scholarly journals Self-Reported Physical Limitations Among U.S. Veterans Compared to Non-Veterans: Findings from NHANES

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 631-631
Author(s):  
Ronna Robbins ◽  
Monica Serra ◽  
Odessa Addison

Abstract Approximately 43% of males over the age of 65 years are Veterans. Veterans may be at elevated risk for functional declines due to barriers to health care access leading to accelerated loss of independence. This compared the prevalence of functional limitations in Veterans and non-Veterans. Data from two National Health and Examination Survey collection periods, administered 2013-2014 and 2015-2016, were used to compare physical functioning data between male Veterans (N=369) and non-Veterans (N=738) matched 1:2 for sex, race, and BMI. Individuals were considered a Veteran if they self-reported having “served in active duty in the U.S. Armed forces.” Pearson’s chi-square tests were used to assess differences in the prevalence of various self-reported functional limitations between groups. Veterans (mean±SEM: age: 64.5±0.54 years; BMI: 30.0±0.3 kg/m2) were disproportionately affected by self-reported functional limitations caused by long-term physical, mental, or emotional illnesses (8% vs. 3%, p<0.004). Twenty-five % of Veterans reported that these limitations kept them from working compared to 18% of non-Veterans (p<0.003). Veterans (38%) were also more likely to report being limited in the amount of work they could perform compared to non-Veterans (27%) (p<0.01). Additionally, Veterans (20%) were more likely to report the use of special healthcare equipment (i.e. cane, wheelchair) than non-Veterans (12%) (p<0.001). These data suggest that Veterans are at greater risk for functional limitations caused by self-reported long-term physical, mental or emotional illness. Therefore, further research is needed to determine if home- and community-based services could prevent further functional decline, ultimately allowing Veterans to maintain independence.

2013 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. 537-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia D. Wides ◽  
Harvey A. Brody ◽  
Charles J. Alexander ◽  
Stuart A. Gansky ◽  
Elizabeth A. Mertz

Cancer ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 118 (23) ◽  
pp. 5964-5972 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne C. Kirchhoff ◽  
Courtney R. Lyles ◽  
Mark Fluchel ◽  
Jennifer Wright ◽  
Wendy Leisenring

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 174-192
Author(s):  
Ariel Arguelles ◽  
Meghna Sabharwal

One of the most significant health care reforms since the implementation of Medicare and Medicaid, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) enacted into law in 2010, was met with widespread criticism. The expansion of Medicaid eligibility was a specific focus of these critiques as sceptics believed the long-term effects would be primarily negative for both the physical and fiscal health of the population. This article provides a brief history of the ACA along with the role of political and public opinion. This is followed with an analysis of initial criticisms and concerns surrounding the eligibility and expansion—with a brief discussion of the constitutionality of the law. Finally, while the long-term effects of the ACA upon health care access and service in the USA are yet to be seen, preliminary results indicate positive effects, contrary to the negatives originally assumed. The article concludes with a summary of current health care reform and a prospective on the future of health care reform in the USA.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-41
Author(s):  
Linda E. Weinberger ◽  
Shoba Sreenivasan ◽  
Daniel E. Smee ◽  
James McGuire ◽  
Thomas Garrick

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document