Hip Fractures Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparative Demographics and Outcomes

Introduction: During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York, hip fractures requiring operative management continued to present to Stony Brook University Hospital. Given the novelty of SARS-CoV-2, there is recent interest in the pandemic and its relationship to orthopedic operative outcomes. This retrospective cohort study compared outcomes for operative hip fractures in patients prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic at a level 1 academic center. Materials and Methods: Data was collected on patients age 18 years or older who underwent operative management for hip fractures performed from January 21, 2019 to July 1, 2019 (pre-pandemic) or from January 21, 2020 to July 1, 2020 (pandemic). COVID-19 status, demographics and outcomes were analyzed. Results: Overall, 159 patients with hip fractures were included in this study, 103 in the 2019 group and 56 in the 2020 group. Within the 2019 group, there was a significantly greater proportion of female patients compared to 2020 (p = 0.0128). The length of hospital stay was shorter for the 2020 group by 1.84 days (p = 0.0138). COVID-19 testing was positive in 4 (7.1%) patients in the 2020 group, negative for 22 patients (39.3%), and the remaining 30 patients in the 2020 group (53.7%) were not tested during their admission. There were no other significant differences in demographics or outcomes between the 2019 and 2020 groups. Discussion: The COVID-19 pandemic did not significantly alter most aspects of care for hip fracture patients at our institution. Interestingly, postoperative pulmonary outcomes were not affected by the pandemic. Conclusions: In this study, a significantly higher proportion of males presented with hip fractures in the pandemic group. In addition, the average length of hospital stay was shorter during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further research is needed to understand the nuances that may lead to improved care for patients with hip fractures during a pandemic.

Download Full-text

665. Key Clinical and Laboratory Features in Early Diagnosis of Ehrlichiosis in an Endemic Area of Long Island, New York

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofy210.672 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽

pp. S240-S241

Author(s):

Olga Kaplun ◽

Kalie Smith ◽

Teresa Khoo ◽

Eric Spitzer ◽

Fredric Weinbaum ◽

...

Keyword(s):

New York ◽

Clinical Presentation ◽

Average Length ◽

Kidney Injury ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Retrospective Chart Review ◽

Suffolk County ◽

University Hospital ◽

Laboratory Findings ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Background Human monocytic ehrlichiosis (HME) is a tick-borne disease caused by Ehrlichia chafeensis in the northeast United States. Suffolk County, New York has the highest amount of HME cases in NY (176 from 2010 to 2014). Our aim is to identify risk factors for HME and compare clinical presentation and laboratory findings of young vs. older adults. Methods A retrospective chart review from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2017 was performed on all patients ≥18 years who presented to the ER at Stony Brook University Hospital (SBUH) or Stony Brook Southampton Hospital (SBSH) with (i) ICD-9 code 082.4 or ICD-10 code A77.40 and (ii) a positive E. Chafeensis PCR. Data were collected on demographics, clinical presentation, and laboratory results. Results Twenty-seven cases of HME were found and separated into Group 1 (G1, n = 10) or Group 2 (G2, n = 17) based on age (Table 1). G1 had a significantly higher chance of being Hispanic than G2. Twenty-four of the 27 patients (89%) were hospitalized with an average length of stay of 3.4 days (range 1–14 days).The only significant difference in clinical presentation was that G1 was more likely to have myalgia (P = 0.02). 40% or more of patients in both groups presented with an acute kidney injury and the average length of hospital stay in days was 4.0 ± 2.9 and 3.2 ± 3.1 for G1 and G2, respectively. The number of cases overall have increased 6.0% per year between 2014 and 2017. Thrombocytopenia presented in all cases. Conclusion. HME is prevalent in Suffolk County. Clinical presentation and laboratory findings were largely similar between the two groups, except the younger population more often presented with myalgia. A risk factor in this study was to be young and Hispanic, likely due to occupational exposure. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Download Full-text

Pilonidal Sinus: How to Choose Between Excision and Open Granulation Versus Excision and Primary Closure?

Swiss Surgery ◽

10.1024/1023-9332.8.6.255 ◽

2002 ◽

Vol 8 (6) ◽

pp. 255-258 ◽

Cited By ~ 28

Author(s):

Perruchoud ◽

Vuilleumier ◽

Givel

Keyword(s):

Hospital Stay ◽

Pilonidal Sinus ◽

Primary Closure ◽

Average Length ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Healing Time ◽

Incision And Drainage ◽

The Mean ◽

Primary Healing

Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate excision and open granulation versus excision and primary closure as treatments for pilonidal sinus. Subjects and methods: We evaluated a group of 141 patients operated on for a pilonidal sinus between 1991 and 1995. Ninety patients were treated by excision and open granulation, 34 patients by excision and primary closure and 17 patients by incision and drainage, as a unique treatment of an infected pilonidal sinus. Results: The first group, receiving treatment of excision and open granulation, experienced the following outcomes: average length of hospital stay, four days; average healing time; 72 days; average number of post-operative ambulatory visits, 40; average off-work delay, 38 days; and average follow-up time, 43 months. There were five recurrences (6%) in this group during the follow-up period. For the second group treated by excision and primary closure, the corresponding outcome measurements were as follows: average length of hospital stay, four days; average healing time, 23 days; primary healing failure rate, 9%; average number of post-operative ambulatory visits, 6; average off-work delay, 21 days. The average follow-up time was 34 months, and two recurrences (6%) were observed during the follow-up period. In the third group, seventeen patients benefited from an incision and drainage as unique treatment. The mean follow-up was 37 months. Five recurrences (29%) were noticed, requiring a new operation in all the cases. Discussion and conclusion: This series of 141 patients is too limited to permit final conclusions to be drawn concerning significant advantages of one form of treatment compared to the other. Nevertheless, primary closure offers the advantages of quicker healing time, fewer post-operative visits and shorter time off work. When a primary closure can be carried out, it should be routinely considered for socio-economical and comfort reasons.

Download Full-text

The management and outcome of paediatric splenic injuries in the Netherlands

World Journal of Emergency Surgery ◽

10.1186/s13017-021-00353-4 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 16 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Maike Grootenhaar ◽

Dominique Lamers ◽

Karin Kamphuis-van Ulzen ◽

Ivo de Blaauw ◽

Edward C. Tan

Keyword(s):

The Netherlands ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Operative Management ◽

Trauma Centre ◽

Management Approach ◽

Haemodynamic Instability ◽

Low Grade ◽

High Grade ◽

Level 1 ◽

Non Operative Management

Abstract Background Non-operative management (NOM) is generally accepted as a treatment method of traumatic paediatric splenic rupture. However, considerable variations in management exist. This study analyses local trends in aetiology and management of paediatric splenic injuries and evaluates the implementation of the guidelines proposed by the American Paediatric Surgical Association (APSA) in a level 1 trauma centre. Methods The charts of paediatric patients with blunt splenic injury (BSI) who were admitted or transferred to a level 1 trauma centre between 2003 and 2020 were retrospectively assessed. Information pertaining to demographics, mechanism of injury, injury description, associated injuries, intervention and outcomes were analysed and compared to international literature. Results There were 130 patients with BSI identified (63.1% male), with a mean age of 11.3 ± 4.0 and a mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 21.6 ± 13.7. Bicycle accidents were the most common trauma mechanism (23.1%). Sixty-four percent were multi-trauma patients, 25% received blood transfusions, and 31% were haemodynamically unstable. Mean injury grade was 3.0, with 30% of patients having a high-grade injury. In total, 75% of patients underwent NOM with a 100% efficacy rate. Total splenectomy rate was 6.2%. Four patients died due to brain damage. Patients with a high-grade BSI (grades IV–V) had a significantly higher ISS and longer bedrest and more often presented with an active blush on computed tomography (CT) scans than patients with a low-grade BSI (grades I–III). Non-operative management was mainly the choice of treatment in both groups (76.6% and 79.5%, respectively). Haemodynamic instability was a predictor for operative management (OM) (p = 0.001). Predictors for a longer length of stay (LOS) included concomitant injuries, haemodynamic instability and OM (all p < 0.02). Interobserver agreement in the grading of BSI is moderate, with a Cohens Kappa coefficient of 0.493. Conclusion Non-operative management has proven to be a realistic management approach in both low- and high-grade splenic injuries. Consideration for operative management should be based on haemodynamic instability. Compared to the anticipated length of bedrest and hospital stay outlined in the APSA guidelines, the Netherlands can reduce the length of bedrest and hospital stay through their non-operative management. Level of evidence Therapeutic study, level III

Download Full-text

Detection of influenza virus in rectal swabs of patients admitted in hospital for febrile illnesses in Thailand

SAGE Open Medicine ◽

10.1177/2050312121989631 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 ◽

pp. 205031212198963

Author(s):

Artit Sangkakam ◽

Pasin Hemachudha ◽

Abhinbhen W Saraya ◽

Benjamard Thaweethee-Sukjai ◽

Thaniwan Cheun-Arom ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Influenza Virus ◽

Gastrointestinal Tract ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Rectal Swab ◽

Average Length ◽

Gastrointestinal Symptoms ◽

Virus Detection ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽

Influenza Virus Detection

Introduction: Influenza virus favours the respiratory tract as its primary site of host entry and replication, and it is transmitted mainly via respiratory secretions. Nasopharyngeal swab is the gold standard specimen type for influenza detection, but several studies have also suggested that the virus replicates in the human gastrointestinal tract. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on all patients positive for influenza virus and initially recruited as part of the PREDICT project from 2017 to 2018. The objectives of the study were to investigate whether rectal swab could aid in improving influenza detection, and if there was any correlation between gastrointestinal disturbances and severity of infection, using length of hospital stay as an indicator of severity. Results: Of the 51 influenza-positive patients, 12 had detectable influenza virus in their rectal swab. Among these 12 rectal swab positive patients, influenza virus was not detected in the nasopharyngeal swab of three of them. Gastrointestinal symptoms were observed for 28.2% patients with a negative rectal swab negative and 25.0% patients with a positive rectal swab. Average length of hospital stay was 4.2 days for rectal swab positive group and 3.7 days for rectal swab negative group. This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.288). Conclusions: There is no correlation between influenza virus detection in rectal swab and gastrointestinal disturbances or disease severity, and there is currently insufficient evidence to support replicative ability in the gastrointestinal tract.

Download Full-text

The independent patient factors that affect length of stay following hip fractures

Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England ◽

10.1308/rcsann.2018.0068 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 100 (7) ◽

pp. 556-562 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

T Richards ◽

A Glendenning ◽

D Benson ◽

S Alexander ◽

S Thati

Keyword(s):

Hip Fracture ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Hip Fractures ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Hospital Length ◽

Acute Hospital ◽

Hospital Length Of Stay ◽

Patient Factors ◽

Mobility Status

Introduction Management of hip fractures has evolved over recent years to drive better outcomes including length of hospital stay. We aimed to identify and quantify the effect that patient factors influence acute hospital and total health service length of stay. Methods A retrospective observational study based on National Hip Fracture Database data was conducted from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2015. A multiple regression analysis of 330 patients was carried out to determine independent factors that affect acute hospital and total hospital length of stay. Results American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade 3 or above, Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) less than 8 and poor mobility status were independent factors, significantly increasing length of hospital stay in our population. Acute hospital length of stay can be predicted as 8.9 days longer when AMTS less than 8, 4.2 days longer when ASA grade was 3 or above and 20.4 days longer when unable to mobilise unaided (compared with independently mobile individuals). Other factors including total hip replacement compared with hemiarthroplasty did not independently affect length of stay. Conclusions Our analysis in a representative and generalisable population illustrates the importance of identifying these three patient characteristics in hip fracture patients. When recognised and targeted with orthogeriatric support, the length of hospital stay for these patients can be reduced and overall hip fracture care improved. Screening on admission for ASA grade, AMTS and mobility status allows prediction of length of stay and tailoring of care to match needs.

Download Full-text

Risk factors for high length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality in hip fractures in the elderly

Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología (English Edition) ◽

10.1016/j.recote.2021.05.009 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 65 (5) ◽

pp. 322-330

Author(s):

J. Salvador Marín ◽

F.J. Ferrández Martínez ◽

C. Fuster Such ◽

J.M. Seguí Ripoll ◽

D. Orozco Beltrán ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Hospital Mortality ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Hip Fractures ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

The Elderly ◽

High Length

Download Full-text

Critical Pathway and Hospital-Hospital Cooperation in Acute Stroke Reduction of the Length of Hospital Stay

Interventional Neuroradiology ◽

10.1177/15910199000060s142 ◽

2000 ◽

Vol 6 (1_suppl) ◽

pp. 251-255 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Y. Hashimoto ◽

T. Terasaki ◽

T. Yonehara ◽

M. Tokunaga ◽

T. Hirano ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Neurological Disease ◽

Average Length ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Stroke Patients ◽

Critical Pathway ◽

Hospital Days ◽

Other Neurological Disease

Stroke patients tend to stay longer in one hospital compared to patients with other neurological disease. After the introduction of 3 types of critical pathway dedicated for various severity of acute ischemic stroke in 1995, the average length of in-hospital days declined from 30.0 days (1993) to 15.3 days (1998), ie 49% reduction. This reduction was achieved by the use of critical pathway and the hospital-hospital cooperation.

Download Full-text

223 Procedural Safety of Stereotactic Laser Ablation (SLA) and Associated Hospital Stay: Outcome from the First Hundred Patient from LAANTERN Prospective Registry

Neurosurgery ◽

10.1093/neuros/nyx417.223 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 64 (CN_suppl_1) ◽

pp. 261-261

Author(s):

Clark C Chen ◽

Robert Rennert ◽

Usman Khan ◽

Stephen B Tatter ◽

Melvin Field ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Laser Ablation ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Radiation Treatment ◽

Average Length ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Invasive Procedure ◽

Patient Discharge ◽

Target Lesion ◽

Hospital Length ◽

Hospital Length Of Stay

Abstract INTRODUCTION We examined the procedural safety and length of hospital stay for patients who underwent stereotactic laser ablation (SLA). METHODS Patients undergoing stereotactic laser ablation were prospectively enrolled in the Laser Ablation of Abnormal Neurological Tissue using Robotic Neuroblate System (LAANTERN) registry. Data from the first 100 enrolled patients are presented. RESULTS >The demographic of the patient cohort consisted of 58% females and 42% males. The mean age and KPS of the cohort were 51 (±17) years and 83 (±15), respectively. 87% of the SLA-treated patients had undergone prior surgical or radiation treatment. In terms of indications, 84% of the SLAs were performed as treatment for brain tumor and 16% were performed as treatment for epilepsy. In terms of the procedure, 79% of the SLA patients underwent treatment of a single lesion. In 72% of the SLA treated patients, >90% of the target lesion was ablated. The average procedural time was 188.2 minutes (range: 48–368 minutes). The average blood loss per procedure was 17.7 cc (range: 0–300cc). In terms of hospitalization, the average length of Intensive Care stay was 38.1 hours (range 0335). The number of hours post-procedure before patient discharge was 61.1 hours (range 6–612). 85% of the patients were discharged home. There were 15 adverse events at the one-month follow-up (12%), with two events definitively related to the procedure (2%), including one patient with post-operative intraventricular hemorrhage and another with post-procedural gait compromise. CONCLUSION SLA is a minimally invasive procedure with favorable profile in terms of safety and hospital length of stay.

Download Full-text

Consent for the discontinuation of life-prolonging treatment in cancer patients: a retrospective comparative analysis before and after the enforcement of the Life Extension Medical Decision law

10.21203/rs.3.rs-118257/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

YuJin Chung ◽

JinHo Beom ◽

JiEun Lee ◽

Incheol Park ◽

Junho Cho

Keyword(s):

Emergency Room ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Average Length ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Life Extension ◽

Medical Decision ◽

Patient Consent ◽

Before And After ◽

The Law

Abstract Background The Life Extension Medical Decision law enacted on February 4, 2018 in South Korea was the first to consider the suspension of nonsensical life-prolonging treatment, and its enactment raised big controversy in Korean society. However, there is no study on whether the actual life-prolonging treatment for patients has decreased after enforcing the law. This study aimed to compare the provision of patient consent before and after the enforcement of the law among cancer patients who visited a tertiary university hospital's emergency room to understand the effects of the law on cancer patients' clinical care. Methods This retrospective single cohort study included advanced cancer patients over 19 years of age who visited the emergency room at a tertiary university hospital. The two study periods were as follows: from February 2017 to January 2018 (before) and from May 2018 to April 2019 (after). The primary outcome was the average length of hospital stay. The consent rate for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), intubation, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), and intensive care unit (ICU) admission were the secondary outcomes. Results The average length of hospital stay decreased after the law was enforced, from 4 days to 2 days (p= 0.001). The rates of direct transfers to secondary and nursing hospitals increased from 8.2% to 21.2% (p=0.001) and from 1.0% to 9.7%, respectively (p<0.001). The rate of provision of consent for admission to the ICU decreased from 6.7% to 2.3% (p=0.032). For CPR and CRRT, the rate of provision of consent decreased from 1.0% to 0.0% and from 13.9% to 8.8%, respectively, but the differences were not significant (p=0.226 and p=0.109, respectively). Conclusion According to previous research, for patients wishing only conservative treatment, the reduction in hospital stays at tertiary hospitals ultimately reduces the physical, emotional, financial burdens and also improves the quality of end-of-life at home or in a hospice facility. In this context, this research ultimately show that the purpose of the LEMD law has been achieved. Further research in several hospitals including those patients who completed the consent after hospitalization is needed to generalize the clinical implication of the LEMD law.

Download Full-text

Locked intramedullary nailing technique of the femur without brilliance amplifier at the trauma and orthopedics department of the university hospital of peace series on 35 cases during 1 year

MOJ Orthopedics & Rheumatology ◽

10.15406/mojor.2021.13.00556 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (5) ◽

pp. 95-97

Author(s):

Augustin Delange Hendrick ◽

Almenord Pharol ◽

Khawly Clifford PG ◽

Augustin Delange ◽

Pierre Marie Woolley

Keyword(s):

Hospital Stay ◽

Intramedullary Nailing ◽

Femoral Fractures ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

University Hospital ◽

Patient Morbidity ◽

Duration Of Hospitalization ◽

The Cost ◽

The University

Femoral fractures increase the length of hospital stay for our patients for several reasons such as lack of blood, economic resources, and lack of infrastructure. The use of a C-arm has been shown to reduce patient morbidity due to early functional recovery and reduced hospital stay. Objective: To develop an intramedullary nailing technique without c-arm with a closed focus to reduce the duration of hospitalization of its patients as well as the cost related to the equipment used for follow-up. Methodology: prospective study on 35 patients for 1 year August 2020 to August 2021 Results: We followed 35 patients in which the mean age was 37.83 years with extremes of 18 and 78 years. The male sex predominates 21 against 14 women or 60% against 40% respectively. The sex ratio is 1.5. A total of 19 diaphyseal fractures (54.3%) were nailed, 9 supracondylar (25.7%) and 7 subtrochanteric (20%). Twenty-seven were closed fractures (71.1%), and 8 were open fractures (22.9%). The length of hospitalization was less than 3 days for 30 patients (85.7%), and more than 3 days for 5 patients (14.3%). Conclusion: We recommend that we promote this closed-hearth technique because it improves the postoperative follow-up of patients. Additionally, it would reduce exposure to radiation from c-arm in hospitals that have this equipment.

Download Full-text