Randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, safety and efficacy study of dutogliptin in combination with filgrastim in early recovery post-MI: rationale, design and first interim analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Von Lewinski ◽  
B Merkely ◽  
I Buysschaert ◽  
R.A Schatz ◽  
G.G Nagy ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Regenerative therapies offer new approaches to improve cardiac function after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Mobilization of stem cells and homing within the infarcted area have been identified as the key mechanisms for successful treatment. Application of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is the least invasive way to mobilize stem cells while DDP4-inhibitor facilitates homing via stromal cell-derived factor 1 alpha (SDF-1α). Dutogliptin, a novel DPP4 inhibitor, combined with stem cell mobilization using G-CSF significantly improved survival and reduced infarct size in a murine model. Purpose We initiated a phase II, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled efficacy and safety study (N=140) analyzing the effect of combined application of G-CSF and dutogliptin, a small molecule DPP-IV-inhibitor for subcutaneous use after acute myocardial infarction. Methods The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of dutogliptin (14 days) in combination with filgrastim (5 days) in patients with STEMI (EF <45%) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Preliminary efficacy will be analyzed using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) to detect >3.8% improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF). 140 subjects will be randomized to filgrastim plus dutogliptin or matching placebos. Results Baseline characteristics of the first 26 patients randomized (24 treated) in this trial reveal a majority of male patients (70.8%) and a medium age of 58.4 years (37 to 84). During the 2-week active treatment period, 35 adverse events occurred in 13 patients, with 4 rated as serious (hospitalization due to pneumonia N=3, hospitalization due to acute myocardial infarction N=1), and 1 adverse event was rated as severe (fatal pneumonia), 9 moderate, and 25 as mild. 6 adverse events were considered possibly related to the study medication, including cases of increased hepatic enzymes (N=3), nausea (N=1), subcutaneous node/suffusion (N=1) and syncope (N=1). Conclusions Our data demonstrate that the combined application of dutogliptin and G-CSF appears to be safe on the short term and feasible after acute myocardial infarction and may represent a new therapeutic option in future. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Other. Main funding source(s): This research is funded by the sponsor RECARDIO, Inc., 1 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94150, USA. RECARDIO Inc. is funding the complete study. The Scientific Board of RECARDIO designed the study. Data Collection is at the participating sites. Interpretation of the data by the Scientific Board and Manuscript written by the authors and approved by the Sponsor

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Qiao Chen ◽  
Die Zhao ◽  
Jie Sun ◽  
Chengzhi Lu

Background. A comprehensive evaluation of the benefits of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients is lacking. Objective. To summarize the evidence on the efficacy and safety of MRA in patients admitted for AMI. Methods. Articles were identified through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Ovid (Medline1946-2021), and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from their inception to December 31, 2020. Results. 15 articles with a total of 11,861 patients were included. MRA reduced the risk of all-cause mortality by 16% (relative ratio (RR): 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.76, 0.94); P = 0.002 ) and the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events by 12% (RR: 0.88, 95% CI (0.83, 0.93), P < 0.00001 ) in post-AMI patients, and further analysis demonstrated that early administration of MRA within 7 days after AMI resulted in a greater reduction in all-cause mortality (RR: 0.72, 95% CI (0.61, 0.85), P < 0.0001 ). Subgroup analyses showed that post-STEMI patients without left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) treated with MRA had a 36% reduction in all-cause mortality (RR: 0.64, 95% CI (0.46, 0.89), P = 0.007 ) and a 22% reduction in cardiovascular adverse events (RR: 0.78, 95% CI (0.67, 0.91), P = 0.002 ). Meanwhile, post-STEMI patients without LVSD treated with MRA get significant improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction (mean difference (MD): 2.69, 95% CI (2.44, 2.93), P < 0.00001 ), left ventricular end-systolic index (MD: -4.52 ml/m2, 95% CI (-8.21, -0.83), P = 0.02 ), and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (MD: -0.11 cm, 95% CI (-0.22, 0.00), P = 0.05 ). The corresponding RR were 1.72 (95% CI (1.43, 2.07), P < 0.00001 ) for considered common adverse events (hyperkalemia, gynecomastia, and renal dysfunction). Conclusions. Our findings suggest that MRA treatment reduces all-cause mortality and cardiovascular adverse events in post-AMI patients, which is more significant in patients after STEMI without LVSD. In addition, MRA treatment may exert beneficial effects on the reversal of cardiac remodeling in patients after STEMI without LVSD.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
V Marcos Garces ◽  
C Rios-Navarro ◽  
L Hueso ◽  
A Diaz ◽  
C Bonanad ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Angiogenesis participates in re-establishing microcirculation after myocardial infarction (MI). Purpose In this study, we aim to further understand the role of the anti-angiogenic isoform vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A165b after MI and explore its potential as a co-adjuvant therapy to coronary reperfusion. Methods Two mice MI models were formed: 1) permanent coronary ligation (non-reperfused MI), 2) transient 45-min coronary occlusion followed by reperfusion (reperfused MI); in both models, animals underwent echocardiography before euthanasia at day 21 after MI induction. Serum and myocardial VEGF-A165b levels were determined. In both experimental MI models, functional and structural implication of VEGF-A165b blockade was assessed. In a cohort of 104 ST-segment elevation MI patients, circulating VEGF-A165b levels were correlated with cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived left ventricular ejection fraction at 6-months and with the occurrence of adverse events (death, heart failure and/or re-infarction). Results In both models, circulating and myocardial VEGF-A165b presence was increased 21 days after MI induction. Serum VEGF-A165b levels inversely correlated with systolic function evaluated by echocardiography. VEGF-A165b blockage increased capillary density, reduced infarct size, and enhanced left ventricular function in reperfused, but not in non-reperfused MI experiments. In patients, higher VEGF-A165b levels correlated with depressed ejection fraction and worse outcomes. Conclusions In experimental and clinical studies, higher serum VEGF-A165b levels associates with a worse systolic function. Its blockage enhances neoangiogenesis, reduces infarct size, and increases ejection fraction in reperfused, but not in non-reperfused MI experiments. Therefore, VEGF-A165b neutralization represents a potential co-adjuvant therapy to coronary reperfusion. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): This study was funded by “Instituto de Salud Carlos III” and “Fondos Europeos de Desarrollo Regional FEDER” (Exp. PIE15/00013, PI17/01836, PI18/00209 and CIBERCV16/11/00486).


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
YeeKyoung KO ◽  
Seungjae JOO ◽  
Jong Wook Beom ◽  
Jae-Geun Lee ◽  
Joon-Hyouk CHOI ◽  
...  

Introduction: In the era of the initial optimal interventional and medical therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), a number of patients with mid-range left ventricular ejection fraction (40% <EF<50%) becomes increasing. However, the long-term optimal medical therapy for these patients has been rarely studied. Aims: This observational study aimed to investigate the association between the medical therapy with beta-blockers or inhibitors of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and clinical outcomes in patients with mid-range EF after AMI. Methods: Among 13,624 patients enrolled in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health (KAMIR-NIH), propensity-score matched patients who survived the initial attack and had mid-range EF were selected according to beta-blocker or RAS inhibitor therapy at discharge. Results: Patients with beta-blockers showed significantly lower 1-year cardiac death (2.4 vs. 5.2/100 patient-year; hazard ratio [HR] 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.98; P =0.045) and MI (1.7 vs. 4.0/100 patient-year; HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.18-0.95; P =0.037). On the other hand, RAS inhibitors were associated with lower 1-year re-hospitalization due to heart failure (2.8 vs. 5.5/100 patient-year; HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.31-0.92; P =0.024), and no significant interaction with classes of RAS inhibitors (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers) was observed ( P for interaction=0.332). Conclusions: Beta-blockers or RAS inhibitors at discharge were associated with better 1-year clinical outcomes in patients with mid-range EF after AMI.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document