scholarly journals The effects of community pharmacy public health interventions on health and health inequalities

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Todd ◽  
F Hillier-Brown ◽  
K Thomson ◽  
M Balaj ◽  
N Walton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Community Pharmacy ◽  
Health Inequalities ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Public Health Interventions ◽  
Health And Health Inequalities

scholarly journals The effects of community pharmacy-delivered public health interventions on population health and health inequalities: A review of reviews

2019 ◽  
Vol 124 ◽  
pp. 98-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie Thomson ◽  
Frances Hillier-Brown ◽  
Nick Walton ◽  
Mirza Bilaj ◽  
Clare Bambra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Community Pharmacy ◽  
Population Health ◽  
Health Inequalities ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Public Health Interventions ◽  
Review Of Reviews ◽  
Health And Health Inequalities

Development and evaluation of complex multicomponent interventions in public health

2021 ◽  
pp. 351-364
Author(s):  
Rona Campbell ◽  
Chris Bonell
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Systems Theory ◽  
Health Inequalities ◽  
Complex Interventions ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Intervention Design ◽  
Public Health Interventions ◽  
Quantitative And Qualitative Research ◽  
Multicomponent Interventions

This chapter examines the issues to consider when developing and evaluating complex public health interventions and signposts where more detailed guidance can be found. It starts by considering what complexity means in this context, including the contribution that systems theory has made. When developing complex interventions we suggest: (i) reading quantitative and qualitative research on similar interventions, preferably within systematic reviews; (ii) consulting stakeholders, including those that the intervention is intended to benefit, to help ensure its relevance, acceptability and ownership; (iii) considering using theory to inform the intervention design and hypotheses to assess in evaluations; (iv) assessing whether the intervention could operate at more than one level (from individual through to policy) to increase its chances of success; and (v) reflecting on issues of equity and how the intervention could reduce health inequalities.

Community engagement in public health interventions to reduce health inequalities: mapping the evidence against policy objectives

The Lancet ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 380 ◽  
pp. S59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison O'Mara-Eves ◽  
Ginny Brunton ◽  
Josephine Kavanagh ◽  
Farah Jamal ◽  
James Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Community Engagement ◽  
Health Inequalities ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Public Health Interventions ◽  
Policy Objectives

Access to intervene. An ethnographic study of public health practices targeting health inequalities

2021 ◽  
pp. 136345932110328
Author(s):  
Mette Terp Høybye ◽  
Ditte Herring Holt ◽  
Morten Hulvej Rod
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Health Inequalities ◽  
Theoretical Perspective ◽  
Economic Value ◽  
Public Health Research ◽  
Health Problems ◽  
Ethnographic Study ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Public Health Interventions ◽  
Target Groups

Much public health research has devoted attention to the question of how interventions aimed at reducing health inequalities can access so-called “hard-to-reach” populations. This work has generally reflected an instrumentalist approach, which implies the preexistence of particular target groups characterized by specific public health problems. The key research interests are to find ways to effectively alleviate health inequalities and to identify the best ways to intervene to address disparate health problems among certain groups of people. Based on ethnographic research with public health officers in four Danish municipalities, this article turns the issue on its head by examining how public health officers gain access to intervene in practice and, as part of this process, define and delineate target groups and public health problems. Through detailed descriptions of two ethnographic cases, we develop the argument that public health interventions carry with them moral differentiations that may contradict the overall intention of reducing health inequalities. We adopt a theoretical perspective developed by Lakoff and Collier, suggesting that public health interventions can be understood as “regimes of living.” This leads us to the conclusion that the practices of gaining access result in the production of unforeseen target groups and new moral configurations where the value of health becomes linked to other types of value, most importantly economic value. For public health officers, the complicated issue of gaining access to intervene is not simply a matter of finding practical solutions; it also defines and delineates the scope of public health itself.

scholarly journals Which public health interventions are effective in reducing morbidity, mortality and health inequalities from infectious diseases amongst children in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs): protocol for an umbrella review

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. e032981
Author(s):  
Elodie Besnier ◽  
Katie Thomson ◽  
Donata Stonkute ◽  
Talal Mohammad ◽  
Nasima Akhter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Global Health ◽  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Health Inequalities ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Umbrella Review ◽  
Public Health Interventions ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries

IntroductionDespite significant progress in the last few decades, infectious diseases remain a significant threat to children’s health in low-income and middle-income countries. Effective means of prevention and control for these diseases exist, making any differences in the burden of these diseases between population groups or countries inequitable. Yet, gaps remain in our knowledge of the effect these public health interventions have on health inequalities in children, especially in low-income and middle-income countries. This umbrella review aims to address some of these gaps by exploring which public health interventions are effective in reducing morbidity, mortality and health inequalities from infectious diseases among children in low-income and middle-income countries.Methods and analysisAn umbrella review will be conducted to identify systematic reviews or evidence synthesis of public health interventions that reduce morbidity, mortality and/or health inequalities due to infectious diseases among children (aged under 5 years) in low-income and middle-income countries. The interventions of interest are public health interventions targeting infectious diseases or associated risk factors in children. We will search for reviews reporting health and health inequalities outcomes in and between populations. The literature search will be undertaken using the Cochrane Library, Medline, EMBASE, the CAB Global Health database, Health Evidence, the Campbell Collaboration Library of Systematic Reviews, International Initiative for Impact Evaluation Systematic review repository, Scopus, the Social Sciences Citation Index and PROSPERO. Additionally, a manual search will be performed in Google Scholar and three international organisations websites (UNICEF Office of Research—Innocenti, UNICEF, WHO) to capture grey literature. Data from the records meeting our inclusion/exclusion criteria will be collated using a narrative synthesis approach.Ethics and disseminationThis review will exclusively work with anonymous group-level information available from published reviews. No ethical approval was required.The results of the review will be submitted for publication in academic journals and presented at international public health conferences. Additionally, key findings will be summarised for dissemination to a wider policy and general public audience as part of the Centre for Global Health Inequalities Research’s policy work.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019141673

scholarly journals Which public health interventions are effective in reducing morbidity, mortality and health inequalities from infectious diseases amongst children in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): An umbrella review

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0251905
Author(s):  
Elodie Besnier ◽  
Katie Thomson ◽  
Donata Stonkute ◽  
Talal Mohammad ◽  
Nasima Akhter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Health Inequalities ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Umbrella Review ◽  
Public Health Interventions ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Disadvantaged Groups

Despite significant progress in the last few decades, infectious diseases remain a major threat to child health in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)—particularly amongst more disadvantaged groups. It is imperative to understand the best available evidence concerning which public health interventions reduce morbidity, mortality and health inequalities in children aged under five years. To address this gap, we carried out an umbrella review (a systematic reviews of reviews) to identify evidence on the effects of public health interventions (promotion, protection, prevention) on morbidity, mortality and/or health inequalities due to infectious diseases amongst children in LMICs. Ten databases were searched for records published between 2014–2021 alongside a manual search of gray literature. Articles were quality-assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews tool (AMSTAR 2). A narrative synthesis was conducted. We identified 60 systematic reviews synthesizing 453 individual primary studies. A majority of the reviews reported on preventive interventions (n = 48), with a minority on promotion (n = 17) and almost no reviews covering health protection interventions (n = 2). Effective interventions for improving child health across the whole population, as well as the most disadvantaged included communication, education and social mobilization for specific preventive services or tools, such as immunization or bed nets. For all other interventions, the effects were either unclear, unknown or detrimental, either at the overall population level or regarding health inequalities. We found few reviews reporting health inequalities information and the quality of the evidence base was generally low. Our umbrella review identified some prevention interventions that might be useful in reducing under five mortality from infectious diseases in LMICs, particularly amongst the most disadvantaged groups.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document