Immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with cancer

2020 ◽  
pp. 030089162095346
Author(s):  
Nilay Sengul Samanci ◽  
Duygu Ilke Cikman ◽  
Kerem Oruc ◽  
Sahin Bedir ◽  
Emir Çelik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Early Recognition ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Combination Treatments ◽  
Grade 3

Introduction: With the widespread use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), we are facing challenges in the management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). We aimed to characterize the spectrum of toxicity, management, and outcomes for irAEs. Methods: Patients who were treated with at least one ICI in clinical trials, expanded access programs, or routine clinical practice were included. Clinical and laboratory parameters were collected retrospectively to determine the incidence of irAEs, methods of management, and treatment outcomes. Results: A total of 255 patients were screened retrospectively. Of these, 71 (27.8%) patients developed irAEs. More than 2 different types of irAEs were detected in 16 (6.2%) out of 255 patients. A total of 3177 doses were given to 255 patients. In 93 (2.9%) of the 3177 doses, 1 episode of irAEs was experienced. A total of 22 out of 93 (23.7%) episodes were reported as grade 1, 49 (52.7%) as grade 2, 19 (20.4%) as grade 3, and 3 (3.2%) as grade 4. The most frequently seen irAEs were pneumonitis, hepatitis, and hypothyroidism. With regard to treatment, 39 out of 93 episodes (42%) of any grade irAEs occurred after anti–programmed cell death-1 therapy, 47 (50.5%) occurred following administration of anti–programmed death-ligand 1, and 7 (7.5%) occurred after combination treatments. Conclusion: With the increased use of immunotherapeutic agents, increased awareness and early recognition are required for effective management of irAEs. Our experience as a single institution might be of use for health care providers in oncology.

scholarly journals Gastrointestinal adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Rajha ◽  
Patrick Chaftari ◽  
Mona Kamal ◽  
Julian Maamari ◽  
Christopher Chaftari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Organ Systems ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy ◽  
Recent Addition ◽  
Gastrointestinal Adverse Events

Abstract Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized cancer therapy and is now the standard treatment for several different types of cancer, supported by favorable outcomes and good tolerance. However, it is linked to multiple immune manifestations, referred to as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). These adverse events frequently affect the skin, colon, endocrine glands, lungs, and liver. The gastrointestinal system is one of the most commonly affected organ systems and is responsible for the most frequent emergency visits resulting from irAEs. However, because immune checkpoint inhibitors are a recent addition to our arsenal of cancer drugs, many health-care providers remain unfamiliar with the management of irAEs. Gastroenterologists involved in the treatment of oncology patients who have received checkpoint inhibitors are currently encountering cases of abdominal pain, diarrhea, and other nonspecific symptoms that may be challenging to manage. This article reviews the gastrointestinal, hepatic, and pancreatic toxicities of checkpoint inhibitors and provides an approach to their diagnosis and recommended workup. It also highlights the management of irAEs according to their toxicity grading and specifically discusses the instances in which corticosteroids should be administered and/or the immune checkpoint inhibitors should be withheld.

Expansion of pharmacist clinical services to optimize the management of immune checkpoint inhibitor toxicities

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 954-960 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine E Renna ◽  
Elizabeth N Dow ◽  
Jason J Bergsbaken ◽  
Ticiana A Leal
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Early Recognition ◽  
Management Program ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Caregiver Education

Introduction The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized cancer treatment and is now a part of the treatment paradigm for several malignancies. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors are generally well tolerated, treatment is associated with immune-related adverse events, some serious and potentially life threatening. Early identification and prompt appropriate management of immune-related adverse events are crucial to prevent morbidity and mortality. The complexity and severity of immune-related adverse events require interdisciplinary collaboration to optimize care. Patient and caregiver education and continued communication between patients and members of the oncology care team are vital for timely recognition and successful management of immune-related adverse events. The objective of this program is to provide a proof of concept; a pharmacist-led immune checkpoint inhibitor management program will increase early recognition and management of immune-related adverse events through patient and caregiver education and proactively assessing patients for toxicities. Methods At the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, we developed and implemented a pharmacist-driven program, referred to as the immune checkpoint inhibitor program, which aimed to ensure patient and caregiver education and continuous monitoring of immune-related adverse events. This program utilized pharmacist–patient encounters to improve patient and caregiver education and follow-up monitoring. The design and implementation are detailed. Pharmacist interventions and patient outcomes were evaluated. Results At interim analysis, 47 patients were enrolled in the program and pharmacists completed 34 interventions on 26 patients. Pharmacists are well positioned to educate patients and caregivers on immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and provide proactive monitoring to detect immune-related adverse events. We hypothesize that the interventions made by pharmacist may lead to earlier recognition and treatment of immune-related adverse events.

scholarly journals Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Combination with Chemotherapy as a First-Line Therapy for Extensive-Stage Small Cell Carcinoma

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 3629
Author(s):  
Hsiao-Ling Chen ◽  
Yu-Kang Tu ◽  
Hsiu-Mei Chang ◽  
Tai-Huang Lee ◽  
Kuan-Li Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Extensive Stage ◽  
Grade 3

Patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) have a very short survival time even if they receive standard cytotoxic chemotherapy with etoposide and platinum (EP). Several randomized controlled trials have shown that patients with ED-SCLC who received a combination of EP plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) had superior survival compared with those who received EP alone. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to provide a ranking of ICIs for our primary endpoints in terms of overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR), as well as our secondary endpoint in terms of adverse events. The fractional polynomial model was used to evaluate the adjusted hazard ratios for the survival indicators (OS and PFS). Treatment rank was estimated using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), as well as the probability of being best (Prbest) reference. EP plus nivolumab, atezolizumab or durvalumab had significant benefits compared with EP alone in terms of OS (Hazard Ratio HR = 0.67, 95% Confidence Interval CI = 0.46–0.98 for nivolumab, HR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.54–0.91 for atezolizumab, HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.59–0.90 for durvalumab) but no significant differences were observed for pembrolizumab or ipilimumab. The probability of nivolumab being ranked first among all treatment arms was highest (SCURA = 78.7%, Prbest = 46.7%). All EP plus ICI combinations had a longer PFS compared with EP alone (HR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.46–0.92 for nivolumab, HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61–0.96 for atezolizumab, HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.65–0.94 for durvalumab, HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.61–0.92 for pembrolizumab), and nivolumab was ranked first in terms of PFS (SCURA = 85.0%, Prbest = 66.8%). In addition, nivolumab had the highest probability of grade 3–4 adverse events (SUCRA = 84.8%) in our study. We found that nivolumab had the best PFS and OS in all combinations of ICIs and EP, but nivolumab also had the highest probability of grade 3–4 adverse events in our network meta-analysis. Further head-to head large-scale phase III randomized controlled studies are needed to verify our conclusions.

scholarly journals Comparative risk of serious and fatal treatment-related adverse events caused by 19 immune checkpoint inhibitors used in cancer treatment: a network meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592094092 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tingting Liu ◽  
Bo Jin ◽  
Jun Chen ◽  
Hui Wang ◽  
Shuiyu Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Combinatorial Therapy ◽  
Grade 5 ◽  
Comparative Risk ◽  
Grade 3

Background: This network meta-analysis assessed the comparative risk of grade 3–5 and grade 5 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), either alone or in combination with other modalities, for cancer treatment. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and recent predominant oncology congresses were searched for relevant phase II and phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs). As outcomes, grade 3–5, and grade 5 TRAE outcomes were reported as odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Results: In 67 RCTs involving 36,422 patients and 19 ICIs, the incidence of grade 3–5 and grade 5 TRAEs was 17.9% and 0.8% with ICI monotherapy and 46.3% and 1.4%, respectively, with combinatorial therapy. Pneumonitis was the most common cause of grade 5 TRAEs following either monotherapy (16.3%) or combinatorial therapy (11.4%). Regarding grade 3–5 TRAEs, atezolizumab + chemotherapy (CT) and antiangiogenic therapy (AT) (atezolizumab + CAT), pembrolizumab + CT, ipilimumab + CT, and atezolizumab + CT were more toxic than any ICI monotherapy, pembrolizumab or nivolumab + radiotherapy (RT), and ICIs dual therapy (durvalumab + tremelimumab and nivolumab + ipilimumab). Tremelimumab, ipilimumab, durvalumab, and pembrolizumab were, however, associated with higher grade 5 TRAEs than combinatorial treatments. Atezolizumab + CAT was the most toxic and nivolumab + RT was the least toxic of combinatorial treatments; among monotherapies, tremelimumab and avelumab were the most and least toxic, respectively. The toxicity ranking changed with type of grade 3–5 TRAEs. Conclusions: Compared with combinatorial therapy, ICI monotherapy caused lower grade 3–5 TRAEs, but some monotherapies resulted in a higher incidence of fatal TRAEs. Atezolizumab + CAT and nivolumab + RT were the most and least toxic of combinatorial treatments, respectively, and tremelimumab and avelumab were the most and least toxic of the monotherapies, respectively.

Liver injury by immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 341-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Personeni ◽  
Tiziana Pressiani ◽  
Antonio Capogreco ◽  
Arianna Dal Buono ◽  
Antonio D'Alessio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Injury ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Subsequent Treatment ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Grade 3

341 Background: In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and baseline liver dysfunction, hepatic immune-related adverse events (HIRAEs) during immunotherapy have not been adequately characterized and their impact on subsequent treatment outcomes is not known. Methods: 40 patients with advanced/unresectable HCC and Child Pugh score A have been enrolled in first and second-line clinical trials of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). HCC etiologies were: hepatitis C (32.5%), hepatitis B (7.5%), alcohol abuse (27.5%), other (32.5%). 7 received anti-PD-1 mAbs alone and 33 received combined regimens that included anti-PD-1 mAbs plus either anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (30.4%) or tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (54.5%), or both (15.1%). We reviewed their liver function tests and HIRAEs onset was related to time to treatment failure (TTF). Results: Overall, 12 patients (30%) developed grade ≥ 3 hepatitis according to Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events v. 4.03, resulting in 4 cases of grade 2 drug-induced liver injury per DILI Working Group criteria. Time between therapy initiation and hepatitis onset was 1.4 months (0.4-2.8) and median peak aminotransferase (AT) level was 258 IU/L (85-869). Out of 6 permanent treatment discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs), 4 were linked to hepatitis. Higher AT median levels at baseline were significantly linked to grade ≥ 3 hepatitis compared with lower grades (95 IU/L vs. 36 IU/L, respectively; p = 0.008). Etiology, age, treatment did not predict HIRAEs onset. TTF in patients in patients with grade ≥ 3 hepatitis was shorter than in the whole cohort (1.4 vs. 3.8 months, p = 0.041), while overall survival did not differ (p = 0.125). Conclusions: We observed a 30% incidence of clinically significant HIRAEs. HIRAEs represent the most frequent AEs leading to treatment discontinuation in patients with HCC undergoing treatments with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Baseline AT levels may identify patients at increased risk of grade ≥ 3 hepatitis.

Immune-related adverse events associated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors therapy in Mexican patients: Experience at a single center.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14580-e14580
Author(s):  
Iván Romarico Romarico Gonzalez Espinoza ◽  
Neil Cortés Escobar ◽  
Mariana Chiquillo-Domínguez ◽  
Gabriela Juárez Salazar ◽  
Julio Cesar Garibay Diaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Non Melanoma Skin Cancer ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Patients Experience

e14580 Background: The use of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for solid malignancies is rapidly rising, and many new agents and treatment combinations are in development. However, ICIs have a unique side-effect profile of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) compared with chemotherapeutic agents or targeted therapies. The aim of this work was to describe the irAEs in diverse types of malignant tumors using real-world data. Methods: This is a retrospective and descriptive study of patients with diverse types of advanced malignancies treated with immunotherapy at Centro Oncológico Integral of the Hospital Ángeles in Puebla, México; during the period 2016-2020. Data about the primary neoplasm, ICIs, irAEs, organ system affected, grade and treatment was collected. Clinical and laboratory parameters were obtained by reviewing medical records. Results: A total of 117 patients were included, median age of 65 years, of which 63.2% were male and 36.8% were female. The most frequent neoplasms treated with ICIs were: lung (27.4%), kidney (16.2%), melanoma (12.8%), hepatocellular (9.4%), breast (8.5%), non-melanoma skin cancer (6.0%), mesothelioma (4.3%) and other tumors (15.3%). 39.3% of the patients had no metastases, 41.9% had metastases to at least 1 or 2 sites, and 18.8% to 3 or more sites. The types of ICIs were: nivolumab (35.0%), pembrolizumab (28.2%), atezolizumab (23.9%), ipilimumab + nivolumab (12.0%) and durvalumab (0.9%). The most frequent irAEs were: gastrointestinal (61.5%), neurologic (46.2%), pulmonary (38.5%), metabolic (32.5%) and hematologic (29.1%). 39.3% of the irAEs were reported as grade 1, 31.6% as grade 2, 14.5% as grade 3 and 2.6% as grade 4. Conclusions: Our work shows the incidence of irAEs in a poorly studied population and provides new data that complement that reported by other works, however, further prospective studies are necessary.[Table: see text]

scholarly journals Emergency Department Utilization for Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Retrospective Analysis of Identification and Outcomes for Those Presenting for Immune-Related Adverse Events

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-59
Author(s):  
Ryan Holstead ◽  
Adi Kartolo ◽  
Tara Baetz
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Emergency Department Utilization ◽  
Presenting Symptoms ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Time Of Presentation

Background: Immune-related adverse events (iRAEs) are known complications of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Early identification and management leads to improved morbidity and mortality. This study seeks to address our center’s experience with iRAEs in the emergency department (ED). Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients treated with ICIs in 2018 and 2019 for any indication. All diagnoses of iRAEs were recorded. For all patients who presented to the ED following administration of an ICI, we assessed whether the presenting symptoms were eventually diagnosed as an iRAE. We assessed disposition, time to initiation of corticosteroids and outcomes in these patients. Results: 351 evaluable patients were treated with an ICI, 129 patients (37%) had at least one presentation to the ED, 17 of whom presented with symptoms due to a new iRAE. New iRAE diagnoses were broad, occurred after median 2 cycles, majority irAEs were grade 3 or higher (70.6%), and two patients died due to toxicity. Twelve patients were admitted to the hospital during initial presentation or at follow-up, four required ICU care. All patients required immunosuppressive therapy, and only three were later re-challenged with an ICI. Of the patients who were admitted to the hospital, median time to first dose of corticosteroid was 30.5 h (range 1–269 h). Conclusions: Patients on ICI have a significant risk of requiring an ED visit. A notable proportion of iRAEs have their first presentation at the ED and often can present in a very nonspecific manner. A standardized approach in the ED at the time of presentation may lead to improved identification and management of these patients.

scholarly journals SARS-CoV-2 infection and adverse events in patients with cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: an observational prospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e001694
Author(s):  
Mario Mandala ◽  
Paul Lorigan ◽  
Matilde De Luca ◽  
Andrea Bianchetti ◽  
Barbara Merelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Antigen Expression ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Patients With Cancer

BackgroundIn ambulatory patients with cancer with asymptomatic or pauci-symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, the safety of targeted therapies (TTs), chemotherapy (CT) or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy is still unknown.Material and methodsFrom the start of the first epidemic wave of SARS-CoV-2 in Bergamo, Italy, we have prospectively screened all consecutive outpatients who presented for treatment to the Oncology Division of the Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo for SARS-CoV-2 antigen expression. We identified patients treated with ICIs and compared these to patients with the same cancer subtypes treated with TTs or CT.ResultsBetween March 5 and May 18, 293 consecutive patients (49% melanoma, 34% non-small cell lung cancer, 9% renal cell carcinoma, 8% other) were included in this study: 159 (54%), 50 (17%) and 84 (29%) received ICIs, CT or TTs, respectively. Overall 89 patients (30.0%) were SARS-CoV-2 positive. Mortality of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients was statistically significantly higher compared with SARS-CoV-2 negative patients (8/89 vs 3/204, respectively, Fisher’s exact test p=0.004). All deaths were due to COVID-19. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were more frequent in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients compared with SARS-CoV-2-negative cases (Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test p=0.0008). The incidence of SAEs in SARS-CoV-2 positive compared with SARS-CoV-2 negative patients was similar in ICI and CT patients (17.3% and 3.7% for positive and negative patients in ICIs and 15.4% and 2.7% in CT, Breslow-Day test p=0.891). No COVID-19-related SAEs were observed in the TTs patients.ConclusionsThe incidence of SAEs was higher for SARS-CoV-2-positive patients treated with ICIs and CT, mostly in advanced disease. No SAEs were observed in patients treated with TTs. SAEs were COVID-19 related rather than treatment related. Treatment with ICIs does not appear to significantly increase risk of SAEs compared with CT. This information should be considered when determining treatment options for patients.

scholarly journals Real-world safety experience with immune checkpoint inhibitors in Saudi Arabia

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (1) ◽  
pp. 003685042199730
Author(s):  
Mohammed Al Nuhait ◽  
Eshtyag Bajnaid ◽  
Abdulmalik Al Otaibi ◽  
Abdullah Al Shammari ◽  
Yousef Al Awlah
Keyword(s):  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Emergency Room ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Immunosuppressive Agents ◽  
Treatment Discontinuation ◽  
Emergency Room Visits ◽  
Grade 3

Lay abstract Real-world safety experience with immune checkpoint inhibitors in Saudi Arabia: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) are rapidly growing and changing cancer care. With introduction of ICIs the landscape for cancer treatment has changed significantly. ICIs are known to induce immune-related adverse effects. This research is intended to shed light on ICIs and describe our safety experience with these agents. This study is a retrospective cohort study aimed to determine the safety of ICIs and its related adverse events at a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia. The study was conducted in the oncology center at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh. We identified study participants by using electronic health care system (BestCare)® to involve patients who received ICIs treatment during the study period from January 2016 up to December 2018, to include a total of 53 patients. Most of our patients were on nivolumab (37 patients) followed by atezolizumab (10 patients), and pembrolizumab (6 patients). The average number of emergency room visits after receiving treatment was three visits per patient. Renal adverse events occurred following ICIs use in nine patients, and none of the reported cases experienced a grade ≥3 event. Moreover, 13 patients experienced a hepatic adverse event, of whom only 1 patient experienced a grade ≥3 event leading to treatment discontinuation. As for diarrhea, among all patients who received ICIs, 14 patients experienced diarrhea, and 5 of them had grade ≥3 events. Also, thyroxine abnormalities occurred in seven patients. While, Pneumonitis occurred in four patients following ICIs use. In addition, we noticed other adverse events with ICIs including (skin reaction, nausea, vomiting, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and neurological adverse events). Furthermore, 17 patients required steroids to manage ICIs adverse events. And, no patients in our study required additional management with other immunosuppressive agents. Immunotherapies are rapidly growing and changing cancer care. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) have the ability to block inhibitory checkpoints and restore the functions of the immune system. ICIs are used for the treatment of several types of cancer, and nowadays, many studies are ongoing in order to get approvals for newer indications. ICIs are known to induce immune-related adverse effects. The safety of ICIs and the most common immune-related adverse events are not yet well recognized for our population since this class of medications is lately introduced in our region, where only limited studies in our population are available in the literature. This research is intended to shed light on ICIs and describe our safety experience with these agents. This study is a retrospective cohort study aimed to determine the safety of ICIs and its related adverse events at a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia. The study was conducted in the oncology center at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh. Study participants were identified by using the electronic health care system (BestCare)® to include patients who were treated with ICIs during the study period from January 2016 up to December 2018. A total of 53 patients were included. Most of our patients were on nivolumab (37 patients) followed by atezolizumab (10 patients), and pembrolizumab (6 patients). The average number of emergency room visits after receiving ICIs was three visits per patient. Renal adverse events occurred following ICIs use in nine patients, and none of the reported cases experienced a grade ≥3 event. Moreover, 13 patients experienced a hepatic adverse event, of whom only 1 patient experienced a grade ≥3 event leading to treatment discontinuation. As for diarrhea, among all patients who received ICIs, 14 patients experienced diarrhea, and 5 of them had grade ≥3 events. Also, thyroxine abnormalities occurred in seven patients. While, pneumonitis occurred in four patients following ICIs use. In addition, we noticed other adverse events with ICIs, including (skin reaction, nausea, vomiting, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and neurological adverse events). Furthermore, 17 patients required steroids to manage ICIs adverse events. And, no patients in our study required additional management with other immunosuppressive agents. Patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors could have a variety of adverse drug events that might lead to treatment discontinuation and increase overall emergency room visits. This study highlights the most common adverse drug events associated with ICIs use at a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document