P3752Ablation of the superior left ganglionic plexus is not necessary for effective denervation of the sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodes

Background Cardioneuroablation by targeting of atrial ganglionic plexi (GP) has been proposed as a new therapeutic option in selected patients with reflex syncope. Contribution of individual GPs to cardiac autonomic regulations is not fully established. Purpose Because consistent vagal responses have been observed during left superior pulmonary vein isolation in patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation, we investigated whether standalone ablation of the superior left GP modifies the vagal input into the sinoatrial (SAN) and atrioventricular node (AVN). Methods Study hypothesis was investigated in otherwise healthy patients undergoing cardioneuroablation for symptomatic bradyarrhythmias. All had preprocedural atropine test suggesting functional disorder. Anatomically-navigated (CARTO-3) radiofrequency (RF) ablation (25–30 W/30 s/20 ml/min) at empirical GP sites was performed in general anaesthesia. Extracardiac high-frequency vagal nerve stimulation (25–60 V/30–50 Hz/0.05–0.1 ms) via right jugular vein was performed at baseline, after initial superior left GP ablation, and after the ablation of remaining septal and inferior GPs. High-frequency vagal nerve stimulation was always done in both sinus rhythm and atrial pacing. The elimination of all stimulation-induced vagal responses was the endpoint of the procedure. Results A study included 8 patients (34±8 years; 5 males). Six of them had recurrent syncope with cardioinhibitory response at the SAN (n=4), AVN (n=1) or both nodes (n=1); and 2 patients had symptomatic sinus bradycardia. At baseline, high-frequency vagal nerve stimulation induced long episodes of sinus arrest and advanced AV block in all patients. Cluster ablation at the superior left GP (RF time: 192±28 s) did not change the sinus rate (59±14 vs 60±15, NS), PQ interval (174±37 vs 173±37, NS), and did not induce any tangible change in SAN/AVN response to high-frequency vagal nerve stimulation. Subsequently, anterior right GP was targeted from the aspect of right atrium (n=7), from the anterior antrum of right pulmonary veins (n=6), and inferior GPs were targeted from the aspect of left atrium (n=7). This lesion set finally resulted in complete non-responsiveness of SAN and AVN to high-frequency vagal nerve stimulation in all patients. Ablation procedure overall (duration: 172±15 min; RF time: 988±306 s; radiation dose: 70±34 μGy·m2) led to sinus rate acceleration by a median of 29 (IQR: 18–38) bpm, increase of Wenckebach point by 21 (IQR: 9–28) bpm, and shortening of AVN effective refractory period by 40 (IQR: 15–73) ms. Conclusions Cardioneuroablation guided by extracardiac high-frequency vagal nerve stimulation can achieve complete denervation of SAN and AVN by ablation of postero(para)septal and inferior GPs only. Ablation of the superior left GP appears unnecessary and can be eliminated from the lesion set design.