Comparison of Left Ventricular Torsion and Strain With Biventricular Pacing in Patients With Underlying Right Bundle Branch Block Versus Those With Left Bundle Branch Block

2015 ◽  
Vol 115 (7) ◽  
pp. 918-923 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabe De ◽  
Zoran B. Popović ◽  
David Verhaert ◽  
Thomas Dresing ◽  
Bruce Wilkoff ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Milman ◽  
M Laredo ◽  
R Roudijk ◽  
G Peretto ◽  
A Andorin ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims In arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) typically displays left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology. Sustained VT with right bundle branch block (RBBB) morphology is very rare despite the frequent left ventricular involvement. The present study sought to assess the prevalence of spontaneous sustained LBBB-VT, RBBB-VT or both as well as clinical and genetic differences associated with these VT types. Methods and results Twenty-six centers from 11 European countries provided information on 952 patients with ACM and >1 episode of sustained VT observed during the patients' clinical course. VT was classified as: LBBB-VT; RBBB-VT or LBBB+RBBB-VT. Among 952 patients, 881 (92.5%) had LBBB-VT alone, 71 (7.5%) had RBBB-VT [alone in 42 (4.4%) patients or with LBBB-VT in 29 (3.0%) patients]. Male prevalence was 90.5%, 79.2% and 55.9% in the RBBB-VT, LBBB-VT and LBBB+RBBB-VT groups, respectively (P=0.001). Patients' age at first VT did not differ amongst the 3 VT groups. ICD implantation was more frequent for the RBBB-VT and the LBBB+RBBB groups (≈90% each) vs. 67.9% for the LBBB-VT group (P=0.001). Death incidence (9.5%–17.2%) was not significantly different between the 3 groups (P=0.425). Plakophylin-2 mutations predominated in the LBBB-VT and LBBB-VT+RBBB-VT groups (47.2% and 27.3%, respectively) and Desmoplakin mutations in the RBBB-VT group (36.7%). Conclusion This large European survey demonstrates: 1) Sustained RBBB-VT is documented in 7.5% patients with ACM; 2) Males markedly predominate in the RBBB-VT and LBBB-VT groups but not in the LBBB+RBBB VT group; 3) Distribution of desmosomal mutations appears to be different in the 3 VT groups. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 427-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giampaolo Luzi ◽  
Andrea Montalto ◽  
Vincenzo Polizzi ◽  
Cesare C D'Alessandro ◽  
Mariano Vicchio ◽  
...  

Cardiac resynchronization therapy is effective in patients with a low ejection fraction and left bundle branch block, but 20%–30% do not respond despite selection of the optimal site for pacing on the left ventricle. We investigated whether optimizing the site for placement of the pacing lead on the right ventricle could further improve left ventricular function during cardiac resynchronization in 19 patients (mean age, 63 ± 5 years) undergoing coronary artery bypass with post-ischemic dilated myocardiopathy (ejection fraction, 25.8% ± 2%) and left bundle branch block. The hemodynamic response to pacing was tested with the right ventricular lead positioned at the interventricular septum, atrioventricular junction, acute margin, and the pulmonary trunk. Biventricular stimulation improved left ventricular function. When the right ventricular lead was sited at the interventricular septum, a significant improvement in all hemodynamic parameters compared to the other sites was obtained. Biventricular pacing is important to optimize cardiac resynchronization. Although further studies are needed to confirm these findings, accurate lead placement is recommended for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with poor cardiac function and left bundle branch block.


2011 ◽  
Vol 301 (6) ◽  
pp. H2334-H2343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristoffer Russell ◽  
Otto A. Smiseth ◽  
Ola Gjesdal ◽  
Eirik Qvigstad ◽  
Per Andreas Norseng ◽  
...  

During left bundle branch block (LBBB), electromechanical delay (EMD), defined as time from regional electrical activation (REA) to onset shortening, is prolonged in the late-activated left ventricular lateral wall compared with the septum. This leads to greater mechanical relative to electrical dyssynchrony. The aim of this study was to determine the mechanism of the prolonged EMD. We investigated this phenomenon in an experimental LBBB dog model ( n = 7), in patients ( n = 9) with biventricular pacing devices, in an in vitro papillary muscle study ( n = 6), and a mathematical simulation model. Pressures, myocardial deformation, and REA were assessed. In the dogs, there was a greater mechanical than electrical delay (82 ± 12 vs. 54 ± 8 ms, P = 0.002) due to prolonged EMD in the lateral wall vs. septum (39 ± 8 vs.11 ± 9 ms, P = 0.002). The prolonged EMD in later activated myocardium could not be explained by increased excitation-contraction coupling time or increased pressure at the time of REA but was strongly related to dP/d t at the time of REA ( r = 0.88). Results in humans were consistent with experimental findings. The papillary muscle study and mathematical model showed that EMD was prolonged at higher dP/d t because it took longer for the segment to generate active force at a rate superior to the load rise, which is a requirement for shortening. We conclude that, during LBBB, prolonged EMD in late-activated myocardium is caused by a higher dP/d t at the time of activation, resulting in aggravated mechanical relative to electrical dyssynchrony. These findings suggest that LV contractility may modify mechanical dyssynchrony.


Circulation ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 102 (25) ◽  
pp. 3053-3059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory S. Nelson ◽  
Ronald D. Berger ◽  
Barry J. Fetics ◽  
Maurice Talbot ◽  
Julio C. Spinelli ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine Ali ◽  
Daniel Keene ◽  
Ahran Arnold ◽  
Matthew Shun-Shin ◽  
Zachary I Whinnett ◽  
...  

Biventricular pacing has revolutionised the treatment of heart failure in patients with sinus rhythm and left bundle branch block; however, left ventricular-lead placement is not always technically possible. Furthermore, biventricular pacing does not fully normalise ventricular activation and, therefore, the ventricular resynchronisation is imperfect. Right ventricular pacing for bradycardia may cause or worsen heart failure in some patients by causing dyssynchronous ventricular activation. His bundle pacing activates the ventricles via the native His-Purkinje system, resulting in true physiological pacing, and, therefore, is a promising alternate site for pacing in bradycardia and traditional CRT indications in cases where it can overcome left bundle branch block. Furthermore, it may open up new indications for pacing therapy in heart failure, such as targeting patients with PR prolongation, but a narrow QRS duration. In this article we explore the physiology, technology and potential roles of His bundle pacing in the prevention and treatment of heart failure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document