scholarly journals Diversity and Variation in Assisted Living Care, Nationally and Over Time

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 528-528
Author(s):  
Portia Cornell ◽  
Tetyana Shippee
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Assisted Living ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Health Care Use ◽  
Medicare Beneficiaries ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Memory Care ◽  
State Subsidies ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Assisted living is generally understood to offer a greater degree of privacy and independence than a nursing home; most residents pay privately, with some receiving support from state subsidies and Medicaid; regulation and oversight are the purview of state agencies. Within these broad parameters, however, one assisted living community may look quite different from another across the country, or down the street, in its resident population and the regulations that govern its operating license. The purpose of this symposium is to explore that variation. The papers leverage an in-depth review of changes in assisted-living regulation from 2007 to 2019 and a methodology to identify Medicare beneficiaries in assisted living using ZIP codes. To set the stage, the first paper examines variation across assisted living licenses to identify six regulatory types and compare their populations’ characteristics and health-care use. The second paper analyzes trends over time in the clinical acuity of assisted living residents associated with changes in nursing home populations. The third paper investigates racial disparities in assisted living associated with memory-care designations and proportions of Medicaid recipients. The fourth investigates how regulation of hospice providers in assisted living affect end-of-life care and place of death. The final paper describes requirements related to care for the residents with mental illness in seven states. The symposium concludes with an expert in long-term care disparities and quality discussing the implications for policymakers, providers, and the population needing long-term care in assisted living.

Hospice Attitudes among Assisted Living and Nursing Home Administrators, and the Long-Term Care Hospice Attitudes Scale

2006 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1388-1400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debra Jean Dobbs ◽  
Laura Hanson ◽  
Sheryl Zimmerman ◽  
Christianna S. Williams ◽  
Jean Munn
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Assisted Living ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Nursing Home Administrators

scholarly journals Social Isolation in Long-Term Care Facilities Related to COVID-19: Effect on Resident Anxiety and Care

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 579-579
Author(s):  
Nazmus Sakib ◽  
Joseph June ◽  
Lindsay Peterson
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Family Support ◽  
Social Isolation ◽  
Assisted Living ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Virus Spread ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities

Abstract Loneliness is a common problem in long-term care. It has been associated with a higher risk of depression, aggressive behaviors, and anxiety and may be a risk factor for cognitive decline. Loneliness can exacerbate social isolation. The COVID-19 emergency brought on measures in Florida, beginning in March 2020, to separate nursing home (NH) and assisted living community (ALC) residents from each other and family members to limit virus spread. This study examines results of a survey with Florida NH (N=59) and ALC (N=117) administrators concerning effects of these measures. Scaled (1-5, lowest to highest) data indicate that resident anxiety was higher in NHs (M=3.40) than ALCs (M=3.17). Care disruptions related to limited resident-to-resident contact also were worse in NHs (M=3.74) than in ALCs (M=3.21), while care disruptions related to loss of family support were higher among ALCs (M=3.19) than in NHs (M=2.86). Implications of these findings will be discussed.

scholarly journals QUALITY OF CARE IN A LONG-TERM CARE COMMUNITY

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S506-S506
Author(s):  
Laura A Murray ◽  
Melinda Heinz
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Medical Model ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Community ◽  
Memory Care

Abstract Older adults may need to reside in long-term care facilities for additional assistance. However, research indicates differences in the quality of care. The purpose of this study was to conduct a naturalistic observation, recording factors affecting the quality of care residents received in a long-term care community. Over a three-week period, observations took place in the nursing home, assisted living, and memory care portions of the community. We predicted that there would be more issues negatively impacting quality of care in the nursing home area due to its medical model philosophy. Open-observations were recorded, coded, and analyzed for themes. Results indicated that the most significant issue influencing quality of care in all areas of the long-term care facility was communication (N = 57 recorded instances). Approximately 66% of recorded communication issues in the nursing home were negative compared to positive (25%) or neutral (8%) instances. Elderspeak was prevalent with staff using high pitched voices or saying “hun” to residents. At times, staff spoke too loudly to residents who did not have hearing impairment or would talk about residents in front of other residents, not taking into consideration privacy. In the memory care environment, positive examples were noted. Staff was friendly and worked together as a team, creating a positive work environment. Overall, results indicated staff members may need professional development in the area of communication, particularly staff working in the nursing home. In addition, reminding staff while it is their workplace it is also the resident’s home would be beneficial.

Uitbraak COVID-19 in de verpleeghuiszorg

2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Informal Caregivers ◽  
Rapid Review ◽  
Daily Routine ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities

Long-term care for older adults is highly affect by the COVID-19 outbreak. The objective of this rapid review is to understand what we can learn from previous crises or disasters worldwide to optimize the care for older adults in long term care facilities during the outbreak of COVID-19. We searched five electronic databases to identify potentially relevant articles. In total, 23 articles were included in this study. Based on the articles, it appeared that nursing homes benefit from preparing for the situation as best as they can. For instance, by having proper protocols and clear division of tasks and collaboration within the organization. In addition, it is helpful for nursing homes to collaborate closely with other healthcare organizations, general practitioners, informal caregivers and local authorities. It is recommended that nursing homes pay attention to capacity and employability of staff and that they support or relieve staff where possible. With regard to care for the older adults, it is important that staff tries to find a new daily routine in the care for residents as soon as possible. Some practical tips were found on how to communicate with people who have dementia. Furthermore, behavior of people with dementia may change during a crisis. We found tips for staff how to respond and act upon behavior change. After the COVID-19 outbreak, aftercare for staff, residents, and informal caregivers is essential to timely detect psychosocial problems. The consideration between, on the one hand, acute safety and risk reduction (e.g. by closing residential care facilities and isolating residents), and on the other hand, the psychosocial consequences for residents and staff, were discussed in case of other disasters. Furthermore, the search of how to provide good (palliative) care and to maintain quality of life for older adults who suffer from COVID-19 is also of concern to nursing home organizations. In the included articles, the perspective of older adults, informal caregivers and staff is often lacking. Especially the experiences of older adults, informal caregivers, and nursing home staff with the care for older adults in the current situation, are important in formulating lessons about how to act before, during and after the coronacrisis. This may further enhance person-centered care, even in times of crisis. Therefore, we recommend to study these experiences in future research.

Predictors of Mortality in Board and Care Homes

1997 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas G. Castle
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Social Services ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Board And Care

Long-term care institutions have emerged as dominant sites of death for the elderly. However, studies of this trend have primarily examined nursing homes. The purpose of this research is to determine demographic, functional, disease, and facility predictors and/or correlates of death for the elderly residing in board and care facilities. Twelve factors are found to be significant: proportion of residents older than sixty-five years of age, proportion of residents who are chair- or bed-fast, proportion of residents with HIV, bed size, ownership, chain membership, affiliation with a nursing home, number of health services provided other than by the facility, the number of social services provided other than by the facility, the number of social services provided by the facility, and visits by Ombudsmen. These are discussed and comparisons with similar studies in nursing homes are made.

scholarly journals The Development and Testing of KNACC: Knowledgeable Nursing Assistants as Creative Caregivers

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 675-675
Author(s):  
Jacqueline Eaton ◽  
Kristin Cloyes ◽  
Brooke Paulsen ◽  
Connie Madden ◽  
Lee Ellington
Keyword(s):  
Focus Groups ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Nursing Assistants ◽  
Direct Care ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Memory Care

Abstract Nursing assistants (NAs) provide 80% of direct care in long-term care settings, yet are seldom viewed as skilled professionals. Empowering NAs is linked to improved resident outcomes. In this study, we collaborate with NAs to adapt and test the feasibility and acceptability of arts-based creative caregiving techniques (CCG) for use in long-term care. We held a series of focus groups (n=14) to adapt, refine, and enhance usability. We then evaluated implementation in two waves of testing (n=8). Those working in memory care units were more likely to use all techniques, while those working in rehabilitation were more hesitant to implement. Participants reported using CCG to distract upset residents. Family members were excited about implementation, and NAs not participating wanted to learn CCG. Nursing assistants have the potential to become experts in creative caregiving but may require in-depth training to improve use.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document