scholarly journals Sustained ventricular tachycardia of left, right or both bundle branch block morphology in patients with Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Milman ◽  
M Laredo ◽  
R Roudijk ◽  
G Peretto ◽  
A Andorin ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims In arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) typically displays left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology. Sustained VT with right bundle branch block (RBBB) morphology is very rare despite the frequent left ventricular involvement. The present study sought to assess the prevalence of spontaneous sustained LBBB-VT, RBBB-VT or both as well as clinical and genetic differences associated with these VT types. Methods and results Twenty-six centers from 11 European countries provided information on 952 patients with ACM and >1 episode of sustained VT observed during the patients' clinical course. VT was classified as: LBBB-VT; RBBB-VT or LBBB+RBBB-VT. Among 952 patients, 881 (92.5%) had LBBB-VT alone, 71 (7.5%) had RBBB-VT [alone in 42 (4.4%) patients or with LBBB-VT in 29 (3.0%) patients]. Male prevalence was 90.5%, 79.2% and 55.9% in the RBBB-VT, LBBB-VT and LBBB+RBBB-VT groups, respectively (P=0.001). Patients' age at first VT did not differ amongst the 3 VT groups. ICD implantation was more frequent for the RBBB-VT and the LBBB+RBBB groups (≈90% each) vs. 67.9% for the LBBB-VT group (P=0.001). Death incidence (9.5%–17.2%) was not significantly different between the 3 groups (P=0.425). Plakophylin-2 mutations predominated in the LBBB-VT and LBBB-VT+RBBB-VT groups (47.2% and 27.3%, respectively) and Desmoplakin mutations in the RBBB-VT group (36.7%). Conclusion This large European survey demonstrates: 1) Sustained RBBB-VT is documented in 7.5% patients with ACM; 2) Males markedly predominate in the RBBB-VT and LBBB-VT groups but not in the LBBB+RBBB VT group; 3) Distribution of desmosomal mutations appears to be different in the 3 VT groups. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 182-7
Author(s):  
A. Samik Wahab

Nine children with diphtheritic ventricular tachycardia ranging in age from 2 to 11 years (mean 6.5 years) were observed and followed up until their terminal state. The ventricular tachycardia showed a left bundle branch block contour in 5 of 9 patients, right bundle branch block in four, multifocal pacemaker in three and unifocal in six patients. Fusion and captured beats were present in two and 4 patients respectively, Including one patient who had both. Four cases were without obvious atrio-ventricular dissociation. All patients were treated with standard therapy for diphtheria, and prednison was given to patients with myocarditis. Because of its controversial results, antwrrhythm1c agent was not given. The prognosis is very poor; all patients died one to 8 days after ventricular tachycardia appearance.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
F D'Ascenzi ◽  
M Sanz De La Garza ◽  
F Anselmi ◽  
L Nunno ◽  
E Arbelo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The electrocardiographic (ECG) definition of Brugada syndrome (BS) can be challenging because benign ECG abnormalities, such as right bundle branch block (RBBB), may mimic pathological ECG characteristics of BrS. However, although myocardial delay and deformation can be quantified by advanced imaging, it has not yet been used to differentiate between BrS and RBBB. Purpose The aim of this study was to characterize the electro-mechanical behavior of the heart of patients with type-1 BrS and subjects with isolated complete RBBB in order to differentiate these conditions. Methods In this two-center study, 66 subjects were analyzed by standard and speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE): 22 type-1 BrS, 24 isolated complete RBBB, and 20 healthy subjects. The participants were not treated by any drug potentially influencing myocardial conduction. Results Standard echocardiographic parameters did not differ among the groups. STE demonstrated that right ventricular (RV) mechanical dispersion (MD) was greater in RBBB as compared to BrS and controls (p<0.05). In patients with isolated RBBB, the greatest delay of RV time-to-peak longitudinal strain (TTP) was found in RV free-wall basal segments. Mean absolute deviations of TTP calculated for each left ventricular (LV) region were greater in patients with RBBB as compared to those with BrS and to controls with a localisation of the delay in LV antero-septal, anterior, lateral, and infero-septal basal segments (figure 1). Conclusions Advanced echocardiographic techniques may help to differentiate between BrS and RBBB. Indeed, STE allows to identify an electro-mechanical conduction delay in RBBB patients that is not found in patients affected by type-1 BrS. Electromechanical delay by STE Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Italian Society of Cardiology


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document