scholarly journals Prognostic value of left ventricular ventricular dyssynchrony in left bundle branch block patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Cortes ◽  
EN Aramayo G ◽  
PE Barboza ◽  
EM Claros ◽  
MA Embon
Keyword(s):  
Left Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Gated Spect ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Spect Imaging ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) patterns on the electrocardiogram include a heterogeneous group of patients with different prognosis and some of them with or without left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony (LVMD). LVMD obtained by gated technetium 99m single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging could be an early tool to detect myocardial damage, identifying a high risk group. Purpose The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of LVMD in LBBB patients. Methods Five hundred and eighty consecutive patients with LBBB were referred for gated SPECT from August 2011 to June 2019. Phase analysis parameters Standard deviation (SD) and histogram bandwidth (HB) were obtained in rest gated SPECT imaging. LVMD was defined as the upper limit of the highest normal for phase analysis results in our control patients mean values plus two standard deviations (SD ≥ 21° or HB ≥ 67°). Follow up was performed by telephone contact or medical history review. Hard endpoint was all-cause death. Event-free survival curves were obtained. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis were performed. Results LVMD was observed in 254 (44%) patients. Compared to non LVMD patients had: similar age (67.68 ± 11.01 vs. 67.2 ± 10.3 y; p NS), more male (75.2% vs 39.6%), more hypertension (75.2% vs. 66.8%), more diabetes (22.8% vs. 13%) and more smoking history (31.9% vs. 23.7%) all p <0.05. A total of 495 patients completed the follow up (mean 29.8 ± 25.8 months). Fourteen patients died (2.8%), 12 had LVMD. Fig 1 shows Kaplan-Meier curve of event-free survival in relation to LVMD. Variables associated with all-cause death in the univariate analysis were: Score Rest Summed ≥ 4 (p 0.02), LV ejection fraction ≤ 35% (p < 0.01), diabetes (p 0.03) and LVMD (p <0.01). The absence of LVMD was a predictor of the lower risk of all-cause death in the multivariate analysis (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.13, 95% confidence interval: 0.03- 0.56; p < 0.01). Conclusion In our population of patients with LBBB, the absence of LVMD assessed by gated SPECT imaging identifies patients with lower risk of hard adverse events.

Abstract 16154: Baseline Left Ventricular Diameter Predicts Recovery in New Systolic Heart Failure Syndromes

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Gold ◽  
Nathan Kong ◽  
Matthew Gold ◽  
Tess Allan ◽  
Anand Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Medical Decision ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Internal Diameter ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Short Term Treatment ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Therapies

Introduction: It is unknown how often patients with very advanced left ventricular (LV) dilation at initial presentation demonstrate meaningful recovery with medical therapy. Understanding short term treatment outcomes may impact medical decision making and counseling. Hypothesis: Patients with left ventricular end diastolic internal diameter (LVEDD) > 6.5cm will be less likely to recover left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as compared to patients with LVEDD < 6.5cm. Methods: Patients were retrospectively identified by a database search of echocardiogram studies obtained at the University of Chicago between 2008-2018. Manual review was performed to ensure new diagnosis of systolic dysfunction with LVEF ≤ 35% and follow up echocardiogram study within 3 to 9 months of index study. LVEDD was determined from parasternal long axis views per routine. LVEF recovery was specified as LVEF > 35%. Chart review was done to assess for composite death, hospice, transplant, left ventricular assist device, and sustained ventricular tachycardia. Chi-square, multivariable logistic regression, and Kaplan-Meier survival were used for analysis. Results: Out of 100 patients included for analysis, mean age was 59.7 years, 41 were female and 82 were African American. 17.7% of patients’ with LVEDD > 6.5 cm had LVEF recovery compared to 53.0% of patients’ with LVEDD ≤ 6.5 cm (p = 0.008). LVEDD > 6.5 cm was associated with less LVEF recovery even when adjusted for age, gender, hypertension, and diabetes (adjusted odds ratio 0.18, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.65). LVEDD > 6.5cm was associated with worse event free survival (p = 0.004) with a median follow-up time of 2.4 years. Conclusions: An LVEDD of > 6.5cm is associated with diminished LVEF recovery and event free survival when compared to those patients with an LVEDD ≤ 6.5cm. Delaying consideration for advanced therapies and device based therapies in hopes of recovery may be inappropriate for many such patients.

scholarly journals Long-term outcomes of His bundle pacing in patients with heart failure with left bundle branch block

Heart ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 105 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weijian Huang ◽  
Lan Su ◽  
Shengjie Wu ◽  
Lei Xu ◽  
Fangyi Xiao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Bundle Branch Block ◽  
His Bundle ◽  
His Bundle Pacing ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure

ObjectivesHis bundle pacing (HBP) can potentially correct left bundle branch block (LBBB). We aimed to assess the efficacy of HBP to correct LBBB and long-term clinical outcomes with HBP in patients with heart failure (HF).MethodsThis is an observational study of patients with HF with typical LBBB who were indicated for pacing therapy and were consecutively enrolled from one centre. Permanent HBP leads were implanted if the LBBB correction threshold was <3.5V/0.5 ms or 3.0 V/1.0 ms. Pacing parameters, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class were assessed during follow-up.ResultsIn 74 enrolled patients (69.6±9.2 years and 43 men), LBBB correction was acutely achieved in 72 (97.3%) patients, and 56 (75.7%) patients received permanent HBP (pHBP) while 18 patients did not receive permanent HBP (non-permanent HBP), due to no LBBB correction (n=2), high LBBB correction thresholds (n=10) and fixation failure (n=6). The median follow-up period of pHBP was 37.1 (range 15.0–48.7) months. Thirty patients with pHBP had completed 3-year follow-up, with LVEF increased from baseline 32.4±8.9% to 55.9±10.7% (p<0.001), LVESV decreased from a baseline of 137.9±64.1 mL to 52.4±32.6 mL (p<0.001) and NYHA Class improvement from baseline 2.73±0.58 to 1.03±0.18 (p<0.001). LBBB correction threshold remained stable with acute threshold of 2.13±1.19 V/0.5 ms to 2.29±0.92 V/0.5 ms at 3-year follow-up (p>0.05).ConclusionspHBP improved LVEF, LVESV and NYHA Class in patients with HF with typical LBBB.

Neuromuscular comorbidity, atrial fibrillation and left bundle branch block predict the prognosis of left ventricular hypertrabeculation/noncompaction

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Stoellberger ◽  
M Hasun ◽  
M Winkler-Dworak ◽  
J Finsterer
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Left Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Neuromuscular Disorders ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Unknown Etiology ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Predictors Of Mortality

Abstract Background The prognosis of patients with left ventricular hypertrabeculation/noncompaction (LVHT) is controversially assessed. LVHT is frequently associated with neuromuscular disorders (NMDs). Aim of the study was to assess cardiac and neurological findings as predictors of mortality in LVHT-patients. Methods Included were patients with LVHT diagnosed between June 1995 and December 2019 in one echocardiographic laboratory. They underwent a baseline cardiologic examination and were invited for a neurological investigation. In January 2020, their survival status was assessed. Results LVHT was diagnosed in 310 patients (93 female, aged 53±18 years) with a prevalence of 0.4%/year. A neurologic investigation was performed in 205 patients (67%). A specific NMD was found in 33 of the investigated patients (16%), NMDs of unknown etiology in 123 (60%) and the neurological investigation was normal in 49 (24%) patients. During 86 months of follow-up, 59 patients received implanted electronic devices (cardioverter/defibrillator n=21, antibradycardic pacemakers n=11, cardiac resynchronization device/defibrillator n=22, cardiac resynchronization device n=4). During follow-up 105 patients died and 6 patients underwent heart transplantation. The mortality was 4.7%/year. By multivariate analysis, the following baseline parameters were identified as predictors of mortality: increased age (p=0.0005), inpatient-status when LVHT was diagnosed (p=0.0050), presence of a specific NMD (p=0.0187) or NMD of unknown etiology (p=0.0052), atrial fibrillation (p=0.0007) and left bundle branch block (p=0.0168). Conclusions LVHT patients should be systematically investigated neurologically since neurological comorbidity has a prognostic impact. Electrocardiographic abnormalities like atrial fibrillation and left bundle branch block should be considered when planning pharmacotherapy and device-therapy. It has to be assessed by prospective studies, which measures improve the prognosis of LVHT. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

P597Clinical and prognostic correlates of volume/time curve at cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with non-ischemic heart failure and left bundle branch block

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Aimo ◽  
A Barison ◽  
A Valleggi ◽  
S Salerni ◽  
R De Caterina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Left Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Systolic Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Bundle Branch Block

Abstract Background In patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure (HF) and left bundle branch block (LBBB), the systolic phase of the left ventricular (LV) volume/time (V/t) curve at cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) can display a wide or a narrow pattern (WP/NP). The clinical and prognostic significance of these patterns are currently unknown. Methods Consecutive patients with systolic non-ischaemic HF (LV ejection fraction <50%) and LBBB were enrolled. They underwent a baseline evaluation including CMR, and were periodically re-evaluated during follow-up. The endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, heart failure (HF)-related event, and ventricular arrhythmias requiring defibrillator shock. Results Out of 101 patients (mean age 64±11 years, males 50%), NP was found in 29 and WP in 72, with no difference in QRS duration. Patients with WP had worse clinical presentation and greater LV volumes, but similar LGE prevalence, extent or distribution. The WP subgroup displayed a greater maximal dyssynchrony time, expressed both as absolute duration (192±80 vs. 143±65 ms, P<0.001), and as percentage of the RR interval (25±11% vs. 8±4%, p<0.001). Even the systolic dyssynchrony index was higher in patients with WP (13±4 vs. 7±3%, p<0.001). The contractility index was lower in patients with the WP (2.6±1.2 vs 3.2±1.7, p<0.05). Over a median follow-up duration of 44 months (interquartile interval 23–59), only WP (p=0.029) and NT-proBNP (p=0.004) demonstrated an independent prognostic value for cardiac events. Conclusions In patients with non-ischaemic systolic HF and LBBB, the WP of V/t curves identifies a subgroup of patients with greater LV dyssynchrony, worse clinical conditions and prognosis.

1227 Risk stratification of patients with asymptomatic moderate mitral regurgitation: the prognostic value of left atrial strain

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Cameli ◽  
M C Pastore ◽  
F M Righini ◽  
G E Mandoli ◽  
F D"ascenzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background In asymptomatic moderate mitral regurgitation (MR), the criteria for risk stratification are still uncertain. Therefore, in these patients, optimal time of surgery remains controversial. Purpose Our aim was to compare left atrial (LA) strain to other echocardiographic parameters for the prediction of cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with asymptomatic moderate MR. Methods 401 patients with primary degenerative asymptomatic moderate MR was enrolled and prospectively followed for the development of CV events (i.e. atrial fibrillation, stroke/transient ischemic attack, acute heart failure, CV death). Patients with history of atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, heart failure, cardiac surgery or heart transplantation, severe MR, mitral valve surgery during follow-up were excluded. Results During a mean follow up of 3.4 ± 2 years, of the 326 patients eligible (mean age 65 ± 9 years), 122 patients had 149 new events. There were no significative differences in mean age and sex, clinical and therapeutic characteristics between the two groups. The event-group presented reduced global peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS), LA emptying fraction, LV strain at baseline, and larger LA volume indexed (p &lt;0.0001). Receiver operating characteristics curves proved the greatest predictive performance for global PALS &lt; 35% (AUC 0.88). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated good intra- and inter-observer agreement and Kaplan Meier analysis showed a graded association between PALS and event-free-survival. Conclusions Speckle tracking echocardiography could provide a useful index, global PALS, to estimate LA function in patients with asymptomatic moderate MR in order to optimize surgical timing before the development of irreversible myocardial dysfunction. Echo-data of our study population Variable No CV events (n = 204) CV events (n = 122) LV ejection fraction (%) 59 ± 9 58 ± 10 LV global longitudinal strain (%) - 18.5 ± 3.4 -17.6 ± 3.6* LA volume indexed (ml/m2) 32.5 ± 6.7 36.4 ± 7.1* LA emptying fraction (%) 68 ± 13 62 ± 15* Mitral E/A ratio 0.94 ± 0.14 0.95 ± 0.16 Mitral E/E’ ratio 11.2 ± 6.5 12.4 ± 7.1 Mitral regurgitant fraction (%) 38.9 ± 8.1 39.1 ± 9.4 End regurgitation orifice area (cm2) 0.34 ± 0.05 0.34 ± 0.06 Global PALS (%) 32.5 ± 8.5 19.7 ± 8.1* *Significative variation between groups. Cardiovascular, CV; Left atrial, LA; Left ventricular, LV; Peak atrial longitudinal strain, PALS Abstract 1227 Figure. Event-free survival according to PALS

scholarly journals The physiologic and prognostic value of regional longitudinal strain during dipyridamole stress echocardiography

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
RA Rosina Arbucci ◽  
DML Diego Maximiliano Lowenstein ◽  
AKS Ariel Karim Saad ◽  
MGR Maria Graciela Rousee ◽  
NG Natalio Gastaldello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Stress Echocardiography ◽  
Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Private Company ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Myocardial Infraction ◽  
Dipyridamole Stress Echocardiography ◽  
Dipyridamole Stress

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Investigaciones Médicas, Cardiodiagnostic Background.  Regional apical longitudinal strain (RALS) allows to corroborate the diagnosis of regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) during dipyridamole stress echocardiography (DSE) on a quantitative basis but data on the prognostic value are missing. Objectives.  The to evaluate the physiologic correlates and prognostic value of RALS vs. RWMA during DSE. Methods.  In a single center, observational design we initially evaluated 150 patients (pts), mean age 68.3 ± 9.6 years, 50.7% men referred for DSE.  RALS was defined as the average of the four apical segments from the 3 apical views.  Any increase in the percentage of deformation was considered normal. Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) was also assessed in mid-distal left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery by pulsed-wave Doppler. Pts were divided into two groups (G). G1: patients with normal RALS, and G2: patients with abnormal RALS.  Major cardiovascular event was considered to be: cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infraction (AMI), stroke or needs for revascularization after 3 months All patients were followed-up. Results. RALS success rate was 94.6% (142 pts), since 8 pts were excluded for inadequeate window. Eighty-seven patients (61.3%) were included in G1 and 55 (38.7%) pts in G2. The mean follow-up was 36 ± 0.93 months. There were no differences in the resting RALS between the G1 and G2 (-22.3% ± 3.3 vs -21.25% ± 4.9, p = NS), but significant differences in the peak dipyridamole effect (-26.3% ± 4.2 vs -18.8% ± 4.1, p &lt; 0.001). Pts G1  showed less RWMA  than pts G2 (G1 3.4% vs  G2 90 %), p &lt; 0.001) and higher CFVR (G1= 2.6 ± 0.5 vs G2 = 1.6 ± 0.4, p &lt; 0.001). Adequeate CFVR showed high concordance with the increase in RALS evaluated  by Kappa Index 0.95, p 0.001 (Pts G1= 98.9% vs pts G2= 96.4%).  In the long-term follow up, 24 pts experienced events: 3 deaths, 3 non-fatal myocardial infarctions, 2 stroke and 16 late revascularizations. Pts with normal RALS had a better event-free survival (G1= 90.8% vs G2 = 70.9%, log Rank p &lt; 0.007, HR: 2.92; 95% CI: 1.27-6.68, p 0.011) (figure 1). In the multivariate analysis of logistic regression, adjusted for age, the RALS was an independent predictor of event. In G2 no significant differences were detected in event free survival in pts with and without visual dyssynergies during DSE (73.7 vs 67.7, respectively (p = ns) Conclusions. A mismatch between RALS and visually assessed RWMA occurs in a significant proportion of patients, and RALS is better correlated to physiologic (CFVR) and prognostic standards. Abnormal RALS during DSE predicted worse outcome, regardless of the RWMA.  Quantitative stress echocardiography is possible feasible and useful during DSE. Abstract Figure. RALS in DSE and Event Free Survival

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document