scholarly journals European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging expert consensus paper: a comprehensive review of cardiovascular magnetic resonance normal values of cardiac chamber size and aortic root in adults and recommendations for grading severity

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 1321-1331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffen E Petersen ◽  
Mohammed Y Khanji ◽  
Sven Plein ◽  
Patrizio Lancellotti ◽  
Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci

Abstract This consensus paper provides a framework for grading of severity of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging-based assessment of chamber size, function, and aortic measurements. This does not currently exist for CMR measures. Differences exist in the normal reference values between echocardiography and CMR along with differences in methods used to derive these. We feel that this document will significantly complement the current literature and provide a practical guide for clinicians in daily reporting and interpretation of CMR scans. This manuscript aims to complement a recent comprehensive review of CMR normal value publications to recommend cut-off values required for severity grading. Standardization of severity grading for clinically useful CMR parameters is encouraged to lead to clearer and easier communication with referring clinicians and may contribute to better patient care. To this end, the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) has formed this expert panel that has critically reviewed the literature and has come to a consensus on approaches to severity grading for commonly quantified CMR parameters.

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine Kawel-Boehm ◽  
Scott J. Hetzel ◽  
Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh ◽  
Gabriella Captur ◽  
Christopher J. Francois ◽  
...  

AbstractCardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) enables assessment and quantification of morphological and functional parameters of the heart, including chamber size and function, diameters of the aorta and pulmonary arteries, flow and myocardial relaxation times. Knowledge of reference ranges (“normal values”) for quantitative CMR is crucial to interpretation of results and to distinguish normal from disease. Compared to the previous version of this review published in 2015, we present updated and expanded reference values for morphological and functional CMR parameters of the cardiovascular system based on the peer-reviewed literature and current CMR techniques. Further, databases and references for deep learning methods are included.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Leiner ◽  
Jan Bogaert ◽  
Matthias G. Friedrich ◽  
Raad Mohiaddin ◽  
Vivek Muthurangu ◽  
...  

Abstract The Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) last published its comprehensive expert panel report of clinical indications for CMR in 2004. This new Consensus Panel report brings those indications up to date for 2020 and includes the very substantial increase in scanning techniques, clinical applicability and adoption of CMR worldwide. We have used a nearly identical grading system for indications as in 2004 to ensure comparability with the previous report but have added the presence of randomized controlled trials as evidence for level 1 indications. In addition to the text, tables of the consensus indication levels are included for rapid assimilation and illustrative figures of some key techniques are provided.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document