scholarly journals Improvement of left ventricular systolic performance during sacubitril/valsartan in a cohort of patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Monosilio ◽  
D Filomena ◽  
S Cimino ◽  
M Neccia ◽  
F Luongo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricle ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Right Atrial ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Sacubitril/valsartan is a well-established therapeutic option for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). While it was clearly demonstrated to improve patients’ clinical conditions, its potential role in inducing left ventricle (LV) reverse remodeling is still under investigation.  Purpose to evaluate clinical and echocardiographic effect of sacubitril/valsartan on a cohort of patients with HFrEF after six months of therapy. Methods 36 patients with HFrEF eligible to start a therapy with sacubitril/valsartan were enrolled. A standard and advanced echocardiographic evaluation was performed before starting the therapy and after six months of follow up (FU). Off-line analysis of left ventricle global longitudinal strain (GLS), longitudinal strain of the free wall of the right ventricle (RVFWSL) and left atrial strain (LAS) was conducted. Clinical and biochemical parameters were evaluated as well. Results At six months of FU NYHA class improved in the vast majority of patients (NYHA class III at baseline vs FU: 56% vs 5%, p 0.001). We observed a significant reduction in LV end-diastolic (99.62 ± 33.24 vs 91.54 ± 33.36, p 0.043) and end-systolic (69.99 ± 26.01 vs 58.68 ± 25.7, p 0.001) volumes and an improvement of LV ejection fraction (30.4 ± 5.02 vs 37.3 ± 6.4, p < 0.001). After six months of therapy, GLS significantly improved (-9.71 ± 2.87 vs -13.04 ± 3.14, p < 0.001). No differences in left and right atrial volumes (respectively 56.6 ± 29 vs 54 ± 30, p 0.349; 54.7 ± 23.7 vs 48.3 ± 19, p 0.157), RVFWSL (-16,5 ± 5,4 vs -16,8 ± 1,5) and LAS (14 ± 6 vs 19 ± 8, p 0.197) were found at FU.  Conclusion Left ventricular function evaluated with standard and advanced echocardiographic parameters improved after six months of therapy with sacubitril/valsartan in HFrEF patients. Reduction in LV volumes was found as well. Echo Analysis Baseline Echo Analysis (n= 36) 6 Months FU Echo Analysis (n= 36) p LVEDVi, mL/m2 99, 62 ± 33,24 91,54 ± 33,36 0,043 LVESVi, mL/m2 69,99 ± 26,01 58,68 ± 25,7 0,001 LVEF, % 30,4 ± 5, 02 37,3 ± 6,4 < 0,001 E/E’ average 12,16 ± 3,74 9,71 ± 1,33 0,023 LS Endo Average ,% -9,71 ± 2,87 -13,04 ± 3,14 < 0,001 LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEDVi: left ventricular end diastolic volume indexed, LVESVi: left ventricular end systolic volume indexed; LS: longitudinal strain

scholarly journals Combined effects of ARNI and SGLT2 inhibitors in diabetic patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyue Mee Kim ◽  
In-Chang Hwang ◽  
Wonsuk Choi ◽  
Yeonyee E. Yoon ◽  
Goo-Yeong Cho
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiovascular Mortality ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Group 1

AbstractAngiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) and sodium–glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) have shown benefits in diabetic patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, their combined effect has not been revealed. We retrospectively identified diabetic patients with HFrEF who were prescribed an ARNI and/or SGLT2i. The patients were divided into groups treated with both ARNI and SGLT2i (group 1), ARNI but not SGLT2i (group 2), SGLT2i but not ARNI (group 3), and neither ARNI nor SGLT2i (group 4). After propensity score-matching, the occurrence of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), cardiovascular mortality, and changes in echocardiographic parameters were analyzed. Of the 206 matched patients, 92 (44.7%) had to undergo HHF and 43 (20.9%) died of cardiovascular causes during a median 27.6 months of follow-up. Patients in group 1 exhibited a lower risk of HHF and cardiovascular mortality compared to those in the other groups. Improvements in the left ventricular ejection fraction and E/e′ were more pronounced in group 1 than in groups 2, 3 and 4. These echocardiographic improvements were more prominent after the initiation of ARNI, compare to the initiation of SGLT2i. In diabetic patients with HFrEF, combination of ARNI and SGT2i showed significant improvement in cardiac function and prognosis. ARNI-SGLT2i combination therapy may improve the clinical course of HFrEF in diabetic patients.

scholarly journals Effect of dapagliflozin therapy on achieving cardiovascular mortality target indicators in patients with heart failure

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 4800
Author(s):  
M. V. Zhuravleva ◽  
S. N. Tereshchenko ◽  
I. V. Zhirov ◽  
S. V. Villevalde ◽  
T. V. Marin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiovascular Mortality ◽  
Patient Population ◽  
Standard Therapy ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure

Aim. To assess the effect of therapy with sodium glucose co-transporter type 2 inhibitor dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (CHrEF) on the state cardiovascular mortality target indicators.Material and methods. All adult Russian patients with NYHA class II-IV HFrEF (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%) were considered as the target population. The characteristics of patients in the study corresponded to those in the Russian Hospital HF Registry (RUS-HFR). The study suggests that the use of dapagliflozin in addition to standard therapy will be expanded by 10% of the patient population annually in 2022-24. Cardiovascular mortality modeling was performed based on the extrapolation of DAPA-HF study result. The number of deaths that can be prevented was calculated when using dapagliflozin in addition to standard therapy. Further, the contribution of prevented deaths with dapagliflozin therapy to the achievement of federal and regional cardiovascular mortality target indicators (1, 2 and 3 years) was calculated.Results. The use of dapagliflozin in addition to standard therapy for patients with NYHA class II-IV CHrEF with the expansion of dapagliflozin therapy by 10% of the patient population annually will additionally prevent 1729 cardiovascular death in the first year. This will ensure the implementation of cardiovascular mortality target indicators in Russia in 2022 by 11,8%. In the second year, 3769 cardiovascular deaths will be prevented, which will ensure the implementation of target indicators in 2023 by 17,2%. In the third year, 5465 cardiovascular deaths prevented, which will ensure the implementation of implementation of target indicators in 2024 by 18,7%.Conclusion. The use of dapagliflozin in addition to standard therapy for patients with NYHA class II-IV CHrEF will ensure the implementation of implementation of target indicators in 2024 by 18,7%.

scholarly journals The central arterial stiffness parameters in decompensated versus compensated states of heart failure: a paired comparative cohort study

2022 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed El Fol ◽  
Waleed Ammar ◽  
Yasser Sharaf ◽  
Ghada Youssef
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Arterial Stiffness ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Pulse Wave ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction

Abstract Background Arterial stiffness is strongly linked to the pathogenesis of heart failure and the development of acute decompensation in patients with stable chronic heart failure. This study aimed to compare arterial stiffness indices in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) during the acute decompensated state, and three months later after hospital discharge during the compensated state. Results One hundred patients with acute decompensated HFrEF (NYHA class III and IV) and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35% were included in the study. During the initial and follow-up visits, all patients underwent full medical history taking, clinical examination, transthoracic echocardiography, and non-invasive pulse wave analysis by the Mobil-O-Graph 24-h device for measurement of arterial stiffness. The mean age was 51.6 ± 6.1 years and 80% of the participants were males. There was a significant reduction of the central arterial stiffness indices in patients with HFrEF during the compensated state compared to the decompensated state. During the decompensated state, patients presented with NYHA FC IV (n = 64) showed higher AI (24.5 ± 10.0 vs. 16.8 ± 8.6, p < 0.001) and pulse wave velocity (9.2 ± 1.3 vs. 8.5 ± 1.2, p = 0.021) than patients with NYHA FC III, and despite the relatively smaller number of females, they showed higher stiffness indices than males. Conclusions Central arterial stiffness indices in patients with HFrEF were significantly lower in the compensated state than in the decompensated state. Patients with NYHA FC IV and female patients showed higher stiffness indices in their decompensated state of heart failure.

scholarly journals Improvement in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Outpatients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam D. DeVore ◽  
Anne S. Hellkamp ◽  
Laine Thomas ◽  
Nancy M. Albert ◽  
Javed Butler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure

Background: Among patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (EF), improvements in left ventricular EF (LVEF) are associated with better outcomes and remain an important treatment goal. Patient factors associated with LVEF improvement in routine clinical practice have not been clearly defined. Methods: CHAMP-HF (Change the Management of Patients with Heart Failure) is a prospective registry of outpatients with HF with reduced EF. Assessments of LVEF are recorded when performed for routine care. We analyzed patients with both baseline and ≥1 follow-up LVEF assessments to describe factors associated with LVEF improvement. Results: In CHAMP-HF, 2623 patients had a baseline and follow-up LVEF assessment. The median age was 67 (interquartile range, 58–75) years, 40% had an ischemic cardiomyopathy, and median HF duration was 2.8 years (0.7–6.8). Median LVEF was 30% (23–35), and median change on follow-up was 4% (−2 to −13); 19% of patients had a decrease in LVEF, 31% had no change, 49% had a ≥5% increase, and 34% had a ≥10% increase. In a multivariable model, the following factors were associated with ≥5% LVEF increase: shorter HF duration (odds ratio [OR], 1.21 [95% CI, 1.17–1.25]), no implantable cardioverter defibrillator (OR, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.34–1.55]), lower LVEF (OR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.10–1.19]), nonischemic cardiomyopathy (OR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.09–1.36]), and no coronary disease (OR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.03–1.35]). Conclusions: In a large cohort of outpatients with chronic HF with reduced EF, improvements in LVEF were common. Common baseline cardiac characteristics identified a population that was more likely to respond over time. These data may inform clinical decision making and should be the basis for future research on myocardial recovery.

Implementation of Guideline-Recommended Therapies for Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Regional Arab Middle East Experience

Angiology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. 431-437
Author(s):  
Mohammad Zubaid ◽  
Wafa Rashed ◽  
Mustafa Ridha ◽  
Nooshin Bazargani ◽  
Adel Hamad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Middle East ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Β Blocker ◽  
Β Blockers

We describe the characteristics of ambulatory patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in the Gulf region (Middle East) and the implementation of guideline-recommended treatments. We included 2427 HFrEF outpatients (mean age 59 ± 13 years, 75% males and median left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] of 30%). A high proportion of patients received guideline-recommended medications (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor [ACEI]/angiotensin receptor blocker [ARB]/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor [ARNI] 87%, β-blocker 91%, mineralocorticoid antagonist [MRA] 64%). However, only a minority of patients received guideline-recommended target doses (ACEI/ARB/ARNI 13%, β-blocker 27%, and MRA 4.4%). Old age was a significant independent predictor for not prescribing treatment ( P < .001 for ACEI/ARB/ARNI and MRA; and P = .002 for β-blockers). Other independent predictors were chronic kidney disease (for both ACEI/ARB/ARNI and MRA, P < .001) and higher LVEF ( P = .014 for β-blockers and P < .001 for MRA). Patients with HFrEF managed by heart failure specialists more often received recommended target doses of ACEI/ARB/ARNI (40% vs 11%, P < .001) and β-blockers (56% vs 26%, P < .001) compared to those treated by general cardiologists. Although the majority of our patients with HFrEF received guideline-recommended medications, the doses they were prescribed were suboptimal. Understanding the reasons behind this is important for improved practice.

P6356Comparisons of clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with and without atrial fibrillation: results from a multicenter PURSUIT-HFpEF registry

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Masuda ◽  
T Kanda ◽  
M Asai ◽  
T Mano ◽  
T Yamada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Heart Failure Patients ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure

Abstract Background The presence of atrial fibrillation (AF) has been demonstrated to be associated with poor clinical outcomes in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction. Objective This study aimed to elucidate the impact of the presence of atrial fibrillation (AF) on the clinical characteristics, therapeutics, and outcomes in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods PURSUIT-HFpEF is a multicenter prospective observational study including patients hospitalized for acute heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction of >50%. Patients with acute coronary syndrome or severe valvular disease were excluded. Results Of 486 HFpEF patients (age, 80.8±9.0 years old; male, 47%) from 24 cardiovascular centers, 199 (41%) had AF on admission. Patients with AF had lower systolic blood pressures (142±27 vs. 155±35mmHg, p<0.0001) and higher heart rates (91±29 vs. 82±26bpm, p<0.0001) than those without. There was no difference in the usage of inotropes or mechanical ventilation between the 2 groups. A higher quality of life score (EQ5D, 0.72±0.27 vs. 0.63±0.30, p=0.002) was observed at discharge in patients with than without AF. In addition, AF patients tended to demonstrate lower in-hospital mortality rates (0.5% vs. 2.4%, p=0.09) and shorter hospital stays (20.3±12.1 vs. 22.6±18.4 days, p=0.09) than those without. During a mean follow up of 360±111 days, mortality (14.1% vs. 15.3) and heart failure re-hospitalization rates (13.1% vs. 13.9%) were comparable between the 2 groups. Conclusion In contrast to heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction, AF on admission was not associated with poor long-term clinical outcomes among HFpEF patients. Several in-hospital outcomes were better in patients with AF than in those without. Acknowledgement/Funding None

P3547Real world experience of sacubitril/valsartan: insights on tolerability and outcome from a specialised heart failure clinic

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K C Neoh ◽  
D Rasoul ◽  
F Hunt ◽  
D W S Chong
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
National Database ◽  
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Background Sacubitril/Valsartan has been shown to improve symptoms and outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) reduced ejection fraction in a single large randomised controlled trial. However, real-world data on its effect is limited. Purpose Our centre operates a dedicated HF clinic for the initiation and titration of Sacubitril/Valsartan in suitable patients. We report on patient tolerability and incidence of adverse effects. We also assessed change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) post-treatment, as well as HF hospitalisation and mortality at 6 months. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of all patients seen in the clinic between January 2016 to January 2019. Patient demographics and pre-initiation treatments were recorded. We compared NYHA class and LVEF category as measured by echocardiography, at initiation and post-titration to the maximum tolerated dose. Data on HF admissions were obtained from electronic hospital records and mortality from a national database. Results A total of 179 patients were initiated on Sacubitril/Valsartan and included in the study. Mean age was 71 years (41–90), and 138 (77%) were male. Half of the patient cohort (89) had an ischaemic aetiology. Prior to initiation, all patients were established on an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker. Almost all were on a beta-blocker (99%) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (98%). 56 patients (31%) had a Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CRT) device and 31 (17%) had an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD). Only 4 patients (2%) had to discontinue treatment completely due to an adverse reaction. Among them, 3 patients sustained an acute kidney injury (AKI) while 1 patient had increased breathlessness. 40 patients (22%) reported symptomatic hypotension which required dose reduction. 7 patients (4%) sustained an AKI. 2 patients reported a rash and 1 patient reported nausea. Figure 1 shows the change in NYHA class after establishment on Sacubitril/Valsartan. Data on change in LVEF post establishment of Sacubitril/Valsartan was available in 124 patients and is shown in figure 2. A total of 133 patients had completed titration of treatment by July 2018 and included in the analysis of 6-month outcome. 13 patients had one HF hospitalisation and all-cause mortality was 4.5% (6 patients). Only 1 patient had heart failure documented as the primary cause of death. Change in NYHA class and LVEF Conclusion In our cohort of well treated HF patients with reduced ejection fraction, 40% of patients experienced an improvement in NYHA class after establishment on Sacubitril/Valsartan while 35% of patients also experienced a significant improvement in LVEF. Treatment was well tolerated and the discontinuation rate was low when managed in a dedicated HF clinic focused on initiation of Sacubitril/Valsartan.

Dapagliflozin in a Real-World Chronic Heart Failure Population: How Many Are Actually Eligible?

Cardiology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Sérgio Maltês ◽  
Gonçalo J.L. Cunha ◽  
Bruno M.L. Rocha ◽  
João Presume ◽  
Renato Guerreiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Real World ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Disease Modifying Drugs ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Sodium Glucose Cotransporter ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure

<b><i>Background:</i></b> In patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus, the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) dapagliflozin was recently shown to reduce the risk of worsening HF or death from cardiovascular causes in the dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (DAPA-HF) trial. Our goal was to investigate how many patients in a real-world setting would be eligible for dapagliflozin according to the DAPA-HF enrolment criteria. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This is a single-center retrospective study enrolling consecutive, unselected patients followed up in an HF clinic from 2013 to 2019. Key DAPA-HF inclusion criteria (i.e., left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤40% and NT-proBNP ≥600 pg/mL [or ≥900 pg/mL if atrial fibrillation]) and exclusion criteria (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] &#x3c;30 mL/kg/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> and systolic blood pressure [SBP] &#x3c;95 mm Hg) were considered. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall, 479 patients (age 76 ± 13 years; 50.5% male; 78.9% hypertensive; 45.1% with an eGFR &#x3c;60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>; 36.5% with TD2M; and 33.5% with ischaemic HF) were assessed. The median SBP was 128.5 (112.0–146.0) mm Hg, mean eGFR was 50.8 ± 23.7 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, and median NT-proBNP was 2,183 (IQR 1,010–5,310) pg/mL. Overall, 155 (32.4%) patients had LVEF ≤40%. According to the DAPA-HF trial key criteria, 90 patients (18.8%) would be eligible for dapagliflozin. The remainder would be excluded due to LVEF &#x3e;40% (67.6%), eGFR &#x3c;30 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> (19.4%), NT-proBNP below the cutoff (16.7%), and/or SBP &#x3c;95 mm Hg (6.5%). If we center the analysis to those with LVEF ≤40%, 58.1% would be eligible for dapagliflozin. The remainder would be excluded due to an eGFR &#x3c;30 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> (20%), NT-proBNP below the cutoff (16.1%), and/or SBP &#x3c;95 mm Hg (8.4%). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Roughly half of our real-world HFrEF cohort would be eligible for dapagliflozin according to the key criteria of the DAPA-HF trial. The main reason for non-eligibility was an eGFR &#x3c;30 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>. However, two-thirds of patients had LVEF &#x3e;40%. These findings show that dapagliflozin is a promising complementary new drug in the therapeutic armamentarium of most patients with HFrEF, while highlighting the urgent need for disease-modifying drugs in mid-range and preserved LVEF and the need to assess the efficacy and safety of SLGT2i in advanced kidney disease patients. The results of ongoing SGLT2i trials in these LVEF subgroups are eagerly awaited.

scholarly journals 633 Efficacy of additional medical therapies in patients with heart failure, reduced ejection fraction, and chronic kidney disease already receiving neurohormonal inhibitors: a network meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_G) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo De Marzo ◽  
Lucia Tricarico ◽  
Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai ◽  
Michele Correale ◽  
Natale Daniele Brunetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Composite Outcome ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure

Abstract Aims We assessed the efficacy of add-on drugs in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and concomitant chronic kidney disease (CKD) already receiving neurohormonal inhibition (NEUi). Methods and results The literature was systematically searched for phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving ≥90% patients with left ventricular ejection fraction &lt;45%, of whom &lt;30% were acutely decompensated, and with published information about the subgroup of estimated glomerular filtration rate &lt;60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Six RCTs were included in a study-level network meta-analysis evaluating the effect of NEUi, ivabradine, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), vericiguat, and omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) on a composite outcome of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure. In a fixed-effects model, SGLT2i (HR: 0.78, 95% CrI: 0.69–0.89), ARNI (HR: 0.79, 95% CrI: 0.69–0.90), and ivabradine (HR: 0.82, 95% CrI: 0.69–0.98) decreased the risk of the composite outcome vs. NEUi, whereas OM did not (HR: 0.98, 95% CrI: 0.89–1.10). A trend for improved outcome was also found for vericiguat (HR: 0.90, 95% CrI: 0.80–1.00). In indirect comparisons, both SLGT2i (HR: 0.80, 95% CrI: 0.68–0.94) and ARNI (HR: 0.80, 95% CrI: 0.68–0.95) reduced the risk vs. OM; furthermore, there was a trend for a greater benefit of SGLT2i vs. vericiguat (HR: 0.88, 95% CrI: 0.73–1.00) and ivabradine vs. OM (HR: 0.84, 95% CrI: 0.68–1.00). Results were comparable in a random-effects model and in sensitivity analyses. SUCRA scores were 81.8%, 80.8%, 68.9%, 44.2%, 16.6%, and 7.8% for SGLT2i, ARNI, ivabradine, vericiguat, OM, and NEUi, respectively. Conclusions Expanding pharmacotherapy beyond NEUi improves outcomes in HFrEF with CKD. 633 Figure

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document