scholarly journals Effective Recruitment Strategies for Community-Dwelling Persons Living With Dementia and Their Caregivers

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 547-547
Author(s):  
LaShauna Connell ◽  
Augustine Boateng ◽  
Darina Petrovsky ◽  
Justine Sefcik ◽  
Nancy Hodgson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Community Outreach ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Recruitment Strategy ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Recruitment Strategies ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Health Fairs ◽  
Diverse Community ◽  
One Year ◽  
Almost All

Abstract Recruitment of diverse community-dwelling persons living with dementia (PLWD) and their caregivers (dyads) into randomized controlled trials (RCT) is challenging, time consuming and expensive. This presentation will describe community outreach efforts used over a one-year period to recruit dyads of PLWD and their caregivers in Healthy Patterns RCT. Community outreach yielded 296 inquiries, such that people expressed interest in joining the study. Of the 296 inquiries, almost all (95.6%) identified as African American, and 91(30.7%) consented to join the study. Presentations at senior centers yielded the highest number of inquiries (n=148), followed by staff presence at various community events such as health fairs and senior galas (n=145) and referrals (n=3). We found that community outreach was an effective recruitment strategy to generate inquiries among diverse PLWD and their caregivers to enroll in Healthy Patterns. We will discuss these strategies and provide suggestions for recruiting diverse dyads into clinical trials.

Recruitment and Screening Methods in Alzheimer’s Disease Research: The FIT-AD Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Greimel ◽  
Jean F Wyman ◽  
Lin Zhang ◽  
Fang Yu
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Exercise Intervention ◽  
Community Outreach ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Single Site ◽  
Recruitment Strategy ◽  
Screening Methods ◽  
Screening Process

Abstract Background Recruiting older adults with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia into clinical trials is challenging requiring multiple approaches. We describe recruitment and screening processes and results from the FIT-AD Trial, a single site, pilot randomized controlled trial testing the effects of a 6-month aerobic exercise intervention on cognition and hippocampal volume in community-dwelling older adults with mild-to moderate AD dementia. Methods Ten recruitment strategies and a four-step screening process were used to ensure a homogenous sample and exercise safety. The initial target sample was 90 participants over 48 months which was increased to 96 to allow those in the screening process to enroll if qualified. A tertiary analysis of recruitment and screening rates, recruitment yields and costs, and demographic characteristics of participants was conducted. Results During the 48-month recruiting period, 396 potential participants responded to recruitment efforts, 301 individuals were reached and 103 were tentatively qualified. Of these, 67 (69.8%) participants completed the optional magnetic resonance (MRI) imaging and seven were excluded due to abnormal MRI findings. As a result, we enrolled 96 participants with a 2.92 screen ratio, 2.14 recruitment rate, and 31.9% recruitment yield. Referrals (28.1%) and Alzheimer’s Association events/services (21.9%) yielded over 49% of the enrolled participants. Total recruitment cost was $ 38,246 or $ 398 per randomized participant. Conclusions A multi-prong approach involving extensive community outreach was essential in recruiting older adults with AD dementia into a single-site trial. For every randomized participant, three individuals needed to be screened. Referrals were the most cost-effective recruitment strategy.

scholarly journals Recruitment of adolescents with suicidal ideation in the emergency department: lessons from a randomized controlled pilot trial of a youth suicide prevention intervention

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Tracey ◽  
Yaron Finkelstein ◽  
Reva Schachter ◽  
Kristin Cleverley ◽  
Suneeta Monga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Suicide Prevention ◽  
Time Of Day ◽  
Recruitment Strategy ◽  
Recruitment Strategies ◽  
Youth Suicide ◽  
Prevention Intervention ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Recruitment Period

Abstract Background Emergency Departments (EDs) are a first point-of-contact for many youth with mental health and suicidality concerns and can serve as an effective recruitment source for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of mental health interventions. However, recruitment in acute care settings is impeded by several challenges. This pilot RCT of a youth suicide prevention intervention recruited adolescents aged 12 to 17 years presenting to a pediatric hospital ED with suicide related behaviors. Methods Recruitment barriers were identified during the initial study recruitment period and included: the time of day of ED presentations, challenges inherent to study presentation, engagement and participation during an acute presentation, challenges approaching and enrolling acutely suicidal patients and families, ED environmental factors, and youth and parental concerns regarding the study. We calculated the average recruitment productivity for published trials of adolescent suicide prevention strategies which included the ED as a recruitment site in order to compare our recruitment productivity. Results In response to identified barriers, an enhanced ED-centered recruitment strategy was developed to address low recruitment rate, specifically (i) engaging a wider network of ED and outpatient psychiatry staff (ii) dissemination of study pamphlets across multiple areas of the ED and relevant outpatient clinics. Following implementation of the enhanced recruitment strategy, the pre-post recruitment productivity, a ratio of patients screened to patients randomized, was computed. A total of 120 patients were approached for participation, 89 (74.2%) were screened and 45 (37.5%) were consented for the study from March 2018 to April 2019. The screening to randomization ratio for the study period prior to the introduction of the enhanced recruitment strategies was 3:1, which decreased to 1.8:1 following the implementation of enhanced recruitment strategies. The ratio for the total recruitment period was 2.1:1. This was lower than the average ratio of 3.2:1 for published trials. Conclusions EDs are feasible sites for participant recruitment in RCTs examining new interventions for acute mental health problems, including suicidality. Engaging multi-disciplinary ED staff to support recruitment for such studies, proactively addressing anticipated concerns, and creating a robust recruitment pathway that includes approach at outpatient appointments can optimize recruitment. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03488602, retrospectively registered April 4, 2018.

scholarly journals Enrollment, retention, and strategies for including disadvantaged populations in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review protocol

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abigail LaPlante ◽  
Renata W. Yen ◽  
Talia Isaacs ◽  
Joanna Crocker ◽  
Zsofia Demjen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Recruitment Strategies ◽  
Disadvantaged Groups ◽  
Disadvantaged Populations ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
True Diversity

Abstract Background Many randomized controlled trials fail to reach their target sample size. When coupled with the omission and underrepresentation of disadvantaged groups in randomized controlled trials, many trials fail to obtain data that accurately represents the true diversity of their target population. Policies and practices have been implemented to increase representation of disadvantaged groups in many randomized controlled trials, with some trials specifically targeting such groups. To our knowledge, no systematic review has quantified the enrollment metrics and effectiveness of inclusion and retention strategies in randomized controlled trials focused on disadvantaged populations specifically. Methods We will conduct a systematic search across EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and CINAHL as well as grey literature, conference proceedings, research monographs, and Google Scholar from inception onwards. We will include randomized controlled trials where at least 50% of enrolled participants are considered to be disadvantaged, as per the RCT authors’ definition and in line with our inclusion criteria. Two independent researchers per article will conduct preliminary title and abstract screening, subsequent full text review, and data extraction for the selected trials, with a third reviewer available to resolve conflicts. We will assess the quality of all included studies using specific criteria regarding data reporting, external validity, and internal validity. We will combine all selected studies and conduct a narrative synthesis to assess enrollment metrics. If there is sufficient homogeneity and sufficient trials comparing recruitment strategies within disadvantaged populations, we will conduct a random effects meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of strategies designed to maximize the inclusion of disadvantaged populations in randomized controlled trials. Discussion The findings of this systematic review will establish baseline recruitment and enrollment metrics of trials targeting disadvantaged populations to elucidate the scope of the challenge of recruiting such populations. We hope that our findings will promote future research on the distinct barriers that may prevent disadvantaged populations from participating in health intervention research, will encourage more trials exploring effective, tailored recruitment strategies, and will establish a foundation to track future progress in the recruitment of disadvantaged populations. Trial registrations PROSPERO ID: CRD42020152814

scholarly journals Effective recruitment strategies for home-living vulnerable older adults with depression into a psychotherapy RCT

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 859-859
Author(s):  
Eva-Marie Kessler ◽  
Fee Hoppmann ◽  
Julie L O’Sullivan ◽  
Paul Gellert ◽  
Christina Tegeler
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Cognitive Status ◽  
Recruitment Strategy ◽  
Recruitment Strategies ◽  
Medical Practitioners ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Time Investment ◽  
Home Living ◽  
First Contact

Abstract Objectives Vulnerable older adults, such as physically impaired or care-dependent individuals, are vastly underrepresented in psychotherapy research. Improving their inclusion in randomized controlled trials is necessary to determine the effectiveness of psychotherapy in this population. This study is the first to systematically evaluate strategies to recruit home-living vulnerable older adults with clinically significant depression into a large randomized controlled psychotherapy trial. Potential participants were approached directly (self-referral) or via cooperation with gatekeepers (gatekeeper-referral). Methods The initiator of the first contact with the study team and successful recruitment strategies were recorded. Referral strategies were compared with respect to number of inquiries and inclusion rates; study personnel’s time investment; and participant characteristics (sociodemographics, functional and cognitive status, depression and anxiety scores). Results Most of the N=197 participants were included via gatekeeper-referral (80.5%, 95%CI=[74.9%,86.1%], but time investment for gatekeeper-referrals was five times higher than for self-referral by media reports. Clinical psychologists and medical practitioners referred the largest proportion of participants (32.3% each) and referral by medical practitioners led to highest inclusion rates (55.6%; χ²(3)=8.964, p<.05). Most participants were referred from a hospital setting (50.3%), whereas referral numbers by medical practices were low (15.9%). Participants who initiated the first contact themselves had higher inclusion rates and were less functionally and cognitively impaired. Conclusions Including home-living vulnerable older adults into psychotherapy trials requires simultaneous implementation of diverse recruitment strategies. Medical practitioners and psychologists, especially in hospitals, are the most effective recruitment strategy, but self-referral via media is most cost-efficient in terms of time investment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document