Corrigendum to: European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging expert consensus paper: a comprehensive review of cardiovascular magnetic resonance normal values of cardiac chamber size and aortic root in adults and recommendations for grading severity

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 1331-1331
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Aortic Root ◽  
European Association ◽  
Normal Values ◽  
Cardiovascular Imaging ◽  
Expert Consensus ◽  
Cardiac Chamber ◽  
Comprehensive Review ◽  
Chamber Size

scholarly journals European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging expert consensus paper: a comprehensive review of cardiovascular magnetic resonance normal values of cardiac chamber size and aortic root in adults and recommendations for grading severity

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 1321-1331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffen E Petersen ◽  
Mohammed Y Khanji ◽  
Sven Plein ◽  
Patrizio Lancellotti ◽  
Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
European Association ◽  
Expert Panel ◽  
Normal Values ◽  
Cardiovascular Imaging ◽  
Comprehensive Review ◽  
Consensus Paper ◽  
Severity Grading ◽  
Chamber Size

Abstract This consensus paper provides a framework for grading of severity of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging-based assessment of chamber size, function, and aortic measurements. This does not currently exist for CMR measures. Differences exist in the normal reference values between echocardiography and CMR along with differences in methods used to derive these. We feel that this document will significantly complement the current literature and provide a practical guide for clinicians in daily reporting and interpretation of CMR scans. This manuscript aims to complement a recent comprehensive review of CMR normal value publications to recommend cut-off values required for severity grading. Standardization of severity grading for clinically useful CMR parameters is encouraged to lead to clearer and easier communication with referring clinicians and may contribute to better patient care. To this end, the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) has formed this expert panel that has critically reviewed the literature and has come to a consensus on approaches to severity grading for commonly quantified CMR parameters.

scholarly journals Reference ranges (“normal values”) for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in adults and children: 2020 update

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine Kawel-Boehm ◽  
Scott J. Hetzel ◽  
Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh ◽  
Gabriella Captur ◽  
Christopher J. Francois ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Normal Values ◽  
Relaxation Times ◽  
Pulmonary Arteries ◽  
Reference Ranges ◽  
Adults And Children ◽  
And Function ◽  
Chamber Size

AbstractCardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) enables assessment and quantification of morphological and functional parameters of the heart, including chamber size and function, diameters of the aorta and pulmonary arteries, flow and myocardial relaxation times. Knowledge of reference ranges (“normal values”) for quantitative CMR is crucial to interpretation of results and to distinguish normal from disease. Compared to the previous version of this review published in 2015, we present updated and expanded reference values for morphological and functional CMR parameters of the cardiovascular system based on the peer-reviewed literature and current CMR techniques. Further, databases and references for deep learning methods are included.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document