scholarly journals Variables Impacting Nursing Home Goals of Care Discussions and Order Implementation During COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 734-734
Author(s):  
Orah Burack ◽  
Joann Reinhardt ◽  
Wingyun Mak ◽  
Himali Weerahandi ◽  
Benjamin Canter ◽  
...  

Abstract Nursing home (NH) residents are especially vulnerable to COVID-19, disproportionately suffering from severe illness and death. As such, resident Goals of Care (GOC) often had to be quickly established to ensure treatment preferences were known and respected. This study examined variables related to the occurrence of GOC discussions and added orders (Do Not Resuscitate, Do Not Intubate, and Do Not Hospitalize), including demographic, physical functioning, cognitive impairment, depression, number of diagnoses, and Optum participation (Optum provided added specialized care by nurse practitioners who routinely address GOC preferences). Subjects were 286 COVID positive residents from a large NYC NH. All data were obtained from the NH’s electronic medical records. Patient median age was 81 n (interquartile range 71-88), 59% were female, 61% were long stay (stay >100 days) and 39% were short stay. Using bivariate correlations we found that older short stay residents were more likely to have GOC conversations. Additionally, older, cognitively impaired, Optum participants were more likely to have orders added. When all independent variables were entered into binary logistic regressions, only older age and being a primary English speaker were significantly related to the occurrence of GOC conversations (□2= 21.76**; N=278; Nagelkerke R2 = .10), while older age and being an Optum participant were related to added orders (□2=32.18**; N=164; Nagelkerke R2 = .24). Results have implications for (1) ensuring the GOC wishes of diverse populations are known and abided by and (2) improving the quality of clinician – resident GOC discussions.

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Liron Sinvani ◽  
Allison Marziliano ◽  
Alex Makhnevich ◽  
Sergey Tarima ◽  
Yan Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Age has been implicated as the main risk factor for COVID-19-related mortality. Our objective was to utilize administrative data to build an explanatory model accounting for geriatrics-focused indicators to predict mortality in hospitalized older adults with COVID-19. Methods Retrospective cohort study of adults age 65 and older (N = 4783) hospitalized with COVID-19 in the greater New York metropolitan area between 3/1/20-4/20/20. Data included patient demographics and clinical presentation. Stepwise logistic regression with Akaike Information Criterion minimization was used. Results The average age was 77.4 (SD = 8.4), 55.9% were male, 20.3% were African American, and 15.0% were Hispanic. In multivariable analysis, male sex (adjusted odds ration (adjOR) = 1.06, 95% CI:1.03-1.09); Asian race (adjOR = 1.08, CI:1.03-1.13); history of chronic kidney disease (adjOR = 1.05, CI:1.01-1.09) and interstitial lung disease (adjOR = 1.35, CI:1.28-1.42); low or normal body mass index (adjOR:1.03, CI:1.00-1.07); higher comorbidity index (adjOR = 1.01, CI:1.01-1.02); admission from a facility (adjOR = 1.14, CI:1.09-1.20); and mechanical ventilation (adjOR = 1.52, CI:1.43-1.62) were associated with mortality. While age was not an independent predictor of mortality, increasing age (centered at 65) interacted with hypertension (adjOR = 1.02, CI:0.98-1.07, reducing by a factor of 0.96 every 10 years); early Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR, life-sustaining treatment preferences) (adjOR = 1.38, CI:1.22-1.57, reducing by a factor of 0.92 every 10 years); and severe illness on admission (at 65, adjOR = 1.47, CI:1.40-1.54, reducing by a factor of 0.96 every 10 years). Conclusion Our findings highlight that residence prior to admission, early DNR, and acute illness severity are important predictors of mortality in hospitalized older adults with COVID-19. Readily available administrative geriatrics-focused indicators that go beyond age can be utilized when considering prognosis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 752-752
Author(s):  
Mary Ersek ◽  
Winifred Scott ◽  
Joan Carpenter ◽  
Jennifer Kononowech ◽  
Ciarian Phibbs ◽  
...  

Abstract This retrospective observational study describes the first 20 months of implementing the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative. We examined patient and facility characteristics associated with life sustaining treatment (LST) orders template completion, including the association between template completion and the Care Assessment Need (CAN) score, which quantifies Veterans’ risk of hospitalization and mortality. As of February 29, 2020, over 274,200 Veterans received at least one goal of care conversation and LST preferences documented on a template. Eighty-two percent of deceased Veterans with the highest risk of hospitalization or mortality had an LST note and order documented prior to their death. Factors that predicted a greater likelihood of LST template completion included higher CAN score, older age, nursing home stay, and being white non-Hispanic. Findings suggest that clinicians are engaging older, sicker veterans in goals of care conversations. Research is needed to understand potential disparities in LST template completion.


Author(s):  
Kelly A. Rath ◽  
Kristi L. Tucker ◽  
Ariane Lewis

Background: There are multiple factors that may cause end-of-life conflict in the critical care setting. These include severe illness, family distress, lack of awareness about a patient’s wishes, prognostic uncertainty, and the participation of multiple providers in goals-of-care discussions. Methods: Case report and discussion of the associated ethical issues. Results: We present a case of a patient with a pontine stroke, in which the family struggled with decision-making about goals-of-care, leading to fluctuation in code status from Full Code to Do Not Resuscitate-Comfort Care, then back to Full Code, and finally to Do Not Resuscitate-Do Not Intubate. We discuss factors that contributed to this situation and methods to avoid conflict. Additionally, we review the effects of discord at the end-of-life on patients, families, and the healthcare team. Conclusion: It is imperative that healthcare teams proactively collaborate with families to minimize end-of-life conflict by emphasizing decision-making that prioritizes the best interest and autonomy of the patient.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 85-85
Author(s):  
Denise Tyler ◽  
Cleanthe Kordomenos ◽  
Melvin Ingber

Abstract Organizations in seven states have been participating in the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) initiative aimed at reducing potentially avoidable hospitalizations among long-stay nursing home (NH) residents. The purpose of this study was to identify market and policy factors that may have affected the initiative in those states. Forty-seven interviews were conducted with key stakeholders in the seven states (e.g., representatives from state departments of health, state Medicaid offices, and nursing, hospital and nursing home associations) and qualitatively analyzed to identify themes across states. Few policies or programs were found that may have affected the initiative; only New York (NY) was found to have state policies or programs specifically aimed at reducing hospitalizations. Market pressures reported in most states were similar. For example, stakeholders reported that the increased availability of home and community-based services and the growing presence of managed care are contributing to higher acuity among both long and short stay residents and that reimbursement rates and staffing have not kept up. Stakeholders suggested greater presence of physicians and nurse practitioners in NHs, better training around behavioral health issues for frontline staff, and more advance care planning and education of families about end of life may help further reduce NH hospitalizations. We also found that all states, except NY, had regional coalitions of health care related organizations focused on improving some aspect of care, such as reducing hospital readmissions. These coalitions may suggest ways that organizations can work together to reduce hospitalizations among NH residents.


1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 591-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce A. Ferrell ◽  
Betty R. Ferrell ◽  
Lynne Rivera

2008 ◽  
Vol 56 (10) ◽  
pp. 1940-1945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlene C. Quinn ◽  
Cynthia L. Port ◽  
Sheryl Zimmerman ◽  
Ann L. Gruber-Baldini ◽  
Judith D. Kasper ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document