scholarly journals Evidence for Positive Regulation of the Proline Utilization Pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Genetics ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 117 (3) ◽  
pp. 429-435
Author(s):  
Marjorie C Brandriss

ABSTRACT A mutation has been identified that prevents Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells from growing on proline as the sole source of nitrogen, causes noninducible expression of the PUT1 and PUT2 genes, and is completely recessive. In the put3-75 mutant, the basal level of expression (ammonia as nitrogen source) of PUT1-lacZ and PUT2-lacZ gene fusions as measured by β-galactosidase activity is reduced 4- and 7-fold, respectively, compared with the wild-type strain. Normal regulation is not restored when the cells are grown on arginine as the sole nitrogen source and put3-75 cells remain sensitive to the proline analog, l-azetidine-2-carboxylic acid, indicating that the block is not at the level of transport of the inducer, proline. In a cross between the put3-75 strain and the semidominant, constitutive mutation PUT3c-68, only parental ditype tetrads were found, indicating allelism of the two mutations. Further support for allelism derives from the comparison of enzyme levels in heteroallelic and heterozygous diploid strains. The constitutive allele appears to be fully dominant to the noninducible allele but only partially dominant to the wild type, suggesting an interaction between the wild-type and PUT3c-68 gene products. The PUT3 gene maps on chromosome XI, about 5.7 cM from the centromere. The phenotypes of alleles of the PUT3 gene, either recessive and noninducible (the put3-75 phenotype) or semidominant and constitutive (the PUT3c-68 phenotype), and their pleiotropy suggest that the PUT3 gene product is a positive activator of the proline utilization pathway.

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 892-899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hoching L. Huang ◽  
Marjorie C. Brandriss

ABSTRACT The proline utilization pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is regulated by the Put3p transcriptional activator in response to the presence of the inducer proline and the quality of the nitrogen source in the growth medium. Put3p is constitutively bound to the promoters of its target genes, PUT1 andPUT2, under all conditions studied but activates transcription to the maximum extent only in the absence of rich nitrogen sources and in the presence of proline (i.e., when proline serves as the sole source of nitrogen). Changes in target gene expression therefore occur through changes in the activity of the DNA-bound regulator. In this report, we demonstrate by phosphatase treatment of immunoprecipitates of extracts metabolically labeled with32P or 35S that Put3p is a phosphoprotein. Examination of Put3p isolated from cells grown on a variety of nitrogen sources showed that it was differentially phosphorylated as a function of the quality of the nitrogen source: the poorer the nitrogen source, the slower the gel migration of the phosphoforms. The presence of the inducer does not detectably alter the phosphorylation profile. Activator-defective and activator-constitutive Put3p mutants have been analyzed. One activator-defective mutant appears to be phosphorylated in a pattern similar to that of the wild type, thus separating its ability to be phosphorylated from its ability to activate transcription. Three activator-constitutive mutant proteins from cells grown on an ammonia-containing medium have a phosphorylation profile similar to that of the wild-type protein in cells grown on proline. These results demonstrate a correlation between the phosphorylation status of Put3p and its ability to activate its target genes and suggest that there are two signals, proline induction and quality of nitrogen source, impinging on Put3p that act synergistically for maximum expression of the proline utilization pathway.


1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 4634-4641 ◽  
Author(s):  
A H Siddiqui ◽  
M C Brandriss

Deletion analysis of the promoter of the PUT2 gene that functions in the proline utilization pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae identified a PUT2 upstream activation site (UAS). It is contained within a single 40-base-pair (bp) region located immediately upstream of the TATA box and is both necessary and sufficient for proline induction. When placed upstream of a CYC7-lacZ gene fusion, the 40-bp sequence conferred proline regulation on CYC7-lacZ. A 35-bp deletion within the PUT2 UAS in an otherwise intact PUT2 promoter resulted in noninducible expression of a PUT2-lacZ gene fusion. When a plasmid bearing this UAS-deleted promoter was placed in a strain carrying a constitutive mutation in the positive regulatory gene PUT3, expression of PUT2-lacZ was not constitutive but occurred at levels below those found under noninducing conditions. In heterologous as well as homologous gene fusions, the PUT2 UAS appeared to be responsible for uninduced as well as proline-induced levels of expression. Although located immediately adjacent to the PUT2 UAS, the TATA box did not appear to play a regulatory role, as indicated by the results of experiments in which it was replaced by the CYC7 TATA box. A 26-bp sequence containing this TATA box was critical to the expression of PUT2, since a deletion of this region completely abolished transcriptional activity of the gene under both inducing and noninducing conditions. Our results indicate that the PUT2 promoter has a comparatively simple structure, requiring UAS and TATA sequences as well as the PUT3 gene product (directly or indirectly) for its expression.


1989 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 4706-4712
Author(s):  
A H Siddiqui ◽  
M C Brandriss

The PUT1 and PUT2 genes encoding the enzymes of the proline utilization pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are induced by proline and activated by the product of the PUT3 gene. Two upstream activation sequences (UASs) in the PUT1 promoter were identified by homology to the PUT2 UAS. Deletion analysis of the two PUT1 UASs showed that they were functionally independent and additive in producing maximal levels of gene expression. The consensus PUT UAS is a 21-base-pair partially palindromic sequence required in vivo for induction of both genes. The results of a gel mobility shift assay demonstrated that the proline-specific UAS is the binding site of a protein factor. In vitro complex formation was observed in crude extracts of yeast strains carrying either a single genomic copy of the PUT3 gene or the cloned PUT3 gene on a 2 microns plasmid, and the binding was dosage dependent. DNA-binding activity was not observed in extracts of strains carrying either a put3 mutation that caused a noninducible (Put-) phenotype or a deletion of the gene. Wild-type levels of complex formation were observed in an extract of a strain carrying an allele of PUT3 that resulted in a constitutive (Put+) phenotype. Extracts from a strain carrying a PUT3-lacZ gene fusion formed two complexes of slower mobility than the wild-type complex. We conclude that the PUT3 product is either a DNA-binding protein or part of a DNA-binding complex that recognizes the UASs of both PUT1 and PUT2. Binding was observed in extracts of a strain grown in the presence or absence of proline, demonstrating the constitutive nature of the DNA-protein interaction.


2000 ◽  
Vol 182 (13) ◽  
pp. 3748-3753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D'Alessio ◽  
Marjorie C. Brandriss

ABSTRACT The Put3p and Gal4p transcriptional activators are members of a distinct class of fungal regulators called the Cys6Zn(II)2 binuclear cluster family. This family includes over 50 different Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins that share a similar domain organization. Gal4p activates the genes of the galactose utilization pathway permitting the use of galactose as the sole source of carbon and energy. Put3p controls the expression of the proline utilization pathway that allows yeast cells to grow on proline as the sole nitrogen source. We report that Gal4p can activate thePUT structural genes in a strain lacking Put3p. We also show that the activation of PUT2 by Gal4p depends on the presence of the inducer galactose and the Put3p binding site and that activation increases with increased dosage of Gal4p. Put3p cannot activate the GAL genes in the absence of Gal4p. Our in vivo results confirm previously published in vitro data showing that Gal4p is more promiscuous than Put3p in its DNA binding ability. The results also suggest that under appropriate circumstances, Gal4p may be able to function in place of a related family member to activate expression.


1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (S1) ◽  
pp. 153-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjorie C. Brandriss ◽  
Darlene A. Falvey ◽  
Shelley Ann G. des Etages ◽  
Shiwei Xu

The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae can use alternative nitrogen sources such as allantoin, urea, γ-aminobutyrate, or proline when preferred nitrogen sources such as asparagine, glutamine, or ammonium ions are unavailable in the environment. To use proline as the sole nitrogen source, cells must activate the expression of the proline transporters and the genes that encode the catabolic enzymes proline oxidase (PUT1) and Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenase (PUT2). Transcriptional activation of the PUT genes requires the PUT3 regulatory protein, proline, and relief from nitrogen repression. PUT3 is a 979 amino acid protein that binds a short DNA sequence in the promoters of PUT1 and PUT2, independent of the presence of proline. The functional domains of PUT3 have been studied by biochemical and molecular tests and analysis of activator-constitutive and activator-defective mutant proteins. Mutations in the URE2 gene relieve nitrogen repression, permitting inducer-independent transcription of the PUT genes in the presence of repressing nitrogen sources. The GLN3 protein that activates the expression of many genes in alternative nitrogen source pathways is not required for the expression of the PUT genes under inducing, derepressing conditions (proline) or noninducing, repressing conditions (ammonia). Although it has been speculated that the URE2 protein antagonizes the action of GLN3 in the regulation of many nitrogen assimilatory pathways, URE2 appears to act independently of GLN3 in the proline-utilization pathway. Key words: Saccharomyces cerevisiae, proline utilization, nitrogen repression.


1989 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 4706-4712 ◽  
Author(s):  
A H Siddiqui ◽  
M C Brandriss

The PUT1 and PUT2 genes encoding the enzymes of the proline utilization pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are induced by proline and activated by the product of the PUT3 gene. Two upstream activation sequences (UASs) in the PUT1 promoter were identified by homology to the PUT2 UAS. Deletion analysis of the two PUT1 UASs showed that they were functionally independent and additive in producing maximal levels of gene expression. The consensus PUT UAS is a 21-base-pair partially palindromic sequence required in vivo for induction of both genes. The results of a gel mobility shift assay demonstrated that the proline-specific UAS is the binding site of a protein factor. In vitro complex formation was observed in crude extracts of yeast strains carrying either a single genomic copy of the PUT3 gene or the cloned PUT3 gene on a 2 microns plasmid, and the binding was dosage dependent. DNA-binding activity was not observed in extracts of strains carrying either a put3 mutation that caused a noninducible (Put-) phenotype or a deletion of the gene. Wild-type levels of complex formation were observed in an extract of a strain carrying an allele of PUT3 that resulted in a constitutive (Put+) phenotype. Extracts from a strain carrying a PUT3-lacZ gene fusion formed two complexes of slower mobility than the wild-type complex. We conclude that the PUT3 product is either a DNA-binding protein or part of a DNA-binding complex that recognizes the UASs of both PUT1 and PUT2. Binding was observed in extracts of a strain grown in the presence or absence of proline, demonstrating the constitutive nature of the DNA-protein interaction.


1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 4634-4641
Author(s):  
A H Siddiqui ◽  
M C Brandriss

Deletion analysis of the promoter of the PUT2 gene that functions in the proline utilization pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae identified a PUT2 upstream activation site (UAS). It is contained within a single 40-base-pair (bp) region located immediately upstream of the TATA box and is both necessary and sufficient for proline induction. When placed upstream of a CYC7-lacZ gene fusion, the 40-bp sequence conferred proline regulation on CYC7-lacZ. A 35-bp deletion within the PUT2 UAS in an otherwise intact PUT2 promoter resulted in noninducible expression of a PUT2-lacZ gene fusion. When a plasmid bearing this UAS-deleted promoter was placed in a strain carrying a constitutive mutation in the positive regulatory gene PUT3, expression of PUT2-lacZ was not constitutive but occurred at levels below those found under noninducing conditions. In heterologous as well as homologous gene fusions, the PUT2 UAS appeared to be responsible for uninduced as well as proline-induced levels of expression. Although located immediately adjacent to the PUT2 UAS, the TATA box did not appear to play a regulatory role, as indicated by the results of experiments in which it was replaced by the CYC7 TATA box. A 26-bp sequence containing this TATA box was critical to the expression of PUT2, since a deletion of this region completely abolished transcriptional activity of the gene under both inducing and noninducing conditions. Our results indicate that the PUT2 promoter has a comparatively simple structure, requiring UAS and TATA sequences as well as the PUT3 gene product (directly or indirectly) for its expression.


1986 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 3990-3998
Author(s):  
S Harashima ◽  
A G Hinnebusch

GCN4 encodes a positive regulator of multiple unlinked genes encoding amino acid biosynthetic enzymes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Expression of GCN4 is coupled to amino acid availability by a control mechanism involving GCD1 as a negative effector and GCN1, GCN2, and GCN3 as positive effectors of GCN4 expression. We used reversion of a gcn2 gcn3 double mutation to isolate new alleles of GCD1 and mutations in four additional GCD genes which we designate GCD10, GCD11, GCD12, and GCD13. All of the mutations lead to constitutive derepression of HIS4 transcription in the absence of the GCN2+ and GCN3+ alleles. By contrast, the gcd mutations require the wild-type GCN4 allele for their derepressing effect, suggesting that each acts by influencing the level of GCN4 activity in the cell. Consistent with this interpretation, mutations in each GCD gene lead to constitutive derepression of a GCN4::lacZ gene fusion. Thus, at least five gene products are required to maintain the normal repressed level of GCN4 expression in nonstarvation conditions. Interestingly, the gcd mutations are pleiotropic and also affect growth rate in nonstarvation conditions. In addition, certain alleles lead to a loss of M double-stranded RNA required for the killer phenotype. This pleiotropy suggests that the GCD gene products contribute to an essential cellular function, in addition to, or in conjunction with, their role in GCN4 regulation.


2000 ◽  
Vol 182 (24) ◽  
pp. 7007-7013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marijke A. H. Luttik ◽  
Peter Kötter ◽  
Florian A. Salomons ◽  
Ida J. van der Klei ◽  
Johannes P. van Dijken ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The Saccharomyces cerevisiae ICL1 gene encodes isocitrate lyase, an essential enzyme for growth on ethanol and acetate. Previous studies have demonstrated that the highly homologousICL2 gene (YPR006c) is transcribed during the growth of wild-type cells on ethanol. However, even when multiple copies are introduced, ICL2 cannot complement the growth defect oficl1 null mutants. It has therefore been suggested thatICL2 encodes a nonsense mRNA or nonfunctional protein. In the methylcitrate cycle of propionyl-coenzyme A metabolism, 2-methylisocitrate is converted to succinate and pyruvate, a reaction similar to that catalyzed by isocitrate lyase. To investigate whetherICL2 encodes a specific 2-methylisocitrate lyase, isocitrate lyase and 2-methylisocitrate lyase activities were assayed in cell extracts of wild-type S. cerevisiae and of isogenicicl1, icl2, and icl1 icl2 null mutants. Isocitrate lyase activity was absent in icl1 andicl1 icl2 null mutants, whereas in contrast, 2-methylisocitrate lyase activity was detected in the wild type and single icl mutants but not in the icl1 icl2mutant. This demonstrated that ICL2 encodes a specific 2-methylisocitrate lyase and that the ICL1-encoded isocitrate lyase exhibits a low but significant activity with 2-methylisocitrate. Subcellular fractionation studies and experiments with an ICL2-green fluorescent protein fusion demonstrated that theICL2-encoded 2-methylisocitrate lyase is located in the mitochondrial matrix. Similar to that of ICL1, transcription of ICL2 is subject to glucose catabolite repression. In glucose-limited cultures, growth with threonine as a nitrogen source resulted in a ca. threefold induction ofICL2 mRNA levels and of 2-methylisocitrate lyase activity in cell extracts relative to cultures grown with ammonia as the nitrogen source. This is consistent with an involvement of the 2-methylcitrate cycle in threonine catabolism.


1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 6229-6247 ◽  
Author(s):  
S M Miller ◽  
B Magasanik

We analyzed the upstream region of the GDH2 gene, which encodes the NAD-linked glutamate dehydrogenase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, for elements important for the regulation of the gene by the nitrogen source. The levels of this enzyme are high in cells grown with glutamate as the sole source of nitrogen and low in cells grown with glutamine or ammonium. We found that this regulation occurs at the level of transcription and that a total of six sites are required to cause a CYC1-lacZ fusion to the GDH2 gene to be regulated in the same manner as the NAD-linked glutamate dehydrogenase. Two sites behaved as upstream activation sites (UASs). The remaining four sites were found to block the effects of the two UASs in such a way that the GDH2-CYC1-lacZ fusion was not expressed unless the cells containing it were grown under conditions favorable for the activity of both UASs. This complex regulatory system appears to account for the fact that GDH2 expression is exquisitely sensitive to glutamine, whereas the expression of GLN1, coding for glutamine synthetase, is not nearly as sensitive.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document