scholarly journals Diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular risk management in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a large international audit

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A.N.N.E Semb ◽  
S Rollefstad ◽  
J Sexton ◽  
G Kitas ◽  
P Van Riel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Treatment Goals ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
Esc Guidelines ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Background The cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is comparable to that of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Although several studies have indicated high prevalence's of DM in RA patients, little is known about how this affects their CVD risk. Objectives To examine indications for, and use of antihypertensive treatment (a-HT) and lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in RA patients with DM (RA-DM) and RA patients without DM (RAwoDM). Further, to compare the prevalence of various types of CVD across RA-DM and RAwoDM. Methods The cohort was derived from the SUrvey of cardiovascular disease Risk Factor in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (SURF-RA), which was performed in 53 centres/17 countries in 5 world regions (West and East Europe; North and Latin America; and Asia) from 2014 - 2019. Indication for a-HT was defined as: 1) systolic/diastolic blood pressure (BP) ≥140/90 mm Hg, 2) self-reported hypertension, and/or 3) current use of a-HT. Indication for LLT was defined according to ESC guidelines. CVD risk estimates (by SCORE) were multiplied by 1.5 according to EULAR recommendations. Target treatment targets for BP and lipids were defined according to ESC guidelines applicable at the time data were recorded. Results Presence of comorbid DM was available in 10 602 (73.1%) of the 14 503 RA patients included in SURF-RA, of whom 75 and 1262 patients reported DM type 1 and type 2, respectively (total 1337 patients, 12.6%). Although less often current smokers, RA-DM patients were more often previous smokers, male sex and had higher body mass index compared to RAwoDM (p<0.0001 for all). a-HT (84.7% vs 62.3%) and LLT (100% vs 47.2%) were more frequently indicated in RA-DM than in RAwoDM patients (p<0.0001 for both). RA-DM were more likely than RAwoDM to receive a-HT on indication (60.4% vs 57.6%, p<0.0001), while the difference in LLT use on indication was not significantly different (45.7% vs 42.5%, p=0.06). Moreover, RA-DM compared to RAwoDM patients had more often reached treatment goals when on a-HT (60.7% vs 54.1%, p<0.0001) and LLT (62.8% vs 48.9%, p<0.0001). Finally, the risk of all recorded established CVD (coronary heart disease, stroke, peripheral artery disease and atrial fibrillation) was increased by a factor of 2 to 3 in RA-DM compared to RAwoDM (Figure). Conclusion The effect of RA and comorbid DM on CVD risk appears to be additive. While CVD preventive medications are more often indicated in RA-DM than in RAwoDM patients, they are also more likely to receive such therapy and to reach CVD preventive treatment goals. The latter finding may be due to more developed CVD preventive care in DM compared to RA patients. Improved CVD preventive systems for patients with RA are warranted. CVD in RA patients with and without DM Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Other. Main funding source(s): Lilly

Survey of cardiovascular disease and risk factor management in patients with rheumatoid arthritis across 5 world regions: results from the SURF-RA

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A.N.N.E Semb ◽  
E Ikdahl ◽  
J Sexton ◽  
G Kitas ◽  
P Van Riel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Cvd Risk Factors ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
East Europe ◽  
World Regions ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Purpose The aim of this survey was to evaluate updated information on CVD risk factors, comorbidities, RA disease characteristics, RA and CVD preventive medication in patient with RA. Methods The audit is termed SUrvey of cardiovascular disease Risk Factors in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (SURF-RA) and was performed in 53 centres/19 countries/5 world regions in 2014–2019. SURF-RA have been performed in patients with coronary heart disease, in primary care, and now in patients with stroke, SLE and antiphophlipid syndrome. The survey was approved by the Data Protection Officer (2017/7243) and a GDPR evaluation has been performed (10/10–2018). Results Among 14 503 patients with RA in West (n=8 493) and East (n=923) Europe, Latin (n=407) and North (n=4 030) America and Asia (n=650) the mean (SD) age was 59.9 (13.6) years, and 2/3 or more were female (table). RA disease duration was comparable across the world regions, ranging from 9.9 to 12.6 years. The prevalence of atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) was lowest in Latin America (2.5%) and highest in East Europe (21.4%), and this pattern was similar regarding familial premature CVD. The mean prevalence (% of each entity) of blood pressure above 140/90 mmHg was 5.3%, of low density lipoprotein cholesterol >2.5 mmol/L: 63.3%. Overall, 29% used antihypertensive medication, lowest in West Europe (17.4%) and highest in East Europe (57.0%), and 26.4% used lipid lowering agent(s), lowest in Asia (7.2%) and highest in North America (31.1%). Body mass index >30 kg/m2 was present in 26.6%, with the smallest waist circumference in Asia [mean (SD): 84.1 (13.6) cm] and highest in East Europe [92.5 (15.5) cm]. The proportion of current smokers was on average: 16.2%, lowest in Asia (7.8%) and highest in East Europe (28.5%). Conclusion The high prevalence of CVD risk factors and ASCVD in patients with RA across five world regions shows that there is still an unmet need for vigilance and improved implementation of preventive measures in this high CVD risk patient population. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Other. Main funding source(s): Lilly

Abstract 043: Health Insurance and the Risk of Incident Cardiovascular Disease in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew T Crim ◽  
Joe X Xie ◽  
Yi-An Ko ◽  
Roger S Blumenthal ◽  
Michael J Blaha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Subclinical Atherosclerosis ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
Ethnic Study

Background: Health insurance plays an important role in access to medical care and is the focus of extensive policy efforts. We examined the association of health insurance with cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence. Methods and Results: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, sponsored by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute of the NIH, followed a US cohort, aged 45-84 without clinical CVD at baseline, for a median of 12.2 years; 788 events occurred among 6,674 individuals. Data were stratified by baseline health insurance status. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analyses were used to assess the association between health insurance and incident CVD (myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, stroke, CVD death, and angina), adjusting for biomedical CVD risk (traditional risk factors, including age and race/ethnicity, and markers of subclinical atherosclerosis) and socioeconomic status (SES). The majority of individuals had private insurance (51%). Uninsured individuals (9%) were more likely to have untreated hypertension and diabetes, less likely to be on lipid-lowering therapy, and more likely to receive care in an Emergency Department (p < 0.0001). Income, 10-year CVD risk, and 10-year event-free survival varied across insurance groups ( Table ). After adjustment for biomedical CVD risk, individuals with health insurance had a lower risk of incident CVD compared to the uninsured (HR 0.72, p=0.03). However, with additional adjustment for SES (income, education, and employment), insurance was no longer associated with incident CVD (HR 0.78, p=0.12). Among the insurance groups, those with private insurance had a lower risk of incident CVD after adjustment for both biomedical CVD risk and SES (HR 0.70, p=0.03). Medicare and Medicaid coverage were not associated with incident CVD. The military/VA group had a lower risk of incident CVD with adjustment for biomedical CVD risk (HR 0.57, p=0.02) that was no longer significant after adjustment for SES (HR 0.66, p=0.09). Conclusions: The association of health insurance with CVD incidence varied by insurance group, and private insurance was associated with a lower risk of incident CVD. Further exploration of the features of health insurance coverage that impact CVD incidence may facilitate improvements in the primary prevention of CVD.

scholarly journals Associations of obesity with modifiable risk factors for the development of cardiovascular disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

2008 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 242-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Stavropoulos-Kalinoglou ◽  
G S Metsios ◽  
V F Panoulas ◽  
K M J Douglas ◽  
A M Nevill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Insulin Resistance ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Cvd Risk Factors ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
The Metabolic Syndrome ◽  
And Gender

Objectives:To assess the association of body mass index (BMI) with modifiable cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods:BMI, disease activity, selected CVD risk factors and CVD medication were assessed in 378 (276 women) patients with RA. Patients exceeding accepted thresholds in ⩾3 CVD risk factors were classified as having the metabolic syndrome (MetS).Results:BMI independently associated with hypertension (OR = 1.28 (95% CI = 1.22 to 1.34); p = 0.001), high-density lipoprotein (OR = 1.10 (95% CI = 1.06 to 1.15); p = 0.025), insulin resistance (OR = 1.13 (95% CI = 1.08 to 1.18); p = 0.000) and MetS (OR = 1.15 (95% CI = 1.08 to 1.21); p = 0.000). In multivariable analyses, BMI had the strongest associations with CVD risk factors (F1–354 = 8.663, p = 0.000), and this was followed by lipid-lowering treatment (F1–354 = 7.651, p = 0.000), age (F1–354 = 7.541, p = 0.000), antihypertensive treatment (F1–354 = 4.997, p = 0.000) and gender (F1–354 = 4.707, p = 0.000). Prevalence of hypertension (p = 0.004), insulin resistance (p = 0.005) and MetS (p = 0.000) was significantly different between patients with RA who were normal, overweight and obese, and BMI differed significantly according to the number of risk factors present (p = 0.000).Conclusions:Increasing BMI associates with increased CVD risk independently of many confounders. RA-specific BMI cut-off points better identify patients with RA at increased CVD risk. Weight-loss regimens should be developed and applied in order to reduce CVD in patients with RA.

Abstract 15576: Cardiovascular Disease in Elderly Familial Hypercholesterolemia Individuals Attending a Cascade Screening Program

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
elaine coutinho ◽  
Marcio H Miname ◽  
Viviane Z Rocha ◽  
Marcio S Bittencourt ◽  
Cinthia Jannes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Familial Hypercholesterolemia ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Coronary Revascularization ◽  
Genetic Diagnosis ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
Cascade Screening

Introduction: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is associated with early onset of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. Lipid lowering treatment (LLT) may change the natural history of FH, however there is scant information about elderly individuals (older than 60 years) with FH. This study describes characteristics of elderly FH individuals presenting or not CVD. Hypothesis: Monogenic defects are important markers of CVD risk and initiation and long-term use of lipid lowering therapy (LLT) is relevant to minimize this risk. Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of clinical and laboratory of molecularly proven elderly FH (FH+) and non-affected (FH-) individuals attending a cascade screening program. FH+ were divided in those presenting or not CVD (defined as previous myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke, carotid or coronary revascularization and angina with stenosis ≥50% on angiography). Results: From 4,111 genotyped individuals, 462 (11.2%) elders were included (198 FH+ and 264 FH-). There was predominance of females in either groups, however with more men in FH+ 37.4% vs. 24.2%, p=0.002. No differences were seen between FH+ and FH- regarding age, [median (%25;75%)] 66 (62;71) and 66 (63;71) years, p=0.68; use of LLT 88.5% vs. 91.5%, p=0.29 and high intensity LLT 61.7 % vs. 55.8%, p=0.20, respectively. Despite longer LLT duration in FH+ 11(7;20) vs. 7 (3;13) years, p<0.001, in either groups LLT was started late, at 54 (47;61) and 59 (52;64) years, p <0.001, respectively in FH+ and FH-. FH+ had higher LDL-C at diagnosis, 243 (179;302) vs. 228 (209;251) mg/dL, p=0.013, as well as greater frequencies of previous CVD 40.9% vs. 27.3%, p=0.002, and early CVD 22.2% vs. 9.0%, p<0.001. In FH+, male sex [OR (95%CI)] 5.29 (2.25-12.45), p<0.001, and use of high intensity LLT 2.51 (1.08-5.87), p=0.03, were independently associated with CVD. Conclusions: The genetic diagnosis of FH was associated with higher rates of CVD and early CVD vs. FH- hypercholesterolemics. Elders with FH+ who survived despite late LLT initiation have a worse CVD history than FH- elders, emphasizing the relevance of a monogenic defect as cause of long-lasting hypercholesterolemia and CVD risk, particularly in men.

scholarly journals Diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular risk management in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an international audit

RMD Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. e001724
Author(s):  
Anne Grete Semb ◽  
Silvia Rollefstad ◽  
Eirik Ikdahl ◽  
Grunde Wibetoe ◽  
Joseph Sexton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Goal Attainment ◽  
Disease Risk ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Preventive Medication ◽  
Study Population

AimThe objective was to examine the prevalence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and its risk factors among patients with RA with diabetes mellitus (RA-DM) and patients with RA without diabetes mellitus (RAwoDM), and to evaluate lipid and blood pressure (BP) goal attainment in RA-DM and RAwoDM in primary and secondary prevention.MethodsThe cohort was derived from the Survey of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis from 53 centres/19 countries/3 continents during 2014–2019. We evaluated the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) among RA-DM and RAwoDM. The study population was divided into those with and without ASCVD, and within these groups we compared risk factors and CVD preventive treatment between RA-DM and RAwoDM.ResultsThe study population comprised of 10 543 patients with RA, of whom 1381 (13%) had DM. ASCVD was present in 26.7% in RA-DM compared with 11.6% RAwoDM (p<0.001). The proportion of patients with a diagnosis of hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and use of lipid-lowering or antihypertensive agents was higher among RA-DM than RAwoDM (p<0.001 for all). The majority of patients with ASCVD did not reach the lipid goal of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <1.8 mmol/L. The lipid goal attainment was statistically and clinically significantly higher in RA-DM compared with RAwoDM both for patients with and without ASCVD. The systolic BP target of <140 mm Hg was reached by the majority of patients, and there were no statistically nor clinically significant differences in attainment of BP targets between RA-DM and RAwoDM.ConclusionCVD preventive medication use and prevalence of ASCVD were higher in RA-DM than in RAwoDM, and lipid goals were also more frequently obtained in RA-DM. Lessons may be learnt from CVD prevention programmes in DM to clinically benefit patients with RA .

scholarly journals Management of dyslipidaemia and hypertension in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in 19 countries

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Rollefstad ◽  
E Ikdahl ◽  
J Sexton ◽  
G.D Kitas ◽  
P Van Riel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
North America ◽  
Goal Attainment ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
East Europe ◽  
Very High

Abstract Background/Introduction The realisation that subjects with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) has led to a growing interest in risk factor control in such people, but whether this has influenced the management of dyslipidaemia and hypertension (HT) is uncertain. Purpose To describe differences in lipid and blood pressure (BP) levels among patients with RA from five world regions. Furthermore, to evaluate attainment of guideline recommended targets for lipid lowering and antihypertensive treatment. Methods The SUrvey of CVD Risk Factors in patients with RA (SURF-RA) was conducted at 53 centres in 19 countries from 2014 to 2019. Data including demographics, RA disease characteristics, CVD comorbidity, risk factors and use of preventive treatment was collected. HT was defined as self-reported HT, and/or measured BP &gt;140/90 mmHg, and/or use of anti HT medication (a-HT). The treatment goal of a-HT was BP &lt;140/90 mmHg. The 10-year risk of a fatal CVD event was calculated by the European CVD risk calculator, the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), and was thereafter multiplied with 1.5 as recommended by the European League Against Rheumatism. Patients were classified in a high or very high CVD risk group according to the 2012 European Society of Cardiology guidelines, with low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) goal at &lt;2.6 and &lt;1.8 mmol/L, respectively. Results In total, 14503 RA patients were included. The mean age was 59.8±13.6 years, most of whom (74%) were female. Nearly 2/3 of the patients were hypertensive. Use of a-HT in the total population differed substantially between the cohorts with limited use in West Europe and Latin America (17.4% and 24.8%), in contrast to North America and East Europe (46.8% and 57.0%). On average, half of those with HT were at the recommended BP goal. The lowest BP goal attainment was seen in Asia, West and East Europe (40.8–43.1%), and the highest in North America (63.5%). Overall 51.5% had an indication for lipid lowering therapy (LLT), and of these only 43.5% were taking LLT. Only 34.0% of patients with an indication for LLT were at recommended LDL-c goals. The proportion of RA patients on target for LDL-c varied greatly between regions, from 23.1% in East Europe to 51.0% in North America. The LDL-c goal attainment was higher in RA patients at high risk (45.1%) compared to those at very high risk of CVD (18.0%). Conclusion(s) This large international survey on RA patients revealed considerable geographical differences in CVD preventive treatment. Only one half of subjects were at blood pressure goals, and achievement of lipid goals was even poorer at one third of those eligible for treatment, which is lower than what is reported for subjects with coronary heart disease. We conclude that there is a substantial need for improvement in CVD preventive measures in RA patients. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): Unrestricted research collaboration with Lilly

Abstract 13249: European and American Blood Cholesterol Guidelines Result in Similar Rates of Statin Recommendations when Applied to a Country with High Cardiovascular Disease Risk

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann M Navar-Boggan ◽  
Tomasz Zdrojewski, ◽  
Adam Wyszomirski ◽  
Mateusz Lachacz ◽  
Grzegorz Opolski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Statin Therapy ◽  
Blood Cholesterol ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
European Guidelines ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Cholesterol Guidelines

Introduction: The American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) recently released updated guidelines for management of blood cholesterol, which differ from current European Society of Cardiology and European Atherosclerosis Society (ESC/EAS) guidelines. How these differences affect the overall number of individuals recommended for statin therapy in a country with high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk remains unclear. Hypothesis: Due to the lower threshold for statin recommendations for primary prevention based on 10-year CVD risk under the AHA/ACC guidelines, more adults overall would be recommended for statin therapy under American compared to European guidelines. Methods: Using 2011 data from a nationwide cross-sectional survey in Poland (NATPOL), we estimated the number and characteristics of adults aged 40-65 recommended for lipid lowering therapy under the ESC/EAS and AHA/ACC guidelines. The survey sample of 1060 adults represented 13.5 million adults in Poland aged 40-65. Results: Under ESC/EAS guidelines, 47.6% of adults (44.6-50.7%) aged 40-65 were recommended for immediate statin therapy, compared to 49.9% (46.9-52.9%) under AHA/ACC guidelines. Among adults free of cardiovascular disease (CVD), 10.5% had discordant recommendations between guidelines. Individuals recommended for statin therapy under ACC/AHA but not ESC/EAS guidelines had less chronic kidney disease, higher HDL cholesterol, higher 10-year (AHA/ACC calculator) risk, and higher 30-year (Framingham) risk than adults recommended under ESC/EAS but not under ACC/AHA guidelines. Ten-year CVD mortality risk estimated by the SCORE algorithm was similar between the two groups. Conclusions: In spite of differences between current European and American cholesterol guidelines, when applied to a nationwide representative sample from a country with high CVD risk, the number of adults aged 40-65 recommended for cholesterol lowering therapy under each guideline was nearly identical. Although more adults met criteria for primary prevention based on 10-year CVD risk under new American guidelines, the impact of this is offset by additional criteria for statin therapy in current European guidelines.

scholarly journals A longitudinal evaluation of cardiovascular risk factors, treatment patterns, and outcomes in patients with documented cardiovascular disease treated with lipid lowering therapy in the United Kingdom

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Beaini ◽  
M Danese ◽  
E Sidelnikov ◽  
G Villa ◽  
D Catterick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Event Rate ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Cvd Risk Factors ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
History Of ◽  
Esc Guidelines

Abstract Background Over time, guidelines for dyslipidemia management in patients at high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) changed with the goal of improving patient outcomes. Guidelines have been released by the European Joint Task Force in 2007, 2012 and 2016, European Society of Cardiology in 2011, 2016 and 2019, Joint British Societies in 2014, and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence in 2014. Purpose Evaluate cardiovascular risk factors, treatment patterns, and cardiovascular outcomes over time related to dyslipidemia management. Methods Ten prevalent cohorts of patients with documented CVD receiving lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) were created using Clinical Research Practice Datalink (CPRD) records as of January 1, each year from 2008 through 2017. For each cohort, we identified CVD risk factors and LLT, and estimated the 1-year composite rate of fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke (IS), or revascularization. Patient follow-up was censored at the earliest of one year, end of data, or the outcome of interest. Patients in each cohort were required to be ≥18 years old, have ≥1 years of available medical history, and have received ≥2 LLT prescriptions in the prior year. Documented CVD was defined as MI, IS, angina, revascularization, transient ischemic attack, carotid stenosis, abdominal aortic aneurysm, or peripheral arterial disease. Patients could be in multiple cohorts. Results Annual patient counts ranged from 170,501 to 179,137 through 2013 and declined to 94,418 by 2017 (due to fewer patients in the overall CPRD data). Comparing 2008, 2011 (when ESC guidelines were revised) and 2017 showed the following for CVD risk factors: mean age was 71.6, 72.3, and 72.5 years; males were 59.9%, 61.1%, and 63.1%; current smoking was 15.1%, 15.2%, and 13.9%; type 2 diabetes was 18.4%, 20.2%, and 22.4%; stage 3–5 chronic kidney disease was 22.4%, 25.1%, and 22.8%; history of MI was 22.5%, 23.9%, and 27.4%; history of IS was 5.5%, 6.6%, and 7.9%; LDL &lt;1.8 mmol/L was 27.8%, 29.2% and 37.2%; and LDL &lt;1.4 mmol/L was 9.9%, 10.1%, and 15.6%. In terms of treatment, high intensity statin use increased from 12.9% to 15.7% to 30.8%; atorvastatin 40–80 mg use increased from 12.9% to 15.5% to 30.5%; while simvastatin 20–40 mg use decreased from 55.4% to 58.8% to 36.7%. The 1-year cardiovascular event rate declined from 2.54 to 2.35 to 1.96 events per 100 person-years (Figure). Conclusions After 2011 in the UK, there was an increased use of high intensity statins, a greater proportion of patients with LDL levels &lt;1.8 and &lt;1.4 mmol/L, and lower 1-year cardiovascular event rates. While improved CVD management likely contributed to the event rate decline, less than 40% of very high-risk patients achieved an LDL &lt;1.8 mmol/L, and the proportion with LDL &lt;1.4 mmol/L, as recommended by the 2019 ESC guidelines, was less than 20%. Clinicians should continue their efforts to reduce LDL in these patients. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Amgen

scholarly journals Cardiovascular risk factors and COVID-19 outcomes in hospitalised patients: a prospective cohort study

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e045482
Author(s):  
Didier Collard ◽  
Nick S Nurmohamed ◽  
Yannick Kaiser ◽  
Laurens F Reeskamp ◽  
Tom Dormans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Cvd Risk Factors ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Secondary Outcomes ◽  
Age And Sex

ObjectivesRecent reports suggest a high prevalence of hypertension and diabetes in COVID-19 patients, but the role of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in the clinical course of COVID-19 is unknown. We evaluated the time-to-event relationship between hypertension, dyslipidaemia, diabetes and COVID-19 outcomes.DesignWe analysed data from the prospective Dutch CovidPredict cohort, an ongoing prospective study of patients admitted for COVID-19 infection.SettingPatients from eight participating hospitals, including two university hospitals from the CovidPredict cohort were included.ParticipantsAdmitted, adult patients with a positive COVID-19 PCR or high suspicion based on CT-imaging of the thorax. Patients were followed for major outcomes during the hospitalisation. CVD risk factors were established via home medication lists and divided in antihypertensives, lipid-lowering therapy and antidiabetics.Primary and secondary outcomes measuresThe primary outcome was mortality during the first 21 days following admission, secondary outcomes consisted of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and ICU mortality. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to determine the association with CVD risk factors.ResultsWe included 1604 patients with a mean age of 66±15 of whom 60.5% were men. Antihypertensives, lipid-lowering therapy and antidiabetics were used by 45%, 34.7% and 22.1% of patients. After 21-days of follow-up; 19.2% of the patients had died or were discharged for palliative care. Cox regression analysis after adjustment for age and sex showed that the presence of ≥2 risk factors was associated with increased mortality risk (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.02), but not with ICU admission. Moreover, the use of ≥2 antidiabetics and ≥2 antihypertensives was associated with mortality independent of age and sex with HRs of, respectively, 2.09 (95% CI 1.55 to 2.80) and 1.46 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.91).ConclusionsThe accumulation of hypertension, dyslipidaemia and diabetes leads to a stepwise increased risk for short-term mortality in hospitalised COVID-19 patients independent of age and sex. Further studies investigating how these risk factors disproportionately affect COVID-19 patients are warranted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document