scholarly journals Immune-related Adverse Events in Patients With Cancer Receiving Influenza Vaccination and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (7) ◽  
pp. 1519-1519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geert H Groeneveld ◽  
Dirk H Wijn ◽  
Albert M Vollaard
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Influenza Vaccination ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Patients With Cancer

Immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with cancer

2020 ◽  
pp. 030089162095346
Author(s):  
Nilay Sengul Samanci ◽  
Duygu Ilke Cikman ◽  
Kerem Oruc ◽  
Sahin Bedir ◽  
Emir Çelik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Early Recognition ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Combination Treatments ◽  
Grade 3

Introduction: With the widespread use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), we are facing challenges in the management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). We aimed to characterize the spectrum of toxicity, management, and outcomes for irAEs. Methods: Patients who were treated with at least one ICI in clinical trials, expanded access programs, or routine clinical practice were included. Clinical and laboratory parameters were collected retrospectively to determine the incidence of irAEs, methods of management, and treatment outcomes. Results: A total of 255 patients were screened retrospectively. Of these, 71 (27.8%) patients developed irAEs. More than 2 different types of irAEs were detected in 16 (6.2%) out of 255 patients. A total of 3177 doses were given to 255 patients. In 93 (2.9%) of the 3177 doses, 1 episode of irAEs was experienced. A total of 22 out of 93 (23.7%) episodes were reported as grade 1, 49 (52.7%) as grade 2, 19 (20.4%) as grade 3, and 3 (3.2%) as grade 4. The most frequently seen irAEs were pneumonitis, hepatitis, and hypothyroidism. With regard to treatment, 39 out of 93 episodes (42%) of any grade irAEs occurred after anti–programmed cell death-1 therapy, 47 (50.5%) occurred following administration of anti–programmed death-ligand 1, and 7 (7.5%) occurred after combination treatments. Conclusion: With the increased use of immunotherapeutic agents, increased awareness and early recognition are required for effective management of irAEs. Our experience as a single institution might be of use for health care providers in oncology.

Effect of influenza vaccination on immune-related adverse events in patients receiving single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18763-e18763
Author(s):  
Naga Malleswari Vutukuri ◽  
Calette Corcoran ◽  
Jill Comeau ◽  
Elizabeth Stephenson ◽  
Kavitha Beedupalli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Influenza Vaccine ◽  
Influenza Vaccination ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Influenza Vaccinations

e18763 Background: Recent single-center, retrospective reviews have evaluated the effect of influenza vaccinations on the incidence and severity of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Methods and outcomes in these studies vary. The most common medication investigated was ipilimumab, an Anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody. There is limited data evaluating the incidence of irAEs in those receiving the specific ICIs, program death-1 (PD-1) and program death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted including patients 18 to 89 years old who received single-agent pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab, or durvalumab at an academic medical center from August 2015 to August 2019. The primary objective was to evaluate the incidence of irAEs in those who received an influenza vaccine compared to those who did not. Electronic health records, and the Louisiana Immunization Network for Kids (LINKS), which now collects adult information, were utilized for data collection. Chi-square tests were used to evaluate all endpoints. Results: Of the 217 charts screened, 133 were included in this study Fifty-three patients were included in the influenza vaccination group and 80 patients in the group that did not receive influenza vaccinations. The median age in those who received an influenza vaccine and in those who did not were 61 years and 62 years, respectively. The most common cancer diagnoses were lung cancer and melanoma. Ninety-one percent of patients in the vaccination group versus 81% in the group who did not receive an influenza vaccine received either nivolumab or pembrolizumab (PD-1 inhibitors). There was no statistical difference in irAEs in those who received an influenza vaccine versus those who did not (30% versus 45%, p = 0.15). The only significant secondary outcome found was the rate of irAEs in patients receiving a PD-1 inhibitor versus a PD-L1 inhibitor regardless of vaccination (42.2% versus 11.1%, p = 0.03). The majority of irAEs were grade 1 or 2. Conclusions: Based on this study, receiving an influenza vaccine does not have an influence on the risk of irAEs in those receiving ICI, specifically PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors. These outcomes may have been affected by adherence issues with yearly influenza vaccinations, inaccurate vaccine records, and receiving vaccines out of state. The statistically significant secondary outcome may have been affected by the disproportionate number of patients who were receiving a PD-1 inhibitor in this study. Larger population studies are needed to validate these findings and identify both the risk and benefit of patients receiving their yearly influenza vaccine while receiving ICI.

scholarly journals SARS-CoV-2 infection and adverse events in patients with cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: an observational prospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e001694
Author(s):  
Mario Mandala ◽  
Paul Lorigan ◽  
Matilde De Luca ◽  
Andrea Bianchetti ◽  
Barbara Merelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Antigen Expression ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Patients With Cancer

BackgroundIn ambulatory patients with cancer with asymptomatic or pauci-symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, the safety of targeted therapies (TTs), chemotherapy (CT) or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy is still unknown.Material and methodsFrom the start of the first epidemic wave of SARS-CoV-2 in Bergamo, Italy, we have prospectively screened all consecutive outpatients who presented for treatment to the Oncology Division of the Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo for SARS-CoV-2 antigen expression. We identified patients treated with ICIs and compared these to patients with the same cancer subtypes treated with TTs or CT.ResultsBetween March 5 and May 18, 293 consecutive patients (49% melanoma, 34% non-small cell lung cancer, 9% renal cell carcinoma, 8% other) were included in this study: 159 (54%), 50 (17%) and 84 (29%) received ICIs, CT or TTs, respectively. Overall 89 patients (30.0%) were SARS-CoV-2 positive. Mortality of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients was statistically significantly higher compared with SARS-CoV-2 negative patients (8/89 vs 3/204, respectively, Fisher’s exact test p=0.004). All deaths were due to COVID-19. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were more frequent in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients compared with SARS-CoV-2-negative cases (Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test p=0.0008). The incidence of SAEs in SARS-CoV-2 positive compared with SARS-CoV-2 negative patients was similar in ICI and CT patients (17.3% and 3.7% for positive and negative patients in ICIs and 15.4% and 2.7% in CT, Breslow-Day test p=0.891). No COVID-19-related SAEs were observed in the TTs patients.ConclusionsThe incidence of SAEs was higher for SARS-CoV-2-positive patients treated with ICIs and CT, mostly in advanced disease. No SAEs were observed in patients treated with TTs. SAEs were COVID-19 related rather than treatment related. Treatment with ICIs does not appear to significantly increase risk of SAEs compared with CT. This information should be considered when determining treatment options for patients.

scholarly journals Association of Blood Biomarkers and Autoimmunity with Immune Related Adverse Events in Patients with Cancer treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Despina Michailidou ◽  
Ali Khaki ◽  
Maria Morelli ◽  
Leonidas Diamantopoulos ◽  
Namrata Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Blood Biomarkers ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
History Of

Abstract Background: Patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) develop immune related adverse events (irAEs), however biomarkers are lacking. We hypothesized that clinicopathologic and laboratory factors would be associated with irAE risk and overall survival (OS) in this population.Methods: In a retrospective study of patients treated with ICIs we collected clinicopathologic, laboratory, irAEs and outcomes data. The association between baseline blood biomarkers, clinicopathologic features and irAEs was assessed by logistic regression adjusting for age, sex, smoking, cancer type, performance status, concomitant other systemic therapy, history of autoimmune disease (AD) and chronic infection. Optimal cutoff values of biomarkers were identified by recursive partitioning analysis.Results: 470 patients were identified; 156 (33%) developed irAEs, which were associated with baseline absolute lymphocyte count >2.6k/ul (adjusted [a]OR:4.12), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≤5.3 (aOR:2.08) and monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR)≤0.73 (aOR:3.11). Patients with pre-existing AD (aOR:2.81), family history of AD (aOR:5.86), and ICI combination (aOR:2.26) had higher odds of irAEs. Baseline NLR≤5.3 (aHR:0.68) and MLR≤0.73 (aHR:0.43) were associated with longer OS.Conclusion: irAE were associated with autoimmune history, ICI combination and baseline laboratory measurements. Lower NLR and MLR may have favorable prognostic value. Our hypothesis-generating findings require validation in larger prospective studies.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Readministration of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors After Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients With Cancer

JAMA Oncology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. 1310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Audrey Simonaggio ◽  
Jean Marie Michot ◽  
Anne Laure Voisin ◽  
Jérome Le Pavec ◽  
Michael Collins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Patients With Cancer

Immune-mediated adverse events following influenza vaccine in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 647-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morgan E Gwynn ◽  
David L DeRemer ◽  
Katherine M Saunders ◽  
Jigarkumar Parikh ◽  
Roni J Bollag ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Influenza Vaccine ◽  
Influenza Vaccination ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Patient Questionnaire ◽  
Immune Mediated ◽  
Increased Risk

Objectives The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors has transformed treatment paradigms for various malignancies. Patients with cancer are at increased risk of complications and hospitalizations from influenza; therefore, it is recommended that they receive inactivated influenza vaccination. However, efficacy and safety of inactivated influenza vaccination in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors is uncertain. The objective of this prospective case series was to evaluate the incidence of immune-mediated adverse events (imAEs) following inactivated influenza vaccination in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. Changes in cytokine and chemokine levels were also evaluated. Methods Patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors during the 2017–2018 influenza season were eligible for study participation. Peripheral blood samples were collected prior to administration of inactivated influenza vaccine and two post-vaccination time points. Evaluation of new or worsening imAEs occurred via patient questionnaire and review of medical records for 60 days following inactivated influenza vaccination. Baseline imAEs were evaluated from review of medical records for 60 days prior to inactivated influenza vaccination. Serum cytokines and chemokines were measured using a multiplex Luminex assay. Results Twenty-four patients were enrolled in this study. Seven patients experienced any grade imAE (one patient having 2) within 60 days following inactivated influenza vaccination. The majority were Grades 1–2, including rash ( n = 3), hypothyroidism, myalgia, and colitis ( n = 1 each). Two patients experienced severe imAEs (grade 3 nephritis and grade 4 diabetes). No significant changes ( p > 0.05) in serum cytokine or chemokine concentrations were observed. Conclusions Although small, our study suggests that inactivated influenza vaccine may be safely administered to patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. The majority of imAEs following inactivated influenza vaccination were Grades 1-2 and did not require changes in immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Immunogenicity of Influenza Vaccination in Patients with Cancer Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 422-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhumsuk Keam ◽  
Chang Kyung Kang ◽  
Kang Il Jun ◽  
Song Mi Moon ◽  
Koung Jin Suh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Influenza Vaccination ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cytotoxic Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Influenza Vaccinations

Abstract Among prospectively enrolled adult patients with cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs; n = 46) or cytotoxic agents (n = 90), seroprotection and seroconversion rates after seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccinations were higher with ICI than with cytotoxic chemotherapy. These results support annual influenza vaccinations for cancer patients receiving ICIs. Clinical Trials Registration clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03590808).

scholarly journals Association of blood biomarkers and autoimmunity with immune related adverse events in patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Despina Michailidou ◽  
Ali Raza Khaki ◽  
Maria Pia Morelli ◽  
Leonidas Diamantopoulos ◽  
Namrata Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Monocyte Count ◽  
Blood Biomarkers ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
History Of

AbstractPatients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) develop immune related adverse events (irAEs), however biomarkers are lacking. We hypothesized that clinicopathologic and laboratory factors would be associated with irAE risk and overall survival (OS) in this population. In a retrospective study of patients treated with ICIs we collected clinicopathologic, laboratory, irAEs and outcomes data. The association between baseline blood biomarkers, clinicopathologic features and irAEs was assessed by logistic regression adjusting for age, sex, smoking, cancer type, performance status, concomitant other systemic therapy, history of autoimmune disease (AD), chronic infection and pre-existing systemic steroid use (regardless of dose). Optimal cutoff values of biomarkers were identified by recursive partitioning analysis. 470 patients were identified; 156 (33%) developed irAEs, which were associated with baseline absolute lymphocyte count > 2.6 k/ul (adjusted [a]OR: 4.30), absolute monocyte count > 0.29 k/ul (aOR: 2.34) and platelet count > 145 k/ul (aOR: 2.23), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≤ 5.3 (aOR: 2.07) and monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR) ≤ 0.73 (aOR: 2.96), as well as platelet to lymphocyte ratio ≤ 534 (aOR: 5.05). Patients with pre-existing AD (aOR: 2.57), family history of AD (aOR: 5.98), and ICI combination (aOR: 2.00) had higher odds of irAEs. Baseline NLR ≤ 5.3 (aHR: 0.68), MLR ≤ 0.73 (aHR: 0.43), PLT > 145 (aHR: 0.48) and PLR ≤ 534 (aHR: 0.48) were associated with longer OS. irAEs were associated with autoimmune history, ICI combination and baseline laboratory measurements. Lower NLR, MLR and PLR may have favorable prognostic value. Our hypothesis-generating findings require validation in larger prospective studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document