P3633Should we continue to routinely revascularize patients during valve surgery in optimal medical therapy era?

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J P Dias Ferreira Reis ◽  
C Strong ◽  
D Roque ◽  
L Morais ◽  
T Mendonca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Disease ◽  
Valve Surgery ◽  
Left Main ◽  
Left Main Disease ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Artery Disease

Abstract Background Optimal management of stable obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients (pts) undergoing heart valve surgery remains controversial. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effective prognostic role of CABG in pts undergoing valve surgery who had concomitant CAD. Methods We conducted a retrospective multicenter survival analysis using multivariable Cox models and Kaplan-Meier curves of consecutive pts undergoing valve surgery with or without concomitant CABG between January 2015 and February 2017. Results From 1196 consecutive pts undergoing valvular surgery in 3 portuguese centers, 257 (21.5%) were found to have obstructive CAD (55.6% male, mean age 74±8 y.o., mean follow-up time 16±8 months, aortic valve disease 78.8%). No coronary revascularization (R) was attempted in 177 pts, complete R was achieved in 40 and R was anatomically incomplete in the remaining 40 pts. Age (75 vs 77.3 y.o.; p=0.202), multivessel disease (46.3% vs 53.8%, p=0.270), aortic valve disease (91.0% vs 92.5%, p=0.683), left ventricular ejection fraction <40% (11.8% vs 19.4%, p=0.272) were comparable between nonrevascularized and revascularized pts; SYNTAX score was low and also similar in both groups (7±12 vs 7±5, p=0.856). Left main disease (8.5% vs 17.5%, p=0.034) and EUROSCORE IIrisk score (2.3±2 vs 3.2±2, p=0.011) was higher for those with any revascularization. Non-revascularized pts had significantly lower all-cause mortality at follow up than those with any R (10.2% vs 21.2%, p=0.016). However, both in-hospital (4% vs 7.5%, p=0.230) and cardiovascular mortality (6.9% vs 7.1%, p=1.00) were similar. In a multivariate analysis, independent predictors for all-cause mortality were: any surgical R (HR 4.52, CI95% 2.09–9.78), baseline atrial fibrillation (HR 2.51, CI95% 1.07–5.90), left main disease (HR 3.153, CI95% 1.26–7.90) and peripheral artery disease (HR 2.95, CI95% 1.036–8.421). All-cause mortality for pts with obstructive CAD was higher than in pts with no CAD (13.6% vs 6.2, p<0.001). Interestingly, however, after multivariable adjustment, complete R was not found to be protective as compared to no R (HR 0.79, IC 0.31–2.06, p=0.633) Kaplan-Meier Plots Conclusion Significant CAD is associated with worse outcomes in pts undergoing valve surgery. In this study, standard angiographically-guided R was not associated with improved results. Randomized controlled trials are needed to further assess risk stratification and the role of coronary R of stable CAD in this setting.

P3628Contemporary coronary artery disease prevalence in a valvular heart disease population undergoing surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T J Carvalho Mendonca ◽  
C Strong ◽  
D Roque ◽  
L Morais ◽  
J P Reis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Disease Prevalence ◽  
Valve Surgery ◽  
Heart Valve Surgery ◽  
Left Main ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Artery Disease

Abstract Background Patients undergoing heart valve surgery are routinely evaluated for the presence of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), with the standard practice of combining valve intervention with a revascularization procedure, notably Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG). Older studies suggest rates as high as 50% prevalence of CAD in this population. However, CAD prevalence, its treatment and prognostic implication has been questioned recently. Objectives The goal of this study is to evaluate the baseline characteristics, prevalence of CAD and treatment strategies in a contemporary population with valvular heart disease (VHD) referred for valve surgery. Methods In a national multicentre registry, consecutive patients, from Jan 2015 to Dec 2016, with a formal indication for heart valve surgery referred for a pre-op routine coronary angiogram were systematically analysed. Baseline characteristics, valve pathology and CAD prevalence and patterns were determined. Obstructive CAD was defined as luminal angiographic stenosis ≥70% (≥50% for left main artery). The prognostic impact of the different valve disease and CAD treatment strategies were assessed. Results 1175 patients (mean age 72.5±10.1; male 49.2%) fulfilled the clinical or echocardiographic indication for valve surgery by European guidelines. Valvular disease prevalence was: aortic stenosis (66.7%), aortic regurgitation (6.6%), mitral stenosis (6%), mitral regurgitation (19.2%), tricuspid regurgitation (7.5%). Mean follow-up time was 29.06±18.46 months. Prevalence of comorbidities was: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) 26%, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) 5.7% and chronic kidney disease (CKD) 23.4%. Mean Euroscore II was 2.6%. Obstructive CAD was present in 27.3% patients. Mean Syntax score was 10.2 (<22 in 88%, 23–32 in 10.2% and >33 in 1.8%). Left main artery and 3-vessel disease were found in 13.1% and 11.8% of patients with CAD, respectively. Valvular surgery was ultimately performed in 80.3%. In patients with CAD, 57.3% were revascularized. All-cause mortality rate during follow-up was 12.9%, with 7.8% from cardiovascular causes. In univariate analysis DM, COPD, CKD, NYHA class, obstructive CAD and no surgery (p<0.05) were associate with mortality on follow up. In multivariate analysis obstructive CAD (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.53–3.65, p<0.01) and no surgery (OR 6.05, 95% CI 3.95–9.30, p<0.01) persisted as independent all-cause mortality predictors. Conclusion In a contemporary cohort of patients with VHD and surgical indication, CAD prevalence is lower (27.3%) than described in literature. Mortality rates were higher in patients with obstructive CAD, worse NYHA functional class and in those who never underwent surgery.

Evaluation of a multimarker panel in chronic heart failure: a 10-year follow-up

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne Bauer ◽  
Christina Strack ◽  
Ekrem Ücer ◽  
Stefan Wallner ◽  
Ute Hubauer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Prognostic Role ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Long Time

Aim: We assessed the 10-year prognostic role of 11 biomarkers with different pathophysiological backgrounds. Materials & methods/results: Blood samples from 144 patients with heart failure were analyzed. After 10 years of follow-up (median follow-up was 104 months), data regarding all-cause mortality were acquired. Regarding Kaplan–Meier analysis, all markers, except TIMP-1 and GDF-15, were significant predictors for all-cause mortality. We created a multimarker model with nt-proBNP, hsTnT and IGF-BP7 and found that patients in whom all three markers were elevated had a significantly worse long-time-prognosis than patients without elevated markers. Conclusion: In a 10-year follow-up, a combination of three biomarkers (NT-proBNP, hs-TnT, IGF-BP7) identified patients with a high risk of mortality.

Long-term prognosis after percutaneous or surgical revascularization in patients with diabetes mellitus and complex coronary artery disease- a systematic review and meta analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Abdul Razzack ◽  
S Mandava ◽  
S Pothuru ◽  
S Adeel Hassan ◽  
D Missael Rocha Castellanos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Left Main ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Artery Disease

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background-Whether Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) confers a survival benefit in patients with diabetes mellitus(DM) and complex coronary artery disease (CAD), including left main CAD and multivessel coronary disease (MVD) after a follow up period ≥ 5 years remains unknown. Methods- Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane) were searched from inception to December 12th 2020. Using a generic invariance weighted random effects model, Hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from individual studies were converted to Log HRs and corresponding standard errors, which were then pooled. The primary outcome of interest was all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) which was defined as a composite of death, myocardial reinfarction and stroke at ≥ 5 years. Results-A total of 8 studies with 13336 participants(PCI = 6783, CABG = 6553)were included in our analysis. Mean age was 54.6 and 55.3 in the PCI-DES and CABG groups respectively. The 5-yr follow-up outcomes including all-cause mortality (HR 1.37; 95%CI 1.15-1.65; p = 0.0006, I2 = 0)and MACCE (HR 1.48; 95%CI 1.29-1.69; p &lt; 0.00001, I2 = 0) were significantly higher with PCI as compared to CABG. Furthermore, at &gt;5 year follow-up, all-cause mortality (HR 1.35; 95%CI 1.10-1.66; p = 0.004, I2 = 37) and MACCE (HR 1.98; 95%CI 1.85-2.12; p &lt; 0.00001, I2 = 0) had similar outcomes. Conclusion-Amongst patients with DM and Complex CAD ( left main/MVD), CABG was associated with improved long-term mortality and freedom from MACCEs as opposed to PCI-DES. CABG is the preferred revascularization strategy in patients with complex anatomic disease and concurrent diabetes. Abstract Figure.

scholarly journals Predictive Value of Circulatingve-catherin in Coronary Artery Disease Patients with Symptomatic Moderate to Severe Chronic Heart Failure

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-78
Author(s):  
Alexander E Berezin ◽  
Alexander A Kremzer ◽  
Tatayna A Samura
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Chronic Heart Failure ◽  
Survival Function ◽  
Cumulative Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Recurrent Hospitalization ◽  
Circulating Levels

Aim: To evaluate the prognostic value of circulating VE-catherinfor cumulative survivalin patients with ischemic chronic heart failure (CHF).Methods: A total of 154 patients withischemic symptomatic moderate-to-severe CHF were enrolled in the study on discharge from the hospital. Observation period was up to 3 years. Blood samples for biomarkers measurements were collected. ELISA method for measurements of circulating level of VE-catherin was used. Concentrations of VEcatherinfor cumulative survival cases due to advanced CHF were tested. Additionally, all-cause mortality, and CHFrelated death were examined.Results: During a median follow-up of 2.18 years, 21 participants died and 106 subjects were hospitalized repetitively. Medians of circulating levels of VE-catherin in survived and died patient cohort were 0.63 ng/ml (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.55-0.64 ng/ml) and 1.03 ng/ml (95% CI = 0.97-1.07 ng/ml) (P<0.001). ROC analysis has been shown that cutoff point of VE-catherin concentration for cumulative survival function was 0.755ng/ml. It has beenfound a significantly divergence of Kaplan-Meier survival curves in patients with high (>0.755 ng/ml) and low (<0.755 ng/ml) concentrations of VE-catherin. Circulating VE-catherin independently predicted all-cause mortality (OR = 1.27; 95% CI = 1.08–1.59; P = 0.002), CHF-related death (OR = 1.16; 95% CI 1.02–1.50; P < 0.001), and also CHF-related rehospitalisation (OR = 1.12; 95% CI = 1.07 – 1.25; P<0.001) within 3 years of observation period.Conclusion: Increased circulating VE-catherinassociates with increased 3-year CHF-related death, all-cause mortality, and risk for recurrent hospitalization due to CHF.J MEDICINE July 2015; 16 (2) : 73-78

scholarly journals Malnutrition Affects Cholesterol Paradox in Coronary Artery Disease: a 41,229 Chinese Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Wang ◽  
Jin Liu ◽  
Shiqun Chen ◽  
Ming Ying ◽  
Guanzhong Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cox Regression ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Chinese Cohort ◽  
Artery Disease

Abstract Background: Several studies found that baseline low LDL-C concentration was associated with poor prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), which was called “cholesterol paradox”. Low LDL-C concentration may reflect underlying malnutrition, which was strongly associated with increased mortality. We objected to investigate the cholesterol paradox in patients with CAD and the effects of malnutrition.Method: A total of 41,229 CAD patients admitted to Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital in China were included in this study from January 2007 to December 2018, and divided into two groups (LDL-C < 1.8 mmol/L, n=4,863; LDL-C ≥ 1.8 mmol/L, n = 36,366). We used Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analyses to assess the association between LDL-C levels and long-term all-cause mortality and the effect of malnutrition. Result: In this real-world cohort (mean age 62.94 years; 74.94% male), there were 5257 incidents of all-cause death during a median follow-up of 5.20 years [Inter-quartile range (IQR): 3.05-7.78 years]. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that low LDL-C levels were associated with worse prognosis. After adjusting for baseline confounders (e.g., age, sex and comorbidities, etc.), multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that low LDL-C level (<1.8mmol/L) was not significantly associated with all-cause mortality (adjusted HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.96-1.24). After adjustment of nutritional status, risk of all-cause mortality of patients with low LDL-C level decreased (adjusted HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83-0.98). In the final multivariate Cox model, low LDL-C level was related to better prognosis (adjusted HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84-0.99).Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that the cholesterol paradox persisted in CAD patients, but disappeared after accounting for the effects of malnutrition.

scholarly journals 1226 Prognostic impact of concomitant cardiac amyloidosis in aortic stenosis patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
V Ferreira ◽  
S Aguiar Rosa ◽  
I Rodrigues ◽  
L Moura Branco ◽  
A Galrinho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
Pacemaker Implantation ◽  
Functional Class ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
Valve Implantation

Abstract Background The prevalence of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) and aortic stenosis (AS) both increase with age. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) expands the number of patients (P) eligible for treatment of AS, emphasizing the need to understand the prevalence of CA in AS and its prognostic associations. Echocardiography with speckle tracking has emerged as a useful method to enhance the clinical suspicion and to provide prognostic information. Purpose To estimate the prevalence of CA in P with severe AS referred for TAVI and to evaluate the impact of concomitant CA in prognosis. Methods 94 consecutive AS P who underwent TAVI with maximum left ventricular wall thickness (LVWT)&gt;12 mm were retrospectively identified. Clinical data, pre TAVI echocardiographic parameters and follow up (FU) data regarding all-cause mortality and MACE (including all-cause mortality, admission for heart failure, pacemaker implantation and stroke) were analysed. We registered apical sparing pattern in bull’s eye plots (ASPB), calculated relative apical longitudinal strain formula (RALS) [average apical LS/(average basal LS + mid-LS)] and ejection fraction/global longitudinal strain (EF/GLS) ratio. Results Mean age was 82.2 ± 5.8 years (Y), with 43 men (45.7%). 27.7% were in NYHA functional class II, 64.9% in functional class III and 7.4% in functional class IV. Median EF was 57 ± 15% and 26.6% presented EF &lt; 50%. Suspected CA evaluated by ASPB was found in 39 P (41.5%) and RALS &gt; 1 was identified in 22 P (23.4%). An EF/GLS ratio &gt; 4.1 was obtained in 53 P (56.4%). Over a median follow-up of 13.4 ± 25.8 months, 28 deaths (29.8%) and 31 MACEs (33.0%) occurred. The presence of ASPB was associated with increased all-cause mortality (33.3% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.002), new bundle branch block and indication for pacemaker implantation (46.2% vs 37.0%, p = 0.05) and MACE (48.7% vs 22.2%, p = 0.01). All-cause mortality was also higher in P with RALS (31.8% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.04). P with GLS&gt;-14.8% and ASPB had significantly worse prognosis regarding all-cause mortality (p = 0.003) and MACE (p = 0.007). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that survival was significantly worse for P with ASPB (log-rank 0.002). With multivariate Cox regression analysis, ASPB was independently associated with all-cause mortality (HR = 4.49, p = 0.039). Conclusions Suspected CA appears prevalent among patients with AS and associates with all-cause mortality. The importance of screening for CA in older AS patients and optimal treatment strategies in those with CA warrant further investigation, especially in the era of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Abstract 1226 Figure. Kaplan–Meier curves and ASPB

P4733Risk of myocardial infarction with coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of fifteen randomised trials

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P H Lee ◽  
H B Park ◽  
J S Lee ◽  
S W Lee ◽  
C W Lee
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Left Main ◽  
Left Main Disease ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Meta Regression ◽  
Artery Disease

Abstract Background It remains controversial whether coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is more effective in the prevention of myocardial infarction (MI). MI has been evaluated only as a secondary endpoint without a focused systematic review in multiple meta-analyses. Purpose To compare the risk of MI at the latest follow-up available between CABG versus PCI with stents in patients with multivessel or left main coronary artery disease in a pairwise meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCT). Methods We searched EMBASE, Cochrane, and Pubmed databases for articles comparing CABG versus PCI for the treatment of multivessel or left main disease. We utilised random-effects model to calculate pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Fifteen trials with a total of 13,592 patients treated with either CABG (n=6,596) or PCI (n=6,996) were eligible and included. A multivariable random-effects meta-regression model, including variables such as age, sex, diabetes mellitus, publication year, follow-up duration, type of stent used, and type of coronary artery disease, was used to explore the source of potential heterogeneity of the primary result. Results After a weighted follow-up of 4.3 years, patients treated with CABG had a significantly lower risk of MI than patients treated with PCI (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58–0.96, P=0.024, I2=66%). The lower risk of MI with CABG as compared to PCI was more evident during a longer duration of follow-up (≥3 years, RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.52–0.91, P=0.008; ≥5 years, RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.48–0.86, P=0.003) and in diabetic population (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.44–0.70, P<0.001). There was a statistically meaningful trend toward fewer MIs with CABG with a similar magnitude of risk reduction across patients with left main disease (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.47–1.15) and multivessel disease (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.53–0.99). Moderate inter-study heterogeneity could not be explained by the clinical and trial-based variables tested in meta-regression, and is likely because of differences in definitions of MI, risk profile of enrolled patients, and procedural specifics. Forest plots Conclusions In patients undergoing revascularization for multivessel or left main disease, the risk of MI was lower with CABG compared to PCI. The quality assurance for MI definition and treatment-specific procedures should be emphasized for future RCTs.

P2659Difference of prognostic impact of Killip classification in ACS patients with or without hemodialysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Takasaki ◽  
T Kurita ◽  
J Masuda ◽  
K Dohi ◽  
K Hoshino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cox Regression ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
History Of ◽  
Artery Disease

Abstract Background Cardiovascular deaths are more frequently in hemodialysis (HD) patients compared to general population. However, difference of prognosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with or without HD were not well evaluated. Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and prognostic characteristics of ACS patients with HD compared to that of ACS patients without HD. Methods We investigated 3427 ACS patients including 63 HD and 3364 non-HD patients between 2013 and 2017 using date from Mie ACS registry, a retrospective and multicenter registry. The primary outcome was defined as all-cause mortality. Results HD patients showed significantly higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, past treatment of coronary artery disease, history of myocardial infarction and Killip ≥2 compared to non-HD patients (p<0.05, respectively). During the follow-up periods (median 719 days), 425 (12.4%) patients experienced all-cause death. HD patients demonstrated the higher all-cause mortality rate compared to that of non-HD patients during the follow-up (11.9% versus 38.1%, p<0.001, chi square). Kaplan Meier survival curves demonstrated that HD and non-HD patients with Killip 1 showed similar 30-day mortality, and Killip ≥2 patients also showed similar prognosis (Left side of figure). On the other hand, all cause mortality at 2 years were higher in Killip 1 HD patients compared to Killip 1 non-HD patients and similar between Killip 1 HD patients and Killip ≥2 non-HD patients in the 30 days landmark analysis (Right side of figure). In addition, cox regression analyses for all cause mortality demonstrated that HD was a strongest independent prognostic factor not of 30-day mortality but of after 30-day mortality with hazard ratio of 4.09 (95% confidential interval: 2.32–7.21, p<0.001). Figure 1 Conclusion Careful management are required in chronic phase for ACS patients with HD even in Killip 1 classification.

scholarly journals Clinical outcome comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention and bypass surgery in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
ChuanNan Zhai ◽  
HongLiang Cong ◽  
Kai Hou ◽  
YueCheng Hu ◽  
JingXia Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Left Main ◽  
Repeat Revascularization ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Artery Disease

Abstract Background The optimal revascularization technique in diabetic patients with complex coronary artery disease (CAD), including left main CAD and multivessel coronary disease (MVD), remains controversial. The current study aimed to compare adverse clinical endpoints of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods Relevant studies were found from MEDLINE, OVID, Science Direct, Embase and the Cochrane Central database from January 2010 to April 2019. Risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to express the pooled effect on discontinuous variables. Outcomes evaluated were all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiac/cerebrovascular events (MACCE), cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeat revascularization. Results Sixteen studies were included (18,224 patients). PCI was associated with the increase risk for MACCE (RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.38–1.85), cardiac death (RR 1.76, 95% CI 1.11–2.80), MI (RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.53–2.57), repeat revascularization (RR 2.61, 95% CI 2.08–3.29). The risks for all-cause mortality (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.00–1.52) and stroke (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.48–1.03) were similar between two strategies. Stratified analysis based on studies design and duration of follow-up showed largely similar findings with the overall analyses, except for a significant increased risk of all-cause mortality (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.04–1.67) in long-term group, and CABG was associated with a higher stroke rate compared to PCI, which are results that were found in RCTs (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.28–0.79) and mid-term groups (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.23–0.66). Conclusions CABG was superior to PCI for diabetic patients with complex CAD (including left main CAD and/or MVD), but might be associated with a higher risk of stroke mid-term follow-up. Number of Protocol registration PROSPERO CRD 42019138505.

scholarly journals Ten‐year Outcomes After Drug‐Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Disease in Patients With and Without Diabetes Mellitus: The PRECOMBAT Extended Follow‐Up Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeong Jin Jeong ◽  
Jung‐Min Ahn ◽  
Junho Hyun ◽  
Junghoon Lee ◽  
Ju Hyeon Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Bypass Surgery ◽  
Left Main Coronary Artery ◽  
Drug Eluting Stents ◽  
Left Main ◽  
Main Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Drug Eluting ◽  
Artery Disease

Background Several trials reported differential outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug‐eluting stents (DES) and coronary‐artery bypass grafting (CABG) for multivessel coronary disease according to the presence of diabetes mellitus (DM). However, it is not well recognized how DM status affects very‐long‐term (10‐year) outcomes after DES and CABG for left main coronary artery disease. Methods and Results In the PRECOMBAT (Premier of Randomized Comparison of Bypass Surgery versus Angioplasty using Sirolimus‐Eluting Stent in Patients with Left Main Coronary Artery Disease) trial, patients with LMCA were randomly assigned to undergo PCI with sirolimus‐eluting stents (n=300) or CABG (n=300). The primary outcome was the incidence of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE; a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or ischemia‐driven target‐vessel revascularization). Outcomes were examined in patients with (n=192) and without (n=408) medically treated diabetes. The follow‐up was extended to at least 10 years for all patients (median, 11.3 years). The 10‐year rates of MACCE were not significantly different between DES and CABG in patients with DM (36.3% versus 26.7%, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 1.35; 95% CI, 0.83–2.19; P =0.23) and without DM (25.3% versus 22.9%, respectively; HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.79–1.67; P =0.48) ( P ‐for‐interaction=0.48). There were no significant between‐group differences in composite of death, MI, or stroke, and all‐cause mortality, regardless of DM status. TVR rates were consistently higher after DES than CABG. Conclusions In this 10‐year extended follow‐up of PRECOMBAT, we found no significant difference between DES and CABG with respect to the incidences of MACCE, serious composite outcome, and all‐cause mortality in patients with and without DM with LMCA disease. However, owing to the limited number of patients and no adjustment for multiple testing, overall findings should be considered hypothesis‐generating, highlighting the need for further research. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03871127 and NCT00422968.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document