Reliability Analysis of Alternating Group Graphs and Split-Stars

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mei-Mei Gu ◽  
Rong-Xia Hao ◽  
Jou-Ming Chang

Abstract Given a connected graph $G$ and a positive integer $\ell $, the $\ell $-extra (resp. $\ell $-component) edge connectivity of $G$, denoted by $\lambda ^{(\ell )}(G)$ (resp. $\lambda _{\ell }(G)$), is the minimum number of edges whose removal from $G$ results in a disconnected graph so that every component has more than $\ell $ vertices (resp. so that it contains at least $\ell $ components). This naturally generalizes the classical edge connectivity of graphs defined in term of the minimum edge cut. In this paper, we proposed a general approach to derive component (resp. extra) edge connectivity for a connected graph $G$. For a connected graph $G$, let $S$ be a vertex subset of $G$ for $G\in \{\Gamma _{n}(\Delta ),AG_n,S_n^2\}$ such that $|S|=s\leq |V(G)|/2$, $G[S]$ is connected and $|E(S,G-S)|=\min \limits _{U\subseteq V(G)}\{|E(U, G-U)|: |U|=s, G[U]\ \textrm{is connected}\ \}$, then we prove that $\lambda ^{(s-1)}(G)=|E(S,G-S)|$ and $\lambda _{s+1}(G)=|E(S,G-S)|+|E(G[S])|$ for $s=3,4,5$. By exploring the reliability analysis of $AG_n$ and $S_n^2$ based on extra (component) edge faults, we obtain the following results: (i) $\lambda _3(AG_n)-1=\lambda ^{(1)}(AG_n)=4n-10$, $\lambda _4(AG_n)-3=\lambda ^{(2)}(AG_n)=6n-18$ and $\lambda _5(AG_n)-4=\lambda ^{(3)}(AG_n)=8n-24$; (ii) $\lambda _3(S_n^2)-1=\lambda ^{(1)}(S_n^2)=4n-8$, $\lambda _4(S_n^2)-3=\lambda ^{(2)}(S_n^2)=6n-15$ and $\lambda _5(S_n^2)-4=\lambda ^{(3)}(S_n^2)=8n-20$. This general approach maybe applied to many diverse networks.

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. 1850008
Author(s):  
Muhammad Imran ◽  
A. Q. Baig ◽  
Saima Rashid ◽  
Andrea Semaničová-Feňovčíková

Let [Formula: see text] be a connected graph and [Formula: see text] be the distance between the vertices [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] in [Formula: see text]. The diameter of [Formula: see text] is defined as [Formula: see text] and is denoted by [Formula: see text]. A subset of vertices [Formula: see text] is called a resolving set for [Formula: see text] if for every two distinct vertices [Formula: see text], there is a vertex [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], such that [Formula: see text]. A resolving set containing the minimum number of vertices is called a metric basis for [Formula: see text] and the number of vertices in a metric basis is its metric dimension, denoted by [Formula: see text]. Metric dimension is a generalization of affine dimension to arbitrary metric spaces (provided a resolving set exists). Let [Formula: see text] be a family of connected graphs [Formula: see text] depending on [Formula: see text] as follows: the order [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. If there exists a constant [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text] for every [Formula: see text] then we shall say that [Formula: see text] has bounded metric dimension, otherwise [Formula: see text] has unbounded metric dimension. If all graphs in [Formula: see text] have the same metric dimension, then [Formula: see text] is called a family of graphs with constant metric dimension. In this paper, we study the metric properties of an infinite class of circulant graphs with three generators denoted by [Formula: see text] for any positive integer [Formula: see text] and when [Formula: see text]. We compute the diameter and determine the exact value of the metric dimension of these circulant graphs.


2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (9) ◽  
pp. 1311-1320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mei-Mei Gu ◽  
Jou-Ming Chang ◽  
Rong-Xia Hao

Abstract For an integer $\ell \geqslant 2$, the $\ell $-component connectivity (resp. $\ell $-component edge connectivity) of a graph $G$, denoted by $\kappa _{\ell }(G)$ (resp. $\lambda _{\ell }(G)$), is the minimum number of vertices (resp. edges) whose removal from $G$ results in a disconnected graph with at least $\ell $ components. The two parameters naturally generalize the classical connectivity and edge connectivity of graphs defined in term of the minimum vertex-cut and the minimum edge-cut, respectively. The two kinds of connectivities can help us to measure the robustness of the graph corresponding to a network. In this paper, by exploring algebraic and combinatorial properties of $n$-dimensional balanced hypercubes $BH_n$, we obtain the $\ell $-component (edge) connectivity $\kappa _{\ell }(BH_n)$ ($\lambda _{\ell }(BH_n)$). For $\ell $-component connectivity, we prove that $\kappa _2(BH_n)=\kappa _3(BH_n)=2n$ for $n\geq 2$, $\kappa _4(BH_n)=\kappa _5(BH_n)=4n-2$ for $n\geq 4$, $\kappa _6(BH_n)=\kappa _7(BH_n)=6n-6$ for $n\geq 5$. For $\ell $-component edge connectivity, we prove that $\lambda _3(BH_n)=4n-1$, $\lambda _4(BH_n)=6n-2$ for $n\geq 2$ and $\lambda _5(BH_n)=8n-4$ for $n\geq 3$. Moreover, we also prove $\lambda _\ell (BH_n)\leq 2n(\ell -1)-2\ell +6$ for $4\leq \ell \leq 2n+3$ and the upper bound of $\lambda _\ell (BH_n)$ we obtained is tight for $\ell =4,5$.


2021 ◽  
pp. 2150005
Author(s):  
Gary Chartrand ◽  
Yuya Kono ◽  
Ping Zhang

A red-white coloring of a nontrivial connected graph [Formula: see text] is an assignment of red and white colors to the vertices of [Formula: see text] where at least one vertex is colored red. Associated with each vertex [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] is a [Formula: see text]-vector, called the code of [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is the diameter of [Formula: see text] and the [Formula: see text]th coordinate of the code is the number of red vertices at distance [Formula: see text] from [Formula: see text]. A red-white coloring of [Formula: see text] for which distinct vertices have distinct codes is called an identification coloring or ID-coloring of [Formula: see text]. A graph [Formula: see text] possessing an ID-coloring is an ID-graph. The problem of determining those graphs that are ID-graphs is investigated. The minimum number of red vertices among all ID-colorings of an ID-graph [Formula: see text] is the identification number or ID-number of [Formula: see text] and is denoted by [Formula: see text]. It is shown that (1) a nontrivial connected graph [Formula: see text] has ID-number 1 if and only if [Formula: see text] is a path, (2) the path of order 3 is the only connected graph of diameter 2 that is an ID-graph, and (3) every positive integer [Formula: see text] different from 2 can be realized as the ID-number of some connected graph. The identification spectrum of an ID-graph [Formula: see text] is the set of all positive integers [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text] has an ID-coloring with exactly [Formula: see text] red vertices. Identification spectra are determined for paths and cycles.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (03) ◽  
pp. 1950012
Author(s):  
Tianlong Ma ◽  
Jinling Wang ◽  
Mingzu Zhang

The restricted edge-connectivity of a connected graph [Formula: see text], denoted by [Formula: see text], if exists, is the minimum number of edges whose deletion disconnects the graph such that each connected component has at least two vertices. The Kronecker product of graphs [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], denoted by [Formula: see text], is the graph with vertex set [Formula: see text], where two vertices [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are adjacent in [Formula: see text] if and only if [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. In this paper, it is proved that [Formula: see text] for any graph [Formula: see text] and a complete graph [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text] vertices, where [Formula: see text] is minimum edge-degree of [Formula: see text], and a sufficient condition such that [Formula: see text] is [Formula: see text]-optimal is acquired.


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 297-317
Author(s):  
Encarnación Abajo ◽  
Rocío Casablanca ◽  
Ana Diánez ◽  
Pedro García-Vázquez

Let G be a connected graph with n vertices and let k be an integer such that 2 ? k ? n. The generalized connectivity kk(G) of G is the greatest positive integer l for which G contains at least l internally disjoint trees connecting S for any set S ? V (G) of k vertices. We focus on the generalized connectivity of the strong product G1 _ G2 of connected graphs G1 and G2 with at least three vertices and girth at least five, and we prove the sharp bound k3(G1 _ G2) ? k3(G1)_3(G2) + k3(G1) + k3(G2)-1.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (06) ◽  
pp. 995-1001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuli Zhao ◽  
Weihua Yang ◽  
Shurong Zhang ◽  
Liqiong Xu

Fault tolerance is an important issue in interconnection networks, and the traditional edge connectivity is an important measure to evaluate the robustness of an interconnection network. The component edge connectivity is a generalization of the traditional edge connectivity. The [Formula: see text]-component edge connectivity [Formula: see text] of a non-complete graph [Formula: see text] is the minimum number of edges whose deletion results in a graph with at least [Formula: see text] components. Let [Formula: see text] be an integer and [Formula: see text] be the decomposition of [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for [Formula: see text]. In this note, we determine the [Formula: see text]-component edge connectivity of the hypercube [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] for [Formula: see text]. Moreover, we classify the corresponding optimal solutions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 723-730 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sizhong Zhou

For a set ℋ of connected graphs, a spanning subgraph H of a graph G is called an ℋ-factor of G if every component of H is isomorphic to a member ofℋ. An H-factor is also referred as a component factor. If each component of H is a star (resp. path), H is called a star (resp. path) factor. By a P≥ k-factor (k positive integer) we mean a path factor in which each component path has at least k vertices (i.e. it has length at least k − 1). A graph G is called a P≥ k-factor covered graph, if for each edge e of G, there is a P≥ k-factor covering e. In this paper, we prove that (1) a graph G has a {K1,1,K1,2, … ,K1,k}-factor if and only if bind(G) ≥ 1/k, where k ≥ 2 is an integer; (2) a connected graph G is a P≥ 2-factor covered graph if bind(G) > 2/3; (3) a connected graph G is a P≥ 3-factor covered graph if bind(G) ≥ 3/2. Furthermore, it is shown that the results in this paper are best possible in some sense.


Author(s):  
V Murugesan ◽  
Sreejith Plappillimadam ◽  
VJ Saji ◽  
SS Maruthi ◽  
AK Anilkumar

Reliability is one of the critical design parameters for the launch vehicles and its systems. When the systems are ready to fly the first time, only limited test data are available and accordingly reliability assessed will be very low. However, in most cases, the new systems are derived and developed using the knowledge and experience gained from the heritage systems to meet the fresh challenges. Hence, the reliability assessed with the minimum number of tests done on the new system does not truly reflect the inherent reliability of the system. In this paper, an approach and a new analytical model are developed for the reliability assessment of systems with limited test data, giving an accurate weighting for the tests and flight experiences with similar systems. The method gives a systematic procedure for arriving at the weighting factor for test data of the pedigree system, with due consideration of the similarities between the systems and various factors influencing system reliability. The method is illustrated with a case study of a newly developed liquid propellant rocket system. The model is validated using the available test and flight data of two propulsion systems with adequate flight experience. The analytical model is generic in nature and can be applied to reliability analysis of any system, which has considerable similarities with a pedigree system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document