scholarly journals Association of beta-blockers and first-registered heart rhythm in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: real-world data from population-based cohorts across two European countries

EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 1206-1215
Author(s):  
Carlo A Barcella ◽  
Talip E Eroglu ◽  
Michiel Hulleman ◽  
Asger Granfeldt ◽  
Patrick C Souverein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Beta Blocker ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Pulseless Electrical Activity ◽  
Heart Rhythm ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Receptor Blockers ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Aims Conflicting results have been reported regarding the effect of beta-blockers on first-registered heart rhythm in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We aimed to establish whether the use of beta-blockers influences first-registered rhythm in OHCA. Methods and results We included patients with OHCA of presumed cardiac cause from two large independent OHCA-registries from Denmark and the Netherlands. Beta-blocker use was defined as exposure to either non-selective beta-blockers, β1-selective beta-blockers, or α-β-dual-receptor blockers within 90 days prior to OHCA. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) for the association of beta-blockers with first-registered heart rhythm using multivariable logistic regression. We identified 23 834 OHCA-patients in Denmark and 1584 in the Netherlands: 7022 (29.5%) and 519 (32.8%) were treated with beta-blockers, respectively. Use of non-selective beta-blockers, but not β1-selective blockers, was more often associated with non-shockable rhythm than no use of beta-blockers [Denmark: OR 1.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.48–2.52; the Netherlands: OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.15–5.49]. Non-selective beta-blocker use was associated with higher proportion of pulseless electrical activity (PEA) than of shockable rhythm (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.01–5.65); the association with asystole was of similar magnitude, although not statistically significant compared with shockable rhythm (OR 2.34, 95% CI 0.89–6.18; data on PEA and asystole were only available in the Netherlands). Use of α-β-dual-receptor blockers was significantly associated with non-shockable rhythm in Denmark (OR 1.21; 95% CI 1.03–1.42) and not significantly in the Netherlands (OR 1.37; 95% CI 0.61–3.07). Conclusion Non-selective beta-blockers, but not β1-selective beta-blockers, are associated with non-shockable rhythm in OHCA.

Abstract 18: Analyzing Heart Rhythm During Chest Compressions in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients Using New Algorithm for Automated External Defibrillators

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Corina de Graaf ◽  
Stefanie G Beesems ◽  
Ronald E Stickney ◽  
Paula Lank ◽  
Fred W Chapman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Pulseless Electrical Activity ◽  
Heart Rhythm ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Study Region ◽  
Automated External Defibrillators ◽  
Conventional Analysis ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Conventional Algorithm

Purpose: Automated external defibrillators (AED) prompt the rescuer to stop cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for ECG analysis. Any interruption of CPR has a negative impact on outcome. We prospectively evaluated a new algorithm (cprINSIGHT) which can analyse the ECG while rescuers continue CPR. Methods: We analysed data from patients with attempted resuscitation from OHCA who were connected to an AED with cprINSIGHT (Stryker Physio-Control LIFEPAK CR2) between June 2017 and June 2018 in the Amsterdam Resuscitation Study region. The first analysis in the CR2 is a conventional analysis; subsequent analyses use the cprINSIGHT algorithm. This algorithm classifies the rhythm as shockable (S), non-shockable (NS), or no decision. If no decision, the AED prompts for a pause in CPR and uses its conventional algorithm. The characteristics of the first 3 cprINSIGHT analyses (analyses 2-4) were analysed. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) cases were both coarse and fine VF with a lower threshold of 0.08 mV. Results: Data from 132 consecutive OHCA cases were analysed. The initial recorded rhythm was VF or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 35 cases (27%), pulseless electrical activity in 34 cases (25%) and asystole in 63 cases (48%). In 114 cases (86%), 1 or more cprINSIGHT analyses were done. Analyses 2-4 covered 90% of all cprINSIGHT analyses. The analyzed rhythm was VF/VT in 12-17%, organised QRS rhythm in 29-35% and asystole in 51-56% (see table). cprINSIGHT reached a S or NS decision in 65-74% of cases, with a sensitivity of 90-100% and a specificity of 100%. When it reached no decision, the rhythm was asystole in 65-79% of analyses, VF/VT in 0-9% and QRS rhythm in 18-27%; conventional analysis followed. Chest compression fraction was 85-88%, CPR fraction was 99%. Conclusion: This new algorithm analysed the ECG without need for a pause in chest compressions 65-74% of the time and had 90-100% sensitivity and 100% specificity when it made a shock or a no shock decision.

Abstract 13292: Comparison of Outcomes Between Pulseless Electrical Activity by Electrocardiography and Pulseless Myocardial Activity by Echocardiography in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 144 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Romolo Gaspari ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Electrical Activity ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Cardiac Activity ◽  
Pulseless Electrical Activity ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Cardiac Electrical Activity ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Objective: To measure prevalence of discordance between electrical activity recorded by electrocardiography (ECG) and myocardial activity visualized by echocardiography (echo) in patients presenting after cardiac arrest and to compare survival outcomes in cohorts defined by ECG and echo. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a previously published prospective study at twenty hospitals. Patients presenting after out-of-hospital arrest were included. The cardiac electrical activity was defined by ECG and contemporaneous myocardial activity was defined by bedside echo. Myocardial activity by echo was classified as myocardial asystole- -the absence of myocardial movement, pulseless myocardial activity (PMA)--visible myocardial movement but no pulse, and myocardial fibrillation- -visualized fibrillation. Primary outcome was the prevalence of discordance between electrical activity and myocardial activity. Secondary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Results: 793 patients and 1943 pauses in CPR were included. 28.6% of CPR pauses demonstrated a difference in electrical activity (ECG) and myocardial activity (echo), 5.0% with asystole (ECG) and PMA (echo), and 22.1% with PEA (ECG) and myocardial asystole (echo). Survival to hospital admission for patients with PMA (echo) was 29.1% (95%CI-23.9-34.9) compared to those with PEA (ECG) (21.4%, 95%CI-17.7-25.6). Twenty-five percent of the 32 pauses in CPR with a shockable rhythm by echo demonstrated a non-shockable rhythm by ECG and were not defibrillated. One of these patients survived, a patient with asystole on ECG and vfib by echo survived because vfib was identified on ECG during a subsequent pause and was defibrillated. Conclusion: Patients in cardiac arrest commonly demonstrate different electrical (ECG) and myocardial activity (echo). Further research is needed to better define cardiac activity during cardiac arrest and to explore outcome between groups defined by electrical and myocardial activity.

Abstract 120: Outcomes of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Children

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie Jayaram ◽  
Bryan McNally ◽  
Fengming Tang ◽  
Paul S Chan
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Temporal Trends ◽  
Pulseless Electrical Activity ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
National Registry ◽  
Older Children ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background: As pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) occurs infrequently, little is known about survival outcomes in children. We examined whether OHCA survival in children differed by patients’ age, sex, and race, as well as recent survival trends. Methods: Within the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES), a prospective U.S. OHCA registry encompassing 64 million residents, we identified patients less than 18 years of age with an OHCA from October, 2005 to December, 2012. We examined whether survival differed by patients’ age (≤1 year, 1-8 years, >8 years), sex, race, and initial cardiac arrest rhythm, using modified Poisson regression, adjusted for patient characteristics. Similarly, we examined trends in survival, with years 2005-7 as the reference. Results: A total of 1,412 patients with an OHCA were identified, of which 67 (4.7%) were infants, 918 (65.0%) were younger children, and 427 (30.2%) older children. Sixty percent of the study population was male and 33.4% were black. The vast majority of arrests involved a non-shockable rhythm, with only 9.2% of patients having a first documented rhythm of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). Overall, 103 (7.3%) patients survived to hospital discharge. Of those with non-shockable rhythms (asystole, pulseless electrical activity, and unknown, non-shockable rhythms), 4.4% survived to discharge compared with a survival of 36.2% in those with VT or VF (P<0.001). After adjustment for patient characteristics, children 1-8 years of age were less likely to survive to hospital discharge compared with children >8 years of age (rate ratio [RR]: 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34, 0.82). In addition, OHCAs due to VT or VF were associated with improved survival (RR 6.67; 95% CI 4.35, 10.23). In contrast, there were no differences in survival by sex or race. Additionally, no temporal trends in survival were observed (p=0.47). Conclusion: In a large, national registry of pediatric OHCA, we found no disparities in survival by patients’ sex, race, or year of arrest, although survival was lower in young children and those with non-shockable cardiac arrest rhythms.

scholarly journals Prior beta-blocker treatment improves outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with non-shockable rhythms

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui-Chun Huang ◽  
Ping-Hsun Yu ◽  
Min-Shan Tsai ◽  
Kuo-Liong Chien ◽  
Wen-Jone Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiovascular Diseases ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Beta Blocker ◽  
Brain Injuries ◽  
Population Based ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Medication Prescription ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

AbstractThe prognosis of out of cardiac arrest is poor and most cardiac arrest patients suffered from the non-shockable rhythm especially in patients without pre-existing cardiovascular diseases and medication prescription. Beta-blocker (ß-blocker) therapy has been shown to improve outcomes in cardiovascular diseases such as heart failure, ischemia related cardiac, and brain injuries. Therefore, we investigated whether prior ß-blockers use was associated with reduced mortality in patients with cardiac arrest and non-shockable rhythm. We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using multivariate propensity score–based regression to control for differences among patients with cardiac arrest. A total of 104,568 adult patients suffering a non-traumatic and non-shockable rhythm cardiac arrest between 2005 and 2011 were identified. ß-blocker prescription at least 30 days prior to the cardiac arrest event was defines as the ß-blockers group. We chose 12.5 mg carvedilol as the cut-off value and defined greater or equal to carvedilol 12.5 mg per day and its equivalent dose as high-dose group. After multivariate propensity score–based logistic regression analysis, patients with prior ß-blockers use were associated with better 1-year survival [adjusted odds ratio (OR), 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01–1.30; P = 0.031]. Compared to non-ß-blocker use group and prior low-dose ß-blockers use group, prior high-dose ß-blockers use group was associated with higher mechanical ventilator wean success rate (adjusted OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01–1.41, P = 0.042). In conclusion, prior high dose ß-blockers use was associated with a better 1-year survival and higher weaning rate in patients with non-shockable cardiac arrest.

scholarly journals Conversion from Nonshockable to Shockable Rhythms and Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Outcomes by Initial Heart Rhythm and Rhythm Conversion Time

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wanwan Zhang ◽  
Shengyuan Luo ◽  
Daya Yang ◽  
Yongshu Zhang ◽  
Jinli Liao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Heart Rhythm ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Initial Rhythm ◽  
Conversion Time ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Favorable Functional Outcome

Background. The conversion from a nonshockable rhythm (asystole or pulseless electrical activity (PEA)) to a shockable rhythm (pulseless ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation) may be associated with better out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes. There are insufficient data on the prognostic significance of such conversions by initial heart rhythm and different rhythm conversion time. Methods. Among 24,849 adult OHCA patients of presumed cardiac etiology with initial asystole or PEA in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Cardiac Epidemiologic Registry (version 3, 2011–2015), we examined the association of shockable rhythm conversion with prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival, and favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤3) at hospital discharge by initial rhythm and rhythm conversion time (time from cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) initiation by emergency medical providers to first shock delivery), using logistic regression adjusting for key clinical characteristics. Results. Of 16,516 patients with initial asystole and 8,333 patients with initial PEA, 16% and 20% underwent shockable rhythm conversions; the median rhythm conversion time was 12.0 (IQR: 6.7–18.7) and 13.2 (IQR: 7.0–20.5) min, respectively. No difference was found in odds of prehospital ROSC across rhythm conversion time, regardless of initial heart rhythm. Shockable rhythm conversion was associated with survival and favorable functional outcome at hospital discharge only when occurred during the first 15 min of CPR, for those with initial asystole, or the first 10 min of CPR, for those with initial PEA. The associations between shockable rhythm conversion and outcomes were stronger among those with initial asystole compared with those with initial PEA. Conclusions. The conversion from a nonshockable rhythm to a shockable rhythm was associated with better outcomes only when occurred early in initial nonshockable rhythm OHCA, and it has greater prognostic significance when the initial rhythm was asystole.

scholarly journals Cerebellar Haemorrhage Leading to Sudden Cardiac Arrest

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ankit Agrawal ◽  
Maria Cardinale ◽  
Douglas Frenia ◽  
Aveek Mukherjee
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Sudden Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Acute Care Hospital ◽  
Pulseless Electrical Activity ◽  
Cerebrovascular Event ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Cerebellar Haemorrhage ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Cardiac Stunning ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

AbstractIntroductionIntracranial haemorrhage (ICH) is a known, but a rare cause of out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). It results in the development of non-shockable rhythms such as asystole or pulseless electrical activity (PEA).Case ReportA 77- years old male had an OHCA without any prodrome. An emergency medical services (EMS) team responded to an emergency call and intubated the patient at the site before transporting him to the Acute Care Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA. On admission, a non-contrast computed tomography scan of the head revealed a large cerebellar haemorrhage. Non-traumatic ICH is a rare cause of OHCA. Although subarachnoid haemorrhage causing cardiac arrest has been described in the literature, cerebellar haemorrhage leading to cardiac arrest is rare. The mechanism by which ICH patients develop cardiac arrest is likely explained by a massive catecholamine surge leading to cardiac stunning.ConclusionA non-shockable rhythm in the seting of a sudden cardiac arrest should raise alarms for a primary non-cardiac ethology, especially a primary cerebrovascular event. The absence of brainstem reflexes increases the likelihood of an intracranial process.

Abstract 144: Good Neurological Survival After Cardiac Arrest with Initial Shockable Rhythm Increased Year by Year but with Unshockable Rhythm Did Not in Japan

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Hanada ◽  
Hiroshi Nonogi ◽  
Ken Nagao
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cerebral Performance Category ◽  
Pulseless Electrical Activity ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Performance Category ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Rate Of Increase ◽  
New Strategy ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest ◽  
External Defibrillator

Backgrounds: Early good cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and early defibrillation are essential for good neurological survival (GNS) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Both automated external defibrillator (AED) equipped in public place and CPR educated people in Japan have been increased. We hypothesized that GNS in patients resuscitated from initial shockable rhythm have been increasing in Japan and that GNS from initial unshockable rhythm might not. Methods and Results: From January 2005 through December 2012, we conducted a prospective, population-based, observational study involving the consecutive patients across Japan who had OHCA (n= 925,288). We identified 73,751 witnessed cardiogenic cardiac arrest with the age >18 years old and transported to hospitals within 60 minutes from the witness. Among them, 18,436 cases had the initial shockable rhythm of ventricular fibrillation (VF) or pulsless ventricular tachycardia (VT) and 55,315 cases had the initial unshockable rhythm of pulseless electrical activity (PEA) or asystole (Asys). GNS was defined as cerebral performance category scale 1 or 2 one month after the arrest. Results were shown in the figure. Although the rate of increase in number of OHCA with unshockable arrest over the year was greater than that with shockable arrest, GNS ratio was increasing only in OHCA with shockable arrest. Conclusion: Good neurological survival resuscitated from initial arrest rhythm with VF/VT had been increasing year by year, but that with PEA/Asys was very low and not changed these 8 years in Japan. We need new strategy for those OHCA patients with initial unshockable rhythm.

scholarly journals Association of subsequent shock after conversion to shockable rhythm with outcomes stratified by the type of initial non-shockable rhythm in children with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

EP Europace ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Goto ◽  
A Funada ◽  
T Maeda ◽  
Y Goto
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Cerebral Performance Category ◽  
Pulseless Electrical Activity ◽  
Delivery Time ◽  
Shock Delivery ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Neurologically Intact ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): The Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research) Background/Introduction: The rhythm conversion from initial non-shockable to shockable rhythm during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by emergency medical services (EMS) providers may be associated with neurologically intact survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in children with an initial non-shockable rhythm. However, the prognostic significance of rhythm conversion stratified by the type of initial non-shockable rhythm is still unclear. Purpose We aimed to investigate the association of subsequent shock after rhythm conversion to shockable rhythm with neurologically intact survival and shock delivery time (time from EMS-initiated CPR to first shock delivery) by the type of initial non-shockable rhythm in children with OHCA. Methods We analysed the records of 19,095 children (age &lt;18 years) with OHCA treated by EMS providers. Data were obtained from a prospectively recorded Japanese nationwide Utstein-style database for a 13-year period (2005–2017). The primary outcome measure was 1-month neurologically intact survival, defined as cerebral performance category score of 1 to 2. Patients were divided into the initial pulseless electrical activity (PEA) (n = 3,326 [17.4%]) and initial asystole (n = 15,769 [82.6%]) groups. Results The proportion of patients who received subsequent shock after conversion to shockable rhythm was significantly higher in the initial PEA than in the initial asystole groups (3.3% [109/3,326] vs. 1.4% [227/15,769], p &lt; 0.0001). The shock delivery time was significantly shorter in the initial PEA than in the initial asystole groups (median [IQR], 8 min [5 min – 12 min] vs. 10 min [6 min – 16 min], p &lt; 0.01). Among the initial PEA patients, there was no significant difference between subsequently shocked (10.0% [11/109]) and subsequently non-shocked patients (6.0% [192/3,217], p = 0.10) regarding the rate of 1-month neurologically intact survival. However, after adjusting for 9 pre-hospital variables, subsequent shock with a delivery time of &lt;10 min was associated with increased odds of neurologically intact survival compared with no shock delivery (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16–5.16], p = 0.018). Among the initial asystole patients, the rate of 1-month neurologically intact survival was significantly higher in the subsequently shocked (4.4% [10/227]) than in the subsequently non-shocked (0.7% [106/15,542], p &lt; 0.0001). A multivariate logistic regression model showed that subsequent shock with a delivery time of &lt;10 min was associated with increased odds of neurologically intact survival compared with no shock delivery (adjusted OR, 9.77 [95% CI, 4.2–22.5], p &lt; 0.0001). Conclusions In children with OHCA with an initial non-shockable rhythm, subsequent shock after conversion to shockable rhythm during CPR was associated with increased odds of 1-month neurologically intact survival only when shock was delivered &lt;10 min from EMS-initiated CPR regardless of the type of initial rhythm.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document