scholarly journals Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Etrasimod for Ulcerative Colitis: Results from the Open-label Extension of the OASIS Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Séverine Vermeire ◽  
Michael Chiorean ◽  
Julián Panés ◽  
Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet ◽  
Jinkun Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
End Of Treatment ◽  
Open Label Extension

Abstract Background and Aims Etrasimod is an oral, selective, sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator. In a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in adults with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis (OASIS), etrasimod 2 mg provided significant benefit versus placebo and was generally well tolerated. This open-label extension (OLE) evaluated safety and efficacy of etrasimod for up to 52 weeks. Methods In OASIS, 156 patients received etrasimod 1 mg, etrasimod 2 mg, or placebo once-daily for 12 weeks. After completing OASIS, patients could enrol in the OLE and receive etrasimod 2 mg for an additional 34–40 weeks. Results 118 patients enrolled in the OLE; 112 patients received etrasimod 2 mg at any point and were evaluated for safety and efficacy. A total of 92 (82%) patients who received etrasimod 2 mg in the OLE completed the study. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 60% (67/112) of patients receiving etrasimod 2 mg at any time, most commonly worsening ulcerative colitis and anaemia; 94% of adverse events were mild/moderate. At end of treatment, 64% of patients met the criteria for clinical response, 33% for clinical remission, and 43% for endoscopic improvement. Week 12 clinical response, clinical remission, or endoscopic improvement was maintained to end of treatment in 85%, 60%, or 69% of patients, respectively. Steroid-free clinical remission occurred in 22% of overall patients. Conclusions In this long-term extension study, etrasimod 2 mg demonstrated a favourable safety profile. Most patients with clinical response, clinical remission, or endoscopic improvement at Week 12 maintained that status to end of treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov numbers NCT02447302, NCT02536404.

scholarly journals P682 Faecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein levels are associated with long-term clinical and endoscopic outcomes: Analysis of the OASIS open-label extension trial of etrasimod for ulcerative colitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S555-S556
Author(s):  
A Yarur ◽  
M Chiorean ◽  
J Zhang ◽  
W Reinisch ◽  
S Vermeire ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Faecal Calprotectin ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Open Label Extension

Abstract Background Reliable biomarkers of ulcerative colitis (UC) disease activity may be useful in clinical trials and practice. Etrasimod is an oral, selective, sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator with efficacy in a 12-week, phase 2, double-blind (DB), randomised, controlled trial in adult patients with moderately-to-severely active UC (OASIS; NCT02447302). Patients who completed the DB study were eligible to enrol in an open-label extension (OLE; NCT02536404) and receive etrasimod 2 mg once daily for up to an additional 34 weeks. The aim of this post-hoc analysis was to assess the correlation of sequential faecal calprotectin (FC) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels throughout the DB study and OLE with clinical and endoscopic outcomes at end of treatment (EOT) in the OLE. Methods In the DB study, patients received etrasimod 1 mg, etrasimod 2 mg or placebo. The OLE evaluable cohort comprised patients who received etrasimod 2 mg throughout the OLE. The modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population comprised patients with non-missing assessments. EOT was the last observation for each patient, occurring at week 46 (OLE week 34) for study completers or at last visit for patients who discontinued or had missing data. Endpoints were modified Mayo Clinic score (mMCS; range 0–9; including endoscopy, rectal bleeding [RB], and stool frequency [SF]); clinical remission (endoscopic subscore ≤1 [with absence of friability], RB ≤1, and SF score ≤1 with ≥1 point decrease from DB baseline); clinical response (clinical remission or decrease in mMCS of ≥2 points and ≥30% decrease from DB baseline, with either a RB decrease of ≥1 or RB score of ≤1); and endoscopic improvement (subscore ≤1). FC and CRP were measured longitudinally to EOT. Comparisons between subgroups were assessed with a Wilcoxon rank-sum test (2-sided P values). Analysis of correlation between variables was conducted using the Spearman’s rank coefficient. Results The evaluable cohort included 105 patients, 31 of whom received etrasimod 2 mg throughout both DB and OLE periods. At EOT 70%, 35% and 45% of patients in the mITT evaluable cohort had clinical response, clinical remission and endoscopic improvement, respectively. Differences in FC and CRP levels between patients with and without clinical remission at EOT are shown in Figures 1 and 2, respectively for patients who received etrasimod 2 mg throughout both the DB and OLE periods. Correlation analyses of FC and CRP with clinical (mMCS) and endoscopic disease activity and with each other are shown in Table 1. Conclusion FC and CRP appear to correlate with clinical and endoscopic outcomes over long-term treatment with etrasimod. Additional validation is needed to determine their utility in treat-to-target management strategies.

One-Year Open-Label Safety and Efficacy Study of Paliperidone Extended-Release Tablets in Patients With Schizophrenia

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 506-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Kramer ◽  
George Simpson ◽  
Valentinas Maciulis ◽  
Stuart Kushner ◽  
Yanning Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Extended Release ◽  
Tolerability Profile ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Stabilization Phase ◽  
Open Label Extension ◽  
Paliperidone Extended Release

ABSTRACTIntroduction: This 52-week open-label extension (OLE) to a double-blind placebo-controlled recurrence prevention study examined the long-term safety and efficacy of flexibly-dosed paliperidone extended-release (ER) tablets in patients with schizophrenia.Methods: Patients entering the OLE either entered from the double-blind phase (placebo or paliperidone ER treatment) or entered directly from the run-in or stabilization phase (paliperidone ER) of the earlier study. During the OLE, patients were treated with flexibly-dosed paliperidone ER (3–15 mg/day; 9 mg starting dose). Safety and tolerability assessments included incidence of adverse events and extrapyramidal symptoms. Efficacy was also assessed.Results: The study population (n=235) was predominantly men (66%), 18–58 years of age. Twelve patients (5%) experienced an adverse event requiring treatment discontinuation. One or more serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 13 patients (6%). There was one death. The mean Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score decreased from open-label baseline to endpoint for all groups, regardless of previous double-blind treatment (placebo or paliperidone ER).Conclusion: This year-long OLE provides information on the long-term safety and tolerability of paliperidone ER in patients with schizophrenia. The resulting safety and tolerability profile was similar to that seen in earlier short-term studies.

scholarly journals P372 Effectiveness and safety of immunosuppressants for pouch disorders: results from the RESERVO Study of GETECCU

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S388-S390
Author(s):  
F Mesonero Gismero ◽  
Y Zabana ◽  
A Fernández-Clotet ◽  
E Leo ◽  
B Caballol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Multicentric Study ◽  
Previous Diagnosis

Abstract Background Pouchitis and other inflammatory disorders of the pouch (IDP), such as Crohn′s-like disease of the pouch (CDP), are frequent in patients operated for a previous diagnosis of ulcerative colitis. Many different therapies have been used, but the effectiveness of immunosupresants (IMM) has been poorly explored in this setting. Our aim was to evaluate the use, efficacy and safety of IMM in patients with pouchitis or another IDP. Methods Retrospective and multicentric study of a Spanish cohort of pouch-carrying patients with previous diagnosis of ulcerative colitis, and subsequent diagnosis of IDP, following ECCO diagnostic criteria. Patients who used IMM to treat these conditions were selected. Clinical effectiveness was evaluated at long-term. We defined clinical remission as returning to the previous stool frequency, no pain or defecatory urgency, clinical response as the improvement in these parameters without the achievement of remission, and non-response as no improvement or worsening symptoms. Endoscopic response was evaluated when possible using modified pouchitis disease activity index (PDAI) endoscopic subscore. Adverse events were collected. We used descriptive statistics. Results In the overall cohort of 338 patients with IDP, 93 (27%) were treated with IMM. Of those, 57% males, median age 40 (20-71) ys, and 72% non-smokers. Colectomy was performed at a median age of 31 (18-63) ys and IPD was diagnosed 25 (1-235) months after ileostomy closure. IMM used were thiopurines (n=86), methotrexate (n=4), cyclosporine (n=2) and tacrolimus (n=1). IMM were used as monotherapy in 66 (71%) cases and were indicated as treatment of pouchitis (n=60, 65%), CDP (n=32, 34.4%) and cuffitis (n=1, 1%). Effectiveness was evaluated only for thiopurine monotherapy (n=62). After a median follow-up of 23 (1-234) months, clinical remission was achieved in 31%, clinical response in 31% and non-response in 38% (Figure 1). There were no differences in effectiveness between pouchitis and CDP (63.9% vs 57.7%, p= 0.62). Endoscopic response was evaluated in 19 (30.6%) cases. After a median of 9 months of follow-up median PDAI endoscopic subscore dropped from 3 (range 2-4) to 1 (range 0-3), (Figure 2). Adverse events related with treatment appeared in 28 patients (45%). Thiopurines were discontinued in 39 cases (63%) due to failure (17), toxicity (16) and long remission (6 cases). Conclusion In our cohort, thiopurines were used in 27% of patients with IDP, with long-term benefit (remission or response) in around two-thirds of them. This therapy could be one more option to manage these disorders.

scholarly journals Long-term safety and efficacy of opicapone in Japanese Parkinson’s patients with motor fluctuations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Takeda ◽  
Ryosuke Takahashi ◽  
Yoshio Tsuboi ◽  
Masahiro Nomoto ◽  
Tetsuya Maeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Motor Fluctuations ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Open Label Extension ◽  
Off Time

AbstractThe double-blind part of the COMFORT-PD (COMt-inhibitor Findings from Opicapone Repeated Treatment for Parkinson’s Disease) study in Japanese levodopa-treated patients with Parkinson’s disease and motor fluctuations found that both opicapone 25 and 50 mg were significantly more effective than placebo. This 52-week open-label extension study evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of opicapone 50 mg tablets in patients who completed the double-blind part of the COMFORT-PD study. Safety was monitored via adverse events, laboratory testing, and physical, cardiovascular and neurological examinations. Efficacy was primarily assessed by change in OFF-time. Secondary efficacy measures included: ON-time, percentage of OFF/ON-time responders, other outcomes from the double-blind part. 391/437 patients were transferred to the open-label extension period and included in the safety analysis set (full analysis set, n = 387; open-label completers, n = 316). Adverse events were frequently reported (n = 338, 86.4%), but < 50% were considered drug-related (39.9%) and few were considered serious (2.6%) or led to discontinuation (2.8%). Decreased OFF-time was consistently observed over the open-label period regardless of initial randomization. Change [LSM (SE)] in OFF-time from the open-label baseline to the last visit showed a persistent effect in patients initially randomized to opicapone 25 mg [− 0.37 (0.20) h, P = 0.0689] and opicapone 50 mg [− 0.07 (0.21) h, P = 0.6913] whereas opicapone 50 mg led to a statistically significant reduction in the previous placebo group [− 1.26 (0.19) h, P < 0.05]. Once-daily opicapone 50 mg was generally well tolerated and consistently reduced OFF-time over 52 weeks in Japanese levodopa-treated patients with motor fluctuations.Trial registration JapicCTI-153112; date of registration: December 25, 2015.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document