scholarly journals P4725The additive value of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in predicting cardiac death and ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
G G Galeotti ◽  
N R Pugliese ◽  
I Fabiani ◽  
R Citro ◽  
P Colonna ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Castrichini ◽  
Paolo Manca ◽  
Vincenzo Nuzzi ◽  
Giulia Barbati ◽  
Antonio De Luca ◽  
...  

Sacubitril/valsartan reduces mortality in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients, partially due to cardiac reverse remodeling (RR). Little is known about the RR rate in long-lasting HFrEF and the evolution of advanced echocardiographic parameters, despite their known prognostic impact in this setting. We sought to evaluate the rates of left ventricle (LV) and left atrial (LA) RR through standard and advanced echocardiographic imaging in a cohort of HFrEF patients, after the introduction of sacubitril/valsartan. A multi-parametric standard and advanced echocardiographic evaluation was performed at the moment of introduction of sacubitril/valsartan and at 3 to 18 months subsequent follow-up. LVRR was defined as an increase in the LV ejection fraction ≥10 points associated with a decrease ≥10% in indexed LV end-diastolic diameter; LARR was defined as a decrease >15% in the left atrium end-systolic volume. We analyzed 77 patients (65 ± 11 years old, 78% males, 40% ischemic etiology) with 76 (28–165) months since HFrEF diagnosis. After a median follow-up of 9 (interquartile range 6–14) months from the beginning of sacubitril/valsartan, LVRR occurred in 20 patients (26%) and LARR in 33 patients (43%). Moreover, left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) improved from −8.3 ± 4% to −12 ± 4.7% (p < 0.001), total left atrial emptying fraction (TLAEF) from 28.2 ± 14.4% to 32.6 ± 13.7% (p = 0.01) and peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) from 10.3 ± 6.9% to 13.7 ± 7.6% (p < 0.001). In HFrEF patients, despite a long history of the disease, the introduction of sacubitril/valsartan provides a rapid global (i.e., LV and LA) RR in >25% of cases, both at standard and advanced echocardiographic evaluations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_G) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Monosilio ◽  
Domenico Filomena ◽  
Federico Luongo ◽  
Matteo Neccia ◽  
Michele Sannino ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) benefits in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are partially related to cardiac reverse remodelling, in terms of volumes reduction and function improvement. Effects on vascular remodelling are less investigated. To evaluate cardiac and vascular remodelling in a cohort of patients with HFrEF after 6 months of therapy with S/V. Methods and results 50 patients with HFrEF eligible to start a therapy with sacubitril/valsartan were enrolled. Clinical evaluation and standard and advanced echocardiography were performed at baseline and after 6 months of follow-up (FU). Standard left ventricular dimension and function parameters and global longitudinal strain (GLS) were calculated. Non-invasive pressure-volume curves (P-V loop) estimation was assessed with an off-line dedicated software using ST-E derived time-resolved LV volumes and brachial pressure as input. The following haemodynamic parameters were calculated based on P–V loop curves: left ventricular elastance (Ees), arterial elastance (Ea), and ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC). At 6 months F/U, a reduction of NYHA class in the vast majority of patients was detected (NYHA Class ≥ II, baseline vs. F/U = 100% vs. 50%; P &lt; 0.001). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were lower, in comparison with baseline values (119 ± 16 vs. 126 ± 11 mmHg; P = 0.002 and 71 ± 8 vs. 78 ± 8 mmHg; P = 0.001, respectively). At echocardiographic evaluation, left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes decreased and ejection fraction and GLS significantly improved (Table). Moreover, a significant reduction of Ea and a significant improvement of Ees and VAC was observed (Table). 511 Table 1 Conclusions Therapy with S/V in HFrEF patients determines both cardiac and vascular remodelling reflecting the complex mechanisms behind clinical improvement.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Monosilio ◽  
D Filomena ◽  
S Cimino ◽  
M Neccia ◽  
F Luongo ◽  
...  

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Sacubitril/valsartan is a well-established therapeutic option for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). While it was clearly demonstrated to improve patients’ clinical conditions, its potential role in inducing left ventricle (LV) reverse remodeling is still under investigation.  Purpose to evaluate clinical and echocardiographic effect of sacubitril/valsartan on a cohort of patients with HFrEF after six months of therapy. Methods 36 patients with HFrEF eligible to start a therapy with sacubitril/valsartan were enrolled. A standard and advanced echocardiographic evaluation was performed before starting the therapy and after six months of follow up (FU). Off-line analysis of left ventricle global longitudinal strain (GLS), longitudinal strain of the free wall of the right ventricle (RVFWSL) and left atrial strain (LAS) was conducted. Clinical and biochemical parameters were evaluated as well. Results At six months of FU NYHA class improved in the vast majority of patients (NYHA class III at baseline vs FU: 56% vs 5%, p 0.001). We observed a significant reduction in LV end-diastolic (99.62 ± 33.24 vs 91.54 ± 33.36, p 0.043) and end-systolic (69.99 ± 26.01 vs 58.68 ± 25.7, p 0.001) volumes and an improvement of LV ejection fraction (30.4 ± 5.02 vs 37.3 ± 6.4, p &lt; 0.001). After six months of therapy, GLS significantly improved (-9.71 ± 2.87 vs -13.04 ± 3.14, p &lt; 0.001). No differences in left and right atrial volumes (respectively 56.6 ± 29 vs 54 ± 30, p 0.349; 54.7 ± 23.7 vs 48.3 ± 19, p 0.157), RVFWSL (-16,5 ± 5,4 vs -16,8 ± 1,5) and LAS (14 ± 6 vs 19 ± 8, p 0.197) were found at FU.  Conclusion Left ventricular function evaluated with standard and advanced echocardiographic parameters improved after six months of therapy with sacubitril/valsartan in HFrEF patients. Reduction in LV volumes was found as well. Echo Analysis Baseline Echo Analysis (n= 36) 6 Months FU Echo Analysis (n= 36) p LVEDVi, mL/m2 99, 62 ± 33,24 91,54 ± 33,36 0,043 LVESVi, mL/m2 69,99 ± 26,01 58,68 ± 25,7 0,001 LVEF, % 30,4 ± 5, 02 37,3 ± 6,4 &lt; 0,001 E/E’ average 12,16 ± 3,74 9,71 ± 1,33 0,023 LS Endo Average ,% -9,71 ± 2,87 -13,04 ± 3,14 &lt; 0,001 LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEDVi: left ventricular end diastolic volume indexed, LVESVi: left ventricular end systolic volume indexed; LS: longitudinal strain


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Johnsen ◽  
M Sengeloev ◽  
P Joergensen ◽  
N Bruun ◽  
D Modin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Novel echocardiographic software allows for layer-specific evaluation of myocardial deformation by 2-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. Endocardial, epicardial- and whole wall global longitudinal strain (GLS) may be superior to conventional echocardiographic parameters in predicting all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of endocardial-, epicardial- and whole wall GLS in patients with HFrEF in relation to all-cause mortality. Methods We included and analyzed transthoracic echocardiographic examinations from 1,015 patients with HFrEF. The echocardiographic images were analyzed, and conventional and novel echocardiographic parameters were obtained. A p value in a 2-sided test &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Cox proportional hazards regression models were constructed, and both univariable and multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated. Results During a median follow-up time of 40 months, 171 patients (16.8%) died. A lower endocardial (HR 1.17; 95% CI (1.11–1.23), per 1% decrease, p&lt;0.001), epicardial (HR 1.20; 95% CI (1.13–1.27), per 1% decrease, p&lt;0.001), and whole wall (HR 1.20; 95% CI (1.14–1.27), per 1% decrease, p&lt;0.001) GLS were all associated with higher risk of death (Figure 1). Both endocardial (HR 1.12; 95% CI (1.01–1.23), p=0.027), epicardial (HR 1.13; 95% CI (1.01–1.26), p=0.040) and whole wall (HR 1.13; 95% CI (1.01–1.27), p=0.030) GLS remained independent predictors of mortality in the multivariable models after adjusting for significant clinical parameters (age, sex, total cholesterol, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, ischemic cardiomyopathy, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and diabetes) and conventional echocardiographic parameters (left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, LV mass index, left atrial volume index, deceleration time, E/e', E-velocity, E/A ratio and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion). No other echocardiographic parameters remained an independent predictors after adjusting. Furthermore, endocardial, epicardial and whole wall GLS had the highest C-statistics of all the echocardiographic parameters. Conclusion Endocardial, epicardial and whole wall GLS are independent predictors of all-cause mortality in patients with HFrEF. Furthermore, endocardial, epicardial and whole wall GLS were superior prognosticators of all-cause mortality compared with all other echocardiographic parameters. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Herlev and Gentofte Hospital


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document