scholarly journals Prevalence and Outcomes of COVID-19 Among Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease—A Danish Prospective Population-based Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Attauabi ◽  
Anja Poulsen ◽  
Klaus Theede ◽  
Natalia Pedersen ◽  
Lone Larsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Diseases ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Disease Course ◽  
Biologic Therapies ◽  
Population Based Study ◽  
Immune Mediated ◽  
Related Hospitalisation ◽  
Bowel Diseases ◽  
National Cohort ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Abstract Background and Aims As no population-based study has investigated the susceptibility and disease course of COVID-19 among patients with inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD], we aimed to investigate this topic in a population-based setting. Methods Two cohorts were investigated. First, a nationwide cohort of all IBD patients diagnosed with COVID-19 was prospectively followed to investigate the disease courses of both diseases. Second, within a population-based cohort of 2.6 million Danish citizens, we identified all individuals tested for SARS-CoV-2 to determine the occurrence of COVID-19 among patients with and without IBD and other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases [IMIDs]. Results Between January 28, 2020 and June 2, 2020, a total of 76 IBD patients with COVID-19 were identified in the national cohort and prospectively followed for 35 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 25–51). A large proportion [n = 19: 25%] required a COVID-19-related hospitalisation for 7 days [IQR: 2–8.5] which was associated with being 65 years or older (odds ratio [OR] = 23].80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.32–89.63, p <0.01) and presence of any non-IMID comorbidity [OR = 8.12, 95% CI 2.55–25.87, p <0.01], but not use of immunomodulators [p = 0.52] or biologic therapies [p = 0.14]. In the population-based study, 8476 of 231 601 [3.7%] residents tested positive for SARS-CoV-2; however, the occurrence was significantly lower among patients with IBD [62 of the 2486 patients = 2.5%, p <0.01] and other IMIDs [531 of 16 492 patients = 3.2%, p <0.01] as compared with patients without IMIDs. Conclusions Patients with IMIDs, including IBD, had a significantly lower susceptibility to COVID-19 than patients without IMIDs, and neither immunosuppressive therapies nor IBD activity were associated with the disease course of COVID-19.

scholarly journals P102 Outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 among patients with inflammatory bowel diseases and the influence of IBD-related medications– A Danish prospective population-based cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S197-S197
Author(s):  
M Attauabi ◽  
A Poulsen ◽  
M Kajbæk Verner-Andersen ◽  
M Rosager Hansen ◽  
N Pedersen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Intensive Care Treatment ◽  
Disease Course ◽  
Danish Population ◽  
Population Based Study ◽  
Systemic Steroids ◽  
Bowel Diseases ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Abstract Background Population-based data regarding outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) are limited. Studies on the association of COVID-19 outcomes and immunomodulating therapies, are scarce. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a population-based study investigating the outcomes of COVID-19 among patients with UC and CD in Denmark. Methods The Danish COVID-19 IBD Database is an extensive population-based database that prospectively monitors the disease course of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 among patients with UC and CD in Denmark. Severe COVID-19 was defined as COVID-19 necessitating intensive care unit admission, ventilator use, or death. Regression analysis was adjusted for age, sex, disease type, disease activity, cardiovascular disease, and corticosteroids. Results The study recruited 363 patients (UC: 223; CD: 140) from January 28th, 2020, to February 7th, 2021. A total of 36 (16.1%) and 18 (12.9%) patients with UC and CD, respectively, required a COVID-19 related hospitalization, while eight (3.6%) and three (2.1%) patients required intensive care treatment. Death due to COVID-19 was observed among eight (3.6%) and two (1.4%) patients, respectively. The association between these outcomes and IBD-related treatment is presented in Table 1. As shown, none of the IBD-related medications were associated with severe COVID-19 in univariate and adjusted analysis. However, systemic steroids were found to be associated with the risk of COVID-19 related hospital admission among patients with UC (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=6.54 (95% CI 1.09-36.39)) and CD (aOR=5.45 (95% CI 2.07-12.24)). Conclusion This ongoing Danish population-based study on COVID-19 outcomes among patients with UC and CD demonstrated severe COVID-19 among only a minority of patients, which was not associated with IBD-related medications. However, use of systemic steroids were associated with COVID-19 necessitating hospital admission among patients with UC and CD.

Systematic Review with Meta-analysis: The Impact of Co-occurring Immune-mediated Inflammatory Diseases on the Disease Course of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Attauabi ◽  
Mirabella Zhao ◽  
Flemming Bendtsen ◽  
Johan Burisch
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Risk Ratio ◽  
Inflammatory Diseases ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Course ◽  
Immune Mediated ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Bowel Diseases ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background and Aims Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are at risk of developing a variety of other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). The influence of co-occurring IMIDs on the disease course of IBD remains unknown. The aim of this study was therefore to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of IMIDs on phenotypic presentation and outcome in patients with IBD. Methods PubMed and Embase were searched from their earliest records through December 2018 and updated in October 2019 for studies reporting proportions or ratios of IBD-related disease outcomes in patients with and without co-occurring IMIDs. Meta-analyses were performed to estimate summary proportions and risks of the main outcomes. PRISMA guidelines were used, and study quality was assessed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results A total of 93 studies were identified, comprising 16,064 IBD patients with co-occurring IMIDs and 3,451,414 IBD patients without IMIDs. Patients with IBD and co-occurring IMIDs were at increased risk of having extensive colitis or pancolitis (risk ratio, 1.38; 95% Cl, 1.25–1.52; P < 0.01, I2 = 86%) and receiving IBD-related surgeries (risk ratio, 1.17; 95% Cl, 1.01–1.36; P = 0.03; I2 = 85%) compared with patients without IMIDs. Co-occurrence of IMIDs other than primary sclerosing cholangitis in patients with IBD was associated with an increased risk of receiving immunomodulators (risk ratio, 1.15; 95% Cl, 1.06–1.24; P < 0.01; I2 = 60%) and biologic therapies (risk ratio, 1.19; 95% Cl, 1.08–1.32; P < 0.01; I2 = 53%). Conclusion This meta-analysis found that the presence of co-occurring IMIDs influences the disease course of IBD, including an increased risk of surgery and its phenotypical expression.

scholarly journals P261 Systematic review with meta-analysis: The impact of concomitant immune-mediated diseases on the disease course of inflammatory bowel disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S280-S281
Author(s):  
M Attauabi ◽  
M Zhao ◽  
F Bendtsen ◽  
J Burisch
Keyword(s):  
Biologic Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Multidisciplinary Care ◽  
Disease Course ◽  
Immune Mediated ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Bowel Diseases ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Several studies have shown an association between inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD] and immune-mediated diseases [IMIDs], but data on the impact of co-occurring IMIDs on IBD course are inconsistent. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of co-occurring IMIDs on IBD phenotype and disease course. Methods PubMed and EMBASE were searched from database inception through December 2018 and updated in October 2019 for studies reporting prevalences or odds, risks or hazard ratios of IBD-related disease outcomes in patients with and without co-existing IMIDs. Meta-analyses were performed to estimate summary prevalences and risks of the outcomes which included disease extension, IBD-related surgery and hospitalisation, malignancy, mortality and need of medication (biologic therapy, steroids and immunomodulators). IMIDs were stratified into primary sclerosing cholangitis [PSC] and ‘IMIDs other than PSC’. Results A total of 93 studies comprising 14,307 IBD patients with IMIDs and 3,409,914 IBD patients without IMIDs were included in the study. Summary risks and prevalences with 95% confidence intervals for each outcome are presented in figures 1 and 2, respectively. The following results are all significant (p < 0.05). Compared with patients without co-occurring IMIDs, patients with ulcerative colitis [UC] and co-occurring IMIDs other than PSC more frequently received immunomodulators and steroids, and patients with Crohn’s disease [CD] and concomitant IMIDs other than PSC more often received biologic therapy. UC patients with co-existing IMIDs other than PSC more often underwent IBD-related surgery, while patients with CD and PSC received fewer surgeries. In addition, UC patients with co-occurring PSC were at increased risk for having extensive colitis, pancolitis, and malignancies. Patients with UC and PSC had a higher mortality rate, but no difference was found among patients with IMIDs other than PSC. PSC did not influence hospitalisation rates among IBD patients. Conclusion This meta-analysis found that IBD patients with co-existing IMIDs have a different disease course than patients without concomitant IMIDs. This study emphasises the importance of multidisciplinary care of IBD and that physicians caring for IBD patients need to be aware of IMIDs as a prognostic factor.

Can We Extrapolate Data from One Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Disease to Another One?

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 248-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Magro ◽  
Rosa Coelho ◽  
Armando Peixoto
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Inflammatory Diseases ◽  
Analytical Techniques ◽  
Approval Process ◽  
Homogeneous Population ◽  
Post Translational Modifications ◽  
Innovator Product ◽  
Immune Mediated ◽  
Bowel Diseases ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases share several pathogenic pathways and this pushes sometimes to extrapolate from one disease or indication to others. A biosimilar can be defined as a biotherapeutic product which is similar in terms of quality, safety, and efficacy to an already licensed reference biotherapeutic product. We review the substrate for extrapolation, the current approval process for biosimilars and the pioneering studies on biosimilars performed in rheumatoid arthritis patients. A biosimilar has the same amino acid sequence as its innovator product. However, post-translational modifications can occur and the current analytical techniques do not allow the final structure. To test the efficacy in one indication, a homogeneous population should be chosen and immunogenicity features are essential in switching and interchangeability. CT-P13 (Remsima™; Inflectra™) is a biosimilar of reference infliximab (Remicade®). It meets most of the requirements for extrapolation. Nevertheless, in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) we need more studies to confirm the postulates of extrapolation from rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis to IBD. Furthermore, an effective pharmacovigilance schedule is mandatory to look for immunogenicity and side effects.

scholarly journals P803 The risk of spine and hip fracture in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: a nationwide population-based study

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S629-S629
Author(s):  
Y J Kim ◽  
H J Ahn ◽  
S Noh ◽  
J C Park ◽  
J Y Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Regression Model ◽  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Population Based Study ◽  
Cox Regression Model ◽  
Bowel Diseases ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Abstract Background This nationwide population-based study sought to investigate the risk of spine and hip fracture in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Methods Using the 2007–2016 data from the Korean national health insurance claims database, we calculated incidence rate and incidence rate ratios (IRR) of spine and hip fracture in patients with IBD (n = 18,228; 64.1% male, 65.9% ulcerative colitis [UC]) compared with age- and sex- frequency matched subjects in 1:10 ratio (n = 186,871). A Cox regression model was used to evaluate risk of spine and hip fracture. Results The incidence rate and IRR of spine and hip fracture in IBD were 2.88/1000 person-years and 1.21 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11–1.31) during the median follow-up of 4.5 years. The risk for spine and hip fracture was significantly higher in UC (IRR 1.39, 95% CI, 1.25- 1.54), whereas it was not significantly higher in Crohn’s disease (IRR 0.85, 95% CI, 0.67- 1.06) than matched controls. In UC, the IRR of spine fracture was 1.41 (95% CI, 1.24–1.58) and the IRR of hip fracture was 1.40 (95% CI, 1.11–1.71). In multivariable analysis using the Cox regression model, the risk of spine and hip fracture increased with age (p trend < 0.001), in female patients (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.94; 95% CI, 1.50–2.51) and in patients with comorbidities including osteoporosis (aHR 2.86; 95% CI, 2.10–3.89), stroke (aHR 2.74; 95% CI, 1.78–4.21) hypertension (aHR 1.82; 95% CI, 1.38–2.41), diabetes mellitus (aHR 1.67; 95% CI, 1.25–2.24) and dyslipidaemia (aHR 1.36; 95% CI, 1.05–1.78). Conclusion In a population-based study from Korea, we found that the risk for spine and hip fracture increased in patients with IBD, especially in UC patients. Also, this risk increased in patients who are older, female, or have comorbidities.

scholarly journals P266 Atopic diseases are associated with the development of inflammatory bowel diseases: A nationwide population-based study

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S282-S283
Author(s):  
S W Hong ◽  
H Soh ◽  
H J Lee ◽  
K Han ◽  
S Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Atopic Disease ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Atopic Diseases ◽  
Population Based Study ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Bowel Diseases ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Abstract Background The association between atopic diseases and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) still remains unclear. We conducted a nationwide population-based study to investigate the effect of atopic diseases on the development of IBD. Methods A total of 9,950,548 subjects who received medical check-up between 2009 and 2012 were included and followed up until 2017. The presence of any atopic disease including atopic dermatitis (AD), allergic rhinitis (AR), and asthma were evaluated. Patients who developed IBD including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) were identified using the claims data from National Health Insurance. Results During a mean follow up of 7.3 years, 1,426 (0.014%) subjects developed CD and 5,916 (0.059%) subjects developed UC. The incidences of CD (per 100,000 person-years) were 4.088, 2.255, and 2.344 in patients with AD, AR, and asthma,, respectively. The incidences of UC were 11.926, 9.857, and 9.377 in patients with AD, AR, and asthma, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that the adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) for incident CD in patients with AD, AR, and asthma were 2.21, 1.33, and 1.59 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.251–3.896, 1.152–1.532, and 1.186–2.123, respectively) compared with controls. The risk for incident UC in patients in AD, AR, and asthma were 1.51, 1.32, and 1.28 (95% CI 1.081–2.101, 1.235–1.416, and 1.110–1.484, respectively) compared with controls. Moreover, increase in the number of atopic diseases gradually increased the risk for CD and UC; CD showed aHR of 1.36 and 1.65 (95% CI 1.180–1.571 and 1.143–2.370), and UC showed aHR of 1.30 and 1.49 (95% CI 1.216–1.398 and 1.247-1.170) in one, and two or more atopic diseases, respectively. Conclusion Patients with any atopic diseases showed an increased risk for IBD, while an increase in the number of atopic diseases gradually increased the risk for IBD.

scholarly journals IBD considerations in spondyloarthritis

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 1759720X2093941
Author(s):  
Caroline Di Jiang ◽  
Tim Raine
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Diseases ◽  
Drug Dosing ◽  
Inflammatory Conditions ◽  
Gastrointestinal Pathology ◽  
Immune Mediated ◽  
Form Part ◽  
Bowel Diseases ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Gastrointestinal Inflammation ◽  
The Difference

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) may be regarded a family of auto-inflammatory conditions with inflammation focused on the joints. These form part of a wider family of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, which include inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). These conditions share common elements of pathophysiology and it is perhaps unsurprising, therefore, that individuals with SpA frequently manifest gastrointestinal inflammation, to which the physician managing the patient with SpA must be alert. In this article, we review the shared epidemiology and pathophysiology of these conditions, before discussing approaches to diagnosis and management of inflammatory gastrointestinal pathology in patients seen in rheumatology clinics. In particular, we discuss the difference between non-specific gastrointestinal inflammation commonly described in this patient group and the more specific diagnosis of Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis. We describe the appropriate diagnostic workup for patients suspected of having IBD. In addition, we discuss how a diagnosis of IBD can inform treatment selection, highlighting important differences in treatment choice, drug dosing, monitoring and drug safety for this particular comorbid patient population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document