scholarly journals Treatment of carotid stenosis: surgery and stent in comparison

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_E) ◽  
pp. E91-E94
Author(s):  
Rocco Giudice ◽  
Claudio Spataro
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Carotid Stenosis ◽  
Carotid Stenting ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trials ◽  
Safe Alternative ◽  
Symptomatic Carotid ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients ◽  
Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis

Abstract Carotid stenosis in the extracranial tract determines 10–15% of all ischaemic strokes. The aim of treatment, therefore, is to prevent major neurological events. Carotid endarterectomy surgery has proved effective in this regard, with various randomized studies that have demonstrated its validity in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. As an alternative, since the late 1990s, the endovascular treatment of carotid stenosis by stenting has gradually established itself. Numerous controlled clinical trials have compared surgery and carotid stenting in terms of perioperative outcomes (death, stroke, and myocardial infarction within 30 days of the procedure) and stroke prevention ipsilateral to the lesion treated during follow-up, evaluating both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. From the systematic review of the data, it is legitimate to state that stenting may represent a safe alternative to conventional surgery in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis under the age of 70, while endarterectomy is clearly safer and more effective than endovascular treatment for symptomatic older patients. On the other hand, as regards asymptomatic patients, the available evidence is limited and further data are needed to compare the two methods and to compare them with the best current medical therapy in order to draw conclusions.

Abstract WP6: Safety of Acute Carotid Stenting Treatment in Acute Symptomatic Patients

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Darko Quispe-Orozco ◽  
Kaustubh Limaye ◽  
Cynthia Zevallos ◽  
Andrea Holcombe ◽  
Sudeepta Dandapat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Stenosis ◽  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Carotid Stenting ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Symptomatic Carotid ◽  
Acute Group ◽  
Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Delayed Group

Carotid stenting (CAS) has been shown to be equivalent to carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients; however its optimal timing remains unclear. In this study, we aim to evaluate the safety of CAS when performed within the first 48 hours of symptom onset. We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of consecutive CAS patients admitted to our comprehensive stroke center with TIA/stroke and ipsilateral symptomatic carotid stenosis >50% from 2014 to 2019. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for demographic, clinical and procedural data and outcomes. Acute and delayed treatment were defined as ≤48 and >48 hours from last known well (LKW) respectively. The primary endpoint was procedure-related major complications (stroke with NIHSS increase of ≥4, myocardial infarction, parenchymal hemorrhage type 2 or death) ≤30 days after CAS. Secondary endpoints were procedure-related minor neurological (stroke with NIHSS increase of <4 and reperfusion injury) and non-neurological (groin puncture hematoma, acute anemia and arrhythmia) complications. Functional outcome was assessed by discharge and 90 days mRS, dichotomized as good (0-2) and bad (3-6). A total of 72 patients were included in the analysis, 36 in each group. There was no difference in age, NIHSS at presentation, gender, incidence of TIA as presentation or percentage of TPA received. The acute group differed significantly from the delayed group in number of thrombectomies (36.1% vs. 5.6%, p=0.001) and median time from LKW to CAS (15.9 hours vs. 88.0 hours, p<0.001). There were significantly more carotid occlusions in the acute group when compared to the delayed group (37.8% vs. 2.2, p<0.0001). Overall, the acute group did not show significant difference from the delayed group in major (2.8% vs. 5.6%, p=1.0), minor neurological (13.9% vs. 2.8%, p=0.09) and minor non-neurological complication rates (13.9% vs. 8.3%, p=0.7). Rates of good outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups at discharge (52.8% vs. 50%) or 90 days (75% vs. 63%). CAS can be performed safely in acute symptomatic carotid stenosis patients within the first 48 hours from symptom onset.

Abstract TP135: Urgent Treatment for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: The Pittsburgh Revascularization and Treatment Emergently After Stroke Protocol

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Tonetti ◽  
Brian Jankowitz ◽  
Kenmuir Cynthia ◽  
Benjamin Zussman ◽  
Rahul Rao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Stenosis ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Recurrent Stroke ◽  
Carotid Stenting ◽  
Clinical Equipoise ◽  
Symptomatic Carotid ◽  
Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis ◽  
Recorded Data ◽  
Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center

Background: Patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis remain at high risk of early recurrent stroke without revascularization. The aim of this report is to analyze prospectively-recorded data from an institutional protocol that standardized the urgent (<48 hours) treatment of patients presenting with symptomatic carotid stenosis and underwent either carotid stenting (CAS) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Methods: All patients presenting over 28 months to a comprehensive stroke center with symptomatic carotid stenosis within 48 hours of index event were screened for inclusion. All patients were given dual antiplatelet therapy. If there was clinical equipoise between CEA and CAS, patients underwent angiography and subsequently revascularization if DSA demonstrated ≥50% stenosis. The primary outcome was a composite of stroke or death within 30 days. Results: 178 patients with a diagnosis of recently symptomatic carotid stenosis were included; 120 patients (67%) met criteria. 59 patients underwent CEA and 61 patients underwent CAS. There were not significant differences in the primary outcome; 3 patients (5.1%) in the CEA arm and 3 patients (4.9%) in the CAS arm met the primary outcome. Conclusion: In this prospective analysis, urgent revascularization for symptomatic carotid stenosis can be done with equivalently low rates of stroke or death, regardless of revascularization strategy.

Obstructed Flow

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Y. Chong ◽  
Michael P. Lerario
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Carotid Stenosis ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Recurrent Stroke ◽  
Early Period ◽  
Carotid Stenting ◽  
Symptomatic Carotid ◽  
Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis ◽  
Ischemic Attack

Patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis benefit from revascularization. The risk of recurrent stroke is highest during the early period after a transient ischemic attack or stroke. Carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting are options for treatment and should be considered within the first 2 weeks if feasible.

Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hardik A. Amin
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Surgery ◽  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Carotid Stenosis ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Clinical Case ◽  
Nonsurgical Treatment ◽  
Symptomatic Carotid ◽  
Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis ◽  
Study Intervention

This chapter provides a summary of the landmark surgical study known as the NASCET trial, which compared surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. The chapter describes the basics of the study, including funding, year study began, year study was published, study location, who was studied, who was excluded, how many patients, study design, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, gives a summary and discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case regarding vascular surgery.

Results using a self-expanding stent alone in the treatment of severe symptomatic carotid bifurcation stenosis

2008 ◽  
Vol 109 (3) ◽  
pp. 454-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Bussière ◽  
David M. Pelz ◽  
Paul Kalapos ◽  
Donald Lee ◽  
Irene Gulka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Stenosis ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Balloon Dilation ◽  
Peak Systolic Velocity ◽  
Stent Insertion ◽  
Symptomatic Carotid ◽  
Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis ◽  
The Mean

Object Conventional endovascular therapy for carotid stenosis involves placement of an embolic protection device followed by stent insertion and angioplasty. A simpler approach may be placement of a stent alone. The authors determined how often this approach could be used to treat patients with carotid stenosis, and assessed which factors would preclude this approach. Methods Over a period of 6 years, 97 patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis were treated with the intention of using a “stent-only” approach. Arteries in 77 patients (79%) were treated with stents alone, 13 required preinsertion balloon dilation, 6 postinsertion dilation, and 1 both pre- and postinsertion dilation. Results The mean stenosis according to North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria was reduced from 82 to 40% in the stent-only group and from 89 to 37% in the stent and balloon angioplasty group. The 30-day stroke and death rate was 7.2%. Patients were followed for a mean of 15 months. In the stent-alone group, the mean preoperative Doppler peak systolic velocity (PSV) was 409 cm/second, with an internal carotid artery/common carotid artery (ICA/CCA) ratio of 7.2. At follow-up review, the PSV decreased to 153 cm/second and the ICA/CCA ratio to 2.1. In the angioplasty group the mean preoperative PSV was 496 cm/second and the ICA/CCA ratio was 9.2, decreasing to 163 cm/second and 2, respectfully, at follow-up evaluation. Restenosis occurred in 12.8% of patients at 6 months and in 15.9% at 1 year. One stroke occurred during the follow-up period in each group. Using multivariable analysis, factors precluding the “stent-only” approach were as follows: severity of stenosis, circumferential calcification, and no history of hyperlipidemia. Conclusions Balloons may not be required to treat all patients with carotid stenosis. A stent alone was feasible in 79% of patients, and 79% of patients were alive and free from ipsilateral stroke or restenosis at 1 year. Restenosis rates with this approach are higher than with conventional angioplasty and stent insertion. Carotid arteries with very severe stenoses (> 90%) and circumferential calcification may be more successfully treated with angioplasty combined with stent placement.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document