672 OESOPHAGOGASTRIC ANASTOMOTIC LEAK IN THE THORAX TREATED WITH COVERED METAL STENTS: SAFE AND HIGHLY SUCCESSFUL

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Manjunath Siddaiah-subramanya ◽  
James Hodson ◽  
Abdulrahman Ghoneim ◽  
Ibrahim Ibrahim ◽  
Sivesh Kamarajah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Anastomotic Leak ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Stent Migration ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Interventional Treatment ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Cylindrical Metal

Abstract   Anastomotic leak (AL) develops in 5–22% of cases following oesophagectomy, and results in additional morbidity, and reduction in overall survival. The management of AL has evolved significantly with advances in endoscopic therapies. Covered cylindrical metal stents have been increasingly used, and insertion techniques have improved over time. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of modern metal stents in the management of AL. Methods All patients who underwent oesophagectomy with thoracic anastomosis between 2006–2020, and subsequently developed AL were retrospectively identified. Initially, treatment details and patient outcomes were assessed for the subgroup of patients where the AL was initially managed using a stent. In all cases, these were cylindrical covered metal stents. Those patients that progressed to surgery after treatment with a stent were then excluded, with the remainder compared to the subgroup of patients that underwent conservative (i.e., non-interventional) treatment for AL. Results Of 63 patients with AL, primary management was with stents in 32 (57%). Technical success was achieved in all stenting procedures, although three patients (9%) developed complications (stent migration). After stenting, six cases (19%) subsequently required escalation to operative management (thoracotomy). The remainder (N = 23) were then compared to those managed conservatively (N = 26) and were found to have a significantly longer length of hospital stay (median: 37 vs. 20 days, p = 0.003). The AL healing rate was 96% in both groups (p = 1.000); one conservatively managed patient died before healing, and one stented patient refused further treatment. Conclusion Endoscopic treatment of oesophageal AL with cylindrical covered metal stents is safe, with a high technical success rate, and low rates of stent-related morbidity. Treatment with stents also avoids the need for operative management including oesophageal disconnection in the majority of cases, whilst leading to successful healing of the AL. However, treatment with stents does significantly increase hospital stay over conservative management, particularly where multiple procedures are required.

scholarly journals Operative Management and Outcomes of Patients with Sigmoid Volvulus at a Tertiary Public Hospital in Malawi

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 176-179
Author(s):  
Ephraim Bitilinyu-Bangoh ◽  
Fatsani Mwale ◽  
Loveness Ulunji Chawinga ◽  
Gift Mulima
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Anastomotic Leakage ◽  
Primary Anastomosis ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Sigmoid Resection ◽  
Sigmoid Volvulus ◽  
Hartmann’S Procedure ◽  
Hartmann's Procedure ◽  
Kamuzu Central Hospital

Background: Sigmoid Volvulus (SV) is a common cause of acute bowel obstruction in Malawi. We aimed to  describe the surgical  management of SV and its outcomes at Kamuzu Central Hospital, Lilongwe, Malawi. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed records from January 2019 to December 2019 of all SV patients, aged 18 years and above. Data  extracted included age, sex, admission date, surgery date, bowel viability at time of surgery, procedure done, suspected anastomotic leakage, length of hospital stay and mortality. The data was analyzed using STATA 14.0. Results: There were more males (n= 59, 81.9 %) than females. The median (IQR) age was 50.5 (38-60) years. A viable sigmoid colon was present in 61 (84.7%) patients. The commonest procedures done were sigmoid  resection and primary anastomosis (RPA) (59.7%, n=43) and Hartmann’s procedure (HP) (36.1%, n=26). The median length of hospital stay was 5 days in HP, 7 days in RPA and longest in  mesosigmoidopexy (10 days). Suspected anastomotic leakage occurred in 2(4.7%) patients. The overall mortality was 6.9% with all deaths occurring in RPA patients. Conclusion: Mortality is high in SV patients who undergo RPA. We recommend Hartmann’s procedure in cases where the bowel has  significant oedema or is gangrenous.

Long-term outcomes after endoscopic retrograde pancreatic drainage for symptomatic pancreaticojejunal anastomotic stenosis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihiko Kida ◽  
Taro Kawane ◽  
Hitoshi Omura ◽  
Tatsuo Kumai ◽  
Masaaki Yano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Stent Placement ◽  
Stent Migration ◽  
Anastomotic Stenosis ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
Technical Success Rate

Abstract 【Background】 There is limited evidence demonstrating the usefulness of endoscopic retrograde pancreatic drainage (ERPD) for symptomatic pancreaticojejunal anastomotic stenosis (sPJS). We examined the usefulness of ERPD for sPJS. 【Methods】 We conducted a retrospective analysis of 10 benign sPJS patients. Following items were evaluated: technical success, adverse events and clinical outcome of ERPD. 【Results】 Technical success rate was 100% (10/10); 9 patients had a pancreatic stent (no-internal-flap: n=4, internal-flap: n=5). Median follow-up was 920 days. Four patients developed recurrence. Among them, 3 patients had a stent with no-internal-flap in initial ERPD and the stent migrated in 3 patients at recurrence, and a stent was not placed in 1 patient in initial ERPD. Four follow-up ERPD were performed. No recurrence was observed in 6 patients. Among them, none of the stents migrated (no-internal-flap: n=1, internal-flap: n=5), and none were replaced stents due to stent failure. A stent placement with no-internal-flap was associated with recurrence (p=0.042). Mild adverse events developed in 14.3% (2/14). 【Conclusions】 ERPD was performed safely with high technical success. Recurrence was common in a stent placement with no-internal-flap, which was associated with stent migration. Long-term stent placement didn’t result in stent failure.

scholarly journals Outcomes of the Use of Fully Covered Esophageal Self-Expandable Stent in the Management of Colorectal Anastomotic Strictures and Leaks

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chad J. Cooper ◽  
Angel Morales ◽  
Mohamed O. Othman
Keyword(s):  
Anastomotic Leak ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Anastomotic Stricture ◽  
Clinical Success Rate ◽  
Stent Migration ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Anastomotic Leaks ◽  
Anastomotic Strictures

Introduction. Colorectal anastomotic leak or stricture is a dreaded complication leading to significant morbidity and mortality. The novel use of self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) in the management of postoperative colorectal anastomotic leaks or strictures can avoid surgical reintervention. Methods. Retrospective study with particular attention to the indications, operative or postoperative complications, and clinical outcomes of SEMS placement for patients with either a colorectal anastomotic stricture or leak. Results. Eight patients had SEMS (WallFlex stent) for the management of postoperative colorectal anastomotic leak or stricture. Five had a colorectal anastomotic stricture and 3 had a colorectal anastomotic leak. Complete resolution of the anastomotic stricture or leak was achieved in all patients. Three had recurrence of the anastomotic stricture on 3-month flexible sigmoidoscopy follow-up after the initial stent was removed. Two of these patients had a stricture that was technically too difficult to place another stent. Stent migration was noted in 2 patients, one at day 3 and the other at day 14 after stent placement that required a larger 23 mm stent to be placed. Conclusions. The use of SEMS in the management of colorectal anastomotic leaks or strictures is feasible and is associated with high technical and clinical success rate.

scholarly journals Efficacy of the Ovesco Clip for Closure of Endoscope Related Perforations

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phonthep Angsuwatcharakon ◽  
Piyapan Prueksapanich ◽  
Pradermchai Kongkam ◽  
Thawee Rattanachu-ek ◽  
Jaksin Sottisuporn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Day Length ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Rectosigmoid Junction ◽  
Iatrogenic Perforation

Aim. To study the efficacy and other treatment outcomes of Ovesco clip closure of iatrogenic perforation. Methods. Retrospective study from 3 tertiary-care hospitals in Thailand. Patients with iatrogenic perforation who underwent immediate endoscopic closure by Ovesco clip were included. Patients’ demographic data, perforation size, number of Ovesco clips used, fasting day, length of hospital stay, success rates, and complication rate were recorded. Technical success was defined as closure achievement during endoscopic procedure and clinical success was defined as the patient can be discharged without the need of additional surgical or radiological intervention. Results. There were 6 iatrogenic perforations in 2 male and 4 female patients. The median age was 59 years (range 39–78 years). The locations of perforation were 5 duodenal walls and 1 rectosigmoid junction. The median perforation size was 13 mm (range 10–40 mm). The technical success was 100% and the clinical success was 83.3%. The success rates per locations were 100% in colon and 80% in duodenum, respectively. The median fasting time was 5 days (range 1–10 days) and the median length of hospital stay was 10 days (range 2–22 days). There was no mortality in any. Conclusion. Ovesco clip seems to be an effective and safe tool for a closure of iatrogenic perforation.

scholarly journals Endoscopic transcecal appendectomy: a new endotherapy for appendiceal orifice lesions

Endoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linjie Guo ◽  
Liansong Ye ◽  
Yilong Feng ◽  
Johannes Bethge ◽  
Juliana Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Postoperative Bleeding ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Lesion Size ◽  
Complete Resection ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Case Series Study ◽  
Submucosal Lesions

Background Endoscopic transcecal appendectomy (ETA) has been reported as a minimally invasive alternative procedure for lesions involving the appendiceal orifice. The aim of this case series study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of ETA for lesions at the appendiceal orifice. Methods This retrospective study included consecutive patients with appendiceal orifice lesions who underwent ETA between December 2018 and March 2021. The primary outcome was technical success. The secondary outcomes included postoperative adverse events, postoperative hospital stay, and recurrence. Results 13 patients with appendiceal orifice lesions underwent ETA during the study period. The median lesion size was 20 mm (range 8–50). Lesions morphologies were polypoid lesions (n = 5), laterally spreading tumors (n = 4), and submucosal lesions (n = 4). Technical success with complete resection was achieved in all 13 cases. There were no postoperative bleeding, perforation, or intra-abdominal abscess. The median length of hospital stay after ETA was 8 days (range 6–18). There was no tumor recurrence during a median follow-up of 17 months (range 1–28). Conclusions ETA is feasible, safe, and effective for complete resection of appendiceal orifice lesions. Larger, multicenter, prospective studies are needed to further assess this technique.

scholarly journals Clinical evaluation of physician-controlled guidewire manipulation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (with video)

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (03) ◽  
pp. E395-E400
Author(s):  
Kyohei Nishiguchi ◽  
Takeshi Ogura ◽  
Nobu Nishioka ◽  
Saori Ueno ◽  
Atsushi Okuda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasound ◽  
Intrahepatic Bile Duct ◽  
Plastic Stents ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Tract Dilation

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided hepaticogastrostomy (HGS) may be most complex because of the EUS-guided biliary drainage procedure and variations in the course of the intrahepatic bile duct compared with the common bile duct (CBD). Appropriate guidewire insertion is essential. Physician-controlled guidewire manipulation (PCGW) might improve technical success rates of bile duct cannulation. The present study aimed to determine the technical feasibility and safety of PCGW during EUS-HGS. Patients and methods A total of 122 consecutive patients who were scheduled to undergo EUS-HGS between October 2017 and April 2019 were prospectively registered. The primary endpoint was the technical success rate of guidewire insertion into the CBD or hepatic hilum. Guidewire insertion was considered to have failed if the HGS assistant failed to achieve manipulation. Results The intrahepatic bile duct was successfully punctured in 120 of 122 patients. During guidewire insertion by the HGS assistant, guidewire fracture was observed in one patient. The guidewire was successfully inserted into the biliary tract and manipulated by the HGS assistant in 96 patients. PCGW was thus attempted for the remaining 23 patients. The guidewire was inserted by PCGW in all 23 patients, improving the technical success rate for guidewire insertion from 80 % to 100 %. After tract dilation, we deployed covered metal stents and plastic stents in 117 and two patients, respectively. The overall technical success rate for EUS-HGS was 97.5 % (119/122). Adverse events comprising bile peritonitis or leakage developed in five patients. Conclusion PCGW might contribute to improving the success rate of EUS-HGS.

Is percutaneous access superior to cutdown access for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair? A meta-analysis

Vascular ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 170853812110327
Author(s):  
Guoshan Bi ◽  
Quanwen Wang ◽  
Guozuo Xiong ◽  
Jie Chen ◽  
Dongyang Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Percutaneous Access ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

Objective The objective is to investigate whether percutaneous access (pEVAR) is superior to cutdown access (cEVAR) in terms of safety and efficacy during endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from January 1999 to December 2020 for studies reporting on the comparison between percutaneous and cutdown techniques for endovascular repair of AAAs. Outcomes evaluated were technical success rates, access site-related complications and operative time, and hospital stay. Results Four randomized controlled trials and nine observational studies with a total of 1683 patients comprising 2715 groin accesses were eligible for the meta-analysis. pEVAR was associated with a lower risk of overall complications (odds ratio (OR) = 0.63; p = .005) and seroma/lymphorrhea (OR, 0.18; p = .0001) and shortened operation time (MD = −39.04; p = .002) and the length of hospital stay (MD = −0.75; p < .00001) compared with cEVAR. The technical success rate for pEVAR was 95.1% (694/729), with an overall OR of 0.27 (95% CI 0.14–0.55, p = .0003) comparing pEVAR with cEVAR. Furthermore, pEVAR did not increase the risk of site infection, femoral artery thrombosis, postoperative hematoma, nerve injury, dissection, and bleeding. Conclusion Percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair is a safe and effective method for the treatment of AAA. It reduces the risk of overall complications and shortens the operation time and hospital stay. The technical success rate of pEVAR is lower than that of cEVAR, which may be linked to the selection of patients, operator experience, and the use of ultrasound. Large definitive trials are required to draw robust conclusions.

scholarly journals A Multicenter, Prospective Study of a New Fully Covered Expandable Metal Biliary Stent for the Palliative Treatment of Malignant Bile Duct Obstruction

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bret T. Petersen ◽  
Michel Kahaleh ◽  
Richard A. Kozarek ◽  
David Loren ◽  
Kapil Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Biliary Obstruction ◽  
Stent Migration ◽  
Covered Stent ◽  
Malignant Biliary Obstruction ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Stent Patency ◽  
Stent Occlusion ◽  
Malignant Bile Duct Obstruction

Background and Study Aims. Endoscopic placement of self-expanding metal stents (SEMSs) is indicated for palliation of inoperable malignant biliary obstruction. A fully covered biliary SEMS (WallFlex Biliary RX Boston Scientific, Natick, USA) was assessed for palliation of extrahepatic malignant biliary obstruction.Patients and Methods. 58 patients were included in this prospective, multicenter series conducted under an FDA-approved IDE. Main outcome measurements included (1) absence of stent occlusion within six months or until death, whichever occurred first and (2) technical success, need for reintervention, bilirubin levels, stent patency, time to stent occlusion, and adverse events.Results. Technical success was achieved in 98% (57/58), with demonstrated acute removability in two patients. Adequate clinical palliation until completion of followup was achievedin 98% (54/55) ofevaluablepatients, with 1 reintervention due to stent obstruction after 142 days. Mean total bilirubin decreased from 8.9 mg/dL to 1.2 mg/dL at 1 month. Device-related adverse events were limited and included 2 cases of cholecystitis. One stent migrated following radiation therapy.Conclusions. The WallFlex Biliary fully covered stent yielded technically successful placement with uncomplicated acute removal where required, appropriate reduction in bilirubin levels, and low rates of stent migration and occlusion. This SEMS allows successful palliation of malignant extrahepatic biliary obstruction.

scholarly journals Safety, efficacy, and removability of a fully covered multi-hole metal stent in a swine model of hilar biliary stricture: a feasibility study

2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (04) ◽  
pp. E498-E503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Seok Park ◽  
Seok Jeong ◽  
Makoto Kobayashi ◽  
Don Lee
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Biliary Stricture ◽  
Stent Migration ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Stent Insertion ◽  
Swine Model ◽  
Type I ◽  
Stent Patency ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Hilar Biliary Stricture

Abstract Background and study aims Use of fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMS) for biliary drainage of malignant hilar biliary strictures is limited because of risk of cholangitis due to side branch obstruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of unilateral placement of a multi-hole FCSEMS (FCSEMS-MH), which had a 2.5-mm hole in the center of the membrane on each cavity, in a swine model of hilar biliary stricture. Materials and methods Six female mini pigs were included in this prospective study. The hilar biliary stricture model was prepared using an endobiliary radiofrequency ablation. FCSEMS-MHs were endoscopically inserted into the peri-hilar bile duct of all the animals. Outcomes were assessed in terms of adverse events (AEs) including cholangitis, stent patency, stent migration, and endoscopic stent removability for 1 month after stenting. Results In terms of hilar biliary stricture types, two animals were of Bismuth type I and four were of type II. Technical success rate for endoscopic metal stenting was 100 % (6/6), and the functional success rate, which was evaluated 7 days after stent insertion, was also 100 % (5/5). The immediate overall AE rate was 0 %. There was no procedure-related mortality and stent migration did not occur in any animal during the 4-week stent indwelling period. Stents were removed from all six animals at 4 weeks post-stenting. Conclusion Unilateral placement of FCSEMS-MH might be safe and effect for swine hilar biliary stricture models. However, long-term follow-up and comparative studies are needed to verify the usefulness of this stent.

scholarly journals Hip Fractures Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparative Demographics and Outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215145932110030
Author(s):  
Alireza K. Nazemi ◽  
Samer M. Al-Humadi ◽  
Ryan Tantone ◽  
Thomas R. Hays ◽  
Stephen N. Bowen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Operative Outcomes ◽  
Academic Center ◽  
Level 1

Introduction: During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York, hip fractures requiring operative management continued to present to Stony Brook University Hospital. Given the novelty of SARS-CoV-2, there is recent interest in the pandemic and its relationship to orthopedic operative outcomes. This retrospective cohort study compared outcomes for operative hip fractures in patients prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic at a level 1 academic center. Materials and Methods: Data was collected on patients age 18 years or older who underwent operative management for hip fractures performed from January 21, 2019 to July 1, 2019 (pre-pandemic) or from January 21, 2020 to July 1, 2020 (pandemic). COVID-19 status, demographics and outcomes were analyzed. Results: Overall, 159 patients with hip fractures were included in this study, 103 in the 2019 group and 56 in the 2020 group. Within the 2019 group, there was a significantly greater proportion of female patients compared to 2020 (p = 0.0128). The length of hospital stay was shorter for the 2020 group by 1.84 days (p = 0.0138). COVID-19 testing was positive in 4 (7.1%) patients in the 2020 group, negative for 22 patients (39.3%), and the remaining 30 patients in the 2020 group (53.7%) were not tested during their admission. There were no other significant differences in demographics or outcomes between the 2019 and 2020 groups. Discussion: The COVID-19 pandemic did not significantly alter most aspects of care for hip fracture patients at our institution. Interestingly, postoperative pulmonary outcomes were not affected by the pandemic. Conclusions: In this study, a significantly higher proportion of males presented with hip fractures in the pandemic group. In addition, the average length of hospital stay was shorter during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further research is needed to understand the nuances that may lead to improved care for patients with hip fractures during a pandemic.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document