scholarly journals HeartMate 3- Challenges in Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation

EP Europace ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Sabbag ◽  
P Peichl ◽  
P Stojadinovic ◽  
M Arceluz ◽  
P Maury ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Apical Region ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation ◽  
Surface Ecg ◽  
Vt Ablation

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background HeartMate3TM (HM3) is a relatively new left ventricular assist device (LVAD) system. Its design and magnetically levitated pump may impact VTA. Objectives To describe clinical characteristics, procedural details, specific challenges and outcomes in patients with HM3 referred for ventricular tachycardia ablation (VTA). Methods Data was collected from patients implanted with an HM3 system who underwent VTA in 7 tertiary centers. Data included baseline patient characteristics, procedural data, mortality, and arrhythmia-free survival. Results  The study cohort included 19 patients (18 male, aged 65 ± 7.8 years) with low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, 17 ± 5%), presenting with VT (53% with storm VT).  VTs were induced in 89% of patients and a total of 41 VTs were observed.  Severe electromagnetic interference was present in the surface ECG (Figure A) but not on endocardial electrograms (Figure B). Hence, VT localization required analysis of intra-cardiac signals or the use of filter in the 40-20 Hz range. A total of 32 VTs were mapped and were successfully ablated (31% to the anterior wall, 38% to the septum, and only 9% to the inflow cannula region).  Notably, the large pump housing tends to obscure clear visualization of the apical region in fluoroscopy particularly in the LAO view (Figure C,D). Therefore, three-dimensional electro-anatomical mapping was aided by ICE or CARTOSound in 71% cases (Figure E). Non-inducibility of any VT was reached in 11 patients (58%). Over a follow up of 429 (IQR 101-692) days, 5 (26%) patients underwent a redo VT ablation due to recurrent VTA and 2 (11%) patients died. Conclusions VT ablation in patients with HM3 is feasible and safe when done in the appropriate setup. Long-term arrhythmia free survival is acceptable but not well predicted by non-inducibility at the end of the procedure. Abstract Figure. HeartMate3 ablation Challenges

P5699Endocardial vs. epicardial ventricular tachycardia ablation: a propensity score matched analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D J Nascimento Matos ◽  
D Cavaco ◽  
P Freitas ◽  
A M Ferreira ◽  
G Rodrigues ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Drug Resistant ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation

Abstract Introduction Direct comparisons of long-term clinical outcomes of endocardial vs. epicardial catheter ablation techniques for drug-resistant ventricular tachycardia (VT) have been scarcely reported. We aim to compare the long-term efficacy and safety of endocardial vs. epicardial catheter ablation (END-ABL and EPI-ABL, respectively) in a propensity score (PS) matched population. Methods Single-center observational registry including 215 consecutive patients who underwent END-ABL (181) or EPI-ABL (n=34) for drug-resistant VT between January 2007 and June 2018. Efficacy endpoint was defined as VT-free survival after catheter ablation, while safety outcomes were defined by 30-days mortality and procedure-related complications. A propensity score was used to match patients in a 1:1 fashion according to the following variables: VT storm at presentation, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV at presentation, ischemic ethology, presence of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), and previous endocardial catheter ablation. Independent predictors of VT recurrence were assessed by Cox regression. Results The PS yielded two groups of 31 patients each well matched for baseline characteristics (Table 1). Over a median follow-up of 2 years (IQR 1–3), 58% (n=18) ENDO-ABL patients had VT recurrence vs. 26% (n=8) in the EPI-ABL group (P=0.020). The yearly rates of VT recurrence were 28%/year for END-ABL vs. 11%/year for EPI-ABL (P=0.021). Multivariate survival analysis identified previous endocardial ablation (HR= 3.52; 95% CI 1.17–10.54, p=0.026) and VT storm at presentation (HR=3.57; 95% CI 1.50–8.50, p=0.004) as independent predictors of VT recurrence. EPI-ABL was independently associated with fewer VT recurrences (HR=0.28; 95 CI 0.12–0.69, p=0.005), but only in patients with a previous endocardial ablation (p for interaction = 0.004) – Figure A. No patients died at 30-days post-procedure. Hospital length of stay was similar between END-ABL and EPI-ABL (5 vs. 4 days respectively, p=0.139), as was the complication rate (6.5% vs. 12.9% respectively, p=0.390), although driven by different causes (Table 1). Conclusion VT storm at presentation and previous catheter ablation were independent predictors of VT recurrence. In patients with a previous failed endocardial catheter ablation, epicardial ablation seems to provide greater VT-free survival than repeat endocardial ablation. Both strategies seem equally safe.

scholarly journals Outcomes of a combined vs non-combined endoepicardial ventricular tachycardia ablation strategy

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Matos ◽  
Pedro Adragão ◽  
Cristiano Pisani ◽  
Vinicius Hatanaka ◽  
Pedro Freitas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Electrical Storm ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation

BACKGROUND Direct comparisons of combined (C-ABL) and non-combined (NC-ABL) endo-epicardial ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation outcomes are scarce. We aimed to investigate the long-term clinical efficacy and safety of these 2 strategies in ischemic heart disease (IHD) and nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) patients. METHODS Multicentric observational registry including 316 consecutive patients who underwent catheter ablation for drug-resistant VT between January 2008 and July 2019. Primary and secondary efficacy endpoints were defined as VT-free survival and all-cause death after ablation. Safety outcomes were defined by 30-days mortality and procedure-related complications. RESULTS Most of the patients were male (85%), with IHD (67%) and mean age of 63±13 years. During a mean follow-up of 3±2 years, 117 (37%) patients had VT recurrence and 73 (23%) died. Multivariate survival analysis identified electrical storm (ES) at presentation, IHD, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV, and C-ABL as independent predictors of VT recurrence. In 135 patients undergoing repeated procedures, only C-ABL and ES were independent predictors of relapse. The independent predictors of mortality were C-ABL, ES, LVEF, age and NYHA class III/IV. C-ABL survival benefit was only seen in patients with a previous ablation (P for interaction=0.04). Mortality at 30-days was similar between NC-ABL and C-ABL (4% vs. 2%, respectively, P=0.777), as was complication rate (10.3% vs. 15.1% respectively, P=0.336). CONCLUSION A combined endo-epicardial approach was associated with greater VT-free survival and lower all-cause death in IHD and NICM patients undergoing repeated VT catheter ablations. Both strategies seem equally safe.

Ventricular tachycardia ablation in nonischemic cardiomyopathy

EP Europace ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Nascimento Matos ◽  
D Cavaco ◽  
P Carmo ◽  
MS Carvalho ◽  
G Rodrigues ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Scientific Development ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Drug Resistant ◽  
Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Epicardial Ablation ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. INTRODUCTION Catheter ablation outcomes for drug-resistant ventricular tachycardia (VT) in nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) are suboptimal when compared to ischemic cardiomyopathy. We aimed to analyse the long-term efficacy and safety of percutaneous catheter ablation in this subset of patients. METHODS Single-center observational retrospective registry including consecutive NICM patients who underwent catheter ablation for drug-resistant VT during a 10-year period. The efficacy endpoint was defined as VT-free survival after catheter ablation, while safety outcomes were defined by 30-days mortality and procedure-related complications. Independent predictors of VT recurrence were assessed by Cox regression. RESULTS In a population of 68 patients, most were male (85%), mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 34 ± 12%, and mean age was 58 ± 15 years. All patients had an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Twenty-six (38%) patients underwent epicardial ablation (table 1). Over a median follow-up of 3 years (IQR 1-8), 41% (n = 31) patients had VT recurrence and 28% died (n = 19). Multivariate survival analysis identified LVEF (HR= 0.98; 95%CI 0.92-0.99, p = 0.046) and VT storm at presentation (HR = 2.38; 95%CI 1.04-5.46, p = 0.041) as independent predictors of VT recurrence. The yearly rates of VT recurrence and overall mortality were 21%/year and 10%/year, respectively. No patients died at 30-days post-procedure, and mean hospital length of stay was 5 ± 6 days. The complication rate was 7% (n = 5, table 1), mostly in patients undergoing epicardial ablation (4 vs 1 in endocardial ablation, P = 0.046). CONCLUSION LVEF and VT storm at presentation were independent predictors of VT recurrence in NICM patients after catheter ablation. While clinical outcomes can be improved with further technical and scientific development, a tailored endocardial/epicardial approach was safe, with low overall number of complications and no 30-days mortality. Abstract Figure.

scholarly journals Combined endocardial and epicardial ventricular tachycardia ablation for ischemic and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Nascimento Matos ◽  
P Adragao ◽  
C Pisani ◽  
V Hatanaka ◽  
P Freitas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Analysis ◽  
Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Functional Class ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Nyha Functional Class

Abstract Background Patients with ischemic (IHD) and nonischemic (NICM) dilated heart disease and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction are at increased risk of ventricular tachycardias (VTs) or sudden cardiac death. VT catheter ablation is an invasive treatment modality for antiarrhythmic drugs-resistant VT that reduces arrhythmic episodes, improves quality of life and improves survival in patients with electrical storm. Direct comparison of the outcomes from combined and non-combined endoepicardial ablations is limited by patient characteristics, follow-up durations, protocols heterogeneity and scarcity of randomized trials. We aim to investigate the long-term clinical outcomes of these 2 strategies in the IHD and NICM populations. Methods Multicentric observational registry including 316 consecutive patients who underwent combined (C-ABL) and non-combined (NC-ABL) endoepicardial ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation for drug-resistant VT between January 2008 and July 2019. Chagas' disease patients were excluded. Primary and secondary efficacy endpoints were defined as VT-free survival and all-cause death after ablation. Safety outcomes were defined by 30-days mortality and procedure-related complications. Results Most of the patients were male (85%), with IHD (67%) and a mean age of 63±13 years. During a mean follow-up of 3±2 years, 117 (37%) patients had VT recurrence and 73 (23%) died. Multivariate survival analysis identified storm (ES) at presentation (HR=2.17; 95% CI 1.44–3.25), IHD (HR=0.53, 95% CI 0.36–0.78), left ventricular ejection fraction (LEVF) (HR=0.97, 95% CI 0.95–0.99), New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III or IV (HR=1.79, 95% CI 1.13–2.85) and C-ABL (HR=0.49, 95% CI 0.27–0.92) as independent predictors of VT recurrence. In 135 patients undergoing two or more ablation procedures only C-ABL (HR=0.36, 95% CI 0.17–0.80) and ES at presentation (HR=2.42, 95% CI 1.24–4.70) were independent predictors of arrhythmia recurrence. The independent predictors of all-cause mortality were ES (HR=2.17, 95% CI 1.33–3.54), LVEF (HR=0.95, 95% CI 0.92–0.98), age (HR=1.03, 95% CI 1.01–1.05), NYHA functional class III or IV (HR=2.04, 95% CI 1.12–3.73), and C-ABL (HR=0.22, 95% CI 0.05–0.91). The survival benefit was only seen in patients with a previous ablation (P for interaction=0.04) – Figure 1. Mortality at 30-days was similar between NC-ABL and C-ABL (4% vs. 2%, respectively, P=0.777), as was the complication rate (10.3% vs. 15.1% respectively, P=0.336). Conclusion A combined endo-epicardial approach appears to be associated with greater VT-free survival and overall survival in ischemic and nonischemic patients undergoing repeated VT catheter ablations. Both strategies seem equally safe. Survival analysis for C-ABL vs NC-ABL Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Abstract 16154: Baseline Left Ventricular Diameter Predicts Recovery in New Systolic Heart Failure Syndromes

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Gold ◽  
Nathan Kong ◽  
Matthew Gold ◽  
Tess Allan ◽  
Anand Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Medical Decision ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Internal Diameter ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Short Term Treatment ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Therapies

Introduction: It is unknown how often patients with very advanced left ventricular (LV) dilation at initial presentation demonstrate meaningful recovery with medical therapy. Understanding short term treatment outcomes may impact medical decision making and counseling. Hypothesis: Patients with left ventricular end diastolic internal diameter (LVEDD) > 6.5cm will be less likely to recover left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as compared to patients with LVEDD < 6.5cm. Methods: Patients were retrospectively identified by a database search of echocardiogram studies obtained at the University of Chicago between 2008-2018. Manual review was performed to ensure new diagnosis of systolic dysfunction with LVEF ≤ 35% and follow up echocardiogram study within 3 to 9 months of index study. LVEDD was determined from parasternal long axis views per routine. LVEF recovery was specified as LVEF > 35%. Chart review was done to assess for composite death, hospice, transplant, left ventricular assist device, and sustained ventricular tachycardia. Chi-square, multivariable logistic regression, and Kaplan-Meier survival were used for analysis. Results: Out of 100 patients included for analysis, mean age was 59.7 years, 41 were female and 82 were African American. 17.7% of patients’ with LVEDD > 6.5 cm had LVEF recovery compared to 53.0% of patients’ with LVEDD ≤ 6.5 cm (p = 0.008). LVEDD > 6.5 cm was associated with less LVEF recovery even when adjusted for age, gender, hypertension, and diabetes (adjusted odds ratio 0.18, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.65). LVEDD > 6.5cm was associated with worse event free survival (p = 0.004) with a median follow-up time of 2.4 years. Conclusions: An LVEDD of > 6.5cm is associated with diminished LVEF recovery and event free survival when compared to those patients with an LVEDD ≤ 6.5cm. Delaying consideration for advanced therapies and device based therapies in hopes of recovery may be inappropriate for many such patients.

Abstract 107: Predictors and Frequency of ICD Implantation for Primary Prevention in ICD Eligible Patients: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Registry

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rory Hachamovitch ◽  
Benjamin Nutter ◽  
Manuel D Cerqueira ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Myocardial Imaging ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Icd Implantation ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Multicenter Registry

Background . The use of implantable cardiac defibrillators has been associated with improved survival in several well-defined patient (pt) subsets. Its utilization for primary prevention in eligible pts, however, is unclear. We sought to examine the frequency of ICD implantation (ICD-IMP) for primary prevention in a cohort prospectively enrolled in a prospective, multicenter registry of ICD candidates. Methods . We identified 961 pts enrolled in the AdreView Myocardial Imaging for Risk Evaluation in Heart Failure (ADMIRE-HF) study, a prospective, multicenter study evaluating the prognostic usefulness of 123I-mIBG scintigraphy in a heart failure population. Inclusion criteria limited patients to those meeting guideline criteria for ICD implantation; these criteria included left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% and New York Heart Association functional class II-III. We excluded pts with an ICD at the time of enrollment, leaving a study cohort of 934 patients. Pts were followed up for 24 months after enrollment. Pts undergoing ICD-IMP after enrollment for secondary prevention were censored at the time of intervention. The association between ICD-IMP utilization and demographic, clinical, laboratory, and imaging data was examined using Cox proportional hazards analysis (CPH). Results . Of 934 pts, 196 (21%) were referred for ICD-IMP over a mean follow-up of 612±242 days. Implantations occurred 167±164 days after enrollment. Patients referred for ICD were younger (61±12 vs. 63±12), but did not differ with respect to proportion female (17% vs. 21%), African-American race (12% vs. 15%), diabetics (37% vs. 36%) (All p=NS). The frequency of ICD-IMP did not differ as a function of age, race, sex, LVEF, or imaging result (All p=NS). CPH revealed that a model including age, race, sex, diabetes, smoking, BMI, NYHA class, hypertension, heart failure etiology, and prior MI identified none of these as predictive of ICD-IMP. Conclusion: This analysis of prospective registry data reveals that in patients who are guideline-defined candidates for ICD-IMP, only about one in five receive an ICD over a two year follow-up interval. Multivariable modeling failed to identify any factor associated with ICD use.

Abstract 5935: Influence of Recent Advances in the Management of Heart Failure and Ventricular Arrhythmias on Survival in Patients with Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshikazu Yazaki ◽  
Mitsuaki Horigome ◽  
Kazunori Aizawa ◽  
Takeshi Tomita ◽  
Hiroki Kasai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Cardiac Sarcoidosis ◽  
Severe Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Predictors Of Mortality ◽  
Recent Advances

Background : We previously described severity of heart failure and ventricular tachycardia (VT) as independent predictors of mortality in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). Medical treatment for chronic heart failure has been established over the last few decades. Prophylactic use of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT or CRT-D) have been introduced in patients with severe heart failure. We therefore hypothesized that the prognosis of CS improves due to such advances in the management of heart failure and VT. Methods : To confirm our hypothesis, we analyzed 43 CS patients diagnosed between 1988 and 2006 and treated with corticosteroids. We classified two sequential referral patients diagnosed between 1988 and 1997 (n=19) and between 1998 and 2006 (n=24), and compared treatment and prognosis between the two cohorts. Results : Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and dimensions were similar between the two cohorts. Although age in the 1988–1997 referral cohort was significantly younger than that in the 1998–2006 referral cohort (54±14years versus 62±10years, p<0.05), survival in the earlier cohort was significantly worse (log-rank=4.41, p<0.05). The 1- and 5-year mortality rates were 88% and 71% in the 1988–1997 referral cohort, and 96% and 92% in the 1998–2006 referral cohort, respectively. The 1998–2006 referral cohort showed significantly higher incidence of ICD or CRT-D implantation (29% versus 6%, p<0.05), β-blocker use (46% versus 6%, p<0.01) and addition of methotrexate (21% versus 0%, p<0.05), and increased maintenance dose (7.0±1.9mg/day versus 5.0±0.9mg/day, p<0.01) compared to the 1988–1997 referral cohort. Multivariate analysis including age, LVEF, and sustained ventricular tachycardia (sVT) identified diagnosis between 1988 and 1997 (hazard ratio [HR]: 19.8, p<0.01) and LVEF (HR: 0.83/1% increase, p<0.01) as independent predictors of mortality. Conclusions : Survival in the recent CS patients is significantly better than previously described. Recent advances in the device therapies and medical treatments including modified immunosuppression alter the clinical outcome in patients with CS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document