scholarly journals Erratum to: Rezafungin Versus Caspofungin in a Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind Study for the Treatment of Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: The STRIVE Trial

Author(s):  
George R Thompson ◽  
Alex Soriano ◽  
Athanasios Skoutelis ◽  
Jose A Vazquez ◽  
Patrick M Honore ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Rezafungin (RZF) is a novel echinocandin exhibiting distinctive pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics. STRIVE was a phase 2, double-blind, randomized trial designed to compare the safety and efficacy of RZF once weekly (QWk) to caspofungin (CAS) once daily for treatment of candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis (IC). Methods Adults with systemic signs and mycological confirmation of candidemia and/or IC were randomized to RZF 400 mg QWk (400 mg), RZF 400 mg on week 1 then 200 mg QWk (400/200 mg), or CAS 70 mg as a loading dose followed by 50 mg daily for ≤ 4 weeks. Efficacy assessments included overall cure (resolution of signs of candidemia/IC + mycological eradication) at day 14 (primary endpoint), investigator-assessed clinical response at day 14, and 30-day all-cause mortality (ACM) (secondary endpoints), and time to negative blood culture. Safety was evaluated by adverse events and ACM through follow-up. Results Of 207 patients enrolled, 183 were in the microbiological intent-to-treat population (~21% IC). Overall cure rates were 60.5% (46/76) for RZF 400 mg, 76.1% (35/46) for RZF 400/200 mg, and 67.2% (41/61) for CAS; investigator-assessed clinical cure rates were 69.7% (53/76), 80.4% (37/46), and 70.5% (43/61), respectively. 30-day ACM was 15.8% for RZF 400 mg, 4.4% for RZF 400/200 mg, and 13.1% for CAS. Candidemia was cleared in 19.5 and 22.8 hours in RZF and CAS patients, respectively. No concerning safety trends were observed; ACM through follow-up was 15.2% (21/138) for RZF and 18.8% (13/69) for CAS. Conclusions RZF was safe and efficacious in the treatment of candidemia and/or IC.


2013 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 1847-1854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph S. Solomkin ◽  
Mayakonda Krishnamurthy Ramesh ◽  
Gintaras Cesnauskas ◽  
Nikolajs Novikovs ◽  
Penka Stefanova ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTEravacycline is a novel fluorocycline, highly active against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogensin vitro, including those with tetracycline and multidrug resistance. This phase 2, randomized, double-blind study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two dose regimens of eravacycline compared with ertapenem in adult hospitalized patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs). Patients with confirmed cIAI requiring surgical or percutaneous intervention and antibacterial therapy were randomized (2:2:1) to receive eravacycline at 1.5 mg/kg of body weight every 24 h (q24h), eravacycline at 1.0 mg/kg every 12 h (q12h), or ertapenem at 1 g (q24h) for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the clinical response in microbiologically evaluable (ME) patients at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit 10 to 14 days after the last dose of study drug therapy. Overall, 53 patients received eravacycline at 1.5 mg/kg q24h, 56 received eravacycline at 1.0 mg/kg q12h, and 30 received ertapenem. For the ME population, the clinical success rate at the TOC visit was 92.9% (39/42) in the group receiving eravacycline at 1.5 mg/kg q24h, 100% (41/41) in the group receiving eravacycline at 1.0 mg/kg q12h, and 92.3% (24/26) in the ertapenem group. The incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events were 35.8%, 28.6%, and 26.7%, respectively. Incidence rates of nausea and vomiting were low in both eravacycline groups. Both dose regimens of eravacycline were as efficacious as the comparator, ertapenem, in patients with cIAI and were well tolerated. These results support the continued development of eravacycline for the treatment of serious infections, including those caused by drug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01265784.)


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS9126-TPS9126
Author(s):  
Myung-Ju Ahn ◽  
Yufan Liu ◽  
Teresa Improta ◽  
Michelle Marcovitz ◽  
Kate DiPiazza ◽  
...  

TPS9126 Background: Systemic chemotherapy for first-line (1L) metastatic NSCLC shows mixed outcomes. Results from studies using immunotherapy alone or combined with chemotherapy as 1L treatment in patients (pts) with metastatic NSCLC represent a substantial advance, but further improvement is needed. Increased DNA damage triggered by polyadenosine 5’diphosphoribose polymerase inhibition may confer antitumor activity, modify tumor immunogenicity, and further sensitize tumors to immune checkpoint inhibition, thus promoting a more durable antitumor response. This Phase 2, randomized, multicenter, double-blind study (NCT03775486) is designed to assess the efficacy and safety of durvalumab + olaparib vs durvalumab alone as maintenance therapy in pts whose Stage IV NSCLC has not progressed following 1L platinum-based chemotherapy + durvalumab. Methods: Adult pts with Stage IV NSCLC with tumors lacking activating EGFR mutations and ALK fusions are eligible. In the initial therapy phase, all pts will receive durvalumab (1500 mg IV) concurrent with platinum-based doublet therapy. Durvalumab + chemotherapy will be administered for 4 cycles for both squamous NSCLC (nanoparticle albumin-bound [nab]-paclitaxel + carboplatin or gemcitabine + carboplatin/cisplatin) and nonsquamous NSCLC (nab-paclitaxel + carboplatin or pemetrexed + carboplatin/cisplatin). Pts whose disease does not progress (complete or partial response [CR/PR] or stable disease [SD]; investigator-assessed RECIST 1.1) will be randomized (1:1) to durvalumab (1500 mg IV, every 4 weeks) + either olaparib (300 mg, oral, BID) or its matching placebo until disease progression. Randomization will be stratified based on objective response to durvalumab + chemotherapy (CR/PR or SD) during the initial therapy phase and histology (squamous or nonsquamous). The primary endpoint is PFS (investigator-assessed, RECIST 1.1). Secondary endpoints are OS, PFS in pts with homologous recombination repair related gene mutation, ORR, duration of response, HRQoL, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of durvalumab, and safety. Pt enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03775486.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4583-TPS4583
Author(s):  
Martin Henner Voss ◽  
Elizabeth R. Plimack ◽  
Brian I. Rini ◽  
Michael B. Atkins ◽  
Robert Alter ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document