scholarly journals P548 Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics after switching from infliximab originator to biosimilar SB2 in inflammatory bowel disease patients: A long-term observational, prospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S466-S467
Author(s):  
S Fischer ◽  
S Mesfin ◽  
E Klenske ◽  
H Schmitt ◽  
F Vitali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Patient Visit ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Abstract Background SB2 is a biosimilar infliximab approved for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. These are the first prospective data investigating long-term efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics after switching from infliximab originator to biosimilar SB2 in IBD patients. Methods This is a prospective, observational cohort study of patients that underwent a switch from infliximab originator to biosimilar SB2 in 2017 as part of routine care at the outpatient Clinic for IBD at the University Hospital of Erlangen, Germany. Long-term safety and clinical effectiveness were recorded over a follow-up period of 18-months. Clinical disease activity was assessed by the Harvey–Bradshaw Index (HBI) in Crohn’s disease (CD) and the partial Mayo Score (pMS) in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. C-reactive protein (CRP) was analyzed at every patient visit, and IFX trough-level (TL) and anti-IFX antibodies (ADA) were measured prior to every SB2 administration, using the Promonitor® tests. The occurrence of adverse events was registered at every patient visit. Results A total of 148 IBD patients (96 CD, 52 UC) was enrolled. The median duration of previous infliximab treatment before the switch was 29 months (range 1.0–110.0). Median disease activity in CD was an HBI of 3 (0–16) at switch (baseline), 2 (0–13) at month 6, 3 (0–15) at month 12 and 2.5 (0–11) at month 18. Median disease activity in UC was a pMS of 0 (0–6) at baseline, 1 (0–4) at month 6, 1 (0–4) at month 12 and 1 (0–5) at month 18. The median TL for all IBD patients was 6.3 mg/ml (0.1–33.7) at baseline, 5.0 mg/ml (0.1–34.3) at month 6, 6.3 mg/ml (0.1–35.8) at month 12 and 5.1 mg/ml (0.1–35.4) at month 18. CRP for all IBD patients was 2.2 mg/l (0.1–45.6) at baseline, 2.2 mg/l (0.1–90.4) at month 6, 2.3 mg/l (0.1–169.5) at month 12 and 2.7 mg/l (0.1–19.8) at month 18. In the 18-month follow-up period, 12/103 (11.7%) of patients who were ADA-negative at baseline developed ADA post-switch. Altogether, 40 (27%) IBD patients discontinued SB2 treatment during the 18-month follow-up period (4 anaphylaxis, 20 loss of response, 7 non-serious and 9 serious adverse events), 2 paused during pregnancy, 1 discontinued in clinical remission, 10 were lost to follow-up (7 change of physician, 3 unknown). Serious adverse events comprised 3 malignancies (breast and prostate carcinoma, neuroendocrine malignancy), 1 liver abscess and 5 intestinal surgical procedures (1 perforation, 1 ileus, and 3 stenoses). Conclusion Switching from IFX originator to biosimilar SB2 was not associated with an increase in disease activity. No clinically meaningful changes in IFX trough levels or immunogenicity were identified. Altogether, SB2 was well tolerated in a real-life setting.

scholarly journals Long-term effectiveness, safety and immunogenicity of the biosimilar SB2 in inflammatory bowel disease patients after switching from originator infliximab

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175628482098280
Author(s):  
Sarah Fischer ◽  
Sarah Cohnen ◽  
Entcho Klenske ◽  
Heike Schmitt ◽  
Francesco Vitali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Normal Ranges ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
The Individual

Background: Long-term data on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients switched from originator to biosimilar infliximab SB2 are lacking. The aim of the conducted study was to investigate the effectiveness, immunogenicity and safety of a large prospectively followed-up IBD patient cohort that was entirely switched from originator infliximab to biosimilar SB2 treatment. Methods: This was a prospective, single-center, longitudinal, observational study describing clinical outcomes in IBD patients, over an 80-week period following switch from originator infliximab to SB2. Primary outcome measures were change of disease activity [Harvey-Bradshaw Index for Crohn’s disease (CD), partial Mayo Score for ulcerative colitis (UC)], C-reactive protein (CRP), infliximab trough levels (TLs), anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) and adverse events. Results: One hundred and forty-four IBD patients (94 CD, 50 UC), with median duration of 30.5 months’ (range 2–110) treatment with originator infliximab were evaluated. Mean change of disease activity compared with baseline was −0.9 (SD 2.6), –0.4 (2.2) and –0.4 (2.0) in CD; 0.1 (1.1), 0.1 (1.1) and 0.1 (1.3) in UC patients at weeks 24, 48 and 72. Median infliximab TLs were 6.2 µg/ml (interquartile range 2.3–12.2), 5.0 µg/ml (2.7–10.0), 6.6 µg/ml (3.5–12.4) and 5.1 µg/ml (2.7–10.9) at baseline and weeks 24, 48 and 72. Median CRP levels were within normal ranges throughout the study. After the switch, 9.8% of the patients developed new ADAs. Persistence on SB2 was 90% (95% confidence interval 0.85–0.95), 79% (0.72–0.86), 72% (0.64–0.80) at weeks 26, 52 and 78. Serious adverse events occurred in 11 patients. Conclusion: Over the individual patient follow-up of 80 weeks, switch to biosimilar SB2 from originator infliximab does not result in increased disease activity or changed immunogenicity patterns. The switch to SB2 was well tolerated.

scholarly journals P477 Italian real-life study evaluating the long-term effectiveness of vedolizumab for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: the elderly cohort

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S419-S422
Author(s):  
D Pugliese ◽  
G Privitera ◽  
A Armuzzi
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Treatment Persistence ◽  
Diagnosis Of Cancer ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
New Diagnosis

Abstract Background Vedolizumab (VDZ) is the first biological therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) tested, in pivotal trials, on patients up to 80 years old and has usually been presented as a safer choice in frail patients. However, real-world data on the effectiveness and safety of VDZ in elderly (≥ 65 years) are scarce. The aim of this study is to explore the effectiveness and safety of VDZ in a large real-life cohort of elderly IBD patients, with a 2 years follow-up. Methods The Long-term Italian Vedolizumab Effectiveness (LIVE) study included CD and UC patients started on VDZ from April 2016 to June 2017 at 40 centres of the Italian Group for the study of inflammatory bowel disease (IG-IBD). Patients were prospectively followed-up to June 2019. Co-primary endpoints were to evaluate cumulative VDZ treatment persistence and safety. Results Of 966 patients, 174 (18%; 81 CD, 93 UC) were ≥ 65 years old at enrolment. Mean disease duration at baseline was 10.9 years ± SD10 (CD 12.5 ± 11, UC 9.6 ± 9). VDZ was used as a first biologic therapy in 78 patients (44.8%). 25 patients (14.4%) had a history of previous cancer. The majority of CD patients had a stricturing behaviour (45, 55.6%) and had already undergone surgery (41, 49.4%). 48 UC patients (51.6%) had extensive colitis. Moderate-to-severe endoscopic activity was present in 80% of CD and in 92% of UC, according to SES-CD and endoscopic Mayo score, respectively. Cumulative VDZ treatment persistence at 12 and 24 months was 71.8% (71.6% CD and 72.0% UC) and 54% (54.2% CD and 53.8%% UC), respectively. 52.9% (40 CD; 52 UC), 4.0%, 3.5%% and 2.9% of patients were on concomitant steroids at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Clinical remission at 12 and 24 months was achieved in 28.7% (31 CD and 29 UC) and in 31.6% (25 CD and 30 UC) of patients. Mean C-reactive protein was 15.6 mg/l ± SD 20 (CD 15.9 ± 21; UC 15.2 ± 19) at baseline and dropped to 8.4 mg/l ± 10 (CD 8.0 ± 8, UC 8.9 ± 11) at 12 months and to 5.9 mg/l ± 6 (CD 5.8 ± 5, UC 6 ± 7) at 24 months. Dose escalation was necessary for 20.3% and 24.7% of patients within the first 12 and 24 months. 44 adverse events were reported: 16 infections.,6 new diagnosis of cancer/dysplasia (2 colon, 1 kidney, 1 prostate, 1 lung, 1 melanoma), 4 arthritis, 3 skin rash, 2 drug-induced cholestasis,11 miscellaneous. 11 patients (6.3%) underwent VDZ withdrawal because of adverse events (6 new diagnosis of cancer/dysplasia; 4 infections; 1 cholestasis). One patient died for pneumonia complications. Conclusion In this preliminary analysis of the largest reported real-world cohorts of elderly IBD patients treated with VDZ, up to 55% of patients persisted on therapy after two years; an acceptable safety profile was observed throughout the entire follow-up period.

scholarly journals Efficacy, safety and drug survival of thioguanine as maintenance treatment for inflammatory bowel disease: a retrospective multi-centre study in the United Kingdom

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed B. Bayoumy ◽  
Elsa L. S. A. van Liere ◽  
Melek Simsek ◽  
Ben Warner ◽  
Aathavan Loganayagam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Multi Centre Study ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Abstract Background Thioguanine (TG) is a thiopurine which has been used for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), who have failed azathioprine (AZA) or mercaptopurine (MP) due to adverse events or suboptimal response. Its widespread use has been hampered due to concerns about nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) of the liver. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of low-dose TG therapy in IBD patients failing AZA and MP. Methods A retrospective multicentre study was performed in IBD patients who failed prior treatment with conventional thiopurines with or without following immunomodulation (thiopurine-allopurinol, biologicals, methotrexate, tacrolimus) and were subsequently treated with TG as rescue monotherapy between 2003 and 2019 at three hospitals in the United Kingdom. Clinical response, adverse events, laboratory results, imaging and liver biopsies were retrospectively collected. Results A total of 193 patients (57% female and 64% Crohn’s disease) were included, with a median daily TG dose of 20 mg (range: 20–40 mg), a median treatment duration of 23 months (IQR 10–47) and a median follow-up of 36 months (IQR 22–53). The clinical response rate at 12 months was 65 and 54% remained on TG until the end of follow-up. Adverse events consisted primarily of elevated liver tests (6%), myelotoxicity (7%) and rash (5%). NRH was histologically diagnosed in two patients and two other patients (1%) developed non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. The median 6-TGN and TPMT levels were 953 pmol/8 × 105 RBC (IQR 145–1761) and 47 mu/L (IQR 34.5–96). Conclusions Long-term follow-up suggests that TG can be an effective and well-tolerated therapy in more than half of difficult-to-treat and multi-therapy failing IBD patients. Findings of this study indicate that TG can be used safely and the occurrence of hepatotoxicity was low. The incidence rate of NRH was within the background incidence.

scholarly journals Switching from Reference Infliximab to Biosimilar CT-P13 did not Change Quality of Life in Stable Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marieke J Pierik ◽  
Andrea E van der Meulen ◽  
Klaas Van der Linde ◽  
Maurice Lutgens ◽  
Johan P Kuijvenhoven ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Abstract Background Quality of life (QoL) data for patients with inflammatory bowel disease switched from the reference infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 is lacking. This study aims to demonstrate non-inferiority for QoL and efficacy after switching. Methods OoL and clinical efficacy were measured prior to and after 2, 4 and 6 CT-P13 infusions. Results 178 patients were included. Non-inferiority was established for QoL (ratio 97.95% (95% CI 95.93-100.01) and efficacy (difference –0.02 (95% CI -0.68-0.64)). Five patients reported 6 non-related, serious adverse events. Conclusion Switching from reference infliximab to CT-P13 did not affect the QoL or disease activity and was well tolerated.

scholarly journals Utility of routinely collected electronic health records data to support effectiveness evaluations in inflammatory bowel disease: a pilot study of tofacitinib

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. e100337
Author(s):  
Vivek Ashok Rudrapatna ◽  
Benjamin Scott Glicksberg ◽  
Atul Janardhan Butte
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Real World ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
P Value ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Real World Evidence ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

ObjectivesElectronic health records (EHR) are receiving growing attention from regulators, biopharmaceuticals and payors as a potential source of real-world evidence. However, their suitability for the study of diseases with complex activity measures is unclear. We sought to evaluate the use of EHR data for estimating treatment effectiveness in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), using tofacitinib as a use case.MethodsRecords from the University of California, San Francisco (6/2012 to 4/2019) were queried to identify tofacitinib-treated IBD patients. Disease activity variables at baseline and follow-up were manually abstracted according to a preregistered protocol. The proportion of patients meeting the endpoints of recent randomised trials in ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) was assessed.Results86 patients initiated tofacitinib. Baseline characteristics of the real-world and trial cohorts were similar, except for universal failure of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in the former. 54% (UC) and 62% (CD) of patients had complete capture of disease activity at baseline (month −6 to 0), while only 32% (UC) and 69% (CD) of patients had complete follow-up data (month 2 to 8). Using data imputation, we estimated the proportion achieving the trial primary endpoints as being similar to the published estimates for both UC (16%, p value=0.5) and CD (38%, p-value=0.8).Discussion/ConclusionThis pilot study reproduced trial-based estimates of tofacitinib efficacy despite its use in a different cohort but revealed substantial missingness in routinely collected data. Future work is needed to strengthen EHR data and enable real-world evidence in complex diseases like IBD.

scholarly journals POS0647 EFFICACY, SAFETY AND CHARACTERISTICS OF IGURATIMOD-BASED THERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF UA, ERA AND RA PATIENTS FOR 24 WEEKS: A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 561.2-562
Author(s):  
X. Liu ◽  
Z. Sun ◽  
W. Guo ◽  
F. Wang ◽  
L. Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Early Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Serious Adverse Events

Background:Experts emphasize early diagnosis and treatment in RA, but the widely used diagnostic criterias fail to meet the accurate judgment of early rheumatoid arthritis. In 2012, Professor Zhanguo Li took the lead in establishing ERA “Chinese standard”, and its sensitivity and accuracy have been recognized by peers. However, the optimal first-line treatment of patients (pts) with undifferentiated arthritis (UA), early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are yet to be established.Objectives:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Iguratimod-based (IGU-based) Strategy in the above three types of pts, and to explore the characteristics of the effects of IGU monotherapy and combined treatment.Methods:This prospective cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01548001) was conducted in China. In this phase 4 study pts with RA (ACR 1987 criteria[1]), ERA (not match ACR 1987 criteria[1] but match ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria[2] or 2014 ERA criteria[3]), UA (not match classification criteria for ERA and RA but imaging suggests synovitis) were recruited. We applied different treatments according to the patient’s disease activity at baseline, including IGU monotherapy and combination therapies with methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, and prednisone. Specifically, pts with LDA and fewer poor prognostic factors were entered the IGU monotherapy group (25 mg bid), and pts with high disease activity were assigned to combination groups. A Chi-square test was applied for comparison. The primary outcomes were the proportion of pts in remission (REM)or low disease activity (LDA) that is DAS28-ESR<2.6 or 3.2 at 24 weeks, as well as the proportion of pts, achieved ACR20, Boolean remission, and good or moderate EULAR response (G+M).Results:A total of 313 pts (26 pts with UA, 59 pts with ERA, and 228 pts with RA) were included in this study. Of these, 227/313 (72.5%) pts completed the 24-week follow-up. The results showed that 115/227 (50.7%), 174/227 (76.7%), 77/227 (33.9%), 179/227 (78.9%) pts achieved DAS28-ESR defined REM and LDA, ACR20, Boolean remission, G+M response, respectively. All parameters continued to decrease in all pts after treatment (Fig 1).Compared with baseline, the three highest decline indexes of disease activity at week 24 were SW28, CDAI, and T28, with an average decline rate of 73.8%, 61.4%, 58.7%, respectively. Results were similar in three cohorts.We performed a stratified analysis of which IGU treatment should be used in different cohorts. The study found that the proportion of pts with UA and ERA who used IGU monotherapy were significantly higher than those in the RA cohort. While the proportion of triple and quadruple combined use of IGU in RA pts was significantly higher than that of ERA and UA at baseline and whole-course (Fig 2).A total of 81/313 (25.8%) pts in this study had adverse events (AE) with no serious adverse events. The main adverse events were infection(25/313, 7.99%), gastrointestinal disorders(13/313, 4.15%), liver dysfunction(12/313, 3.83%) which were lower than 259/2666 (9.71%) in the previous Japanese phase IV study[4].The most common reasons of lost follow-up were: 1) discontinued after remission 25/86 (29.1%); 2) lost 22/86 (25.6%); 3) drug ineffective 19/86 (22.1%).Conclusion:Both IGU-based monotherapy and combined therapies are tolerant and effective for treating UA, ERA, and RA, while the decline in joint symptoms was most significant. Overall, IGU combination treatments were most used in RA pts, while monotherapy was predominant in ERA and UA pts.References:[1]Levin RW, et al. Scand J Rheumatol 1996, 25(5):277-281.[2]Kay J, et al. Rheumatology 2012, 51(Suppl 6):vi5-9.[3]Zhao J, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2014, 32(5):667-673.[4]Mimori T, et al. Mod Rheumatol 2019, 29(2):314-323.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

The SPOSIB SB2 Sicilian Cohort: Safety and Effectiveness of Infliximab Biosimilar SB2 in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Including Multiple Switches

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Salvatore Macaluso ◽  
Walter Fries ◽  
Anna Viola ◽  
Andrea Centritto ◽  
Maria Cappello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Tumor Necrosis ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Cumulative Number ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Bowel Diseases ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Necrosis Factor

Abstract Background No data on the recently introduced infliximab (IFX) biosimilar SB2 in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are available. Methods The Sicilian Prospective Observational Study of Patients With IBD Treated With Infliximab Biosimilar SB2 is a multicenter, observational, prospective study performed among the cohort of the Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Disease. All consecutive IBD patients starting the IFX biosimilar SB2 from its introduction in Sicily (March 2018) to September 2019 (18 months) were enrolled. Results Two hundred seventy-six patients (Crohn disease: 49.3%, ulcerative colitis: 50.7%) were included: 127 (46.0%) were naïve to IFX and naïve to anti-tumor necrosis factor medications (anti-TNFs), 65 (23.5%) were naïve to IFX and previously exposed to anti-TNFs, 17 (6.2%) were switched from an IFX originator to SB2, 43 (15.6%) were switched from the biosimilar CT-P13 to SB2, and 24 (8.7%) were multiply switched (from IFX originator to CT-P13 to SB2). The cumulative number of infusions of SB2 was 1798, and the total follow-up time was 182.7 patient-years. Sixty-seven serious adverse events occurred in 57 patients (20.7%; incidence rate: 36.7 per 100 patient-year), and 31 of these events caused the withdrawal of the drug. The effectiveness after 8 weeks of treatment was evaluated in patients naïve to IFX (n = 192): 110 patients (57.3%) had steroid-free remission, while 56 patients had no response (29.2%). At the end of follow-up, 72 patients (26.1%) interrupted the treatment, without significant differences in treatment persistency estimations between the five groups (log-rank P = 0.15). Conclusions The safety and effectiveness of SB2 seem to be overall similar to those reported for the IFX originator and CT-P13.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document