scholarly journals Erratum to: Socioeconomic position and first-time major cardiovascular event in patients with type 2 diabetes: a Danish nationwide cohort study

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Robinson ◽  
C Raina Elley ◽  
Sue Wells ◽  
Elizabeth Robinson ◽  
Tim Kenealy ◽  
...  

INTRODUCTION: New Zealand (NZ) guidelines recommend treating people for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk on the basis of five-year absolute risk using a NZ adaptation of the Framingham risk equation. A diabetes-specific Diabetes Cohort Study (DCS) CVD predictive risk model has been developed and validated using NZ Get Checked data. AIM: To revalidate the DCS model with an independent cohort of people routinely assessed using PREDICT, a web-based CVD risk assessment and management programme. METHODS: People with Type 2 diabetes without pre-existing CVD were identified amongst people who had a PREDICT risk assessment between 2002 and 2005. From this group we identified those with sufficient data to allow estimation of CVD risk with the DCS models. We compared the DCS models with the NZ Framingham risk equation in terms of discrimination, calibration, and reclassification implications. RESULTS: Of 3044 people in our study cohort, 1829 people had complete data and therefore had CVD risks calculated. Of this group, 12.8% (235) had a cardiovascular event during the five-year follow-up. The DCS models had better discrimination than the currently used equation, with C-statistics being 0.68 for the two DCS models and 0.65 for the NZ Framingham model. DISCUSSION: The DCS models were superior to the NZ Framingham equation at discriminating people with diabetes who will have a cardiovascular event. The adoption of a DCS model would lead to a small increase in the number of people with diabetes who are treated with medication, but potentially more CVD events would be avoided. KEYWORDS: Cardiovascular disease; diabetes; prevention; risk assessment; reliability and validity


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000786
Author(s):  
Frederikke Schønfeldt Troelsen ◽  
Henrik Toft Sørensen ◽  
Lars Pedersen ◽  
Rune Erichsen

ObjectivePrevalent type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer and could impair the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. This may in turn increase the risk of overlooked precancerous polyps and subsequent risk of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC). We investigated whether patients with T2D are at increased risk of PCCRC compared with patients without T2D.DesignWe conducted a population-based cohort study of patients with T2D and without T2D undergoing colonoscopy in Denmark (1995–2015). We investigated the risk of PCCRC by calculating >6 to 36 months cumulative incidence proportions (CIPs) treating death and colectomy as competing risks. Using Cox proportional-hazards regression analyses, we also computed HRs of PCCRC, comparing patients with T2D and non-T2D. According to the World Endoscopy Organization guidelines, we calculated PCCRC 3-year rates to estimate the proportions of T2D and non-T2D CRC patients experiencing PCCRC.ResultsWe identified 29 031 patients with T2D and 333 232 patients without T2D undergoing colonoscopy. We observed 250 PCCRCs among patients with T2D and 1658 PCCRCs among patients without T2D. The >6 to 36 months CIP after a first-time colonoscopy was 0.64% (95% CI 0.55% to 0.74%) for T2D and 0.36% (95% CI 0.34% to 0.38%) for patients without T2D. The HRs of PCCRC were 1.43 (95% CI 1.21 to 1.72) after a first-time colonoscopy and 1.18 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.85) after a second-time colonoscopy. The PCCRC 3-year rate was 7.9% for patients with T2D and 7.4% for patients without T2D.ConclusionT2D may be associated with an increased HR of PCCRC.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A.C Falkentoft ◽  
B Zareini ◽  
C Wichmand ◽  
T.B Hansen ◽  
C Selmer ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Social inequality poses a major public health challenge. Low socioeconomic position has been associated with cardiovascular disease in patients without diabetes. Yet, the association between socioeconomic position, type 2 diabetes, and first-time cardiovascular disease has not previously been investigated in a nationwide cohort from a country with equal access to healthcare. Purpose To examine the association between socioeconomic position and development of first-time major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in a Danish nationwide population of patients with incident type 2 diabetes. Methods Using the Danish nationwide registers, we identified all Danish residents with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes between 2000 and 2017. Patients aged 40–79 years, without a history of ischemic heart disease and/or stroke were included. Income was used as a surrogate for socioeconomic position, and was assessed as quartiles of inflation adjusted, mean five-year income prior to index. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to assess the association between income and the primary composite outcome of ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular mortality (MACE). We assessed income as a time-dependent variable and adjusted for age, gender, calendar year, baseline comorbidities, and medication. Results In total 107,612 patients were included with a median age of 63 (interquartile range [IQR] 55–70) years and a median follow-up time of 6.8 (IQR 3.5–10.6) years. Patients in the lowest income quartile were older (median age 69 vs. 60 years) and more likely to be female (53.3% vs 36.7%) compared with the highest quartile (all P<0.0001). The 10-year risk of MACE decreased with higher income quartile: 30.3% (n=6814) in 1st quartile, 23.4% (n=4760) in 2nd quartile; 19.1% (n=3861) in 3rd quartile; 16.0% (n=3042) in 4th quartile (P<0.0001). In adjusted analysis, using the highest quartile as reference, the relative risk of MACE was inversely proportional to income (P-trend<0.0001): hazard ratio (HR) 1.59 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.52–1.66) in 1st quartile; HR 1.42 (95% CI 1.36–1.49) in 2nd quartile; 1.20 (95% CI 1.14–1.25) in 3rd quartile. We found age specific differences in the risk of MACE between the younger (40–64 years) and the older (65–79 years) patients (P-interaction = 0.007). In stratified adjusted analysis, the youngest age group were associated with higher HR's compared to the oldest age group (Figure). The absolute unadjusted risk of MACE was highest in the elderly with low income. Conclusions Despite equal access to healthcare, low socioeconomic position was independently associated with an increased risk of first-time MACE in patients with incident type 2 diabetes. The finding was significant across age groups with the highest relative risks of MACE among younger patients. Our results indicate the importance of prevention strategies targeting patients with low socioeconomic position. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Zealand University Hospital Roskilde


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose L Flores-Guerrero ◽  
Margery A Connelly ◽  
Dion Groothof ◽  
Eke G Gruppen ◽  
Stephan JL Bakker ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sopio Tatulashvili ◽  
Gaelle Gusto ◽  
Beverley Balkau ◽  
Emmanuel Cosson ◽  
Fabrice Bonnet ◽  
...  

Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 131-OR
Author(s):  
VASILEIOS LIAKOPOULOS ◽  
ANN-MARIE SVENSSON ◽  
INGMAR NASLUND ◽  
BJORN ELIASSON

Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 536-P
Author(s):  
MICHAEL BLANKENBURG ◽  
CSABA P. KOVESDY ◽  
SELINE EISENRING ◽  
ANNE FETT ◽  
EMILE W. SCHOKKER ◽  
...  

Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1029-P
Author(s):  
EDWARD B. JUDE ◽  
AMAR ALI ◽  
RIFAT EMRAL ◽  
NITHYA NANDA ◽  
ROBERT LUBWAMA ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document