinder Singh ◽  
Dipesh Goel

Background: Surgery in chronic cholecystitis is very challenging because of inability to hold the gall bladder, dense adhesions, frozen Calot’s triangle and difficulty in applying clips. Precise and meticulous dissection is required to establish critical view of safety. There is no consensus among surgeons about appropriate intraoperative steps in difficult gall bladder (GB) surgery. The authors aim to present various intraoperative difficulties and strategies to overcome them.  Methods: A prospective study of 81 patients of chronic cholecystitis was done in our institution. They were divided in two groups. Group A in which surgery could be done easily. Group B in which surgery was difficult and different intraoperative strategies were applied to overcome them. Results: Total 42 patients were included in group A and 39 patients in group B. Various difficulties encountered while performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in group B were adhesions (53.8 %), inability to grasp the fundus of GB (15.3%), frozen Calot’s triangle (15.3%), inability to grasp the Hartmann’s pouch (12.8%) and cystic duct edema (2.5%).  Conclusions: Intraoperative technique of identification of Rouviere′s sulcus first, followed by high peritoneal incision on the GB body. Subsequently blunt dissection of Calot’s triangle using gauze piece and hydro dissection by suction irrigation canula ventral to the sulcus. It created a retro gall bladder tunnel safely. It established the critical view of safety in all our cases. 


Author(s):  
Muayad Alkhafaji ◽  
Ahmed Alsagban ◽  
Rawya Reyadh Abbood

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the standard method for the removal of a diseased gallbladder. The technique most commonly employed is the infundibular approach which entails dissecting the gallbladder (GB) from its neck upward, after dissecting the cystic artery and cystic duct using laser or electrocautery. Common bile duct (CBD) injury is one of the most serious complications of LC. misidentification of the bile duct during dissection of the Calot's triangle can lead to such injuries. The critical view of safety (CVS) has been recently discussed in controlled study, it is characterized by dissection of the upper part of the Calot's space, which does not usually contain arterial or biliary anomalies so it is ideal for a safe dissection even in less experienced hands2. This study was amid to introduce a safe method for dissection of the GB away from CBD which forms one boarder in the Calot's triangle. This Prospective clinical analysis of 1000 cases of LC was utilizing the CVS technique over a period from January 2014 to January 2017 was conducted at Al-Diwanyia Teaching Hospital Laparscopic Center.The diagnosis of acute cholecystitis, chronic cholecystitis and cholilithiasis was established with history, physical examination, and ultrasound examination. The patients were categorized for sex, age, operating time and post operative There were 270 (27%) LC for (acute cholecystitis) and 730 (73%) LC for (chronic cholecystitis and cholilithiasis). There were minor significant complications when compared with CBD injuries complications, with short operating time (mean time for operation in our study35.9 minutes). Critical view of safety (CVS) seems to be a safe method of dissection that clearly demonstrating the cystic duct and help to reduce the bile duct injuries.  


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 2296-2297
Author(s):  
Mariam Fatima ◽  
Naeem Ghaffar ◽  
Muhammad Shahid Hussain

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is commonly performed surgical procedure for symptomatic gall stone disease due to its better cosmetic results and shorter hospital stay; however, its safety in some cases is still questionable5. Methods: A retrospective, observational study was done in surgical unit 1, Sir Ganga Ram hospital, Lahore, from January 2017 to December 2019. Results: There were 209 cases whose surgical notes, hospital record and follow up notes were studied. Among these, 21 cases were converted to open. There was no injury of bile duct in any case. Conclusion: Experience of surgeon, careful dissection at calot’s triangle, use of critical view of safety and timely decision for conversion to open were factors participating insafe surgery. Keywords: Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Bile duct injury, critical view of safety


Cureus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramon Vidrio Duarte ◽  
Antonio Ramiro Martínez Martínez ◽  
Luis H Ortega León ◽  
Juan Gutierrez Ochoa ◽  
Ariel Ramírez Nava ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mariana Chávez-Villa ◽  
Ismael Dominguez-Rosado ◽  
Rodrigo Figueroa-Méndez ◽  
Aldair De los Santos-Pérez ◽  
Miguel Angel Mercado

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document