P1382Extended long-term follow-up of radiofrequency catheter ablation for redo procedures after pulmonary vein isolation with the cryoballoon technique (first versus second generation cryoballoon)

EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Kettering

Abstract Catheter ablation has become the first line of therapy in patients with symptomatic, recurrent, drug-refractory atrial fibrillation. Cryoablation has been shown to be a safe and effective technique for pulmonary vein isolation. However, there is a significant arrhythmia recurrence rate after cryoablation procedures and there are no established strategies for redo procedures in these patients. Therefore, we have summarized our experience with radiofrequency catheter ablation for redo procedures after pulmonary vein isolation with the cryoballoon technique (including an analysis of pulmonary vein conduction recovery patterns ater procedures performed with the first or second generation cryoballoon). Methods One hundred and twenty patients (paroxysmal AF: 78 patients, persistent AF: 42 patients) had to undergo a redo procedure after initially successful circumferential PV isolation with the cryoballoon technique. The redo ablation procedures were performed using a segmental approach or a circumferential ablation strategy depending on the intra-procedural findings. Results During the redo procedure, a mean number of 1.8 re-conducting PVs were detected (using a circular mapping catheter; group A: 2.1 re-conducting PVs, group B: 1.5 re-conducting PVs). There was a slightly higher incidence of chronic PV reconnections related to the left-sided PV ostia than to the right-sided PVs in both groups. Furthermore, sites of chronic PV reconnection were found more frequently in the inferior parts of the PV ostia than in the superior parts. In 53 patients in group A, a segmental approach was sufficient to eliminate the residual PV conduction because there were only a few recovered PV fibers (1-3 reconnected PVs; group A1). In the remaining 7 patients in group A, a circumferential ablation strategy was used because of a complete recovery of the PV-LA conduction of all four pulmonary veins (group A2). In group B, a segmental approach was sufficient in all patients because there was only a minor  reconnection of 1-2 PVs. All recovered PVs could be isolated sucessfully again. At 42-month follow-up, 78 % of all patients were free from an arrhythmia recurrence (94/120 patients; group A: 43/60 patients (71 %), group B: 51/60 patients (85 %)). There were no major complications in both groups. Conclusions In patients with an initial circumferential PVI using the cryoballoon technique, a repeat ablation procedure can be performed safely and effectively using radiofrequency catheter ablation. In most cases only a few re-conducting PV fibers were found and therefore, a segmental re-ablation approach seems to be sufficient in the majority of patients (especially in patients treated with the second generation cryoballoon).

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Kettering

Abstract   Catheter ablation has become the first line of therapy in patients with symptomatic, recurrent, drug-refractory atrial fibrillation. Cryoablation has been shown to be a safe and effective technique for pulmonary vein isolation. However, there is a significant arrhythmia recurrence rate after cryoablation procedures and there are no established strategies for redo procedures in these patients. Therefore, we have summarized our experience with radiofrequency catheter ablation for redo procedures after pulmonary vein isolation with the cryoballoon technique (including an analysis of pulmonary vein conduction recovery patterns ater procedures performed with the first or second generation cryoballoon). Methods One hundred and fifty patients (paroxysmal AF: 99 patients, persistent AF: 51 patients) had to undergo a redo procedure after initially successful circumferential PV isolation with the cryoballoon technique (Arctic Front Balloon: 75 patients (group A); Arctic Front Advance: 75 patients (group B)). The redo ablation procedures were performed using a segmental approach or a circumferential ablation strategy (CARTO) depending on the intra-procedural findings. Results During the redo procedure, a mean number of 1.7 re-conducting PVs were detected (using a circular mapping catheter; group A: 2.1 re-conducting PVs, group B: 1.3 re-conducting PVs). There was a slightly higher incidence of chronic PV reconnections related to the left-sided PV ostia than to the right-sided PVs in both groups. Furthermore, sites of chronic PV reconnection were found more frequently in the inferior parts of the PV ostia than in the superior parts. In 65 patients in group A, a segmental approach was sufficient to eliminate the residual PV conduction because there were only a few recovered PV fibers (1–3 reconnected PVs; group A1). In the remaining 10 patients in group A, a circumferential ablation strategy was used because of a complete recovery of the PV-LA conduction of all four pulmonary veins (group A2). In group B, a segmental approach was sufficient in all patients because there was only a minor reconnection of 1–2 PVs. All recovered PVs could be isolated sucessfully again. At 48-month follow-up, 74.7% of all patients were free from an arrhythmia recurrence (112/150 patients; group A: 51/75 patients (68%), group B: 61/75 patients (81.3%)). There were no major complications in both groups. Conclusions In patients with an initial circumferential PVI using the cryoballoon technique, a repeat ablation procedure can be performed safely and effectively using radiofrequency catheter ablation. In most cases only a few re-conducting PV fibers were found and therefore, a segmental re-ablation approach seems to be sufficient in the majority of patients (especially in patients treated with the second generation cryoballoon). Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Kettering

Abstract Background Catheter ablation has become the first line of therapy in patients with symptomatic, recurrent, drug-refractory atrial fibrillation. Circumferential pulmonary vein ablation is still the standard approach in these patients. However, the results are not very favourable and more complex ablation strategies are the subject of current controversy. Therefore, we have evaluated the effect of an additional linear lesion at the roof of the left atrium on the long-term outcome. Methods A total of 220 patients (114 men, 106 women; mean age 69 years (SD ± 14 years)) with symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation underwent a circumferential pulmonary vein ablation procedure in combination with an additional linear lesion at the roof of the left atrium (group A). After discharge, patients were scheduled for repeated visits at the arrhythmia clinic at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96 and 102 months after the ablation procedure. The long-term follow-up data was compared to 220 patients who underwent circumferential pulmonary vein ablation without an additional linear lesion at the roof of the left atrium (group B). Results The ablation procedure could be performed as planned in all patients. Fifty-one out of 220 patients (23.2 %) in group A and 53 out of 220 patients (24.1 %) in group B experienced an arrhythmia recurrence within the first 3 months after ablation requiring an electrical cardioversion. At 102-month follow-up, analysis of a 168-hour ECG recording revealed no evidence for an arrhythmia recurrence in 125/220 patients (56.8 %) in group A and in 103/220 patients (46.8 %) in group B. In 66/220 patients (30.0 %) in group A and 59/220 patients (26.8 %) in group B, only short episodes of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were documented. In 29 patients (13.2 %) in group A, a recurrence of persistent atrial fibrillation (> 48 hours) was revealed by the long-term recordings (group B: 58 patients (26.4 %)). The lower arrhythmia recurrence rate in group A was partially due to a lower incidence of atypical atrial flutter after catheter ablation. The rate of repeat ablation procedures was significantly lower in group A than in group B. There were no major complications. Conclusions Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation comprising a circumferential pulmonary vein ablation and an additional linear lesion at the roof of the left atrium provides more favourable results than circumferential pulmonary vein ablation alone. The effect is more pronounced during long-term than during short-term follow-up.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Kettering

Abstract Background Catheter ablation has become the first line of therapy in patients with symptomatic, recurrent, drug-refractory atrial fibrillation. Circumferential pulmonary vein ablation is still the standard approach in these patients. However, the results are not very favourable and more complex ablation strategies are the subject of current controversy. Therefore, we have evaluated the effect of an additional linear lesion at the roof of the left atrium on the long-term outcome. Methods A total of 240 patients (125 men, 115 women; mean age 70 years (SD ± 15 years)) with symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation underwent a circumferential pulmonary vein ablation procedure in combination with an additional linear lesion at the roof of the left atrium (group A). After discharge, patients were scheduled for repeated visits at the arrhythmia clinic at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 102 and 108 months after the ablation procedure. The long-term follow-up data was compared to 240 patients who underwent circumferential pulmonary vein ablation without an additional linear lesion at the roof of the left atrium (group B). Results The ablation procedure could be performed as planned in all patients. Fifty-five out of 240 patients (22.9%) in group A and 58 out of 240 patients (24.2%) in group B experienced an arrhythmia recurrence within the first 3 months after ablation requiring an electrical cardioversion. At 108-month follow-up, analysis of a 168-hour ECG recording revealed no evidence for an arrhythmia recurrence in 135/240 patients (56.3%) in group A and in 111/220 patients (46.3%) in group B. In 73/240 patients (30.4%) in group A and 66/240 patients (27.5%) in group B, only short episodes of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were documented. In 32 patients (13.3%) in group A, a recurrence of persistent atrial fibrillation (>48 hours) was revealed by the long-term recordings (group B: 63 patients (26.2%)). The lower arrhythmia recurrence rate in group A was partially due to a lower incidence of atypical atrial flutter after catheter ablation. The rate of repeat ablation procedures was significantly lower in group A than in group B. There were no major complications. Conclusions Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation comprising a circumferential pulmonary vein ablation and an additional linear lesion at the roof of the left atrium provides more favourable results than circumferential pulmonary vein ablation alone. The effect is more pronounced during long-term than during short-term follow-up. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 643-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jindong Chen ◽  
Hao Wang ◽  
Mengmeng Zhou ◽  
Liang Zhao

AbstractBackground:To assess the effectiveness of radiofrequency catheter ablation for lone atrial fibrillation in young adults.Methods:This single-centre, retrospective, observational study enrolled 75 consecutive patients (86.7% men) under 35 (median, 30) years old with lone atrial fibrillation (68% paroxysmal, 26.7% persistent, and 5.3% long-standing persistent) without other cardiopulmonary diseases who underwent catheter ablation between April 2009 and May 2017. Procedural endpoints were circumferential pulmonary vein ablation for atrial fibrillation with pulmonary vein trigger, and target ablation or bidirectional block of lines and disappearance of complex fractionated atrial electrograms for atrial fibrillation with clear and unclear non-pulmonary vein triggers, respectively.Results:Main study outcome was rate of survival free from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence, which at median 61 (range, 5–102) months follow-up was 62.7% (64.7 and 58.3% for paroxysmal and non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, respectively) after single ablation, and 69.3% (68.6 and 70.8% for paroxysmal and non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, respectively) after mean 1.2 ablations (two and three ablations in 11 and 2 patients, respectively). In multivariate analysis, non-pulmonary vein trigger was a significant independent predictor of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia (OR, 10.60 [95%CI, 2.25–49.96]; p = 0.003). There were no major periprocedural adverse events.Conclusions:In patients under 35 years old with lone atrial fibrillation, radiofrequency catheter ablation appeared effective particularly for atrial fibrillation with pulmonary vein trigger and regardless of left atrial size or atrial fibrillation duration or type. Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence after multiple ablations warrants further study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document