scholarly journals P260Effects of prehospital epinephrine on neurologically intact survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with non-shockable rhythm depend on cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration until hospital arrival

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Funada ◽  
Y Goto ◽  
M Yamagishi
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Hospital Arrival ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Neurologically Intact ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

P1703Impact of prehospital epinephrine administration and quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation on neurologically intact survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with non-shockable rhythm

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Funada ◽  
Y Goto ◽  
H Okada ◽  
T Maeda ◽  
M Takamura
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Epinephrine Administration ◽  
Hospital Arrival ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Neurologically Intact ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background The effects of prehospital epinephrine administration in combination with the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on neurological outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with non-shockable rhythm remains unclear. Purpose This study aimed to elucidate the effects of prehospital epinephrine administration in combination with the quality of CPR on neurologically intact survival in OHCA patients with non-shockable rhythm. Methods We analysed 118,732 adult OHCA patients with non-shockable rhythm from the All-Japan OHCA registry between 2011 and 2016 (29,989 emergency medical service [EMS]-witnessed arrests with EMS-initiated CPR [high-quality CPR] and 88,743 bystander-witnessed arrests with bystander-initiated CPR continued by EMS providers [low-quality CPR]). Patients who achieved prehospital return of spontaneous circulation without prehospital epinephrine administration were excluded. The primary outcome measure was 1-month neurologically intact survival (cerebral performance category 1 or 2; CPC 1–2). Time from collapse to prehospital epinephrine administration for patients with prehospital epinephrine administration, or to hospital arrival for patients without prehospital epinephrine administration was calculated and adjusted collectively in multivariate logistic regression analysis for 1-month CPC 1–2. Results Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the time from collapse to prehospital epinephrine administration or to hospital arrival was negatively associated with 1-month CPC 1–2 (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.95 per 1-minute increment, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94–0.96). Compared with bystander-witnessed arrests without prehospital epinephrine administration, EMS-witnessed arrests with or without prehospital epinephrine administration were significantly associated with increased chances of 1-month CPC 1–2 (adjusted OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.50–2.75 and adjusted OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.57–2.48, respectively). Prehospital epinephrine administration was significantly associated with an increased chance of 1-month CPC 1–2 among bystander-witnessed arrests (adjusted OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.24–1.98), but not among EMS-witnessed arrests. EMS-witnessed arrests without prehospital epinephrine administration were significantly associated with an increased chance of 1-month CPC 1–2 compared with bystander-witnessed arrests with prehospital epinephrine administration (adjusted OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.01–1.56). Conclusions High-quality CPR is crucial for increasing neurologically intact survival in OHCA patients with non-shockable rhythm. The additional beneficial effects of prehospital epinephrine administration were observed only among OHCA patients with low-quality CPR.

5227Effects of witness status and time to cardiopulmonary resuscitation by emergency medical services on neurological outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with non-shockable rhythm

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Funada ◽  
Y Goto ◽  
H Okada ◽  
T Maeda ◽  
M Takamura
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Emergency Call ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Neurologically Intact ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background Data on the effects of witness status and time from an emergency call to initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by emergency medical service (EMS) providers on neurological outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with non-shockable rhythm according to the first documented rhythm are limited. Purpose We aimed to determine the effects of witness status and time from an emergency call to CPR initiation by EMS providers on neurologically intact survival in OHCA patients according to the type of non-shockable rhythm (pulseless electrical activity [PEA] and asystole). Methods We analysed the records of 583,431 adult OHCA patients with non-shockable rhythm (191,905 bystander-witnessed arrest and 391,526 unwitnessed arrest). Data were derived from the prospectively recorded All-Japan OHCA registry between 2011 and 2016. Call to EMS-CPR interval was defined as the time from an emergency call to CPR initiation by EMS providers. The primary outcome was 1-month neurologically intact survival (cerebral performance category 1 or 2; CPC 1–2) and secondary outcome was presence of PEA. Results The rates of 1-month CPC 1–2 were 1.21% (2,326/191,905) for bystander-witnessed arrest and 0.24% (959/391,526) for unwitnessed arrest. When divided into 4 groups based on witness status and initial documented rhythm, these rates were 2.42% (1,869/77,190) for bystander-witnessed arrest with PEA (group A), 0.40% (457/114,715) for bystander-witnessed arrest with asystole (group B), 1.51% (679/44,926) for unwitnessed arrest with PEA (group C) and 0.08% (280/346,600) for unwitnessed arrest with asystole (group D). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed each 1-min delay of Call to EMS-CPR interval to be significantly associated with decreased chances of 1-month CPC 1–2 for groups A, B and D (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.95, 0.91 and 0.96, respectively; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93–0.96, 0.88–0.94 and 0.93–0.99, respectively). However, for group C, there was no significant relationship between these variables (adjusted OR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.98–1.02). The proportion of PEA was 40.2% (77,190/191,905) for bystander-witnessed arrest and 11.5% (44,926/391,526) for unwitnessed arrest. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that, as Call to EMS-CPR interval lengthened (per 1-min delay), the number of OHCA patients with PEA decreased for bystander-witnessed arrest (adjusted OR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.93–0.94) and for unwitnessed arrest (adjusted OR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.96–0.97). Conclusions The 1-month CPC 1–2 rate differed by witness status and initial documented rhythm in OHCA patients with non-shockable rhythm. Shortening of Call to EMS-CPR interval is crucial for improving 1-month CPC 1–2 rate and sustaining PEA, particularly in bystander-witnessed arrest.

scholarly journals Shockable Rhythm at Hospital Arrival as the Predictor of Favourable Neurological Outcome in Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) Receiving Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pei-I Su ◽  
Min-Shan Tsai ◽  
Wei-Ting Chen ◽  
Chih-Hung Wang ◽  
Wei-Tien Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Multiple Logistic Regression ◽  
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Hospital Arrival ◽  
Neurological Outcomes ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Introduction: For patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) without return of spontaneous circulation under advanced life support, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is the only lifesaving option. This study aimed to analyse the predictors of favourable neurological outcomes (FO, cerebral performance category 1-2) at hospital discharge among patients with OHCA following ECPR.Methods: In this single-centre retrospective study, 126 patients with OHCA who received ECPR between January 2012 and December 2019 were enrolled. The primary outcome was the FO at hospital discharge. The predictors of FO were assessed using multiple logistic regression analysis. Patients with an initial shockable rhythm were further analysed according to the cardiac rhythm at the time of hospital arrival. Results: Among the patients who received ECPR, the FO at hospital discharge was 21%. Certain resuscitation variables were associated with FO including witnessed collapse (P=0.014), bystander CPR (P=0.05), shorter no-flow time (P=0.008), and a shockable rhythm at hospital arrival (P=0.009). Multiple logistic regression showed that a shockable rhythm at hospital arrival was the only independent predictor of FO at discharge (odds ratio, 3.012; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-8.53; P=0.038). Among patients with an initial shockable rhythm, the group with a shockable rhythm at hospital arrival had a FO of 30%, which was significantly higher than the 11% in the non-shockable rhythm group (P=0.043).Conclusions: In patients with OHCA who received ECPR, a shockable rhythm at the time of hospital arrival was associated with favourable neurological outcomes at discharge. The ECPR selection criteria could consider the rhythm at hospital arrival.

Abstract 48: Neurological Outcomes of Inpatient Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a University Hospital

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lia M Thomas ◽  
Miguel Benavides ◽  
Pierre Kory ◽  
Samuel Acquah ◽  
Steven Bergmann
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Therapeutic Hypothermia ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Arrest ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Neurological Dysfunction ◽  
Neurological Outcomes ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Neurologically Intact

Background: Despite advances in out- of- hospital resuscitation practices, the prognosis of most patients after a cardiac arrest remains poor. The long term outcomes of patients successfully resuscitated from cardiac arrest are often complicated by neurological dysfunction. Therapeutic hypothermia has significantly improved neurological outcomes in patients successfully resuscitated from out- of- hospital cardiac arrests. The objective of this study was to look into the neurological outcomes in inpatients after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in a university hospital setting. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study of 68 adult patients who experienced cardiac or respiratory arrest over an 18 month period at a metropolitan teaching hospital with dedicated, trained code teams. Arrests that occurred in the Emergency Department, Critical Care Units or Operating Rooms were excluded. Results: Of the 68 consecutive patients included in this study, 53% were resuscitated successfully. However, only 12 (18%) survived to discharge from the hospital and only 6 (10%) were discharged with intact neurological status. The initial survival was better in patients who received prompt CPR and in those with less co - morbidities. Pulseless electrical activity (PEA) or asystole were the most common rhythms (47% of the arrests). Most patients who survived and were neurologically intact had PEA (67%). We believe that most PEA arrests were more likely severe hypotension with the inability to palpate a pulse rather than true PEA. The mean time to defibrillation for all patients with an initial shockable rhythm (n=5) was 8.2 minutes. Patients who had an initial shockable rhythm and survived to discharge were shocked within 1 minute (n=2). Conclusion: Despite advances in critical care, survival from inpatient cardiopulmonary arrest to neurologically intact discharge remains poor. Therapeutic hypothermia should be expanded to those resuscitated from in - hospital cardiopulmonary arrest to determine if neurological outcomes would improve.

Abstract 208: A Comprehensive Simulation-Based Training for E-CPR Improves the Neurological Outcome in Patients With Refractory Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Circulation ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 140 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Unoki ◽  
Daisuke Takagi ◽  
Yudai Tamura ◽  
Hiroto Suzuyama ◽  
Eiji Taguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Neurological Outcome ◽  
Intervention Period ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Simulation Based ◽  
Favorable Neurological Outcome ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background: Prolonged conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (C-CPR) is associated with a poor prognosis in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) has been utilized as a rescue strategy for patients with cardiac arrest unresponsive to C-CPR. However, the indication and optimal duration to switch from C-CPR to E-CPR are not well established. In addition, the opportunities to develop teamwork skills and expertise to mitigate risks are few. We thus developed the implementation protocol for the E-CPR simulation program, and investigated whether the faster deployment of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) improves the neurological outcome in patients with refractory OHCA. Methods: A total of 42 consecutive patients (age 58±16 years, male ratio 90%, and initial shockable rhythm 64%) received E-CPR (3% of OHCA) during the study period. Among them, 32 (76%) were deployed ECMO during the pre-intervention time period (Pre: from January 2012 to September 2017), whereas 10 (24%) were deployed during the post-intervention time period (Post: October 2017 to May 2019). We compared the door to E-CPR time, collapse to E-CPR time, 30-day mortality, and favorable neurological outcome (Cerebral Performance Categories 1, 2) between the two periods. Results: There was no significant difference in age, the rates of male sex and shockable rhythm, and the time form collapse to emergency room admission between the two periods. The door to E-CPR time and the collapse to E-CPR time were significantly shorter in the post-intervention period compared to the pre-intervention period (Pre: 39 min [IQR; 30-50] vs. Post: 29 min [IQR; 22-31]; P=0.007, Pre: 76 min [IQR; 58-87] vs. Post: 59 min [IQR; 44-68]; P=0.02, respectively). The 30-day mortality was similar between the two periods (Pre: 88% vs. Post: 80%; P=0.6). In contrast, the rate of favorable neurological outcome at the time of discharge was significantly higher in post-intervention period (Pre: 0% vs. Post: 20%; P=0.01) compared to the pre-intervention period. Conclusion: A comprehensive simulation-based training for E-CPR seems to improve the neurological outcome in patients with refractory OHCA patients.

Abstract 264: The Association of Chest Compression Fraction and Clinical Outcomes from Shockable Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest During the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Primed Trial

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheldon Cheskes ◽  
Robert H Schmicker ◽  
Tom Rea ◽  
Judy Powell ◽  
Ian R Drennan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Reference Group ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Process Data ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Neurologically Intact ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

INTRODUCTION: The role of chest compression fraction (CCF) in resuscitation of shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is uncertain. We evaluated the relationship between CCF and clinical outcomes in a secondary analysis of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) PRIMED trial. METHODS: We included OHCA patients from the ROC PRIMED trial who suffered cardiac arrest prior to EMS arrival, presented with a shockable rhythm, and had cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) process data for at least one shock. We used multivariable logistic regression adjusting for Utstein variables, CPR metrics of compression rate and perishock pause, and ROC site to determine the relationship between CCF and survival to hospital discharge, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and neurologically intact survival defined with Modified Rankin Score (MRS) ≤ 3. Due to potential confounding between CCF and cases that achieved early ROSC, we also performed an analysis restricted to patients without ROSC in the first 10 minutes of EMS resuscitation. RESULTS: Among the 2,558 eligible patients, median (IQR) age was 65 (54, 76) years, 76.9% were male, and mean (SD) CCF was 0.70 (0.15). Compared to the reference group (CCF < 0.60), the odds ratio (OR) for survival was 0.57 (95%CI: 0.42, 0.78) for CCF 0.60-0.79 and 0.32 (95%CI: 0.22, 0.48) for CCF ≥0.80. Results were similar for outcomes of ROSC and neurologically intact survival. Conversely, when restricted to the cohort who did not achieve ROSC during the first 10 minutes (n=1,660), the relationship between CCF and survival was no longer significant. Compared to the reference group (CCF < 0.60), the OR for survival was 0.85 (95 %CI: 0.58, 1.26) for CCF 0.60-0.79 and OR 0.87 (95%CI: 0.58, 1.36) for CCF ≥0.80. CONCLUSIONS: In this observational cohort study of OHCA patients presenting in a shockable rhythm, CCF when adjusted for Utstein predictors, CPR metrics and ROC site was paradoxically associated with lower odds of survival. The relationship between CCF and clinical outcomes was null in a sensitivity analysis restricted to patients without ROSC in the first 10 minutes. CCF is a complex measure and taken by itself may not be a consistent predictor of clinical outcome.

Abstract 165: Impact of Prehospital Epinephrine for Patients Treated With Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation After Refractory Out-Of-Hospital Shockable Cardiac Arrest

Circulation ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 140 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken Nagao ◽  
Yoshio Tahara ◽  
Hiroshi Nonogi ◽  
Naohiro Yonemoto ◽  
David Gaieski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Neurological Outcome ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Hospital Arrival ◽  
Curve Estimation ◽  
Favorable Neurological Outcome ◽  
Neurologically Intact

Background: The 2015 CoSTR recommended that standard-dose epinephrine (SDE) was reasonable for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) was reasonable rescue therapy for selected patients with ongoing cardiac arrest when initial conventional CPR was unsuccessful. We investigated the effect of prehospital SDE for patients who met the criteria of ECPR. Methods: From the All-Japan OHCA Utstein Registry between 2007 and 2015, we included 22,552 patients who met the criteria of ECPR of the SAVE-J study (age between 20 and 75, witnessed shockable OHCA, cardiac arrest on hospital arrival, cardiac etiology, and collapse-to-ECPR interval within 60 minutes). Study patients were divided into two groups according to prehospital SDE or not. Primary endpoint was favorable 30-day neurological outcome after OHCA. Results: Of the 22,552 study patients, 5,659 (25%) received prehospital SDE and 16,893 (75%) did not. The SDE group resulted in lower proportion of favorable 30-day neurological outcome than the no-SDE group (5.6% versus 8.4%, p<0.001) with longer collapse-to-hospital-arrival interval (36.7±9.8 min vs. 29.6±11.3 min, p<0.001). After adjustment for independent predictors of resuscitation, prehospital SDE did not impact on neurological benifit (adjusted OR,1.13; 95%CI,0.98-1.29), but the collapse-to-hospital-arrival interval was associated with neurological benefit (adjusted OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.93-0.95). In curve estimation of the SDE group, when collapse-to-hospital-arrival interval was delayed, proportion of the favorable neurological outcome decreased to about 25% at 1 minute and about 0% at 54 minutes (R=0.14). In the 274 patients undergoing ECPR of the SAVE-J study, however, it was about 43% at 1 minute and about 0% at 96 minutes (R=0.17). Conclusions: Prehospital SDE did not improve likelihood of favorable neurological outcome for patients who met the criteria of ECPR (age between 20 and 75, witnessed shockable OHCA, cardiac arrest on hospital arrival, cardiac etiology and collapse-to-ECPR interval within 60 minutes), because SED administration delayed the collapse-to-hospital-arrival interval which was closely related to the neurologically intact survival on ECPR.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document